1. Higan Bana (6.27 stars, 1325 notes)

__Ag wrote:

这是有想法的图，其实没什么多说的，随便说点个人感觉

01:06:821 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 这一串实在和音乐不符 加个鼓点吧，不想用转盘

01:17:573 - 这里的1/8不做出来吗不怎么会在跳的时候放短折返啊

01:18:787 (7,8,1) - 这里有空拍，DS却是差不多的嗯，叠上

02:02:833 (10,12) - 这个lap不好看改了，三角形对内

02:04:047 (2,3) - 这个也是竖着放吧

02:25:897 (1,2) - 和整体风格不符，全图都这么远，这里却粘在一起其实也没那么大差别吧。。拉远了点

02:35:261 - 这里的1/8不做出来？改一处其他全要加啊，有点懒了等等再改

03:43:238 (10) - 这个这样放顺手一些改了

图

全图影响美观的overlap比较多，感觉没有突出cs5的那种整洁度

1. you started to map at 00:01:619 - and you ended it at 05:01:272 - which is not even a 5 minutes map gameplay. just add a spinner at the end to make it as an approval map will ya? .-.
2. maybe u should do sth about the NCs
3. ctrl + a them, turns out sth another masterpiece of "not messy note placements everywhere" LOL (for a corner)
4. 00:01:619 - 00:12:717 - would be a good idea to start with a low SV for the intro
5. 00:23:122 (11) - wanna try out a symmetrical pattern from 00:22:949 (10) - ?
6. 00:46:012 (1) - finish will do rather than whistle. in additional, remove NC and 00:46:359 (2) - NC this will do for readability (it's not about readability too ya know. it could be sth else)
7. 01:06:821 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i'm pretty sure that this one isn't rly right to the rhythm. just try this instead http://puu.sh/r6xX6/2a6b59e479.jpg
8. 01:17:226 (6) - finish
9. 01:29:712 (14,15) - 01:30:058 (16,17) - mind about giving these 2 sliders a space? touching the slider feels like rly meh for some reason. u could try sth aesthetically like http://puu.sh/r6y4u/5d7375c797.jpg for example
10. 01:40:116 (7) - NC for emphasize?
11. 01:51:735 (10,12) - i just don't like the sliders touching each other with an unreasonable overlap stuff
12. 02:03:700 (1) - same reason as i have mentioned b4
13. 02:06:128 (9,10,1) - well this is rly hard to get it with its spacing. just move 02:06:388 (10) - to 301|205 to make it as an equal spacing
14. 02:07:515 (5) - u could just copy paste 02:06:995 (3) - and ctrl+g it
15. 02:08:902 (11,12,1) - make an equal spacing pls
16. 02:09:943 (4,5) - avoid making an overlap slider here
17. 02:11:677 (10,11,1) - this one. again
18. 02:17:226 (8,9,1) - ^
19. 02:19:654 (7,8,9) - ^
20. 02:25:897 (1,2) - wew how about a "no" for an overlap slider?
21. 02:35:608 (7) - NC this for better emphasize
22. 02:45:318 - why is this rly different from 01:27:631 - ?
23. 02:59:191 - i'd highly recommend you to use a slow slider speed here + low spacing rather than making it as a jumpy part stuff
24. 03:19:827 (5,6,7,8) - i don't think that this is a suitable rhythm tbh. try this instead http://puu.sh/r6BB2/d46714d284.jpg
25. 03:34:394 (9,10,11) - the distance are kinda far + not even symmetrical
26. 03:42:717 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - mind about using a slider then ctrl+shift+f to make the stream more neater? cuz the spacing of the stream isn't rly consistent ya know
27. 03:43:584 - about the triplets and stuff... if i were you, i'd just start the triplet from the white line instead rather than in a red tick. it'd look more suitable than this one ya know .-.
28. 04:03:180 (2,3,4,5) - this is so weird to start a slider at the red tick instead of white tick for its rhythm
29. 04:07:688 (8,9,10) - i don't totally get the spacing here even that (9) doesn't emphasize with the loud beat
30. 04:22:255 (14,1,2) - the flow looks rly harsh here
31. 04:58:498 (1,2) - the overlap looks kinda harsh and kinda unreadable to play
32. 05:00:925 (8,9,10,11,12) - u could make a huge stream spacing for this intense part

lit120 wrote:

yo

[higan banana xd]

1. you started to map at 00:01:619 - and you ended it at 05:01:272 - which is not even a 5 minutes map gameplay. just add a spinner at the end to make it as an approval map will ya? .-.
   if someone who 4m52s can approval, why i can't.
2. maybe u should do sth about the NCs
3. ctrl + a them, turns out sth another masterpiece of "not messy note placements everywhere" LOL (for a corner)
4. 00:01:619 - 00:12:717 - would be a good idea to start with a low SV for the intro
5. 00:23:122 (11) - wanna try out a symmetrical pattern from 00:22:949 (10) - ?I don't think so, it's symmetrical enough
6. 00:46:012 (1) - finish will do rather than whistle. in additional, remove NC and 00:46:359 (2) - NC this will do for readability (it's not about readability too ya know. it could be sth else)fixed
7. 01:06:821 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - i'm pretty sure that this one isn't rly right to the rhythm. just try this instead http://puu.sh/r6xX6/2a6b59e479.jpg
   isn't unrankable
8. 01:17:226 (6) - finishfixed
9. 01:29:712 (14,15) - 01:30:058 (16,17) - mind about giving these 2 sliders a space? touching the slider feels like rly meh for some reason. u could try sth aesthetically like http://puu.sh/r6y4u/5d7375c797.jpg for example fixed
10. 01:40:116 (7) - NC for emphasize?
11. 01:51:735 (10,12) - i just don't like the sliders touching each other with an unreasonable overlap stuff
12. 02:03:700 (1) - same reason as i have mentioned b4 fixed
13. 02:06:128 (9,10,1) - well this is rly hard to get it with its spacing. just move 02:06:388 (10) - to 301|205 to make it as an equal spacing fixed
14. 02:07:515 (5) - u could just copy paste 02:06:995 (3) - and ctrl+g it
15. 02:08:902 (11,12,1) - make an equal spacing pls
16. 02:09:943 (4,5) - avoid making an overlap slider here fixed
17. 02:11:677 (10,11,1) - this one. again
18. 02:17:226 (8,9,1) - ^
19. 02:19:654 (7,8,9) - ^
20. 02:25:897 (1,2) - wew how about a "no" for an overlap slider?
21. 02:35:608 (7) - NC this for better emphasize
22. 02:45:318 - why is this rly different from 01:27:631 - ? well, i don't know it's rly important?
23. 02:59:191 - i'd highly recommend you to use a slow slider speed here + low spacing rather than making it as a jumpy part stuff
24. 03:19:827 (5,6,7,8) - i don't think that this is a suitable rhythm tbh. try this instead http://puu.sh/r6BB2/d46714d284.jpg
25. 03:34:394 (9,10,11) - the distance are kinda far + not even symmetrical
26. 03:42:717 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - mind about using a slider then ctrl+shift+f to make the stream more neater? cuz the spacing of the stream isn't rly consistent ya knowfixed
27. 03:43:584 - about the triplets and stuff... if i were you, i'd just start the triplet from the white line instead rather than in a red tick. it'd look more suitable than this one ya know .-.
28. 04:03:180 (2,3,4,5) - this is so weird to start a slider at the red tick instead of white tick for its rhythm
29. 04:07:688 (8,9,10) - i don't totally get the spacing here even that (9) doesn't emphasize with the loud beat fixed
30. 04:22:255 (14,1,2) - the flow looks rly harsh here
31. 04:58:498 (1,2) - the overlap looks kinda harsh and kinda unreadable to play not that bad , i think
32. 05:00:925 (8,9,10,11,12) - u could make a huge stream spacing for this intense part if sombody want it..

i don't rly like those sliders set tbh. it's kinda messy and the spacing aren't pretty emphasize to sth idk :/

GL!