https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/2208154/discussion/-/generalAll#/4451499 вообще название должно было быть как у этой дифы первоначально вроде бы но я уже не помню карте больше года все равно
сейчас будет субъективщина, которую можешь не воспринимать всерьез. у меня всегда была тенденция, чтобы менее интенсивные парты по своей "силе" в структуре не были слабее чем основные парты, где ритм может быть достаточно примечательным, чтобы его сильно выделять. это связанно больше с моей позиционкой, что каждый парт на карте должен соответствовать своему старейту/не должен быть в разы легче предыдущего. но в общем и целом да, траблы со спейсингом есть, которые я замечаю обычно после повторного осмотра. надеюсь, когда-нибудь доведу свой флоу до мастерства. сам по себе я всегда тяготился от мувмент маппинга (не такого, каким его представляют всекие чери, капулеты, белки или смоукеманы) =)
I also had this feeling at one point, but with regards to the rhythm, I mapped specifically for the synth, not the piano on the second music track. Anyway, I will try to make this part MUCH easier, so that it is at least closer in difficulty to the level of the first kiai.
99% of cut patterns (I'm now speaking in general for the complex use of spacing in the playfield, and not for my map specifically) are the concept of the challenge. There is no point in ignoring it if from the very beginning you are aimed at creating a map with an ideological direction to the gimmick component (or a complex one, if you already use concepts that are synonymous in my understanding).
Modern osu mapping should aim to create complex shapes (obviously using a measure and in proportion to the total complexity/starrate of the map). I did not try to make this map for the jumping format, because the trance and techno genre (the second genre within the first track) is much more difficult to understand rhythming, which at first glance may not seem so, lol.
In general, this also applies to repetitions. The use of cut patterns is nothing more than adhering to the rules of stable mapping, which also reinforces the aforementioned complexity in the first place.
By itself, this map (well, at the moment progress) has a fairly high starrate, and, as for me (SUPER SUBJECTIVE, I understand =) ), this complexity does not apply to random or differential spacing, although I do not deny that in many places I could add more hyperbole/overmapping.
It may sound strange, but 1/2 rhythming is a waste of the past, which occurs only when the rhythm of the song is concentrated on one specific instrumental part (drums, synthesizer, guitar), and there is no possibility to combine them.
I do not see the point of what you wrote above, except for the fact that in some aspect the concept used can be extremely chaotic/random, moving away from stability. I will try to improve in this direction :)
by the way, it is very logical, considering that almost the entire part up to the cue consists of long sliders. 2 jump moments within the beginning of the "pre-kiai part" look so-so, even taking into account that I corrected the part where I chose a more "calm" 1/8 reverse slider. slightly remapped 03:50:957 - 04:02:019.
nah... not a fan of doubles, especially within the whole map where they are used at an absolute minimum... there is no good reason to add a double here -> 04:08:207. as for the 1/4 slider at 04:08:582 - it doesn't get any better, unlike 2 sliders for 2 ticks in 1/4, emphasis is preserved anyway.
For the most part, I was trying to portray the "blast beat" that goes on for 04:40:457 - 04:44:519 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4 ,1,2), but yes, the spacing is a bit exaggerated. done
As for 01:49:256 (10,11,12), it seems to me that in terms of the rhythm of the structural consistency at this timing, it is more than acceptable.
01:55:456 (2,3,1) imo the start of a strong tick stream would have looked much better, even though it's out of consistency and the rhythm breaks a bit. party itself 01:52:456 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 11,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) is essentially a continuous emphasis. 3 tick sliders break the rhythm. In any case, in place of 01:55:656 (4) I put a cut slider
01:55:456 (2,3) - a solid alternate 2 in 1/4
06:19:237 (7,8,9) - done
С точки зрения мувмента выглядит куда лучше, чем если просто триплет. 00:43:290 (1,1,2,3) - например, здесь триплет куда лучше смотрится, т.к после слайдера с высоким св будет куда лучше выглядеть, чем нота + слайдер на 2 тика. Мех.
вообще почему-то ощущается, что с 00:16:328 (1) темп становится чуть живее, поэтому увеличил на 1,25. Ну, если что, возьму на заметку, когда буду еще раз перепроверять