Here is the mod you've been waiting for, Melysstyle !
[General]
Offset 129 (-6)
BG is fine (Ratio-wise, so I will leave it.)
MP3 is too.
Put 125,00 BPM ? I feel like this song is more 62,5 but oh well
[Easy]
Though this map is easy enough for me, as the song is not really 125 BPM but more 62.5, I felt like the 1/1s @125 went 1/2 @62,5. I don't know if you really want it played as a 125 BPM song or stick more to the song's real speed. If you want the second choice, you have to delete a lot of notes on the upbeat - All would be very heartbreaking since this Easy plays well - but if you want to keep it as it is, then keep it as it is.
The rest of the mod though
IMO, the AR should be put at 3, that's all.
Easy does not have the same Combo Colors as Normal and Hard !! Please fix this.
[Normal]
00:03:975 (1) - Second control point @ (272,108)
00:30:853 (3) - Second CP @ (300,120)
00:46:931 (3) - Regunar note instead ? It feels pretty hard for a normal
00:50:051 (2,3) - Delete (3) and add 2 repeats for (2).
If you applied this ^
00:51:491 (3) - (152,272)
00:57:011 (3) - Delete it ?
01:00:851 (3) - ^
01:04:449 (3,4,5) - Oh lol it'd be a paradox but change this to 5 circles ? As you did this for 01:08:289 (2,3,4,5,6)
01:30:367 (1) - Second CP @ (232,88)
01:49:087 (1,2) - One single slider with 2 more repeats ? This is a bit risky since you'll have to change. Another solution would be using 4 circles.
01:56:765 (1,2) - 1 circle and 1 slider instead ? The first slider seems to be slightly overmapped.
02:11:885 (3) - Delete ?
02:15:725 (3) - ^
02:19:563 (2) - ^
02:23:403 (2) - ^
02:34:683 (2,3,4) - 5 circles instead ?
02:52:921 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Delete (2,3,4), add 1 repeat to (1)
02:56:760 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^ The same thing, delete (2,3) and add 1 repeat to (1)
03:01:801 (2) - Delete ?
03:05:641 (2) - ^
03:17:159 (2) - ^
03:18:599 (1) - ^ and NC to 03:18:839 (2)
[Hard]
00:07:814 (1) -
00:09:734 (5) - As it's the same, use Ctrl+J+H
00:16:693 (2) @(400,184)
00:16:933 (3) @(444,224)
00:17:173 (4) @(400,264)
00:17:413 (5) @(344,284)
^Imo, these would look better.
00:55:810 (2,3,4,5,6) - Moving (3,4,5,6) to these points (In order) : (284,304) - (360,300) - (420,256) - (444,184) looks way better.
01:00:371 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ but with (2-7) and at (152,228) - (76,236) - (24,180) - (36,104) - (100,64) - (172,92)
01:03:489 (1,2,3,4,5) - Spread it out better with the 2 above suggestions
01:11:649 (3,4,5,6,1) - Try to make a pentagonal pattern ?
Imo, this map deserves a small taiko diff, and overall it's good if we don't take in count the speed problem.