[Easy]
Spacing here surely does not good >< considering it's an Easy diff, it's supposed to go through the song with DS enabled, keeping safe spacing along the song. Maybe you want apply DS = 0.8 instead of 0.7, so many notes would be made readable without need violate correct spacing.

* Just a comment on SV. It's 1.4x and DS is 0.7. They would feel more compatible if, for example, DS around 0.8~1.0x and SV = 1.0, more recommendable to an Easy diff.

00:09:342 (3,4) - Move these two to y:292, for make spacing regular.

00:14:580 (2) - Move to x:176, same reason.

00:53:151 (4) - An anti-jump here >< compare spacing on (3,4) = 0.35x with spacing on (4,5) = 0.71x for the same time distance (2/1) = two white ticks. Compare the visual distance between notes in the screen with the same notes at timeline and see how they look inconsistent. It's not bad at all, but such patterns are more intended to be used at Hard/Insane/Extra diffs, since they agree with the song's rhythm feeling. The almost same goes on 00:55:056 (1,1,2) -

01:07:596 (1) - Unsnapped slider. It should be at 01:07:674 and end at 01:07:912.

Well, not much to say here (or too many...). The diff would be remapped with DS around 0.8~1.0x and SV around 1.0x.


[Normal]

* The same about spacing I said at Easy diff could be applied here, just by sticking to DS, since the current SV feels good here.

00:36:008 (4) - Spacing! Move to y:224 to fix it.

00:36:008 (1,2) - This kind of overlap (note (1) under slider (4) path) is not good. It's covering the note (1) what make this pattern unrankable. Try this, instead → http://puu.sh/5TWhK.jpg

00:41:723 (1) - This note is being covered by the slider (4) path. Would be good position this note in other place.

02:13:151 (1) - I miss the hole on this loop ><

[Hard]

SV would be 1.6x
OD would be raised by 1
CS would be 5, since CS 6 does not allow people play with HR, because CS 6 + HR mod = CS 7, what is way too small, like an one cent coin, while sliders become almost like crayon-drawn lines (on thickness).

00:48:866 (1,2,3) - Move 00:48:866 (1) - to x:432 and move 00:49:342 (2,3) - to x:336, so spacing irregularity will fixed -- even though it's not feels so bad as those at Easy (it's a good-to-see one). Perhaps you don't like move the (2,3), then in this case, 00:48:866 (1) - would be at x:384 for more intuitivity.

00:56:008 (3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - This pattern is very confuse, with the notes (4,5,6) covering the slider (2) at all >< Surely unrankable! → Would try this instead → http://puu.sh/5TXdf.jpg ← and even though it brokes a little the spacing on 00:57:913 (3,4), the whole pattern becomes more readable.

01:19:818 - This part of break starting here would be mapped.

01:28:747 - Add a note here, it's missing.

01:35:294 (2,1) - There's a jump of 2.10x here, not suggested by the song and so big :O would consider reducing it (at least), or sticking to DS.

01:46:723 (2,1) - ^ jump of 1.75x, also not suggested by the song.

02:23:270 (3) - This note feels not good to be here because it does not fit the main rhythm as would be 02:23:151 (2,4,5). Consider removing it