its better to continue with a uniform density in a monotonic sense since statistically didnt use the kind of transition you intended.
also, could give bonus points for including these irregular elements, but i dont want to put too much meaning into it (since the example didnt appeal to me)
honestly, i dont think it matters much, but 00:53:842 - this triple and 00:53:984 - this double should be changed a little bit
other than that, you can ignore my pattern suggestion of this
like this
what about this?
remove this 00:37:829 - for https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/2289293/discussion/4885416/timeline#/4724467
also triple for the higher emphasis of double
2. 00:01:419 (1419|1,1522|2,1624|0,1726|3,1828|1,1931|2,2033|0,2135|1) =
00:01:419 (1419|1,1522|2,1624|0) - 00:01:726 (1726|3) - 00:01:828 (1828|1,1931|2) - 00:02:033 (2033|0,2135|1) - although the sounds are so diversely divided, they are expressed simply with almost similar flows, so is this really just a visually connected sound? it is impossible to create a distinction
solution?
i think it can be solved by simply moving 00:27:469 (27469|1) - this note to column 3, bcuz feel like it spreads the most at 00:27:469 - this point
its okay most of the time, but 01:53:283 (113283|2,113283|3,113515|2,113864|2,114213|2) - when everything is concentrated in one hand, the other hand is very empty, so it feels a little awkward. if only there was a solution for that, it wouldn't matter.
my best solution: 
in conclusion, 00:01:829 (1829|3,2178|3) - 00:03:050 (3050|3,3573|3) - i think it wont be very noticeable when you think about the playability you feel later because its all shown in the 4th column.
i agree with both of your opinions, but if i were to add my own thoughts, i think it would be better to proceed with a spread method rather than a one-handed method
when approaching the matching of sound and pattern, the finger rest between the two sounds is also important, but 01:52:446 -> 01:52:651 - i felt that there was a difference in emphasis between the first and second sounds
therefore, when the difficulty of composing a pattern is rated on a maximum of 10 points,
first sound (01:52:446): 5 points
second sound (01:52:651): 7 points
needs like a structural intention
i think that it is more important to let the player feel the visual aspects that are essential while processing the notes rather than checking the deep playability of the pattern with a structural approach
therefore, ex that the pattern that snomi proposed is meaningless if the sound is not the same or there is no repetitive characteristic through the flow because it uses a repeating pattern up and down
maybe best
ok im here
Extra: as a result, the intended snap
selecting 2 columns out of 1|2|3|4 and using notes exposes the limitations of how fingers press and feel.
00:53:605 (53605|0,53648|1,53721|0) -> 00:53:866 (53866|0,54011|0,54070|1) -
00:53:814 (53814|2,53895|2,53910|3) -> 00:54:041 (54041|2,54103|3,54193|3) -
although the same number of notes were used, the most reasonable one due to the different visual feel and intended finger switching
also, some notes may not be arranged in a way that matches the exact sound, but from the mapper's perspective, they were arranged considering the compromise between visual appearance and accurate typing, so if you think too much about it, you're looking at a big mountain.
--
therefore, i think it's just a chorus melody that shouldn't be added too much or too little. it can be explained as a reasonable pattern that expresses the melody weakly compared to the preview.
sryy
these slightly ugly arrangements seem to approach the vague limits heard in the song = in other words, they are deliberately created to create patterns that are not typed correctly
tried to share the state and wealth to keep the minimum feeling
ur suggestion is good, but unfortunately, i think my best is only allowed up to this point ;w
:skull:
i feel like stepping on a fatal limit
01:07:907 (67907|2,67950|3,67994|2) - highest point -> 01:08:116 (68116|3,68168|2) - not necessary, but the difficulty-excluded -> 01:08:256 (68256|3,68256|1,68343|2,68372|1,68488|1,68539|0,68561|2,68626|3,68634|0,68674|2,68750|1,68779|0,68876|0) - medium
i think its not bad structure
of course i understand the absence of LN due to anchors, but there is no more potential to change here.
also in terms of transitions, 01:38:023 (98023|2,98038|1,98081|0) - this should definitely be connected, and eventually 01:31:628 (91628|2,91628|0,91693|1,91737|2,91780|1,91824|0,91846|2,91911|0,91977|2,92020|3,92064|0,92064|2,92122|3,92151|0,92209|3) - i don't think it's necessary to change it even considering this imprecise pattern.
well, that's a good suggestion, but it's a little hard to follow the exact sound.
rest point after the intense technique is what makes it fun, so i extended the rest point for the flow that ended here to 00:55:610 -> 00:55:719 -, so if put it on the white line, will feel the continuation, and even consider the slight physical exhaustion, so abandoned the snare and followed the neuro
maybe if put it on the white line as you wish, mightly have to change this whole form to 00:55:370 (55370|3,55458|2,55465|1,55523|0,55567|3,55589|2,55610|0) -
actually you're right
but if you think about it a little differently, 00:39:302 - here, the two-handed flow you wanted is already used, but 00:40:698 - from this section, there is potential for the song to be more twisted (more complex sounds as the pitch increases)