[metadata]
[quote="Nerova Riuz GX"]m4m. no kd please. if you need sp i'll shoot a star instead.
kkFill the Artist with
Cartoon instead of
Cartoon (ft. Coleman Trapp). Move that ft. from Artist to Song Title.
fixed, mbThis shouldn't be questionable, and the title change is legit. We can have some examples which wrote feats in title:
- Ranked Rameses B songs
- https://osu.ppy.sh/b/621703
- https://osu.ppy.sh/b/717959 ...many more.
feats should be addressed depending on how the artist wrote. In this case, it should be in the title. Sources are down below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyXmsVwZqX4https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/why-w ... 1003611055https://soundcloud.com/nocopyrightsound ... cs-releaseAlso, it's possible to have
NCS, NoCopyrightSounds in tags. it helps since that's where the song released.
sure[general]
- Preview time conflict in Hobbes2's Light Insane. fixed
[easy]
The most fatal point here is that you make the HP to high. You can try it by yourself: It's quite hard to have HP recovered unless it's the end of a combo. Set it to 3.5 or 3 is a better choice.
thanks for catching that, never meant 4. changed to 3Also, over 90% of the time you SHOULD BETTER have some blanks in Easy/Normal diffs (e.g.00:30:515 - ). It helps players at this level to reset if they get confused, and have some more diversity.
From 00:43:886 - to 01:09:258 - and all the parts after kiai starts you have no blanks added. Though on mapping it looks good, to me it's not a well-designed lower diff.
blankets are not a necessity, that reasoning is a bit odd to me, there's plenty of ways to incorporate aesthetics into a normal or easy without blankets. i use them sparingly because they're a pretty cheap shot at aesthetics that i dont want to overdo, and they're more tasteful when sparingly used.- 00:30:858 (1) - 00:41:829 (4) - inconsistent NCing did every 4 measures instead of 2
- 01:07:201 (1) - Though obviously in this part all the patterns/NCs are made for vocals, this NC feels quite unnecessary. it's neither a start of vocal nor a real downbeat drop. fixed in last fix
- 01:07:201 - did you miss a whistle here ye
- 02:11:315 - I noticed that you have a 50% volume green line here and it feels useless. it didn't reflect anything - in fact, it sounds weird. you can try to listen to it in Test Mode with Auto on.
(You might want to make the spinner end 50% tho) silenced spinnerend, this was cause of a copied hitsound mistake lol fixed greenline
[normal]
In my opinion, I think you used too much 1/2 in kiai. the density difference between kiai and non-kiai is quite large.
i try to scale it, the intro uses 1/1, the synth uses more frequent 1/2 patterns, and the chorus uses quite a bit, which i think works fine.This is quite subjective, but the arranging is nice. There's no need to change, but to me it could be better.
thanks ^^- 00:30:858 (4) - i would add an NC here done
nothing real
[armible]
- 00:43:715 (3,1) - can stack them so you'll get a stop motion sure
- 01:01:543 - 01:03:772 - did you miss a whistle here ya
- 01:14:058 (1) - yea slightly bent slider triggered but seriously it looks better if it's flipped upside down ee i like it more this way
- 01:28:972 (6,1) - 01:39:943 (1,2) - ......and many more. inconsistent NCing between the first and the last half kiai. collab joys, fixed
- 02:06:858 (1) - optional but i think it's not that extreme. does it really deserve that NC? (since NC can wipe the follow points it doesnt fit here imo) fixered
[top]
- 00:43:029 - as a silenced spinner end, it can't really represent something clear. I won't suggest you to end a spinner silent here. if you want to fit the bg instrument like you did all the way through, please make it more audible. otherwise, end it on 00:42:858 - might be a better choice since it's a vocal end and can leave a small gap before the next jump. it helps decrease some intensity and make the jump stand out more. kk
- 00:43:202 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't you separate 00:43:201 (1) - and 00:43:887 (2) - as well after separating 00:43:373 (2,1) - ? it's much better looking imo. kk
- 01:12:687 (1,2) - 01:16:459 (4,5) - they feel a bit too dense here imo. what do you think about stacking two circles together? stacked first
- 01:32:916 (1) - 01:43:887 (1) - these two extended sliders are questionable. they don't have a wub sound support (e.g. a clear one on 01:30:173 (1) - ). these places are not quite related to consistency between other extended ones as well. will be better if you change it into 1/2 ones. the wub is there, just not as strongly
quite decent. you do care about the consistency a lot.
thx ^-^[]