modder info

xtrem3x's Modding History

00:36:214 - kdd 01:43:582 - kkd Although they are the same sequence, the second one has an additional sound and it would be better to leave it with this variant, although it remains under consideration.
But when reviewing this same suggestion I noticed a small inconsistency and modified it to be more "symmetrical"
I don't understand what happened with this update, but I applied these suggests ._.
not intentional, changed to Kat.
and the 2nd comment was for density but I guess it didn't work, notes removed.
osu!what? This was the first suggestion I applied when the notifications appeared ._.
indeed the 1st suggest is good.
https://wallpapersden.com/a-forest-night-4k-wallpaper/ not 3am but is a forest in the night
**This collaboration is special, because ani and moco are siblings.** :3chat:
is good
ok
exactly in this album... Reitaisai 12 (2015-05-10) GENSOKYO DEMPA EXPO -IOSYS Touhou Compilation vol.23- Length - 04:49 Scarlet Police on Ghetto Patrol 24/7 sukāretto keisatsu no gettō patorōru nijūyon-ji スカーレット警察のゲットーパトロール24時
Considering it's based on Chainsaw Man ED4, it might be correct, although it has more songs on top, it could be considered a mashup, but the base remains intact from start to end
I agree.
seems reasonable to me.
in 00:30:853 - seems better.
I made the necessary changes but I didn't add the finisher, even in the 2nd part you mention I forgot to focus a note on the bass.
It may be possible but in reality my sound tracking is very simple which takes the dons on the bass and the kats on the claps for each beat.
I don't think so, the notes 00:07:545 - , 00:08:007 - and 00:08:468 - are fixed on the claps while the triple kkd takes the rest of the claps at reduced volume and the don has a different sound that is more consistent with the cymbal of the next note.
Because it is a map with restrictions, it is not allowed to make a difficulty higher than 5* but a variation of this type could be correct.
Ranking Criteria / osu!taiko -> Overall (General) -> RULES -> point 6.3 **If the drain time of each difficulty is between 4:15 and 5:00, the lowest difficulty cannot be harder than an Oni.** I don't know if these rules have changed but both the audio and the drain time do not complete the 5 minutes for the diff to be considered as Inner Oni, all my suggestions are specifically for the Oni diff.
04:46:509 - change this to d, although it is within the allowed criteria of 9 notes in 1/4 it seems somewhat dense compared to other previous patterns.
04:44:310 - same
04:38:184 - same
04:37:713 - same.
04:22:163 - same 04:24:362 - same
04:20:279 - same.
03:55:226 - hitsound volume in 65% 03:55:540 - 70% 03:55:855 - 80% 03:56:169 - 90% 03:56:483 - 100% 03:56:797 - return to 70%.
03:28:211 - this note should also be deleted and these others...03:30:410 - , 03:31:038 - , 03:35:279 - , 03:35:593 - , 03:35:907 - 03:35:436 - additionally, this note could be changed to d to make the low and high sounds clear. 03:36:221 - this triple is a single high sound, so it can be **"kkk"**. 03:39:205 - Continuing with the notes that should be deleted would be 03:39:520 - , 03:44:232 - , 03:44:546 - , 03:49:258 - , 03:49:572 -
03:14:441 - with the Snap Divisor at 1/7 moves this note to 03:14:434 - , it seems strange but that strong sound fits better at this point than the previous one with 1/6.
02:29:781 - Speaking of the "hit sound", here it seems you omitted one and it would be necessary to change the notes to **"ddkk"** 02:32:294 - **"dkkd"** 02:33:551 - **"dddk"** 02:34:807 - other change to d here. 02:35:436 - **"dkkkkkkkd d k"** , here it would be more noticeable because another rhythm starts and they are mostly claps.
01:43:917 - complementing this same suggestion you could change this note to k.
01:31:980 - In addition to that, it would be changing this one to d and the next triple to be a solid **"kkk"**.
01:17:451 - same here. 01:19:022 - same here.
01:15:567 - same here. 01:16:745 - same here.
01:06:692 - same here.
00:53:263 - Something similar happens here, but in this case it would be to delete this note and change the next note to Kat to focus the vocal properly.
00:44:860 - Something similar happens here and it is better with a Kat.
00:08:420 - Change this note to d, and a "mirror" effect could be generated to complete what is mentioned in parentheses.
seems fair to me (-w-)b
00:22:404 - something similar happens in this point but here is better with this pattern **"k d k d k d d - D"**
as optional suggest ... I am intrigued as to whether this change might be necessary due to the slight lag it has. 00:29:190 - Red Line with "omit first bar line" checked. 00:29:529 - Red Line to reset NC cymbal.
is right ...
In the end you can expect more opinions, although I don't think I'm the only one with these types of comments but my opinion does not change, "Rejection" diff is the most adaptable that can be done in this type of songs without becoming nonsense overmapping. Is there a button called "opinion"? No. Is my comment a "suggestion"? No, because I'm emphasizing a problem that not many people want to write about because they think that doing nonsense overmapping on songs that clearly don't exist is acceptable just for pps. I also can't use the "Praise" option because yes, I like the song and the main diffs without a doubt but that top diff is the total opposite. Although the "Problem" is a specific button for structural things or missing metadata or a file with parameters exceeded or below the minimum, it is clear that it could also serve as an "opinions" button when something like this is detected.
The metadata can change constantly when the necessary evidence is shown to correct errors, although there are 2, 4, 8 or many ranked maps of the same song or the compilation that has this visual, it may have errors that have been omitted for reasons vague as the what you mentioned... It is not common to see a situation like this but must understand that that is why it is called **Primary Metadata** and that is not altered unless the creator or producer him/herself declares it so. although you can ask Camellia, I'm not sure if he would retaliate upon seeing this song here but oh well...
The TANO*C store is a label container (except for direct crew releases) you cannot take literally what it says there when the direct source has already been provided. and that happens because the songs on this site (http://p19.sakura.ne.jp/moflity/) are exclusive enough to add the creator/illustrator, you have to focus on those types of details, it's almost like a musical circle like Confetto, Pichnopop, IOSYS, (and a large etc.) I mean, they are reading it right there when they see the web page, do you want to question the primary metadata?
Honestly, I have never seen spaces when they mention artists but instead the spaces are generated by certain symbols like "の" Furthermore, one thing is missing from the artist and that is the nickname of the creator of that visual novel (practice19) which he has reduced to p19. **かめりあ×ななひら× p19** https://youtu.be/DF9VTtM6dQY?si=7f6_69l7TnMTWECT
kasane teto with the letters messed up
Demn ... I had always thought that the song was totally based on the PCB version ._. https://puu.sh/K6N4Y.png **Runs in discarded**
Source: 東方Project that's all? Every Touhou song has an origin from an official game, and this one is no exception.
/