1. 00:21:486 (1) - delete it and put this slider here 00:21:606 (2) - because it sounds weird
2. 00:23:166 (2) - delete clap on the end of the slider
3. 01:00:606 (6) - ctrl+g?
4. 01:40:206 (1,2,3) - this isnt perfect! http://puu.sh/ab4I5/8a7c20ede5.jpg
5. 00:13:342 (3) - this blanket isnt perfect too! try x:160 y:168
6. 00:19:566 (1,2) - swap them on timeline, because it sounds weird
7. 01:09:006 (5) - delete clap and put finish on the end of slider

1. 00:09:966 (1,2,3,4) - i think that this singletap is too fast for normal
2. 00:24:366 (3,4,5,6) - ^

340 wrote:

amazing map as always :3

[General]

offset = 386 (listen here 00:10:462 - to verify this) ok

[Extra]

this part of mod were writen with your offset!

1. 00:21:486 (1) - delete it and put this slider here 00:21:606 (2) - because it sounds weird not problem
2. 00:23:166 (2) - delete clap on the end of the slider k
3. 01:00:606 (6) - ctrl+g? nope.
4. 01:40:206 (1,2,3) - this isnt perfect! http://puu.sh/ab4I5/8a7c20ede5.jpg maybe done.
5. 00:13:342 (3) - this blanket isnt perfect too! try x:160 y:168 done.
6. 00:19:566 (1,2) - swap them on timeline, because it sounds weird nice catch.
7. 01:09:006 (5) - delete clap and put finish on the end of slider nope.

[Normal]

1. 00:09:966 (1,2,3,4) - i think that this singletap is too fast for normal no problem.
2. 00:24:366 (3,4,5,6) - ^ ^

Timorisu wrote:

Nice map but will you still map Hard and Insane? ;Д;

ts8zs wrote:

Strange song :3
[EXTRA]
Just some idea.
00:22:946 (1) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1829396
00:31:826 (2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1829398
00:34:226 (2,4) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1829404
00:35:666 (6) - 356,160
00:38:786 (3) - NC
00:47:426 (1,2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1829407
00:50:306 (1) - Ctrl+G
00:50:786 (4) - Ctrl+G
00:51:026 (5) - Ctrl+G
00:56:066 (1,2) - swap
00:56:786 (5,6) - swap
01:00:626 (6) - Crl+G
01:00:866 (1,2) - swap
01:03:746 (1,2) - swap
01:09:026 (5) - move 256,232 SV x0.5
01:16:546 (5,6) - del and 01:16:586 - note or a sliderend
01:31:946 - ^
02:20:306 (1,2) - Ctrl+J,swap
[Insane]
Much harder than Hard.more like Extra?how about call this another:3
[Hard]
00:49:346 (6) - NC

paseli wrote:

[HARD]
00:37:346 (1) - it sounds odd if you leave the backslider like this, split it up into 2 sliders with the 2nd one starting at 00:37:826 - done.
01:00:866 (5,6,7,8) - THese double stacks are maybe too hard for a hard map, a backslider should be fine here as well np imo.
01:11:426 (1) - that backslider is way too long, split it up in 3 smaller ones i want some pettern.
I see you go from 1-3 backsliders after every iteration - which is nice, but too long backsliders are a no-go for a hard map imo.
01:15:266 (1) - split in two
01:26:786 (1) - split in three
01:30:626 (1) - split in two


[INSANE]
00:28:106 - add circle done.
00:29:186 - add circle here and start the spinner at the red tick and let it end on 00:30:866 - added circle.
00:31:106 - add circle here instead no.
00:38:426 (1,2,1) - i think you can find a more interesting pattern than this one (the same for the Extra map) i like this. keep.
01:15:266 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - you may try out doing a small jump between 6&7 as well as at the end between 12 & 1 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1830705 . This could also be applied on the extra map. interesting, but, keep now. i want thinking time.
01:19:106 - ^
01:26:786 - ^
01:30:626 - ^

[EXTRA]
Pretty much the same as in INSANE. Also not much to say from me since i can't pass this yet. xD

Average song, but good maps! Too bad i can't pass the last one yet to test it properly xD

Greetings,
paseli

Regraz wrote:

Hi!Pomuta~
As you requested!
======================
Note that I am a new mapper/modder, so sorry if I cannot offer much help!
======================
[General]
Why not add Pomuta in the tags like your other maps? XD added!
[EASY]
00:23:426 (1,2) - (nazimod) This blanket can beimproved. http://puu.sh/ahoAe/6923f17f4c.jpg
00:33:026 (4) - The slidertick here is little noisy. -5%
01:28:226 (4,1) - ^ not fixed.
02:21:986 (4) - Why not create a 1/1 here like your previous section 02:20:066 (2) - ? I want some pettern. and more easily. because easy diff.
[NORMAL]
Oh! Why slildertick so high! Really a little noisy at some degree!~ agreed!
00:04:226 (1,1) - Is it rankable to place a note only 1/1 after a spinner in NORMAL? I have easy diff. maybe fine imo.
01:29:186 (2) - Repeat twice is a combo killer to newbies. bit long slider. fine
01:35:426 (4) - Moveto 163|80 for a prefect stack. fixed
01:49:106 (2,2) - This overlap is not good. http://puu.sh/ahpaS/3166dac5c4.jpg fixed more beautiful.
01:59:426 (1) - Not recommend stack together when the space between them is 2/1 fine for me. but, will consider.
[HARD]
00:12:386 (2) - Hidden under th slider? According to the rnking creteria, only Insane can do this. other modder said this, i'll conside ;w;
01:11:426 (1) - Repeat a lot of times. A little noisy, maybe you can lower the volume a little just same stream!. nothing problem imo~.
02:03:986 (4) - End at 345|176 to make a perfect stack. fixed
Other diffs are perfect.
Only one thing more I want to say that, during the last part of the last KIAI, the hitsounds are too loud, thus the music is hard to be heard. ok, all 80%→75%!!
================
=Anyway, this map is so good! Good Luck!~

Loneight wrote:

Hi~
M4M.

• 
  Black is just suggestion, if you don't like , you can skip it
  Blue is recommended to fix
  red is unrankable issue

[general]

1. because the music stop at 02:26:185 - , I think kiai time's end is not at 02:26:306 - but at 02:26:185 - okay.

[Easy]

1. 00:23:426 (1,2) - I just feel a little weird for there no have clap hitsound, how about 00:24:866 (2) - add a clap to make different hitsounds of system? if you change, 00:28:226 (2) - add a clap at rotation, 00:32:546 (3) - add a clap sorry, all no.
2. 01:55:106 (6) - remove the whistle at start, because it's weird that only there have whistle sound and it's not suitable for music ? sound fit imo. this part only is bad? That is wrong.

~

[Normal]

1. 00:04:226 (1,1) - I think there is hard for newbie, because the waiting-time is too short in the high BPM, try 00:04:226 (1) - end on 00:07:106 - and put a note on 00:07:586 -
   [/color]
2. 00:29:306 (1,1) - reason same as ^, try 00:29:306 (1) - end on 00:30:626 - and put a note on 00:31:106 -
   [/color]
3. 00:26:546 (3) - I think it is hard to read for newbie, because of stack, it would be covered by 00:25:346 (1) - 's score, try to NC it or move other way
   [/color]
4. 00:36:866 (1) - reason same as 00:04:226 (1,1) - , how about end on 00:38:066 - to make a different rhythm? or you can change it like 00:04:226 (1,1) -
   [/color]
5. 01:55:586 (1,2) - how about swap NC? to make easier to read for newbie okay.
6. 02:08:906 (1) - change it end on 02:10:466 - , I think you know why

~

[Hard]

1. 00:22:226 (4) - how about NC it? a little hard to read because it's close 00:21:866 (2,3) - can't understand
2. 02:10:946 - ~ 02:26:186 - I think there claps are unnecessary, they are a little noisy and not suitable for music, try to remove them like Normal or reduce them sounds good, keep

[Insane]

1. 00:07:826 (3) - well.. try to NC it, it's hard to read when the music just start without prompt agree
2. 02:10:946 - ~ 02:26:186 - same as Hard

[Extra]

1. 00:34:346 (3) - try to NC it to make 00:34:226 (2,4) - easier to read, 01:03:146 (3) - same as here
2. 01:34:466 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - because of the stack Leniency system, 1:35:426 (1) - would be covered by their score and hard to read that is a slider
3. 01:19:826 (10) - a one-rotation slider in a stream is hard to read and uncomfortable, why you don't make it to be a perfect stream? I mean change this to 3 circles
4. 02:20:306 (1) - remove NC, it would make player hesitate
5. 02:10:946 - ~ 02:26:186 - same as Hard

Extra all no.

that's all
good luck

-APXH wrote:

[Extra]
A lot of symmetry. I kinda got annoyed playing this (Ok, TRIED playing this)
00:53:666 (5,6) - I'm not sure about the shape of these two i like this.

[Insane]
This is the only difficulty with slowdowns in the Kiai. Just saying
00:09:926 and 00:09:986 - Remove these timing points two. They're not in use. done.
00:13:766 and 00:13:886 - ^ done.
00:17:606 and 00:17:666 - 00:17:666 done.
00:54:146 (1,2,1,2) - Most of the time, I usually try avoiding using more than 2 repeats back sliders for insane difficulties, but that's just me. fine imo.
01:01:826 (1,2,1,2) - ^ ^
01:24:386 - Remove timing point done.

True be told, my computer lagged when I was modding these two ~

[Hard]
Is this really a hard difficulty, or an I just still stuck in 2013?
00:16:706 (3) - No, why a red point? Just curve regularly. I'd accept it if it was along side other slider with red dots but... ok.
00:18:626 (5) - ^ ok.
00:19:106 (7) - Try making this curve more so that it blankets 4 better fine for me.

[Normal]
00:19:106 (5) - Is this slider a bit short? lol, thanks.

[Easy]
00:33:026 (4) - Curve this more so that it can blanket 3 other style changed.

It's a good map, but the song kinda drives me nuts...
Um... If you can to ask for a mod, could you try to remember I don't like THESE kinds of songs? Thanks
Thank you for listening~ Ganbatte ya~

[-MrSergio-] wrote:

Here I am (a bit late xD)
Mod request from in game

[EXTRA]

00:17:426 (5,4) - Aren't stacked properly ok
00:28:466 (3,5) - Same ^ ok
00:53:306 (2,1) - Same ^ ok
00:57:026 (1,2) - Ctrl+G ? no
01:00:626 (6) - Ctrl+G ? no
01:03:146 (3,5) - Stack properly ok

02:05:906 (5) - Blanket could be improved: move the last anchor point to 406:89 ok
02:10:826 (1) - Stack this note properly ok

[INSANE]

00:08:786 (4) - Blanket could be improved: move the first anchor point to 345:308 other fixed.
00:17:186 (3) - Stack this properly
00:54:626 (2,2) - Stack them properly
00:59:186 (2,3,4,5,6) - (4) in (5)'s place; (5) on (2)'s end; (6) on the next combo's slider's start (I mean where (3) was) (Basically it's triangle, if I was too confusing xD no problem imo :p
01:49:706 (3,3) - Stack them properly
01:50:906 (2,4) - Same ^
01:50:786 (1,5) - Same ^
01:51:746 (1,2,3,4,5) - Maybe another triangle? Same as 00:59:186 (2,3,4,5,6) (clockwise or not, it's upon to you) keep.
01:54:026 (4,6) - Stack them properly
NOTE: if you haven't a SB disable Widescreen Support, you don't need it :3 done

[HARD]

00:15:266 (4) - Maybe Q ? From here you change DS...so...this is fine!
00:33:026 (1) - Stack this note properly ok

02:24:506 (1) - Same ^ ok

[NORMAL]

01:46:946 (7,1) - Stack them properly ok

01:47:666 (9,2) - Same ^ ok
01:59:426 (1) - Maybe put it in the previous combo? keep?

[EASY]

01:32:546 (1,3) - I know on Easy and Normal diffs there is a lot of spacing, but these two notes are 0.01 apart xD ok
01:53:666 (5) - Blanket could be improved: move first anchor point to 364:117 sorry, spacing nochanged,

That's pretty much all I had to say.
I hope I was useful
Good Luck with this

xLoupGarou wrote:

Sorry . . I can't mod this . like your a very experienced mapper and i'm just a ordinary modder XD
Have my Star . .

jesus1412 wrote:

00:11:426 (4) - I think this slider is really ugly but it's fine to play.　XD
00:49:346 (1) - I think this should be moved right (near the slider start). At the moment it makes the pattern kinda awkward. oh, i need more opinion for people!
01:00:866 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe make these jumps wider (would be less awkward and everyone loves jumps!) um, i love jump too! but, this is fine play!
01:08:546 (1,2,3,4) - Awkward jumps (I personally hate patterns like this ever since atama no taisou did it). i agreed, but, how to fix, i'll consider this!
01:35:426 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think this part of the stream shouldn't curve downwards as much, it's not in the direction that my cursor wants to go right now. oh, i'll consider.

1. AR -1
2. 00:29:306 (1) - I think, spinner begins too fast. Move it to 00:29:426 -
3. 00:37:106 (1) - ^
4. 00:32:546 (3,4) - It looks not so nice, maybe blanket can improve it?
5. 00:51:266 (2,4) - Beginners can missunderstand this moment and press (4) instead of (3). Maybe ignore the symmetry and make smth more clear like this? :
   
   
6. 00:54:146 (1,2,3,4) - Blankets?
7. 00:57:986 (1,2) - ^
8. 01:28:226 (4,1) - ^
9. 01:44:066 (1,2) - ^
10. 01:53:186 (4,5,6) - ^
11. 00:51:266 (2,3,1) - ^
12. 01:30:626 (4,5,1) - Make a perfect triangle

1. 00:22:466 (3,4,1) - Make a perfect triangle
2. 01:27:746 (3,4,1) - ^
3. 01:42:866 (3,4,5,2) - ^
4. 01:53:186 (4,1,2) - ^
5. 00:53:666 (5,1) - Blanket plz
6. 01:40:466 (2,3) - ^

1. HP and OD +1
2. 00:04:226 (1) - End it here? 00:07:106 -
3. 00:12:626 (3,4) - Blanket pls
4. 01:07:226 (7,1) - ^
5. 01:03:746 (5) - NC
6. 01:33:026 (2,3,4) - Perfect triangle pls
7. 01:59:906 (2,3,4) - ^

AlexaBM wrote:

hi~ from queue
[Easy]

1. AR -1 why... this is high bpm. ar2=really slow.
2. 00:29:306 (1) - I think, spinner begins too fast. Move it to 00:29:426 - 1/2. no problem imo.
3. 00:37:106 (1) - ^
4. 00:32:546 (3,4) - It looks not so nice, maybe blanket can improve it?
5. 00:51:266 (2,4) - Beginners can missunderstand this moment and press (4) instead of (3). Maybe ignore the symmetry and make smth more clear like this? : no
   
   
6. 00:54:146 (1,2,3,4) - Blankets?
7. 00:57:986 (1,2) - ^
8. 01:28:226 (4,1) - ^
9. 01:44:066 (1,2) - ^
10. 01:53:186 (4,5,6) - ^
11. 00:51:266 (2,3,1) - ^
12. 01:30:626 (4,5,1) - Make a perfect triangle fixed.

[Normal]

1. 00:22:466 (3,4,1) - Make a perfect triangle fixed.
2. 01:27:746 (3,4,1) - ^ done.
3. 01:42:866 (3,4,5,2) - ^ done.
4. 01:53:186 (4,1,2) - ^ done
5. 00:53:666 (5,1) - Blanket plz
6. 01:40:466 (2,3) - ^

[Hard]

1. HP and OD +1 sorry. no.
2. 00:04:226 (1) - End it here? 00:07:106 - keep for now.
3. 00:12:626 (3,4) - Blanket pls
4. 01:07:226 (7,1) - ^ done.
5. 01:03:746 (5) - NC i forgot, fixed.
6. 01:33:026 (2,3,4) - Perfect triangle pls done.
7. 01:59:906 (2,3,4) - ^ done.

other diffs are too hardcore for me, sorry D: good luck!

• 
  fine

1. 00:33:026 (4) - 1-2-3で右回りの流れが出来てるので4を反転させたほうが流れを切らずに済むと思います。
2. 00:35:426 (1,2) - 上記の修正をした場合、1と2の位置を逆にしたほうがいいかな。
3. 02:22:466 (1,2) - 02:18:626 (1) - のように折り返してみてはどうでしょう。

1. 00:15:506 (3) - ここの始点(00:15:506 - )に単発をひとつおいて、末端(00:15:746 - )1/1スライダーを置く とか
   
   SPOILER

   
   恐らく00:22:466 (3,4) - と同じパターンで組んでると思うんですが、後半部分はKIAIへの導入部分として速いテンポで強調させたいので？前半部分を弱め、こういう配置もどうかなーって提案してみました。上手く説明できなくてすみません・・・
2. 01:47:906 (1) - ここまで1/1のリズムできていたのに、このスライダーで流れを切ってるように思えます…1/1スライダー2つに変えてみるとかどうでしょう？
3. 01:54:146 (2) - ^
4. 02:04:226 (3,1) - ^ ここは最後のKIAIなので1/1スライダーを多用してもいいんじゃないかって思います。

1. 全体的に難しい…
2. 00:21:986 (3,4) - 順序入れ替えても良いかもしれません。スライダーの形と2の配置から中央に向かって巻き込む流れができているので。
3. 00:53:186 (4,5,6,7) - 4-5,6-7を離すか5-6を近づけるかしてスペーシングを一定にしたほうが視認しやすいかな。
4. 01:34:466 (1,2,3,4) - こういう配置はどうでしょう。
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 02:12:386 (4) - (02:14:306 (4,5) - )や (02:16:226 (4,5) - )と同じリズムの取り方にしてみてもいいと思います。

1. これをExtraって言って出しても遜色無い気がします。
2. 00:07:826 (1,2) - 順序入れ替え？うーん・・・
3. 00:13:346 (4,5) - 配置の提案です。
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:21:506 (1) - 完全に見栄えの問題ですが。このスライダーを1,2マス右に移動して、(00:21:266 (5) - )の末端と(00:21:866 (2) - )との距離を一定にしてみてはどうでしょう。(00:21:266 (5) - )のスライダーの流れのまま(00:21:506 (1) - )のスライダーに流れる、という目的でも右に移動させるのは有効なんじゃないかと思います…自分の好みが入ってるのでそちらの判断にお任せします。
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:24:866 - ここ叩かせてもいいと思うなぁ・・・
6. 01:31:586 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ここも1/3スライダーにしてしまったらどうですか。他の区間は1/3スライダーが配置されてますしEXTRAとの区別にもなります。
7. 01:53:666 (1,2,3,4) - スペーシング狭めてもいいかな
8. 02:15:266 (2,3,4,5) - ^

1. 00:09:746 (5,1) - 5の末端と1の始端を1,2マス開けてみても良いかも。他のところは開いてるし見栄えも視認もよくなると思います。
2. 00:27:266 (1,2) - 順序入れ替え (00:26:306 (1,2,1,2) - )の流れをそのままに、(00:27:746 (3) - )に繋げられるので入れ替えをお勧めします。
3. 00:30:986 - add note? INSANEにはここにノーツが入っています。

sionKotori wrote:

Hey fucker. what do you say
To all the stupid shit you do
Hey fucker, what do you say
to all the shit we do for you~♪

[General]

• 
  fine

[EASY]

1. 00:33:026 (4) - 1-2-3で右回りの流れが出来てるので4を反転させたほうが流れを切らずに済むと思います。
2. 00:35:426 (1,2) - 上記の修正をした場合、1と2の位置を逆にしたほうがいいかな。 両方修正
3. 02:22:466 (1,2) - 02:18:626 (1) - のように折り返してみてはどうでしょう。　色んなパターンあったほうが面白いかな（直すの面倒なだけ）

[NORMAL]

1. 00:15:506 (3) - ここの始点(00:15:506 - )に単発をひとつおいて、末端(00:15:746 - )1/1スライダーを置く とか　確かにその音取りは良いと思うんですがこれは個人的に趣味なので変えるつもりはイマのところありません。
   
   SPOILER

   
   恐らく00:22:466 (3,4) - と同じパターンで組んでると思うんですが、後半部分はKIAIへの導入部分として速いテンポで強調させたいので？前半部分を弱め、こういう配置もどうかなーって提案してみました。上手く説明できなくてすみません・・・
2. 01:47:906 (1) - ここまで1/1のリズムできていたのに、このスライダーで流れを切ってるように思えます…1/1スライダー2つに変えてみるとかどうでしょう？　音の変化であえてこうしています。
3. 01:54:146 (2) - ^　上記とはまた理由が変わってくるんだけど、このままでいきます
4. 02:04:226 (3,1) - ^ ここは最後のKIAIなので1/1スライダーを多用してもいいんじゃないかって思います。　ボーカル取った音取りとしているのでとりあえずこのままで。ほかのmodderさんからも言われたら考えます。

[HARD]

1. 全体的に難しい… bpm・SV的にもそうかもしれません。しかし1/2の音を使う配置となるとこうなりざる負えませんでした。7odoaさんの250bpmのhardはもっと難しいんで大丈夫でしょう（適当）
2. 00:21:986 (3,4) - 順序入れ替えても良いかもしれません。スライダーの形と2の配置から中央に向かって巻き込む流れができているので。
3. 00:53:186 (4,5,6,7) - 4-5,6-7を離すか5-6を近づけるかしてスペーシングを一定にしたほうが視認しやすいかな。 NCの調整でとりあえず様子を見ます。
4. 01:34:466 (1,2,3,4) - こういう配置はどうでしょう。修正しました。
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 02:12:386 (4) - (02:14:306 (4,5) - )や (02:16:226 (4,5) - )と同じリズムの取り方にしてみてもいいと思います。　確かにそうですね、修正しました。

[INSANE]

1. これをExtraって言って出しても遜色無い気がします。 このmapset上は問題ないかと思います。star rateのバランスもhardに関しても一応問題ないと僕の意見ですが思っています。
2. 00:07:826 (1,2) - 順序入れ替え？うーん・・・修正しました、正しくは元に戻しました。ただこの配置あんまり好きじゃないんで機会あれば単発ごと変えるかもしれません。
3. 00:13:346 (4,5) - 配置の提案です。とりあえず保留で。
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:21:506 (1) - 完全に見栄えの問題ですが。このスライダーを1,2マス右に移動して、(00:21:266 (5) - )の末端と(00:21:866 (2) - )との距離を一定にしてみてはどうでしょう。(00:21:266 (5) - )のスライダーの流れのまま(00:21:506 (1) - )のスライダーに流れる、という目的でも右に移動させるのは有効なんじゃないかと思います…自分の好みが入ってるのでそちらの判断にお任せします。　修正しました。
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:24:866 - ここ叩かせてもいいと思うなぁ・・・スピナーの音取りにした以上、２つ目と３つ目のスピナーの長さ統一したいがために、此処を犠牲にしました。
   
6. 01:31:586 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ここも1/3スライダーにしてしまったらどうですか。他の区間は1/3スライダーが配置されてますしEXTRAとの区別にもなります。
7. 01:53:666 (1,2,3,4) - スペーシング狭めてもいいかな　おｋです。
8. 02:15:266 (2,3,4,5) - ^　一応最後のパートでそんな叩きづらくもないのが個人的な意見なので保留。
   
   とりあえずstar rate0.6くらい下がりました　v^ｰﾟ)v

[HEY FUCKER]

1. 00:09:746 (5,1) - 5の末端と1の始端を1,2マス開けてみても良いかも。他のところは開いてるし見栄えも視認もよくなると思います。 修正しました。
2. 00:27:266 (1,2) - 順序入れ替え (00:26:306 (1,2,1,2) - )の流れをそのままに、(00:27:746 (3) - )に繋げられるので入れ替えをお勧めします。すいませんkeepで。
3. 00:30:986 - add note? INSANEにはここにノーツが入っています。やり易いが為にあえて消してたんですが、良い所に追加できそうなのであれば検討していきます。
   

遅くなってごめんなさい！
いい譜面でした。rank待ってます！

fergas wrote:

All my mod contains from my personal view on flow. I see that we understand this word in diffrent ways. Feel free to ingore everything.

• 
  IZI

1. 00:11:426 (4,1) - gives strange feeling. That transition need a little curve. After previous patterns cursor atomaticly want to move more lefter. Hard to explain ;zzz Look: 00:08:066 (1,2,3) - that transition contains curve lane on (3) so need to move cursur directly object to object. With (4)-(1) there is no any curves and slider move onto left side. On the first look it would be nice to move cursor lefter but in fact (3)-(4)-(1) placed on one lane. Plus that transition is uniq during the map. I suggest you to move object a little:
   1)pink(1) (240;316)or (244;316) with etc copypast rotations and stacks purple(1) with saving all dc.
   2)just redraw purple(1) moving a bit left and saving all ds
   3)pink(1) (272;316) rotations etc... but this time move purple (1) (240;316)(symmetric place with pink(1)) saving all dc.
   Imho, first one is good choice for your map. idk, i can fixed, i can't read ling english.
2. 00:23:426 (1) - blanket nazi fine for me.
3. 00:25:346 (3,4) - personal suggestion: think that (1)-(2)-(3) isnt curve enough. Try to move (3) (336;92) (500;232) done.
4. 00:27:266 (1,2) - guees need to move them a bit down. Again i think transition (4)-(1) isnt curve enough. move to (332;356) or (360;360) if accepted past mod and decide waht looks better for you. ok
   
5. 00:33:026 (4) - Try to move to (256;232) and rotate in range from -5 to -11. I guess trianlge pattern (2,3,4) suit worse than compressed square (1,2,3,4). changed 10.
6. 00:35:426 (1) - absolutely my opinion without any explanations. Guess that rhythm suits better sorry. no.
   
7. 00:54:146 (1,3) - blanket nazi. Or did you palce them in this way on purpose? Maybe try to move (1) higer and (3) downer to emphize that this is not a blanket? bit changed.
8. 01:02:786 (3) - try to move (200;96)(save dc for next object etc...) for square (4,1,2,3) also it will give more symmetrycal posion for (3) - 2nd dot will be close to Oy. OR just move (3)
   a bit righter all combo 01:02:786 (3,4,5,6,1) - (3) and spacing changed.
9. 01:07:586 (3,4) - nazi nazi changed,
10. 01:09:986 (2) - light unstack with 01:07:106 (2) - not have relation lol
11. 01:26:306 (2,3,4) -tru (2,4) on (256;216) and (3) on (376;180 just looks more symmetrical keep for now.
12. 01:45:026 (2) - i see little unstack with 01:43:586 (4) - . Try ctrl+g 01:44:066 (1,2) - stack them and ctrl+g back keep
13. 01:53:666 (5) - nazi nazi ummm
14. 02:14:786 (1) - nazi ommm

• 
  NORMAL
  In general maybe try to lower stack leniency? to 5 for exp. Imho patterns like 01:01:826 (1,2) - looks not good with high parametters. Guess better to draw it in your own way such things. done.

1. 00:08:786 (4,5,6) - try third dot on (6) on (252;40). After all thsi combo on (28;216). keep.
2. 00:34:466 (6) - bbblanket sorry, i can't fix.
3. 00:52:706 (3) - bakanket i tried third dot left 1 moved.
4. 00:57:026 (4) - dont see any reason to use here a red dot. Maybe typical parallel pattern? If this dot for summetric pattern than try to move 00:57:746 (6) - to (180;132) i remove red point.
5. 01:01:346 (5,2) - mb stack them ?
6. 01:09:266 (5,1) - try to move to (392;332) keep.

• 
  HARD

1. 00:21:986 (3) - try to (244;148) just line looks better in htis case. done.
2. 01:33:026 (2) - guees (440;192) whoud be better to avoid overlap x:436 y:is fixed.
3. 01:41:666 (5) - also for same reason(188;120). Here you want to emphize this close placement i decied to write this numbers but in fffact i would move them more down. done.
   
   

• 
  INSANE

1. 00:21:266 (5) - it looks like flow after this note go over (1), imho. Try to move 3rd dot to (212 or 216;160) done.
2. 00:27:026 (4) - check it on (320; 256). It gives better path to (1) broken symmetry. also, no problem imo.
   
3. 00:57:026 (1,2,3) - (104;144). Guess it looks a bit better and also give a bit easier transition (5)-(1). sorry, no.
4. 01:05:666 (1,2,3) - i hate such flows: straight path os circles and after straight slider which change direction only for (-45)-(45) just they looks terrialbe and hard to play. Jus try to copypast 01:05:426 (5) - (but in this casue u would need to change future placements) or copypast 01:06:146 (4) - with 120 rotation. I like straight.
5. 01:11:426 (1) - how the f**k i am passing 1/3 stream so easy? This streams is only one reason why i can pass thsi diff. noob 1/4 more fast and hard
6. 01:34:466 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,1,2) - JUST try out place all this combo on (464;172). It gives better transition between purple (2) and start of stack. picture here(i drawed stack as it actually looks in game): i know. but, i like it.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:42:386 (2) - try out this shape. Idea to make this slider more pararrel to 01:41:666 (3) - bit changed.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 02:14:426 (4) - babanket nazi i can't how to fix sorry.

• 
  EXTRA

1. 00:26:306 (1,1) - ask bats. It may overlap hp bar. I mean if user got huge hp bar itgonna looks strange. not unranked. no change.
2. 00:57:026 (1,2) - ctrl+g every separate. Atm transition 00:56:786 (5,6,1) - looks uncomfortable. i don't understand your mean.
3. 00:57:986 (1) - move a bit right to avoid little overlap and make right triangle ?
4. 00:58:466 (3) - same about hp bar. etc mb same momnet i will write nothing
5. 01:07:586 (1) -
6. 01:40:706 (3) - all no suggest.
7. 01:42:506 (2) - move to (452;44) - better blanket and better transition with next slider. And 01:43:946 (4) - symmetry pettern broken. sorry. no.
8. 01:48:386 (3) -
   I am not pro in question of hp bar overlap but some slider overlap even with standart one. Need to be care. no problem.

Well. I am not fun of symmetrciv patterns and high bpm songs. Feel sorry for this useless mod. Good luck!

[ Joey ] wrote:

Hello, sorry for the delay

Extra
00:08:066 (1) - Kind of any ugly slider. Maybe make it blanket the previous slider better what...
00:10:466 (2) - You should make this slider curve the other way no : http://puu.sh/aoLDD/de20c78224.jpg
00:27:746 (3) - Give more curve for better blanket done.
00:31:826 (2) - ctrl + g? no
01:40:226 (1,2,3) - Try to make the perfectly symmetrical if you teach axis, i fix this.
Couldn't find anything else. This diff is a little above my skill level =/ I failed at the end

Insane
00:07:586 (1,2,1,2) - I think this should all be one combo fine
00:20:666 (2) - NC should be here fine.

00:48:386 (1,2) - If these were angled this way: http://puu.sh/aoMk9/5aa57531e8.jpg it would have slightly better flow umm, keep now.
01:04:466 (6,1) - Blanket? yes
01:05:906 (3,4) - Can improve this long range blanket idk fix.
01:18:626 (3) - Can you position it more like this? no
http://puu.sh/aoMte/8cbee38ac5.jpg
01:30:626 - Can you make this stream wrap around the slider like this? good suggest, but, i concidet this.

http://puu.sh/aoMBH/b50d560afd.jpg

Hard
00:11:426 (4,2) - I don't really like how these overlap i like it ^^
00:15:266 (4,5,1) - Maintain distance here bit jump. sound is strong.
00:35:906 (5) - NC? broken NC pettern.
01:11:426 (1) - I highly suggest splitting this up into multiple reversing sliders sorry, i like this pettern.
01:15:266 (1,2) - ^
01:26:786 (1) - ^
01:30:626 (1,2) - ^
01:49:826 (6) - NC? good.
02:02:906 - Spinner should end here fixed

Good luck with this map!
I really enjoy playing the Extra and the Insane!

handsome wrote:

good map, good luck!

[GENERAL]

new image: JPG [LQ] / JPG [HQ] / PNG

wow, cool BG!!really nice!

[HARD]

00:11:426 (4) - can be more creative ^^ ._.
00:15:266 (4,5) - put closer? this is jump.
00:19:106 (7) - same, can make cooler :p ._.
00:58:466 (3) - feel weird with no circle after this, got many parts, but its up to you yes, up to me!
01:54:146 (3,4,5,6) - zigzag? i like it!

[INSANE]
streams in middle, can be more spaced, its ok

00:38:786 (1) - put in middle? i want keep ;w;
00:57:266 (2,3,4) - closer no problem!
01:03:746 (1,2,3,4) - this is so hard T_T, maybe make X playable this lol
01:09:506 (1) - start in middle? keep.
01:53:666 (1,2,3,4) - too hard, closer nope.

[XTRA]

00:28:586 (4) - this jump is too big no..
00:36:386 (1,2) - not perfectly mirror (small thing) fixed.
01:29:666 (1,2,3) - hmm, don't like o.o
02:21:746 (3,4) - rotate a bit? fine.

Sieg wrote:

HEY FUCKER

General:
clear
oh... my ears

Insane:
00:31:946 (3,4,5,6,7) - too much overlapping happens here, HD hell ,maybe try something like http://puu.sh/aqfU8/fba6e1ab75.jpg It's really like flow. keep >,<
00:48:626 (2,3,4,5) - too tricky for insane, especially with 00:48:626 (2,3) - such broken flow this is consider.
01:43:586 (3,4) - that jump is too mad and not consistent with others, consider to reduce seems yes. but, really easily play.
01:44:066 (1,2) - blanket? i can't really fix this, but, bit moved.

Hard:
00:15:746 (1) - ctrl+g and 00:16:226 (2) - this one two, seems like flow is better http://puu.sh/aqge5/d5b6b12909.jpg done.
00:35:066 (2) - consider to remove, it's hard to play (on hard level) and will be more consistent to your rhythm this is great suggest. done.
00:48:266 (7) - ^ same, you don't have circle in similar spots on 00:47:306 () and 00:49:226 () i keep for now this. i made pettern.

Easy:
some claps in the end would be nice you are right, done.

Sorry, mod is pretty fast cus quality is already good and I can't stand any longer.
tt

Good Luck!

-Yuzuriha-inori- wrote:

INSANE

00:52:706 単発は緑４までにして、５からはスライダーにしたほうがいいかも 結構好きなんでkeepで。
00:50:786や00:48:386と同じように

01:45:386　X=183,Y=190 がいいと思います　ここは飛ばす予定ないのでkeepで。

01:57:866　微妙です・・・　音取りしっかり取れてますし、ここ指摘されたのも初めてなのでどう直すか検討も付きませんでした。

HARD

00:27:026　リズムを　↓　こうしたほうがいいと思います　修正しました。

　　　　　　　　　http://www.fastpic.jp/images.php?file=5865293814.jpg

00:46:466　リズムを　↓　こうしたほうがいいと思います

　　　　　　　　　http://www.fastpic.jp/images.php?file=4986307922.jpg　リズムを統一してるんでこのままでいきます。

NOMAL

特に無し


軽いmodですが参考になれば幸いです

ではﾉｼ

1. As an alternative to ALL the stacking issues I mentioned in the mod, I suggest changing combo colour 2 to a brighter one. I think this one should do:
   
   RGB: 105,28,249
   
   
   If you do this, ignore the stacking suggestions of that combo colour.
   ANYWAY, I STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU TO APPLY THIS

1. 00:33:026 (4) - I feel like this could be smoother. Try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   256,224,33026,2,0,B|164:152|164:152|160:76|224:44,2,248,0|0|4,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:54:146 (1,2,3,4) - Picky as f*ck but you could make better use of this pattern by making a better blanket:
   
   SPOILER

   
   (If you have trouble doing this, poke me for tips)
3. 01:01:826 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, I'm being picky because the difficulty itself doesn't have any big issues; so, you could take the chance and make these perfectly symmetrical!

1. 00:26:546 (3) - I'm a little concerned with this being stacked under a sliderend. The thing is, the approach circle is hard to see (in my opinion) due to how it blends with the background, and since you add a stack, it becomes even more difficult (for a normal, I suppose). Can you please unstack this?
2. 00:47:426 (3) - Again, I feel like these kind of sliders, you could make smoother. Just an opinion though, I'm very perfectionist with slidershapes heh.

1. AR8 seems a little excessive, would you please try AR7.5 ? (You can get decimal values by holding shift while adjusting the settings)
2. 00:33:026 (1,2) - It might just be me, but I have trouble reading stacks of this combo colour in particular, due to some sections in the background. Mind unstacking these?
3. 01:53:426 (9,10,1) - This seems a bit clustered. I suggest opening this up a bit so it flows better. Here's my approach:
   
   SPOILER

   

1. AR9 seems a little excessive, would you please try AR8.5 ? (You can get decimal values by holding shift while adjusting the settings)
2. 00:36:386 (1) - I would remove this new combo, it isn't really needed.
3. 00:32:066 (4,5,6,7) - (5) and (7) are extremely hard to read. I do not recommend stacking under sliderstarts. Try unstacking these please.
4. 00:38:786 (1) - I don't think the new combo is needed here. Also, maybe you could unstack this, it does feel weird in my opinion.
5. 01:10:466 (1) - In [EXTRA], you didn't have a new combo in here. I think you should remove this one for consistency.
6. 01:14:306 (1) - (^)
7. 01:18:146 (1) - (^)
8. 01:25:826 (1) - (^)
9. 01:29:666 (1) - (^)
10. 01:33:506 (1) - (^)
11. 02:06:626 (1) - Remove this new combo, it's not really worth adding for these two sliders.
12. 02:17:666 (1) - Right after this section, you used a lot of new combos for the slider jumps. Are those really needed? I think it's readable even if you use a more consistent combo pattern. Mind at least trying to remove some new combos in this section?

1. 00:19:946 (2) - This spacing is way too confusing, I believe. Try spacing this out:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. Not really much to add since this is supposed to be very difficult, so I think it's fine. Watch the combo patterns, just in case!

Kitcaliber - HEY FUCKER

narakucrimson wrote:

Hey, m4m request here.

[General]

1. As an alternative to ALL the stacking issues I mentioned in the mod, I suggest changing combo colour 2 to a brighter one. I think this one should do:
   
   RGB: 105,28,249
   
   
   If you do this, ignore the stacking suggestions of that combo colour.
   ANYWAY, I STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU TO APPLY THIS
   done.

[EASY]

1. 00:33:026 (4) - I feel like this could be smoother. Try this: done.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   256,224,33026,2,0,B|164:152|164:152|160:76|224:44,2,248,0|0|4,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:54:146 (1,2,3,4) - Picky as f*ck but you could make better use of this pattern by making a better blanket: maybe done lol (talk irc)
   
   
   SPOILER

   
   (If you have trouble doing this, poke me for tips)
3. 01:01:826 (1,2,3,4,5) - Again, I'm being picky because the difficulty itself doesn't have any big issues; so, you could take the chance and make these perfectly symmetrical! done.

[NORMAL]

1. 00:26:546 (3) - I'm a little concerned with this being stacked under a sliderend. The thing is, the approach circle is hard to see (in my opinion) due to how it blends with the background, and since you add a stack, it becomes even more difficult (for a normal, I suppose). Can you please unstack this? done.
2. 00:47:426 (3) - Again, I feel like these kind of sliders, you could make smoother. Just an opinion though, I'm very perfectionist with slidershapes heh. done.

[HARD]

1. AR8 seems a little excessive, would you please try AR7.5 ? (You can get decimal values by holding shift while adjusting the settings) this is BPM250 and harder diff. i want keep setting.
2. 00:33:026 (1,2) - It might just be me, but I have trouble reading stacks of this combo colour in particular, due to some sections in the background. Mind unstacking these? done.
3. 01:53:426 (9,10,1) - This seems a bit clustered. I suggest opening this up a bit so it flows better. Here's my approach: i'll consider this.
   
   SPOILER

   

[INSANE]

1. AR9 seems a little excessive, would you please try AR8.5 ? (You can get decimal values by holding shift while adjusting the settings) same.
2. 00:36:386 (1) - I would remove this new combo, it isn't really needed. done.
3. 00:32:066 (4,5,6,7) - (5) and (7) are extremely hard to read. I do not recommend stacking under sliderstarts. Try unstacking these please. sorry, i want keep. maybe bit confuse. but, i like this flow.
4. 00:38:786 (1) - I don't think the new combo is needed here. Also, maybe you could unstack this, it does feel weird in my opinion. done.
5. 01:10:466 (1) - In [EXTRA], you didn't have a new combo in here. I think you should remove this one for consistency.
6. 01:14:306 (1) - (^)
7. 01:18:146 (1) - (^)
8. 01:25:826 (1) - (^)
9. 01:29:666 (1) - (^)
10. 01:33:506 (1) - (^) all done.
11. 02:06:626 (1) - Remove this new combo, it's not really worth adding for these two sliders. done.
12. 02:17:666 (1) - Right after this section, you used a lot of new combos for the slider jumps. Are those really needed? I think it's readable even if you use a more consistent combo pattern. Mind at least trying to remove some new combos in this section? this combo is keep now.

[EXTRA]

1. 00:19:946 (2) - This spacing is way too confusing, I believe. Try spacing this out: your suggest is good, but, my place is blanket and fine play imo! keep for now!
   
   SPOILER

   
2. Not really much to add since this is supposed to be very difficult, so I think it's fine. Watch the combo patterns, just in case! okay.

That's everything! Good luck!

Neil Watts wrote:

Here's my mod - I'll try my best !

Kitcaliber - HEY FUCKER

- Is the title authorized?

[Easy]
- 00:28:226 (2) - stop this slider here 00:28:706 - and make the spinner a little longer ?
- 00:53:186 (5,2) - align them ?
- 01:18:146 (2) - improve this blanket maybe done.

[Normal]
- 00:27:266 (1,2) - blanket here ?
- 00:29:186 (1) - remove this circle ? done.

[Hard]
- So high slider speed for a Hard diff !
- 01:51:746 - really hard part, maybe too hard for a "Hard" diff
- 02:06:866 (5,5) - align them ?
- 02:07:586 (4,8) - same
- 02:23:906 (5) - move this circle ? to avoid superposition

[Insane]
- 00:07:586 (1,2,1,2) - mb improve this ?
- 01:23:006 (1,1) - seriously ?
- 01:30:626 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - try to change the pattern, begin by the small slider then the stream

[Extra]
I'll try anyway to mod this diff because my mod is poor.
- 00:11:906 (1,4) - try to align their start
- 00:28:466 (3,4) - reverse ?
- 00:35:666 (6,3) - align here
- 00:35:186 (3,2) - ^
- 00:46:466 (1,5) - ^
- 00:48:386 (1,2) - make them symetrical ?
- 01:45:026 (1,2) - align

The mapping and soundmapping are interesting, even if I don't like the song. Good job!

(I think you'll have to stop searching mods. Find some defects at this time will be hard.)

kuroanchan wrote:

[Easy]
00:29:306 (1) - try this done

00:36:986 (1) - ^ done

[Normal]
02:01:346 (1) - try this fine for me.
02:08:906 (1) - ^ fine for me.

[Hard]
AR -1 keep

[Insane]
AR -1 keep

sry if i not help you enough, so here is a star for you (ﾉ´ヮ´)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧

Gaia wrote:

hey~ M4M

[General]
Not much of a problem i think but why do you have to capitalize everything in ur diffs? BECAUSE HEY FUCKER

[EASY]
00:33:026 (4) - the shape isn't very attractive naraku's suggested, already fine.
00:51:266 (2,3,4,5) - this diamond thing u have isn't very organized I agreed, but, how to fix.. xp
01:04:706 (6,1) - im not sure about the flow here fine for me.
01:11:426 (5,6,1) - blanket? this part won't blanket.
01:13:346 (1) - curve a bit more to flow better keep

01:29:666 (2,4) - line it up instead symmetry done.
01:53:666 (5) - Ctrl + G for flow sorry. keep.
02:00:866 (6) - move more to the right? nope.
Honestly, starting from 02:11:426 (1) - if you just listen to it it does not match the music at all :] This is easy diff. i do best sounding. fine for me.

[NORMAL]
SV kinda high this is normal diff and bpm250. SV9.5 is fine for me.
00:12:866 (3) - if u curve it other way it flows better keep.
00:18:626 (4) - whistle sounds off no
00:22:466 (3) - ^ no
00:26:786 (5) - curve other way better flow fixed.
00:28:946 (4) - (64,100) looks much better spacing bad.
01:19:106 (3) - breaks flow no
01:34:706 (3) - curve other way keep
01:35:426 (4,5) - for some reason it sounds much better to me if it was like this vv (there might be something wrong with offset but idk how to check sry :\) blue line really bad. please stop ugly suggest. this is already fine. i took drum sound.

SPOILER

01:54:146 (2) - flows better into next notes if curved i won't change.

[INSANE]
Holy crap the SV is way too high what
00:48:626 (2,3,4) - they should be parallel imo
srry i have no idea how the heck to mod this cuz jumps are massive and SV is so fast omg
I guess I'll mod this map more generally// you hope more good player.
01:08:306 (5,6,1) - this kinda pattern is reeeeally hard >: derp ez
01:46:946 (4,5) - cross map jump ehh.. idk this might be okay but still challenging not hard jump lol
02:08:066 (1) - this entire combo is a cross map jump l: this is great flow ^^
The tempo is high, and your jumps are huge :] 01:49:826 (1) - play ur music from here, close ur eyes and just listen There's barely a break for the player :S

So yeah I tried playing and er

attempt 1

yeah last second fail

attempt 2

sry for being noob, here's replay

K hope i helped and GL~

P o M u T a wrote:

Gaia wrote:

hey~ M4M

01:35:426 (4,5) - for some reason it sounds much better to me if it was like this vv (there might be something wrong with offset but idk how to check sry :\) blue line really bad. please stop ugly suggest. this is already fine. i took drum sound.

SPOILER

No I meant it sounds more natural if you put it that way. I know blue ticks are bad, so I'm thinking there's something wrong with the offset

[INSANE]
Holy crap the SV is way too high what

your slider velocity.. speed.. too fast