Monstrata wrote:

Origin

00:28:450 (1) - For sliders like this, set it up like this: It makes the curve cleaner

Note the red anchor in the middle

00:50:278 (1) - This is good, but slightly off, since this part isn't completely straight:

~

01:05:012 (2,1) - You could make a triangle here with 2+ 1's head and tail. would look nicer. I did something, I hope that the iluminaty looks nice:

Basic

00:26:267 (1,2) - These just look off to me. They aren't centered, and yea xP.
01:18:655 (1,2) - This rhythm is too simple imo. You can make it more complex ;c
01:23:020 (1) - Same. End it at 01:24:385 - and use a 1/2 slider instead for 01:24:657 - ?
01:25:203 (3) - Same i think. You can end it on the red tick and map another slider on 01:26:295 - .

[]

Spread is okay I guess since it's just two diffs, But I think you can make Basic slightly more dense . It's a borderline Normal diff by Normal standards, cuz of your 1/2 treatment, but the second half of the map could be a bit more dense. I would avoid so many long sliders and 2/1 gaps, and I've pointed out some locations where I'd like to see those changes. Poke me if you change them.

Irreversible wrote:

Hi!

[Basic]

00:50:278 (3) - How about making this shape edgy, instead of curvy? I think this will fit the way the background sounds a lot. I cannot agree with you. In my point of view curve perfectly fits the sounds and also there aren't any edgy sliders in the map so I am not gonna change it.

Nothing else to say, well executed.

[Origin]

00:28:450 (1) - This slider has a little corner in the middle of the slider. You might want to fix this, so it is a bit cleaner. I hope it's better now
00:50:278 (1) - Same idea as in Basic, but it's completely up to you. The same answer as in Basic
01:12:106 (1) - Is there a specific reason why this sound deserved this kind of slider? It doesnt' sound that much more outstanding than the rest, does it? This slider fills up the whole tact, I used such sliders for the moments like this. Though there are only two such sliders which fill up the whole tact

Call me back!

Namki wrote:

поздравляю

Taboki wrote:

As this is a song from an official artist, isn't the source supposed to be osu! ?

ByBy wrote:

Taboki wrote:

As this is a song from an official artist, isn't the source supposed to be osu! ?

you mean the artist is one of the featured artists of osu?

Bakari wrote:

Been thinking of using osu! as source. I don't think it's necessary since the track hasn' been originally written for the game, nor is it exclusive for osu!

Shmiklak wrote:

This issue was discussed before in Sieg's H8 U map.

Bakari wrote:

Been thinking of using osu! as source. I don't think it's necessary since the track hasn' been originally written for the game, nor is it exclusive for osu!

So in this case osu! shouldn't be added as source. Also I've already replied for this on second page