Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Ranked Beatmaps (Archived)
  4. Beatmap Graveyard

ORESAMA - Trip Trip Trip

posted
Total Posts
9
Underforest
5,895 posts
Joined July 2015
Topic Starter
Underforest
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on miércoles, 06 de septiembre de 2017 at 7:53:41 p.m.

Artist: ORESAMA
Title: Trip Trip Trip
Source: 魔法陣グルグル
Tags: mahoujin guru guru magical circle 2017 first opening tv size
BPM: 168
Filesize: 19456kb
Play Time: 01:26
Difficulties Available:
  1. Easy (1.52 stars, 103 notes)
  2. Hard (3.09 stars, 234 notes)
  3. Insane (3.95 stars, 301 notes)
  4. Magic (4.87 stars, 376 notes)
  5. Normal (2.1 stars, 169 notes)
Download: ORESAMA - Trip Trip Trip
Download: ORESAMA - Trip Trip Trip (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
mapping another kiddo anime op
hitsounds stolen from RepL4y

ready
Last edited by Underforest , edited 5 times in total.
FL37
445 posts
Joined April 2015
FL37
Hi!
M4M * But nobody moded back.

[ Easy]

00:11:927 - delete green line
00:21:749 (2) - It feels better when its on 00:21:570
00:48:892 (4) - I think you should move it to 00:49:070
00:49:606 (1,2,3) - ^ Try this
00:58:713 (2,3,4) - Hmm.. You could do somethings like this(It would lower the star ratio to 1.49)
00:59:517 - delete green line
01:24:606 (2) - same as 00:21:749 (2)

[ Normal]

I would change sv to 1.1 and object distance to 1.2
00:31:392 - maybe extend slider to this point?
01:12:284 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe like this(I know you wanted to make it similar to this 00:09:427 (1,2,3,4,5) - but it doesn't fit imo)

[ Hard]

00:29:606 (1,2,3,4,1) - Flow is kinda of right here
00:41:034 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^ same
00:58:356 (2,3,4,5) - Maybe move it a bit to the right

[ Insane]

Sorry I can't rly find anything wrong in this diff

[ Magic]

I would lower spacing a bit in non-kiai sections
00:17:999 (10,1,2,3,4,5) - I think u could lower the spacing in this pattern
00:20:142 (3,4) - space them a bit
00:20:856 (6,1) - ^
01:02:642 (2,3) - Lower spacing (1.1 - 1.2)
01:02:999 (3,4) - (2.5 - 2.6)
01:26:213 (2,3,4) - maybe change 2 and 3 to Slider


Good luck.
Last edited by FL37 , edited 2 times in total.
Underforest
5,895 posts
Joined July 2015
Topic Starter
Underforest

FlameLancer wrote:

Hi!
M4M (ofc if you accept it in your queue, If not then NM)

[ Easy]

00:11:927 - delete green line ok
00:21:749 (2) - It feels better when its on 00:21:570 ok
00:48:892 (4) - I think you should move it to 00:49:070 following vocals
00:49:606 (1,2,3) - ^ Try this hmm...
00:58:713 (2,3,4) - Hmm.. You could do somethings like this(It would lower the star ratio to 1.49) circles fits better in this part
00:59:517 - delete green line ok
01:24:606 (2) - same as 00:21:749 (2)

[ Normal]

I would change sv to 1.1 and object distance to 1.2 that's pretty intense for current spread
00:31:392 - maybe extend slider to this point? following the music
01:12:284 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe like this(I know you wanted to make it similar to this 00:09:427 (1,2,3,4,5) - but it doesn't fit imo) hmm...

[ Hard]

00:29:606 (1,2,3,4,1) - Flow is kinda of right here yes
00:41:034 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^ same
00:58:356 (2,3,4,5) - Maybe move it a bit to the right stacked for safety

[ Insane]

Sorry I can't rly find anything wrong in this diff

[ Magic]

I would lower spacing a bit in non-kiai sections
00:17:999 (10,1,2,3,4,5) - I think u could lower the spacing in this pattern ok
00:20:142 (3,4) - space them a bit ok
00:20:856 (6,1) - ^
01:02:642 (2,3) - Lower spacing (1.1 - 1.2) this would ruin the stack
01:02:999 (3,4) - (2.5 - 2.6) hmm...
01:26:213 (2,3,4) - maybe change 2 and 3 to Slider circles are better imo


Good luck.
ty
Sylas
Elite Mapper
1,023 posts
Joined January 2014
Sylas
hi m4m

extra
00:19:249 (5) - sound on the tail is stronger than head + it also has a vocal on it. would be better to replace this slider with two circles
00:20:856 (6) - i think this slider should be snapped to 1/6, if you listen closely 1/6 fits better than 1/8. anyway its pretty ambiguous which time signature it is so using either 1/6 or 1/8 is fine but i'd recommend using 1/6 for the sake of being consistent with 00:20:142 (3) which helps readability
00:21:570 (1,2) - you represented these with a jump but 00:22:999 (3,1) - these with a stack, itd be better to stay consistent since they are the exact same sounds
00:28:356 (2) - sound on tail is pretty strong, 2 circles would be better
00:34:963 (9) - nc for sv change also why is the slider snapped to 1/6? would be better to just end it on the blue tick. making the slider end 5% volume would also be a nice touch since right now its kinda loud and it doesn't represent any sound
00:50:320 (3) - feels awkward having such a strong sound on the tail even if ure mainly following vocals
01:04:784 (6) - why is the jump to this note so big when theres not really any strong sound to emphasize? goes against spacing emphasis
01:14:784 (6) - would be interesting if you extended this slider the next blue tick to emphasize the drop
01:21:570 (3) - move this slider slightly to the left so that 01:21:392 (2) - follows the slider's curve better, looks slightly better imo

insane
00:21:570 (2,3) - 00:22:999 (6,1) - like extra would be better if these were represented in the same way
00:27:463 (3) - strong sound is on slider tail
00:28:356 (2) - same as extra, 2 circles would be better
00:34:606 (1) - would be a nice touch to rotate (and flip upside down) this slider so that it points right, that way theres uncomfortable flow towards 00:34:963 (2) - which emphasizes the circle and its better imo since its a very different sound and making it stand out a little helps represent that
http://i.imgur.com/b0KGgHJ.jpg
00:36:034 (3) - awkwardly loud sound on tail
00:38:892 (4) - ^

hard
01:01:392 (1) - i think this slider should be on a lower sv than 01:02:284 (2) - since its sounds are so weak
01:05:320 (1) - in the insane u start the slider on 01:05:142 - and skip the downbeat but here you start the slider on the downbeat even tho theres not really any strong sound
01:08:177 (1) - ^

cant find anything in normal

easy
01:02:999 - feels off skipping this sound

rest seems fine
good luck!
Crissa
850 posts
Joined December 2014
Crissa
Yo o/ M4M
Magic
00:02:999 (3,5) - these two seems different, maybe just copy the 2nd one wich is more curvy

00:08:356 (2,3) - you could try to change these two, feels a bit boring having this 4 exact same sliders when vocals have some changes

00:10:677 (4) - i think 2 circles fits better, instrumental is over vocals here

00:16:034 (4,5,1) - intensity here is the same imo, should have equal spacing

00:22:999 (3,1) - maybe you should do the same as 00:21:570 (1,2) - here, they're the exact same sound

00:28:356 (2) - i know you was following the same last slider's sound, but the new sound coming here should be a bit more emphasized, try puting 2 circles instead

00:34:963 (9) - this sounds a lot better when you end it on 1/4, maybe you should lower tail's volume if you want to keep it

00:39:338 (6) - this is completely ghost, it helps to emphasize but you do this just here, i think you should remove it

01:19:070 (5,6,1) - same reasoning as above, (1) should have more spacing imo

01:24:428 (1,2) - same as above

Insane
00:17:820 (6) - try putting 2 circles instead, vocals have phrase is a bit more intense than last slider and helps to emphasize next section

00:30:499 (4) - tail has a tone change, i would replace with 2 circles

00:38:177 (1,2) - a slider should feel better here, no remarcable sound on red tick and sustained vocals/instrumental

00:45:142 (6,7,1,5,6,1) - i think this could be a bit too intense for some players? maybe replace 1st and 3rd stack with repeated kicks

01:06:749 (1,2) - you started strong with vocals, i think you should replace with a slider to get some more emphasis

01:07:999 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you could have a better rhythm here, 4 breaks a bit your consistency

01:16:927 (2) - 2 circles maybe?

Hard
00:02:284 (4,6) - there's no reason to make them different imo

00:09:249 (6) - try to erase it, i think you break last pattern's consistency too fast

00:09:963 (2,3) - two 1/2 sliders would fit better imo, following vocals

00:17:820 (5) - maybe 2 circles, makes the sound transition a bit more natural

00:36:570 (1) - you could make this blanket a bit better
00:44:427 (2) - ^

00:46:213 (4) - maybe a triple? it's the most intense of these, there's a little stop after it so there should be no problem

01:03:892 (1) - here you don't follow vocals, but starting from 01:08:713 (2) - here you start to, you could try to move some objects at the beginning to make it more consistent

Normal
00:24:606 (2) - i think clap should be here instead of (3)
00:27:463 (2,3) - ^
00:36:034 (2,3) -

01:06:749 (1) - rotate a bit to make it more smooth looking, also i think 1 and 2 should have diferent shapes

Easy
00:09:427 (1) - it should look better if you make it symmetric

00:24:606 (2) - blanket

00:48:892 (4) - maybe a 1/2? next red tick is pretty strong

00:53:177 (2,3,4,1) - try to make their blanket distance equal for all these

01:06:749 (1) - maybe make this a straight slider, blanket with last one doesn't look that good

Pretty solid set, good luck~
- titan
238 posts
Joined July 2016
- titan
hiii

m4m from your queue
Easy
00:31:749 (4) - move this up a bit for aesthetic stuff ?
how come at 00:41:034 (1,2,3,4) you use a slightly different rhythm than at 00:43:892 (1,2,3,4) ? imo if you used the first rhythm for both of the it would be a lot better.
00:46:749 (1,2,3) - make this a perfect triangle maybe ?
00:54:606 (4,1) - would look better if these were the same slider shape
01:05:856 (4,1) - i don't really like how close the second slider's body is to the first one. maybe you could make the second slider have a weaker curve so the first one would kinda wrap around it ?
01:26:391 (5) - up the hitsound volume just for this one note? it's too quiet imo

Normal
00:11:749 (5,1) - blanket is kinda bad honestly
00:26:749 (1,2) - ^ same here :/
00:55:320 (1,2,3) - this structure looks bad imo. you could make the second and third sliders curved and it would look better.
01:14:606 (6,1) - blanket
01:26:391 (5) - same thing with hitsound volume?

Hard
00:05:856 (6,7,8) - perfect triangle?
00:05:856 (6,8,1) - same thing here i guess
00:23:177 (1,1) - i don't really like this because it breaks flow and it's a bit confusing
00:24:427 (3,1) - nazi blanket
00:32:463 (1,2) - ^
why not move 01:02:642 (3) over and stack 01:01:392 (1,4) ?
01:03:892 (1,2) - bad blanket but idk if it even matters
01:15:141 (1,2) - same thing here (also, if you flipped (2) vertically it would look better imo)
01:17:998 (1,2,3,4) - make this a perfect square?
01:17:998 (1,1) - you could stack these with proper ds if this was a perfect square
01:22:463 (1,2) - blanket
01:26:213 (2) - volume thing? sounds fine to me on this diff (probably because of the 1/4 thing) but still :/

Insane
00:05:856 (6) - move this to the right for aestheticy stuff again
00:07:284 (3) - move this to the left also for aesthetics
00:16:570 (1) - why aren't the anchors more centered?
00:25:142 (1) - this is the same thing ^
00:47:284 (2,1) - nazi blanket
00:57:463 (5,6,7,8,9,1) - a bit hard for something that isn't even 4*
01:08:356 (2,4) - pretty sure this doesn't perfectly wrap around
01:26:392 (3) - hitsound thing (same thing i said for the hard diff applies here)

Magic
00:02:820 (2,5,1) - nazi blanket i guess
00:14:606 (4) - ctrl+g makes flow better (same with 00:15:142 (1) )
00:22:999 (3,1) - these being stacked makes the triangle kinda uncomfortable :/
00:53:534 (5,1) - blanket
01:26:392 (4) - hitsound thing + what i said on hard diff
slidertick 2?

nice map / good luck! my map
Nikakis
770 posts
Joined May 2014
Nikakis
nice song lul, gl
Underforest
5,895 posts
Joined July 2015
Topic Starter
Underforest
i fixed some things in the diffs, i'm lazy to post a reply but i'll probably do soon
edit: yes, gonna reply sometime today or tomorrow - mar/2/2018

thanks~
SilenceKakashi
SilenceKakashi
I just looked at the map, since I got nothing to do anyways :)
Sorry, I could only do a few suggestions for the easier diffs, since I couldn't really see anything wrong with the map.
Normal
00:03:534 (5) - I think it looks better if you move it a little down (on about x:77 y:65)
00:12:284 (1) - looks a bit better with mid ticket on x:106 y:323
00:26:749 (1) - maybe move start ticket to x:177 y:252
00:32:999 (2) - Suggest moving it on x:194 y:304, looks better this way (or so I think)
00:44:427 (2) - Same as 00:32:999 (2)
01:15:142 (1) - Same as 00:12:284 (1)
Easy
00:09:427 (1) - I think the slidershape is too complex for a player of that level to not be confused. It's also a bit uneven. Move second ticket to x:288 y:122 and fourth ticket to x:310 y:115. I think this way it looks better.
00:45:320 (2, 3) - I'd think there's 1 beat distance between them. Try changing something.
01:05:856 (4) - I think it looks better if mid ticket is set to x:72 y:274 and end ticket to x:32 y:195
Hope it was, even if just a bit, helpful
BanchoBot
w00t p00t
34,832 posts
Here since the beginning
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 9