1. Another (5,18 stars, 545 notes)
2. Easy (1,9 stars, 149 notes)
3. Extra (5,76 stars, 604 notes)
4. Hard (3,4 stars, 372 notes)
5. Insane (4,28 stars, 455 notes)
6. Normal (2,24 stars, 227 notes)

General

1. Forgot to uncheck widescreen support in easy , normal and lite insane

Big circles

1. 00:43:578 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - No More fc on sightread ;w;
2. 01:11:854 (1,1) - stack?
3. 01:55:992 (1,1) - fix stack

Insane

1. 00:43:578 (5) - NC here like in the highest diff
2. 02:12:198 (6,7) - too close ;w;

Light Insane

1. 00:55:302 - in hard diff u used 1/2 sliders here and in here there are easy 1/1 sliders which make Hard look more denser than light insane in this part -w-
2. 01:04:957 (1,2,3,4,5) - this might be too hard for ametuers and also not a very nice pattern for a "light insane" diff
3. 02:12:026 (4,5,6) - a normal stack would work better here

Hard

1. 00:43:578 (5) - nc
2. also ~ increase AR to 7,5 or something? AR 7 is slow for this

Normal

1. 00:44:267 - make this clickable?
2. 02:10:302 (2) - move it a bit higher? would flow better

Easy

1. 01:40:819 (3,4) - DS

Milan- wrote:

m4m from ur q' . my map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/458931 ty xd

easy
-00:00:130 (1,1) - i think it'd make more sense to either start the spinner right after the circle to give more time of spinning or start it from 00:00:819 - where a new instrument is introduced but where I start has a piano tick and I think it's best place to start spinner from there
-00:35:302 (4,1,2) - this angle is so flow breaking tho, you could do stuff like http://puu.sh/pYxno/7f228eeb1b.jpg if you wanna have this kind of angle
-00:57:371 (4,1,2) - this one could be less edgy aswell but dunno.. the other one after is better somehow
-for the 1/2 instances i'd suggest you to use a longer slider afterwards, so the player doesnt have to think too much (? changed one of two

normal
-00:00:130 (1,1) - same?
-00:42:716 (4,5,1) - wouldnt something like this http://puu.sh/pYxL6/5f1640d358.jpg sound better?
-02:03:405 (5,3) - im so triggered
-also one super subjective thing, 00:25:819 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - this part feels kinda clustered in one place and doesnt look too nice >< I've seen worse xd

hard
-01:25:130 (3,4,1) - this thing so hard to acc and move aaa, maybe move (4) like 64/307 to keep ur structure and stuff?
-dam so dense, u may wanna use 7.5 ar or so

light
-01:36:681 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this pattern doesnt feel fitting with how you mapped the rest of the section. copying this rhythm 01:47:888 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - will be better i think but it's cool, and it's in the most intense section so it fits imo, 01:14:612 (1,2,3,4,5) - this was the less extreme version, so mb I'll switch to that if needed

insane
-01:05:819 (5,6,7) - shouldnt (6) be more apart of (7)? i believe you like doing these emphasizing things so ya the note isn't that important so I skipped emphasizing it for playability and aesthetics
-02:12:026 (4,5,6,7) - uuhm 8/10 would keep streaming again .. move 7 to 256/256?

the
-00:04:957 (4,5) - these hitsounds are so loud compared to the rest,. pls
-00:43:578 (1,4,5) - use ncs for readability?
everything looks so messy with this cs and intensity balance ;; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

no much to say lo, hard has the better sliders tbh hard best diff confirmed

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

Hi ~ M4M , Queue , blah blah

General

1. Forgot to uncheck widescreen support in easy , normal and lite insane

Big circles

1. 00:43:578 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - No More fc on sightread ;w;
2. 01:11:854 (1,1) - stack? no, I used manual stack for this slider to go opposite direction
3. 01:55:992 (1,1) - fix stack

Insane

1. 00:43:578 (5) - NC here like in the highest diff
2. 02:12:198 (6,7) - too close ;w;

Light Insane

1. 00:55:302 - in hard diff u used 1/2 sliders here and in here there are easy 1/1 sliders which make Hard look more denser than light insane in this part -w- nerfed in hard
2. 01:04:957 (1,2,3,4,5) - this might be too hard for ametuers and also not a very nice pattern for a "light insane" diff
3. 02:12:026 (4,5,6) - a normal stack would work better here I tried, but I like this more

Hard

1. 00:43:578 (5) - nc don't need imo
2. also ~ increase AR to 7,5 or something? AR 7 is slow for this

Normal

1. 00:44:267 - make this clickable?
2. 02:10:302 (2) - move it a bit higher? would flow better a few pixels all I can move xd

Easy

1. 01:40:819 (3,4) - DS

Thats it ~ Great map

My map https://osu.ppy.sh/s/473066

gl gl

_IxApplePie_ wrote:

m4m from your queue. my map -> https://osu.ppy.sh/s/479175
Suggestion only. Feel free to reject.

Easy

1. There's some probs that the AiMod picked up abt the distance snap
2. 00:00:130 (1) - i think the spinner should start here instead of the red tick... like the others which started on white there's very strong beat I wanted it to be clickable
3. 00:38:750 (1) - either straighten or angle at the first point. It looks weird now, neither a "v" or "L"
4. 01:32:543 (3,4) - blanket more
5. 01:40:819 (3,4) - 4 is kind out of place for the blanket
   

Normal

1. 00:00:130 (1) - the spinner thing, same as Easy same
2. 01:16:336 (5,6) - you could stack this, if you dw it's fine having only one stack in whole map might be confusing so just gonna go with no stacks
3. 01:42:198 (1,2,3,4) - i think reverse for the short.s would be nice want to keep consistant with before
4. 01:57:026 (2) - this note shift up to 01:56:854? full mapped snares this normal instead of kicks

Hard

1. 01:12:371 (2,3,4) - imo, the straight flow up is not so smooth maybe shift 3 out a little bit I think it's ok, not completely straight and still plays fine
2. 01:18:750 (1,4) - move your 01:18:750 (1) - to overlap, tried 01:19:957 (4) and it couldn't be perfect </3

That's all I can find
Light Insane seems fine i guess.
Can't play Insane and Extra.

Good luck!

MugiwaraSekai wrote:

no more no no more from your queue

light insane
00:04:267 (1) - what about making slider 1/1 instead as sound at 00:04:440 (2) - is not really important, but if you want to keep it its still okay I follow piano here and I can hear piano on those ticks so keep. 1/1 works too as I've used it on insane diff
00:22:198 (1) - here too, is a bit boring, you should make this differently, as you could make a 1/1 slider until 00:22:543 (7) - and then completed by circles/1/2 slider I'm emphasizing powerful downbeat and there's nothing more important to map than it
00:27:716 (1) - ^
00:57:371 (2,1) - dont really like to check that, but blanket pls : ( oops, not sure how that happened
00:59:094 (4,1) - i think it should be as spaced as 00:58:750 (3,4) - or more it's ok, this spacing shouldn't be too much difference from 00:57:371 (2,1) -
01:28:923 (3,4,5) - too hard for a light insane, you should maybe decrease a bit spacing if you want absolutely keep this pattern imo it's already baby spacing, and this insane introduces to leniency stuff
01:30:302 (4,5,6) - ^ ^
01:31:681 (3,4,5) - ^ ^
01:33:061 (6,7,8,9,10) - ^ ^
etc. it's just what the part/diff is built around
01:42:198 (1) - it will be confusing with 01:39:957 (2,3,4) - imo
01:50:992 (2) - overmap, i estimate that sound at 01:51:078 - is less important than 01:51:250 - most of the blue ticks are audible and are more or less even strenght
01:54:181 (3) - overmap audible
01:55:474 (4,5,6) - ^ audible
etc.
02:00:130 (1,2,3) - you should maybe overlap instead of stack completely for better readability I tried, but I think it makes readability worse

insane
00:00:130 (1) - try being more original and map this part well it's calm part and it's suppose to have low density
00:22:198 (1) - same as light
00:38:664 - don't skip
00:42:026 (7,8,9,10,11,1) - I think it's make a weird "concatenation", it's difficult to follow your rhythm since first you decided to follow vocal at 00:42:026 (7,8,9,10,11) - and after you continue following drums (just my opinion) it's mostly to combat the density, I don't want to make full stream here, so I just used the chance for suing 1/2 stuff
00:59:095 (4,1) - same as light fixed this one though
01:10:130 (6,7) - more space imo nothing special to increase spacing for I think
01:44:612 (7,8) - spacing feels off all good

hard
01:15:302 (3,4,5) - spacing inconsistent imo
01:44:095 (4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - too much pressure imo you should maybe replace 01:44:785 (8,9,1) - by a 1/2 reverse ? I think it's good, most intense in music for most hardest part
01:48:578 (2) - start it maybe at 01:48:405 ? it's to keep consistant with other diff rhythm wise
02:04:785 (3,4) - bad overlap
good and neat diff

normal
00:40:992 (5) - why a reverse only here ?

[]
i hope it was helpful and good luck!
my map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/472742

-NanoRIPE- wrote:

m4m from your q

[General]
looks fine ~

[Easy]
00:21:509 - this unherited timing looks unnecessary ~ (and also the next one) well I coppied them from other diff so they stayed, but they don't hurt so just letting them be
01:05:647 - ^
01:11:854 (1) - finish?
01:19:095 (4,3) - try to stacked it?
01:27:716 - same as before
01:32:543 (3,5) - hmmm maybe make it neater? http://prntscr.com/bs6u4u
01:34:957 (2,4) - are u sure about this overlap?
01:49:440 - too many unherited timing here (looks unnecessary too)
02:11:164 (5) - NC? nc every 2nd downbeat for consistency here

[Normal]
01:11:854 (1) - finish?
01:25:647 (1,4) - overlap
01:50:130 - this unherited timing looks unnecessary

[Hard]
00:33:233 until 00:44:267 - hmm i'm not sure about this rhythm (i think if u follow vocal would be better) and also to make it easier don't think it's hard to press and hold reverse lol, but the rhythm I like because it has background drums starting from here
01:11:854 (1) - finish
01:33:922 (1) - what about finish?
02:04:785 (3,4) - bad pattern (maybe ctrl j slider(4)

[Light Insane]
01:06:164 (5) - hmm i think 1 circle would be better (i'm not sure about this kickslider on light insane) I used many kicksliders in this diff so I think it's ok
01:10:992 (6) - ctrl g (for better flow) I want that movement on purpose
01:11:854 (1) - finish
01:21:509 (1,2) - ehh the stacked looks hard to read it (for me) what about this? http://prntscr.com/bs70e6
02:00:474 (2,3) - what about usntack (2) and ctrl (3)? like this http://prntscr.com/bs71as

[Insane]
01:25:130 (3,4,5,6) - this pattern looks hard to read it :> shouldn't be too difficult, the flow motion goes in one direction

Nice diff

[No more small circles??]
none ~

GL ~ and sorry for my terrible english and short mod ;w;

Akali wrote:

General

I hate the idea of kiai for half of the map, I figure you cut the mp3 messing up the song structure a bit but you can easily drop kiai of some parts. Either 1:05 - 1:28 , 1:28-1:50 or what would be even better - both. But might be just me. well I just put the kiai at the biggest drop spot, but ye, basicly cutting the song in half made this thing, but I'll keep kiai as it is cuz it's fits perfectly imo

Easy,Normal,Hard can't find nuthin

Light Insane
00:37:371 (1,2,3) - can increase spacing to 1,4 or something is good, because density increase by a lot is already hard enough here

00:43:923 (1,2,3) - rotate 3 degrees CW nothing big but looks better

01:21:509 (1,2) - don't like 1/1 stop and go here, 01:15:992 (1,2) - one here is enough and fits song structure better

01:24:785 (2,3) - dislike this, effectively stopping player in one place for no reason, inconsistent with previous interpretation of this

01:38:061 (1,2,3) - might be bit confusing for this difficulty level? it doesn't completely overlap cuz of leniency setting so I think it's still ok

01:47:888 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this fits the music in a way but I just hate those in terms of how they feel when played, consider something more standard here I think it's pretty cool, and don't want to make the map too boring and stuff even if the challenge might be a bit too high

Insane

00:27:716 (1) - coool

01:08:233 (2,3) - again like on Light, this is sort of lame for flow, I get the reason for it but a)piano sounds have different pitch b) there is no particular "slowdown" in music, it just keeps going. I guess bass does something different but still it would rather warrant a bigger spacing in my book rather than this in this diff it's consistant so I will keep these

01:10:992 (2,3) - again, comparing this to 01:09:095 (1,2) - where nothing is happening it could be waaaay more jumpy. Not as important for me as the sliders before on 1:08 though

01:13:750 (2,3) - low spacing fits those better as piano goes lower than before, but again don't like this stack anyway

01:19:267 (2,3) - variety I guess, still random wouldn't call it random, it complements the shape of 01:18:750 (1) -

01:23:405 (2,3,4) - fits previous slider designwise which is cool idea, but still no reason for a wiggle as you said it's design wise, not everything has to complement the music 100 % to the max

01:24:785 (2,3,4,5) -

01:47:888 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I know there is already a lot of 1/4 sliders in previous section but they would fit this better. At least consider making these more spaced and/or making them one stream not two I listened closely here when I mapped and felt like this would feel the best to play, how it's on light insane I like less.

the cool diff

00:00:130 (1,1,1,1) - Typing out MORE in a song where dude repeats NO MORE to his death is kinda conflicting, don't you think I'm a confilicting person... will see what I can do later lol

00:11:164 (1) - R looks just a bit lame, make the loop a bit smaller so the "leg" is longer maybe http://puu.sh/q5J8L.jpg rough estimate

00:43:923 (1) - 228:222 for readability and cool flow?

01:25:647 (1,1,1) - 01:27:026 (1,1,1) - SV changes feel funky but pretty great throughout most of the diff, however this is just weird and unreadable, NCs don't help at all. Also note previous SV changes go with vocals/bass/synth, this part is mostly focused on being a drum passage and I don't like mapping drums this way. If you want to keep the SV at least try to make it more readable using spacing, something like this might be better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5635067 it's probably one of the hardest to read paterns, but once you're able to read this it's really fun to play, and I had over half of testplayers sightread this so it's a matter of being able to read and listen to music closely enough. I plan to keep this even if it's hard, but it's the point of this diff lol

01:47:888 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - like on insane, continous stream or sliders would be better for build up

01:58:578 (8,9,1) - looks like you got cornered, first and only time you use this approach angle into a slider, not significantly harder but stands out for no reasonit's more that it looked very dumb when it was curved into a straight slider, so I just made this, but I'll keep in mind if I get any ideas nvm fixed

pishifat wrote:

maybe someone interested in m4m with me

here's the map: https://osu.ppy.sh/b/856035

easy
SPIN
00:55:302 (1,2,3,4) - tbh separate so that tails aren't closer to next objects' tails https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5668296
easier to understand whats happening for target audience of scrubs this actually triggers me because I wanted to give this suggestion to someone else and don't apply by myself g

hard
SLIDE
00:20:043 (1) - 00:53:923 (1) - hards actually need 1 beat of recovery time gg well it just makes it harder for them but lets go

light
00:16:681 (1) - google knows my past Ｓ
01:00:819 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - excuse me 17:19:838 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - yes, thanks for giving me a perfect patern for a light insane, you will now forever regret using such paterns in extra
meaningful modding right here

insane
02:12:026 (4,5,6,7,1) - more indicative of what rhythm is if comboing were like 12312 I felt like something was wrong with it, but now I see tyy
like for whatever reason i can tell it's a spaced triple through starting a combo there


big boy
00:04:785 (3) - these could use whistles tbh and 00:05:474 (7,1) - could use drumclap7 and drumfinish1 tbh. neither are really necessary tho, just sounds cooler sur
00:16:681 (1) - >not symmetrical painful
00:55:992 (3,1) - so easy to avoid l'overlap downpls o, ye when I moved something, this happened
01:06:336 (1) - 01:50:474 (1) - entire sections too good will try to make it worse I guess
01:25:130 (3,4) - can always just lower stack leniency to achieve what you're trying to do lol. actually seeing 02:00:647 (2,4) - im not sure waht you want to do I don't want to hide it completely that's what I want to do, I personally hate stuff like hidding circles under sliders, so I just manual stack, because autostacking both of these things seemed not a good choice for me, but yea I guess I could have just changed the leniency thing

1 10-12
3 3-5
4 2-4
5 2-4
8 1 2-3
i had to write down some dates and times while i was on a phone call and this page was open so ty, what kind of dates and time are those

im ready to bubble call me back in 10 months ty