I see 00:56:424 missing a note it will be added. the doubles are intentional to create stacks at the start of 1/1, like 00:54:854 (54854|3,55029|3,55203|3) - 00:56:249 (56249|3,56424|3,56598|3) - 00:59:040 (59040|0,59215|0,59389|0) - (<- adjusted) -01:00:436 (60436|0,60610|0,60784|0) - (<-adjusted)
for me it would be impossible to map all the 6 consec synth (00:33:924 (33924|2,34098|1,34273|1,34447|1,34622|3,34796|3) - for example) with double so I followed similar structure like previous two bars to map a double at 4th 1/2 but also differenciating with patterns like one-hand doubles 00:34:273 (34273|1,34273|0,34447|0,34447|1) - vs 00:32:877 (32877|2,32877|3,33052|3,33052|1) - 00:31:482 (31482|0,31482|1,31656|2,31656|0) -
it's transition part and leading to the first js part so I used some one hand trills to differenciate with normal js, so to make player nervous for next part
the pitch is not aligned to 1/2 here, I understand your point but this kind of "boring" opening actually gets player prepared for dumping on 1/4s instead of trying to catch the pitch and that fits the map overall style imo
well... since the pitch of those syllables are the same it's fine to use repeating LNs? There are similar ideas shown in this part like 01:49:782 (109782|2,109990|3,110198|2,110407|3) - will keep for now
keep: very personal preference here, stacking the triple on 123 cols instead of 'spliting' them up 124 feels better cuz the chord of pitch (bass and main melody) reunited in this sound. I'll try keep the response short for now
the reason why 01:12:106 (72106|2,72106|0) - varies from 00:58:773 (58773|2,58773|3) - is: I want to emphasize the lyrics being different for the two parts, you can see the difference between 00:56:898 (56898|2,57315|2,57523|0,57731|2,57940|0,58148|2,58148|3) - and 01:10:231 (70231|3,70648|1,70856|3,71065|0,71273|1,71481|2,71481|3) - and the part you questioned is also part of this lyric variation representation
ok emm firstly, for me 01:12:106 (72106|2,72106|0) - this should only relate to 00:58:773 (58773|2,58773|3) - the other double short LNs being on same hand are for different concepts and intentions (also for 02:03:981 - 02:50:440 - )
I want 00:01:481 (1481|1,1585|0,1690|2) - to differ from stair, like a turnaround, for the addition of long piano sound, so making them all stairs may lose this intention. Same for 00:08:148 (8148|2,8252|0,8356|1) - keep unless necessary to change
nah I kinda wanted to enphasize bass + vocals more ( 01:52:731 (112731|2,112731|3) - more specificly) and I just feel like after tripling it the space (visually) cannot help the later double LN to standout.
simply adding an extra note will make this part too packed, and the reason why I put double at 00:47:731 instead of 00:47:940 is to spread notes density more evenly
it being transition part having only vocal therefore it's treated differently. vocals are not missed in this part but rather mapped with piano as a whole.