small_hins wrote:

Hello there! from my queue.

I think the source should be "Deemo" only. I don't think it makes much of a difference.

[Easy]
OD=2
00:14:391 (1,3) - As far as I know, stacking is not allow in Easy. Fix it. Yeah, I thought so ._.
00:15:699 (3,1) - the objects are too close together, separate them.
00:39:249 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - In Easy, we're mainly focused on flow & blanket, not triangle patterns. Recommend fix it will sliders.
01:15:227 (3,4) - blanket improve
01:15:881 (4,1) - ^
01:33:543 (3,4) - stacking problem
01:34:197 (4,6) - too close each other, separate them.
01:36:814 (1,2) - ^ Doesn't look nearly as impressive as the scissors, but I made it work.
01:49:897 (5) - bad shape, fix it.

[Normal]
AR=5
00:09:158 (2,2) - too close together, separate them.
00:13:083 (3,4) - blanket improve
00:18:643 (3,4) - ^ (1/16 can help you)
00:24:040 (2,3,4) - maybe do this?

00:29:273 (2,4) - too close together
00:52:659 (2) - do a straight slider?
01:19:806 (5) - the slider's end should be 01:20:460 (6) , remove 01:20:460 (6) 's circle.
01:22:750 (5,6,7) - use slider instead of these. I don't know, I use it as a hint at how the Hard map will work.
01:25:366 (1,2,3) - ^
01:39:430 (1,2) - stack them are better? That seems to work.
01:42:047 (2,3) - ^

[Hard]
AR=6
00:12:592 (1,2,3,4) - sliders are better

I feel like 00:13:083 (7) - needs to be clicked, so I only changed the first 2 notes into a slider.
00:13:900 (1,2,3,4) - ^
00:40:558 (2) - NC
00:40:885 (1) - if you do ^ , remove NC Also removed the NC at 00:40:230 (4) - because it now seems pointless.
00:43:829 (4,1) - blanket improve
still need more improve. Yeah, it was the first beatmap to be made.

[Insane]
AR=8-8.5
00:33:198 (5,7) - too close together, separate them.
01:36:814 (1,1) - 1 spinner only
need more help for this.

sorry I can't mod >5* difficulty...

Anyway, this map need more help. I guess so...

gl with your map

Micro wrote:

NM~

Easy
All good in the hood

Normal
00:12:755 (2) - This is not aligned with the sliders, maybe move to y:304
00:17:989 (2) - This is in a slight tilt compared to the slider before it 00:17:007 (1) - try to align them That was barely noticeable to me. Fixed.
00:33:688 (2,4) - ^
They look a bit out of place in my opinion. Don't know maybe that's just how you like them in that case its fine.
The followpoints should help you allign them

Hard
00:33:198 - Try to fit a note here
Nothing much to say

Insane
00:17:825 (4,5,6) - This triple could be in a slight angle, not stacked completely
Nothing much to say here either

ANiMAte
00:45:136 - This spaced stream feels a bit janky and forced. Try making it smoother
(Something like you did with this one 00:50:042 (1) - ) Makes sense.
01:11:356 - Maybe start the stream from already here or move the start of the stream ( 01:11:629 (4) - ) closer to 01:11:465 (3) -
01:14:246 (4) - Same here, the stream starts in a crooked angle I just made the thing one huge stream.

Nice song and map

Nathan Kiss wrote:

hi remember me? Hmmm... can't say I do...

[Easy]

1. 00:05:560 (4) - I would turn this into a 1/1 reverse slider since there is a note at 00:05:887
2. 00:10:466 (5) - The blanket would look neater if you used 3 points instead of (4) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4521385 you can even get a perfect DS of 1 this way as well Wow, thanks! I didn't know I could pull that off!
3. 00:25:511 (3) - I think having the curve the other way would be better as the sound contrasts with 00:24:530 (2) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4521395 Interesting! I never thought of that!
4. 00:28:128 (3) - Same as above
5. 00:31:399 (1) - delete finish on tail, its excessive I still feel like I need to accent these notes, so I swapped it with a whistle instead.
6. 00:32:380 (2) - delete finishes on head and tail for the same reason as above ^
7. 00:34:669 (3) - What do you thinking about turning this into a slider to get rid of the pause? That pause does sound kinda awkward
8. for sliders like these 00:54:948 (1) 00:57:565 (1) 01:00:181 (1) it would be better to use 3 points instead of 4 as they look neater
9. 01:02:798 (1,2) - I would replace these with 2 1/1 sliders as it is the same sound as 01:02:144 (4) and it also doesnt skip the major beat at 01:03:125 (2)It's not exactly the way you put it, but I did change it. I do agree that 01:03:125 - shouldn't be skipped.
10. 01:09:994 (4) - move down a bit so the sliders (2) and (3) arent so close, it just looks more polished this way since its about the same distance apart as your other sliders https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4521431
11. 01:12:610 (4,5) - ctrl + g? 01:11:956 (3,4) - are the same sound afterall they should both be 1/1 sliders imo Sometimes I think weird.
12. 01:33:870 - map this beat?
13. 01:31:581 (1) - the hitsounds for this section seem weird to me, like you have 2 finishes on 01:35:505 (5,6) but you dont have 1 on more major sounds such as 01:32:235
14. 01:41:066 (4) - blanket could do with fixing
15. 01:51:205 (1) - a timing point at the end of the slider to reduce the sound would sound better imo, up to you tho http://puu.sh/n5Kz1/a66a4b2414.jpg

I hope this mod was useful in any way, gl

Namki wrote:

yo

[General]
You have unsnapped green points in each diff, fix that.
Mhm, combo colors doesn't match the BG, maybe try these or find by yourself for the better cc's.

combo colors

[Colours]

Combo1 : 63,72,248
Combo2 : 253,77,156
Combo3 : 254,159,44
Combo4 : 134,135,118
Combo5 : 105,6,215

These look a lot better. Thanks!

[Easy]
I don't really like your flow.00:17:007 (1,2,3,4,5) - isn't it better place object like that. And so on.
01:01:489 (2,3,4) - pattern inconsistency, delete slider and place two notes.
01:09:339 (3,4) - avoid this overlap.

[Normal]
Avoid overlaps if you map 1/1 in normal.
A lot of 1/1 singletap, maybe try to place more sliders.
01:36:814 (1) - unrankable spinner, make it shorter by one white tick. I shortened it another white tick so that it flows with the music better.
01:42:701 (4) - remove second repeat and place a circle at the big white tick. It can be sudden for newbies. The 1/3 spacing makes it pretty close, but okay...
01:47:280 (1) - what a 2007's slider, try this. That seems to work.

[Hard]
00:17:335 (2) - make 2 more repeats and place circle at the big white tick.
00:28:782 (1,2,3,4) - spacing inconsistency, make it 1.5x as you did before.
00:31:399 (1,2,3) - same here.
00:32:871 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,1) - a lot of singetaps, try to reduce they amount.
00:34:179 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - overlap doubles and triples are hard to read.
00:55:275 (2,3,4) - but I hear the 1/4 stream.
Mhm, make slider velocity ~1.4 and spacing 1.3x and map without the big amount of singletaps and 1/2 overlaps.
If I increase the SV from 0.8 to 1.4, I might as well remap, which I'm not willing to spend a few days doing. The SV has been increased to 1.0, but I don't know how much more I can do.
And don't do the 1/3 streams.
And please don't use insane 3x spacing in Hard. Yeah, that was me when I first started mapping ._.

good luck

AIBat v3.1 wrote:

[All .osu Files]

Combo Colours
Inconsistency in combo colours:

- [ANiMAte] :
Combo1 : 105,6,218
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Easy] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Hard] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Insane] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Normal] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

Kiai
Inconsistency in Kiai Times:

- [ANiMAte] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Easy] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:34:015
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Hard] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:05:415
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Insane] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Normal] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

[ANiMAte]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:20:937 - snap to 00:20:932
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114

Spinner Length
01:38:776 (1) - This spinner is 654 ms long, which is shorter than 750 ms; check that it gets at least 1000 on auto.

[Easy]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

[Hard]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping
01:21:441 (2) - Unsnapped slider (end).

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:10:796 - snap to 00:10:793
00:34:023 - snap to 00:34:015
01:09:352 - snap to 01:09:339
01:10:992 - snap to 01:10:975
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114

[Insane]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:11:777 - snap to 00:11:774
01:10:748 - snap to 01:10:811
01:15:899 - snap to 01:15:881
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114
01:26:368 - snap to 01:26:347
01:44:764 - snap to 01:44:827

[Normal]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:44:492 - snap to 00:44:482
01:10:315 - snap to 01:10:321
01:10:748 - snap to 01:10:730
01:15:899 - snap to 01:15:881
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114
01:45:520 - snap to 01:45:481

WazZzaA123 wrote:

Modding queue NM

First of all impressive mapping... Wow, thanks! It hasn't been easy getting this far...

[Easy]
01:15:227 (3,4) - Good blanket here but space them just a little, it maybe look confusing for newbies

[Normal]
01:36:814 (1) - I would end this slider here instead ? 01:38:776 Yeah, I thought it sounded better that way...
01:51:205 (1) - add finish and clap Might as well do these on all the others as well!

[Hard]
00:17:335 (2) - This can be confusing just a thought
01:21:441 (2) - Object's end is not snapped ---- AiMod Huh. No one ever caught that o_O
Should work on redesign this master piece Maybe, but I'd rather not remap.

[Insane]
Nice diff really like it Thanks!

[ANiMAte]
I suggest AR 9.5 or 9.7 it's easier to read streams like that when high levels play ( like me Kappa )
01:05:578 I suggest make a break here than ends 01:10:648 (1) - here because I feel That it's more appropriate since well... there's no break in the song even tho its a 1 min song but yee that's probably just me being crazy about that stuff Anyway it's up to you If you like what I just told you try it and also if you do DELETE kiai time I dunno, it kinda sounds empty without the notes. Maybe if it's suggested more.
TIME FOR SOME AIBAT v3.1

AIBat v3.1 wrote:

[All .osu Files]

Combo Colours
Inconsistency in combo colours:

- [ANiMAte] :
Combo1 : 105,6,218 Wow, I didn't realize that!
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Easy] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Hard] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Insane] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

- [Normal] :
Combo1 : 105,6,215
Combo2 : 63,72,248
Combo3 : 253,77,156
Combo4 : 254,159,44
Combo5 : 134,135,118

Kiai
Inconsistency in Kiai Times:

- [ANiMAte] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Easy] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:34:015
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Hard] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:05:415
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Insane] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

- [Normal] :
Kiai #1: Starts on 00:23:549, ends on 00:28:782
Kiai #2: Starts on 00:54:948, ends on 01:10:648
Kiai #3: Starts on 01:31:581, ends on 01:39:430
Kiai #4: Starts on 01:44:664, ends on 01:51:205

[ANiMAte]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:20:937 - snap to 00:20:932
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114

Spinner Length
01:38:776 (1) - This spinner is 654 ms long, which is shorter than 750 ms; check that it gets at least 1000 on auto. Just barely; the 1000 bonus comes up <100 ms before it ends!

[Easy]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

[Hard]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping
01:21:441 (2) - Unsnapped slider (end).

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:10:796 - snap to 00:10:793
00:34:023 - snap to 00:34:015
01:09:352 - snap to 01:09:339
01:10:992 - snap to 01:10:975
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114

[Insane]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:11:777 - snap to 00:11:774
01:10:748 - snap to 01:10:811
01:15:899 - snap to 01:15:881
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114
01:26:368 - snap to 01:26:347
01:44:764 - snap to 01:44:827

[Normal]

Audio Lead-In
There is only 1308 ms of audio lead-in, which is less than the minimum of 2000 ms.

Breaks
Consider adding a break before 01:31:308.

Snapping

Unsnapped inherited (green) sections at:
00:44:492 - snap to 00:44:482
01:10:315 - snap to 01:10:321
01:10:748 - snap to 01:10:730
01:15:899 - snap to 01:15:881
01:21:134 - snap to 01:21:114
01:45:520 - snap to 01:45:481

fattypikachu wrote:

Thanks for the mod, WazZzaA123!

freebird42 wrote:

Hi

Easy

00:57:565 (1) - and 01:00:181 (1) - why dont you just ctrl-c - ctrl -v this slider 00:54:948 (1) - and paste it instead of previous 2? that would be more accurate
01:31:254 - note?
01:36:487 - and here Made it into a slider.
01:49:897 (5) - how about making this slider reversal and starting spinner here 01:49:897 (5) -
That doesn't sound right to me, so I'll skip this one.


Normal

00:43:173 (2,3,4,5) - i think its a bit hard for normal, maybe just make 00:43:828 (4) - reversal?
00:48:734 (4) - if you rotate this ~165 degrees 00:48:080 (3,4) - will look more accurate http://puu.sh/nsCYa/bf6e2ad92b.jpg but it kinda ruins the flow, so if you dont wanna remap, just ignore this. I made something that works a little better... hope it helps
01:13:591 (2,3) - why dont you make here 01:10:975 (2) - this slider?
01:40:412 - how about 1/1 slider starting here instead of just note?

Hard

00:06:541 (4) - nc?
00:27:147 (3,4,5) - looks weird, how about just stack this under 00:27:147 (3) - end?
00:32:871 (4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this is just too much, you definitely should make it easier 00:34:179 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - this you can change to 2 reversal sliders + note, and here i suggest making 00:36:959 (3) - just 1/2 non reversal slider, and then make 2 more 1/2 sliders + note starting from here 00:37:286 -
00:42:192 (2) - i think that you should change it to 00:41:538 (4) - this slider, cause i hear triple here
00:43:664 (3) - just split it into 2 notes and stack with sliderhead
00:59:854 (4) - reversal? Found out that that was a 1/3 instead of a 1/2, so I don't need to change anything else.
01:03:452 (3) - hears like 1/1
01:05:087 (5,6) - just 1/4 reversal would be enough
01:42:211 (2,3) - doesnt look nice, make 01:42:701 (3) - vertical or smth
01:44:009 (5,2) - fix overlap

cs 4.2 is too small for hard imo
and make ar 7 or 7.5 or even 8, because 6 is way too low

Insane

00:19:624 (6) - nc and split it into 2 sldiers, the second one start here 00:20:278 - and here 00:20:932 - put a note
00:21:914 (3,4,5) - stack this or increase spacing
00:23:549 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - you already used this flow in hard diff, try something new
00:36:632 (5,6) - the sapcing is just too low, figures are nearly overlap each other, so i think you should increase it
00:39:249 (1,2,3) - flow is not really good
00:40:230 (1,2,3,4) - a bit strange curve
00:44:155 (8,1) - fix overlap
00:56:175 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1) - i think it would be better if you stack notes with sliders
01:02:798 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - you can make jumps instead of some sliders
01:05:578 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4) - here i think some jumps also will be good Replaced the 2nd half with circles as that's what it is in ANiMAte.
01:15:881 (1) - 1/2? Whoops
01:43:355 - i think here should be note, so this 01:42:701 (3) - slider has only 1 repeat
01:44:991 (1,2,3) - spacing too low again
01:48:588 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - too hard, 1/3 spaced stream in insane diff is really unplayable

also cs 4.6 is rare on insane diffs, make it 4.5 maximum (4 is the best imo)

animate

00:13:083 (5) - and 00:14:391 (4) - nc
00:11:774 (1) - i feel like this slider should be 1/1 Ehh. Doesn't sound right. :/
00:21:750 - guess you can put here a note
00:25:838 (3,4) - strange spacing here, better make this 00:25:511 (1,2,3,4) - a square pattern or back and forth i dunno
00:27:964 - note? cause without it feels kinda empty
00:45:136 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - spacing is too big, make it lower
00:50:042 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - just imagine the spacing here with hardrock on, dude, plz
01:11:302 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - again, i dont wanna say that this spacing is unplayable, but come on, its not the deathstream in dragonforce maps Redid it with a DS of 1.3 instead. It should be less unplayable
01:19:152 (9) - curve i more accurate
01:39:757 (2,3,4,5,1) - plz staph Yeah... Fixed that.

in the end i must say that this diff would be a pretty good 5.3-5.5* map if you just decrease spacing and make od 8.5-9 maximum, because 9.2 is so hard to play, you know, also make cs just 5 All things said and done, this brought the SR down to 5.6, so it should be good

good luck with set

HighTec wrote:

hOI!
NM from da qUEUE!

xi is bae

ANiMAte
ok here we go ugh

kinda centre-mapped, watch out

just do HP5.5

Is the beginning survivable with HR on a base to where you don't have to stress about getting 1x100? if not, please consider mapping more or lowering HP

00:11:774 (1,2,3,4) - awkward angle, let 234 be in such a way so that it flows with the end of 1 like this
00:14:063 (3,1) - put on same y
00:19:951 (7,8) - awkward sliders, maybe put a jump inbetween them
00:21:259 (6,7) - blanket ! I'm pretty sure it is...
00:27:474 (4,1) - these are not connected well, lower x of 1
00:30:745 (7) - angle this so that it connects better with 00:30:418 (5,6) -
00:32:871 (1,2) - put these closer together
00:36:632 (5,2) - overlap !
00:38:267 (7,8,1,2) - too far away from each other Ctrl-G should do the trick
00:45:136 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - just make jumpy sliders out of em, I promise people will like it more
00:50:042 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - ^^^^^
00:56:093 (1,2,3) - useless overmapping Brought the DS down to 0.8x.
00:57:892 (1,2) - closer together
00:58:710 (1,2,3) - again useless overmapping
01:00:508 (1,2) - and also need to be closer together
01:04:106 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - make the jumps more intense, suits the situation better
01:05:087 (7,8) - then make a 5tap out of this
01:10:975 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - try to make it so that it has more curves, maybe after every 8 notes. keeps the stream interesting and fun to play
01:13:591 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^^^^
01:29:291 (3,4,5) - 5 is not in the middle Dang, that's not by much! Fixed.
01:38:776 (1) - 1/8 slider please Guess having a ninja spinner won't do any good here.
01:41:720 (3,4,1) - make this play better/angle better with 01:41:556 (2) -
01:44:991 (3,6) - overlap problem
01:48:588 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - or make more curves, or make jumpy sliders, because just making a circle wont do imo

ok done with being such a meanie
hf ranking if that's the goal!

Marianna wrote:

Hello

Easy

1. 00:07:849 - I feel that a Whistle here fall well
2. 00:07:849 (2,3) - Place a circle behind the slide is awkward and leaves the bad flow and may confuse some players FL, to improve the flow put the circle the front or top of the slider
3. 00:10:466 (5) - New section, please put NC but keep the second
4. 00:10:466 (5) - Snap Error i quess Not sure what you mean by this...
5. 00:15:045 (2) - There is nothing so special here to stand with a Finish, I feel it would be better to have a Whistle
6. 00:16:353 (4) - Maybe replace the Clap for one Finish but keep the Whistle
7. 00:26:166 - The Clap here is unnecessary
8. 00:28:455 - Here needs special attention, place a Finish to give a highlight here
9. 00:34:669 - The strong sound of the piano here could be represented with a Finish Using a finish didn't sound well, so I used a whistle instead.
10. 00:51:677 (4) - Here Clap is unnecessary, which would be better here is a Whistle
11. 00:52:986 (2,3) - In music there are some Finish Then change the Clap by Finish to get better with the Music
12. 01:05:415 - Here is a strong beat, to be clickable to get better flow
13. 01:05:742 (1,2) - Bad Blanket
14. 01:15:881 (4,1) - As I said at the beginning, it is strange and can confuse beginners and player FL
15. 01:15:881 (4,1) - The beginning of these sliders can be better represented with Whistle
16. 01:49:897 (5) - This new session would be better represented with a NC

A small and lazy mod because I'm still practicing and used its map for that

GL~ xD

Kalindraz wrote:

A from my queue

[Animate]

1. 00:08:340 - , 00:09:648 - then, on the parts I mentioned, you did a slider (00:07:849 (2,4) - ) that should be 1/1 is not 4/1,...Meaningless to the rhythm, I recommend fix it. Okay, but those were 3/2 whatever
2. 00:10:466 (1,2,3,4) - make a equivalent distance.
3. missing notes that part ( 00:13:246 - , 00:14:557 - , 00:15:209 - ) I did not understand the real intention of skipping the three parts to put only 4 single notes. I don't hear any note there, so it makes no sense putting them there.
4. 00:20:851 (5,1) - Errh... fix distance?
5. 00:32:053 (4,5,6) - Tries to put the notes with the same DS, and also aligned sliders
6. 00:33:361 (3,4) - Only relate these two notes to get a perfect half-moon stream.
7. 00:34:261 (3,6) - Was meaningless these triplets with these two notes, why not hear the note to these parts (my vision), I'd better removing them. I hear the notes right there, I'm sure of it.
8. 00:34:997 (2,3,4) - Mann, look at this different distance between each note, fix.
9. 00:40:884 (2,3) - These sliders are without an objective way, it seems that were placed randomly.Pretty sure they were randomly placed at first. Fixed.
10. 00:41:865 (1,3,1) - Again, take a reasonable distance, need not be "stuck" with the slider 1/4, being 180 bpm is quite easy to jump to next note without missing. I don't know, the 2.5x DS makes it kinda iffy...
11. 00:45:136 (2) - NC here.
12. 00:46:444 (3) - Make a 1/2 slider e put another 1/2 slider here 00:46:771 - will become more flowing.
13. 00:57:892 (1) - This is 1/4 not 1/3. They are 1/3s.
14. 01:02:798 (2,3,1,2) - Give a reasonable distance like that > http://puu.sh/nEbLV.jpg
15. 01:05:087 (4,5,6,7) - Surely it has to be replaced by a slider 3/4. It was originally a repeating 1/4 slider, but then someone suggested I change it. Would not really be happy about having to change it back.
16. 01:10:321 (1) - Remove NC again.
17. 01:11:629 (1,1,1,1,1) - ^ Again remove nc, its totally nonsense,If you change the distance of each note, then it would be valid to use the NC, you have to apply more curved shapes that would make more sense or simply replace sliders 1/4 with reverse arrow
18. 01:22:422 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 01:25:039 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - These streams did not match much with this part, if you realize it focuses more on the 1/2 patterns recommend putting 24 single notes emphasizing jumps, I think it will be much better than these streams
19. 01:38:531 (6,7,8) - fix ds my friend.
20. 01:44:827 (2) - where he got this 1/8 o--O?
21. 01:50:714 (6) - delete this note.
    

[Insane]

1. 00:14:391 (1,2,3) - slightly away from these notes, including 00:14:391 (1) - distant from 00:14:227 (4) -
2. 00:19:624 (6) - NC because too long combo, may cause extreme lag for ctb players.
3. 00:23:549 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - again leave a resonable distance,this "gathering" notes causes a super, lack of aesthetics
4. 00:26:166 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - ^ Might as well do it for the other ones as well!
5. 00:36:550 (4,5,7) - fix DS.
6. 00:42:846 (2) - move to x200 y172
7. 00:44:155 (8,1) - try to give a high distance.
8. 00:49:388 (8,1) - ^
9. 00:56:502 (6,1,3,5) - I believe this to be uranked, has only on old maps and is confusing
10. 00:58:791 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - ^
11. 01:01:408 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^^
12. 01:09:994 - Fix the green line.
13. 01:26:347 (1) - Fix snap;
14. 01:27:002 (3) - Fix DS.
15. 01:28:310 (3) - ^
16. 01:40:412 (7) - move to x463 y14 and ctrl+g Uhh... you can't place objects that high...
17. 01:41:720 (7) - replace for 4 notes 1/4

gl

Naxess wrote:

From Queue

General

SPOILER

01:36:814 - Shouldn't the kiai time end here? It doesn't really make sense to end it at 01:39:430 in my opinion.

Easy

SPOILER

1. 00:10:466 (1,1) - Fix blanket, may not be noticeable, but it should look like this:
   
2. 00:13:083 (2) - Move to 356, 48. Will both semi blanket as well as improve flow.
   
3. 00:28:128 (3) - Remove finish HS, add whistle like 00:25:511 (3) , for consistency.
   00:29:763 (2) - Add whistle HS, for consistency with 00:24:530 (2) and 00:27:147 (2) , for example.
   01:15:227 (3) - ^ Add whistle HS
   00:31:399 (1) - Remove whistle HSThis is trying to emulate the cymbal in the music, so I'll leave it.
   00:32:380 (2) - ^ ^
   01:13:591 (1) - ^
   00:37:613 (3) - Add clap HS
   And so on. My examples may be bad, but I still think the HS could use some more thought, because some of them are not very consistent at the moment.
   
4. 01:30:272 (5) - I feel like there should be circles instead of a slider here.
   
5. 01:31:581 (1,2) - Consider replacing these parts as such, because it doesn't make sense to have one of the sounds clickable but not the other:
   
   01:34:197 (1,2) - ^
   01:36:160 (3) - You may also want to make this slider like 01:33:543 (3,4) to increase consistency.
   
6. 01:41:066 (4) - Ctrl + H, then move to 244, 84. Both for symmetry and flow.
   
7. 00:45:790 (3) - I'd suggest making this part the same as 00:51:023 (3,4) , both for consistency and for making 00:46:444 clickable.
   
8. 01:01:489 (2,3,4,5) - If you're going to have a pattern, make it clear. If you're going to have it linear, make it straight. Sort of messy at the moment. Made it a straight line.
   
9. Overall it seems this map is centermapped slightly towards the right in this area (see image), you may want to spread out the notes a bit more if possible.Didn't think of that! Fixed.
   

Phew this map has been modded to bits, considering that the thread has 5 pages... I think it's 36 (?) mods...I couldn't even count how many mods there were, but I modded easy at least.

Hello- wrote:

[General]

1. current bg's size 1024x614. change 1024x768(4:3) 1366x768 it's unrankable.

hanyuu_nanodesu wrote:

Hey, M4M from my modding Q~
Thank you for the mod before and sorry it's a bit late since I'm getting pretty moody last days ~,~

Red : unrankable (or might be unrankable) issue
Blue : highly suggested to fix
Black : normal suggestion
Green : random comment
Bold : slightly more important than others

[General]

1. Nice BG, but it should be better if it's at the perfect widescreen size which is 1366x768. And what with those white bars.... Here, edited it for you http://puu.sh/obIZV/839e57270e.jpg Edit 2 : read below for more information. Thanks!

[Easy]

1. AiMod said a preview time conflict~ This might be the Insane's fault tho, try to check it. Turns out the other preview points are slightly later than the Insane point. Fixed!
2. 00:19:624 (1,1,2) - Well, since this is Easy, I think the spinner is pretty short one. I suggest to just delete these 00:22:241 (1,2) - and then extend the spinner until here 00:22:241 it would fit Easy better that way imo.
3. 00:23:549 (1,2,3) - Yeah a little thing, there's a thing called polarity problem here. Polarity problem happened because a sudden change of rhythm line, try to watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53PkFLrK8Ws As explained, polarity problem happened because you suddenly switched from white-red rhythm to blue rhythm. But for easier diffs like this one, a sudden switch from white rhythm to red rhythm could be called polarity problem too, and you have one in this case. Well, I guess it's can't be helped because the main piano played like that, but I suggest to at least use different rhythms for the four kiai verse since you used the same rhythm for the whole verse, and it's boring. Maybe use something like this http://puu.sh/obJmS/2af0cd6dba.jpg or http://puu.sh/obJpj/3ab8f1d792.jpg or maybe anything else with the same counting but different composition of notes.
4. 00:25:511 (3,1) - Even if these don't mean to be blanketed, it would look much better if they are blanketed, really... Ended up moving out of the way, so there's no need to blanket.
5. 00:28:782 Uhh... Why does the kiai ends here while the music don't change at all? .-. You even still used the same kind of rhythm.... I highly suggest to just end the kiai at the end of the verse here 00:34:015 Apply this on all diffs
6. 00:35:324 (1) - Remove NC here because you usually NC-ed every two big white ticks, keep your pattern consistent~
7. 00:43:173 (1) - ^^^
8. 01:04:760 (5) - Why don't do it like this http://puu.sh/obJDn/d6b104e24b.jpg
9. 01:05:415 (6,1) - Uhm, swap NC
10. 01:21:441 (2) - For sound like this, I prefer it to be separated into a 1/1 slider and a circle http://puu.sh/obJGU/254aec51d8.jpg because the 1/1 slider would independently cover the 3 reverse piano sound and the circle would play the other piano sound. Same for this 01:24:058 (5) -
11. 01:26:020 Add a note? it feels weird when suddenly there's nothing to hit while there's clearly a piano sound and you were following the piano sound all along. Or maybe to make it simpler, just extend 01:25:039 (6) - until then, or changing it to two 1/1 sliders would fit well too http://puu.sh/obJNc/5f9088cd17.jpg Anything else you like tho.
12. 01:31:581 (1,2,3) - Since you don't use 1/2 rhythm before, I don't suggest to use it near the end (actually I don't suggest 1/2 rhythm at Easy at all) Well it's fitting enough because there's two big sounds, but actually the biggest sound is the one at white tick, so covering the sound at white tick only with circles would still fit well http://puu.sh/obJUk/1e9c78509c.jpg but well, slider indeed emphasize it better tho. I think I'll leave this one.
13. Okay

[Normal]

1. Wow, the stats are very high for Normal o-o
2. CS 3.5. 3.8 is too small, it's almost reached 4. Even I used CS 3.7 for Insane...
3. AR 5 is fitting enough and is the limit for Normal.
4. OD 4, because Easy's is 2 and from 2 to 5 is a pretty big jump
5. 00:11:774 (1,2,3) - Better to place this kind of pattern at the middle so you could feel the symmetry better.
6. 00:32:871 (4) - Since this note is in the middle of 3 piano sounds, I suggest to just delete it and change it to a 1/2 reverse slider http://puu.sh/obKcP/27ebf3c5c2.jpg I'm gonna make a normal 1/2 slider since the way you did it would throw of the rhythm.
7. 01:31:581 (1,2,3) - Maybe try it like this for Normal http://puu.sh/obKjP/5e00873fa4.jpg pretty advanced, but it more fun to play I guessIt does sound better and matches the upward scales.
8. 01:47:280 (1) - Try to make it looks better http://puu.sh/obKmG/1bc7e2289b.jpg
9. Kay Alright

[Hard]

1. 00:05:560 (1,2,3,1) - Well, I see you're trying to keep the distance, but what about actual cross sign motion? http://puu.sh/obKtP/12ddabb59e.jpg That's actually really nice! Thanks!
2. Woah, this actually looks more like Advanced o-o I mean, the notes are close and even overlapped each other. And it's only 2.9 stars... While the Insane is 4.5 stars... It's a big jump dude .-. I suggest to rename this as Advanced and make a proper Hard. Yeah, I was mulling over that for a while. I guess I'll just ask for a GD or something.
3. 00:31:399 (1,2,3) - I mean, why are your notes placed so close to each other like this? .-. Since Hard mainly plays on 1/2 rhythm, notes with 1/2 rhythm should be separated from each other. I guess your distance snap multiplier is too low... If you gonna rename this as Advanced and make a new Hard, leaves it be. But if you insist on one Hard, I suggest to increase the DS multiplier by holding alt and adjust it at the top right corner http://puu.sh/obKGb/cba9ccdf0f.jpg and then re-DS the entire map. It's almost mean remap so if I were you, I prefer to make the whole new diff with around 3.5 till 3.7 stars or something. Try to take a look at ranked Hard diffs...
4. I'll mod this as Advanced
5. 00:34:015 (1,2,3,4) - That sudden jump don't really make sense tho :/ I mean it's not like the 1/4 reverse slider is a very big sound or something.... If you want to make jumps, do it before big white tick notes like this 00:33:688 (3,1) - You can bigger the spacing to make it emphasize better.
6. I just realized the slow SV too.... Hard's SV should be around 1.40 till 1.60 but you used 1.00... it's usually used for Easy or Normal...
7. 01:30:926 (3,4) - I prefer if they are placed at the same row so it'll looks balanced and give symmetry feelings. Or if you actually want to make zig zag pattern, try to expand it more http://puu.sh/obKTZ/3404a4370a.jpg it would be better.
8. 01:39:594 (2,3) - Why no DS, just DS this. Don't know why, honestly.
9. Well, okay, rethink making a new diff, really.

Okay, I'll end this here~
Good luck ^^

Edit:

Hello- wrote:

[General]

1. current bg's size 1024x614. change 1024x768(4:3) 1366x768 it's unrankable.

Not it's not unrankable, it's just the recommended size, and it's better to use the widescreen ratio tho 16:9 which size I mention (1366x768)

Good luck again~

CyberX wrote:

IRC mod for Kuro's Hyper

IRC

2016-05-04 17:17 CyberX: 00:17:334 (2,3,4) - prefer this to be continue
2016-05-04 17:18 CyberX: http://puu.sh/oFLVI/cc1187ae9a.jpg
2016-05-04 17:18 CyberX: 00:18:643 (2,3,4) - ^ same
2016-05-04 17:18 Kuro Fuyusaki: nope :)
2016-05-04 17:18 CyberX: 00:21:586 (3,4,5,6) - zigzag flow, bad idea
2016-05-04 17:19 Kuro Fuyusaki: .-.
2016-05-04 17:19 CyberX: 00:26:983 (4) - dont overlap since this is not insane or extra
2016-05-04 17:19 Kuro Fuyusaki: i'll consider it
2016-05-04 17:19 CyberX: 00:29:763 (4) - 
2016-05-04 17:19 CyberX: ^
2016-05-04 17:19 CyberX: 00:32:871 (4,5,6) - you emphsize to much
2016-05-04 17:19 CyberX: too*
2016-05-04 17:20 CyberX: 00:49:388 (8,9) - stack bad ide
2016-05-04 17:20 CyberX: a
2016-05-04 17:20 Kuro Fuyusaki: 00:32:871 (4,5,6) - well yea :)
2016-05-04 17:21 Kuro Fuyusaki: 00:49:388 (8,9) - will stack the second circle with slider afterward
2016-05-04 17:21 CyberX: 01:06:396 (4) - why this not a slider?
2016-05-04 17:22 CyberX: 01:13:264 (1) - whistle better
2016-05-04 17:23 Kuro Fuyusaki: 01:13:264 (1) - wut?
2016-05-04 17:23 CyberX: 01:31:581 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - stack bad idea
2016-05-04 17:23 Kuro Fuyusaki: 01:06:396 (4) - i wonder why :')
2016-05-04 17:23 CyberX: its better if its slider
2016-05-04 17:23 CyberX: 01:13:264 (1) - just preference of mine
2016-05-04 17:24 CyberX: 01:39:757 (2,3,4,5,6) - i wonder why you dont make this thing in the kiai mode
2016-05-04 17:24 CyberX: 01:47:280 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - bad idea
2016-05-04 17:24 CyberX: 01:51:369 (1) - spinner start 01:51:287 - 
2016-05-04 17:24 Kuro Fuyusaki: 01:47:280 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - till 4 modder
2016-05-04 17:25 Kuro Fuyusaki: 01:51:369 (1) - preference of mine
2016-05-04 17:25 CyberX: ok i guess thats it
2016-05-04 17:25 Kuro Fuyusaki: 01:39:757 (2,3,4,5,6) - BLAME THE MAPPER !!!!!!!!!!!

100bit wrote:

Hey from my queue, my name is Max 100bit, and this is my mod!
Well, opinion of modder is opinion of modder.
Do not judge strictly, I could be wrong.
And yep, I am just learning. My english is bad, so sorry for googletranslate.
P.S. I afraid I'll be useless because you have big SP for search BN.
P.P.S. xi forever!

Song and beatmaps

I think BPM = 183.5 is more right. P.S. I'll mod without this fix. I'm almost certain it's 183.444. xi does this stuff *cough* freedom dive
Remove "2.0" from Source, it's just "Deemo"
Add "mobile" to Tags if you want Hadn't thought of that! Thanks!
How about move preview-point to 01:10:975 ? I kinda prefer it where it is.

Easy

00:01:308 (1,2,3) - change to slider because it's big jumps for novicesIt follows the DS, so I'm fine with it as is.
00:11:774 (1) - you need nc here? Tried getting rid of it and it didn't feel right, so I'm keeping it.
00:11:774 (1,2,1) - fix flow here Can't do much about 00:11:774 (1,2), but I fixed the last one.
00:34:342 (2,3) - fix this strange overlap
00:36:632 (2,3,4) - you need wrong flow here too because cursore move to 4, not to 3 (p.s. stacks in easy-diffs is not allowed)
00:39:249 (1,2) - identicalI don't see much of a problem with that.
01:01:489 (2,3,4,5) - make another singletapping-pattern
01:15:881 (4) - set nc here, remove nc in 01:17:189 (1) - and set nc in 01:19:479 (3) Moved the last NC to 01:18:498 (1) -
01:24:058 (5) - nc
01:26:347 (1,2,3) - maybe identical? Again, I don't see much of a problem with that.

Normal

Fix all mistakes with Distance Spacing: Ctrl+Shift+A -> Check distance snap
00:40:230 - 00:40:393 - add slider
00:40:557 (1,2,3) - make smooth triangle
00:44:809 (2,3,4,5) - 1/8 in normals? are you serious?! They're 1/3s, but I see your point. Can't do much about them, though
00:50:042 (2,3,4,5) - ^
00:47:425 (2,3) - fix overlap
00:56:584 (4,1) - fix flow
01:42:701 (4,5) - ^

Advanced

00:25:838 (6,1) - make small jump
00:28:455 (7,1) - ^
01:01:489 (1,2,3,4) - don't make this "square, make like in 00:58:873 (1,2,3,4)
01:05:414 (1,2,3,4) - fix jump
01:08:031 (1,2) - this sliders break this diff, i think How so?
01:09:339 (3,4) - make 4 sliders instead 2
01:11:956 (4) - nc
01:15:226 (5) - ^

Good luck!
{end of mod}

Chaos wrote:

Finally got around to doing forum mods for my queue, so here it is. Hope this is helpful

?

General

Metadata
Source is "Deemo".

Timing
I believe you're using an identical mp3 to this ranked set, which has a proper timing done. This seems to work for your map as well, but double check. Please look at the mod prior to changing this, as the timestamps are done with the map as is.
BPM = 183.50, Offset = 1321 I'm pretty sure I'm using a different mp3. As for the BPM... I'm kinda unsure. Maybe it is 183.5, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's 183.444 freedom dive

ANiMAte

Check your note snapping. I noticed some of the circles weren't quite on the beat.

00:10:466 (1,2,3,4) - Change the pattern here so the 3,4 aren't stacked? I think it would look/feel better if all 4 circles were jumps.
00:12:592 (2,3,4,1) - Use consistent DS here, imo. Looks unpolished as is. Would like to hear your reasoning behind its current spacing if you intend to keep this as is.
00:13:900 (2,3,4,1) - Same here as above. This one looks noticeably worse. From what I gather 3,4,1 are supposed to be a triangle, but 2 is just kind of along for the ride due to your intent being really distinguishable visually to the player.

00:23:712 (2,3,4) - Same DS please. This goes for this entire section too. Make them both same spacing and consistent across all instances of the triples.
00:25:184 (6,7,8) - Raise slightly so 00:24:857 (4,5,6) - are more linear similar to 00:23:876 (4,5,6).
00:34:179 (2,3,4) - Use same DS.
00:34:997 (2,3,4,5,6) - Same DS.
00:36:305 (1,2,3,4,5) - Same DS.
00:37:041 - Add a circle here, imo. If you want, you can put a curving 5 notes starting from 00:36:959 (6) - and blanketing around the end of 00:36:632 (5) - which would still lead up to 00:37:450 (4) - I don't hear anything there, so I'm going to leave it.
00:37:940 (5) - NC here?
00:40:230 (1,2,3,4,1) - DS
00:40:557 (1,2,3) - You can probably improve the look of this. 2 is the issue imo.
00:41:538 (4,2,4) - Going to offer a suggestion here to make these 1/4 circles stacked onto the respective following sliders. Doing this also allows you to space the 1/2 sliders (00:41:865 (1,3,1) - ) if you want.

00:47:098 (5) - NC suggestion
00:47:344 (6,7,8,9,10,11) - DS
00:48:079 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS
00:48:734 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS
00:52:659 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS
00:53:313 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS
01:05:087 (3,4,5,6,1) - Straighten please.
01:05:415 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern spacing looks unclean and make it seem arbitrary. Your use of matching DS for 2,3,4 doesn't really match the 1/2 nature of the music here.

01:10:975 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) -
01:13:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - These are awkward to play. Would you consider smoothing out the paths these streams take?
01:18:661 (3,3) - DS doesn't match the rest of the stream.
01:31:908 (3,4,5,6,1) - , 01:32:562 (3,4,5,6,1) - , 01:33:216 (3,4,5,6,1) - Please fix the distance snapping to make this look like you intended to do this. As is, it feels like you just wanted a slight zigzag but just put the circles down without really being clean about the application.
01:33:707 (2) - Should be 1/3, same duration. Not sure what you mean by this?

01:34:524 (3,4) -
01:35:178 (3,4) -
01:35:833 (3,4) - Make these look better/more consistent with each other?
01:39:430 (3) - NC here, maybe?
01:39:757 (2,3,4,5,1) - Clean up the shape/path of this stream.
01:41:720 (3,4,1) - What is your reasoning for this pattern being this way? Musically, this is the same as the few combos before this which you mapped as 1/4 circles.Don't know why, it looks so obvious now :/ Fixed.
01:42:374 (3,4) - Should be 3 1/3 beats. Didn't notice that Fixed.
01:45:645 (5,6,7,8,1) - Fix DS/stream shape.
01:48:588 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Fix DS

In general, it seems like you never utilized the convert slider to stream function in the editor. This allows you to make very clean and properly spaced streams by simply creating a slider for the proper length/path/duration. Ended up using it when you asked for a DS fix.You don't have to do all of your streams this way (for example: 01:31:908 (3,4,5,6,1) - I thought this was a good idea but the distance snap is inconsistent so it looks poorly done instead of intentional). If you have any questions, feel free to ask either in the reply or ingame. I'll check back into this thread to respond to anything you might have to say.

CookieKivi wrote:

Froм мy мoddιɴɢ qυeυe.

dιdɴ'т ι мeɴтιoɴed тнαт ι doɴ'т lιĸe ѕтreαмy ѕтreαм мαpѕ ιɴ мy qυeυe? ɴyα, rιp rυleѕ. Umm... no you didn't...

easy

ɢeɴerαl
please. use distance snap for close notes


тнe oтнer ѕтυғғ
00:02:615 (2) - NC / to NC stuff like that in easy is precious. dont forget that.
00:03:923 (3) - ^
00:05:558 (4) - ^
00:06:539 (1) - Remove NC
00:07:847 (2) - NC
00:07:847 (2,3) - Blanket thoose
00:18:964 (4) - put to x:360 y:236
00:19:291 (5) - x:338 y:160
00:27:629 (2) - blanket error
00:40:544 (2) - should be the same like 00:39:237 (1) -
00:52:970 (2) - blanket error
01:08:991 (2) - ^ Alright, I just did everything on here.


ιтѕ α ɢood coɴcepт, вυт yoυr eαѕy мαppιɴɢ ѕтιll ɴeedѕ prαcтιcιɴɢ. твн ι'll ѕυɢɢeѕт yoυ тo αѕĸ ѕoмeoɴe тнαт coυld creαтe yoυ α eαѕy dιғғ. вυт yoυ doɴ'т нαve тo.

c:

Kyle Y wrote:

[Insane]
00:05:885 (5,1) - this two circle place too close, making poor looking. please separate them.
00:27:384 (2,3) - this distance spaced like 1/2 snapped instead, it is quite misleading to players. please place them like 00:26:893 (5,6) - Whoops, didn't mean to do that.
00:44:795 (2) - 00:50:027 (2) - usually changing snapping will add a nc here.
00:46:103 (2,3) - 01:44:959 (1,2) - slider placed too close with poor looking, please separate them or change into other pattern.
00:47:820 - 00:49:128 - 00:49:291 - why skipping this 1/4 sound? The piano doesn't play there, so there's no note there.
00:55:749 - 00:55:912 - please map this beat sound also. I honestly don't see why. I don't hear anything special on this beat.
01:03:106 (2) - 01:03:760 (4) - ctrl+g for flowing?
01:11:934 - big tick contain stronger beat, which you cannot place slider end here, but clickable object instead.
01:13:160 - I don't know why you skipped all 1/4 sound for this combo chain. I'm gonna save that for the 2nd time this happens.
01:47:574 (2,3,4) - I still hear it is 1/2 snapped sound. I'm pretty sure it sounds right the way it is.
um.... in fact, I think that 00:29:100 (3,4) - this part is a little bit hard to play as it is too close and the flowing is not that good. Of course, I think it is not un-rankable, but I think that it is better to fix for this part, and other with same rhythm like 00:29:591 (6,1) - . Fixed. Thanks!


[K's Hyper]
00:19:945 - 00:20:599 - why skipped this sound?
00:30:081 - big tick contain stronger beat, which you cannot place slider end here, but clickable object instead. I suggested you can ctrl+g 00:29:754 (4,5) - for rhythm change.
00:32:697 - ^
00:31:880 (2,3) - blanket
00:44:795 (2) - 00:50:027 (2) - nc for changing snapping.
01:10:626 (6) - nc for big tick.
01:36:784 - adding a note here and start spinner at 01:36:866 - ? it is a common pattern for spinner.
01:51:335 (1) - start the spinner 1/4 beat before, like what above said.

[General]
For some parts, like 01:48:555 -, it is 1/8 snapped in Insane diff but 1/4 snapped in Hyper diff. it is in-consistent in terms of rhythm. Please check if it is 1/4 snapped or 1/8 snapped like what Insane diff did. To me, I think the Insane is correct, but since the Hyper is a GD, I'll let them decide.

(sorry for poor modding as I seldom mod stream songs)

lazyboy007 wrote:

Hey from modding queue for NM!

(xi sucks btw Kappa)

Easy:

00:07:847 (1,2) - blanket
00:44:468 (1,2) - doesn't align well
00:52:316 (1,2) - blanket
01:13:569 (1,2) - align Pretty sure this is aligned....
01:30:245 (5,6) - distance snap inconsistent

Nice map

Normal:

00:18:637 (3,4) - Blanket
00:22:234 (2,3) - missing beat between those two, might as well put something here
00:59:182 (4) - rotate to align better with 00:58:855 (3) -
01:01:798 (4,1) - blanket
01:40:871 (4,2) - overlap
01:47:247 (1,2) - could blanket better
Simple stuff, everything's been fixed!

Nice diff too^^

Advanced:

00:23:542 (1,2,3,4) - curve those less, this looks a little clunky, same for all following similar patterns
01:09:645 (1,1,1,2) - remove NC (leave the first one only)
Same here.

Nice map too, but some patterns (i mentionned above) are slightly weird and some chains of singletap too long for an advanced diff

Kuro's Hyper:

00:39:237 (1) - from here on hitsounds are way too low
01:05:395 (1,2) - blanket
01:09:318 (4) - a bit weird, but fine

the rest of it is cool :3

Good luck ranking this ^^ I'm trying to... (>_<)

1Computer wrote:

From my queue.

SPOILER

General

1. Tags are conflicting apparently. Best fix would be to open up the .osu in Notepad and copying the tags.
2. You don't use the corners at all. While it isn't an unrankable issue, it does limit your mapping space. Well, I'm not going to remap anything, so I'll just keep that in mind when mapping in the future.

Insane

1. 00:11:771 (1,2) - Keep spacing consistent.
2. 00:51:008 (1,2,3,4) - Would look nicer if they weren't touching.
3. 00:54:604 (8,1) - Spacing between these two is too low.
4. 01:48:555 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - WHAT. No. The spacing of all these notes are the same, yet in the timeline they have varying gaps. Remap it. Huh. Must have been a mistake with time snapping, since they were equally space last I remembered.
5. 01:50:681 - Missed notes.

ANiMAte

1. 00:07:847 (2,3,4) - Blanket.
2. 00:11:444 (4,1) - ^
3. 00:29:427 (5,6,5,6) - Stack them on top of each other. That was unintentional... fixed.
4. 01:11:280 - I suggest you make your stream shape smoother, as well as keeping distance snap consistent ie 01:12:670 (2,3).
5. 01:48:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same thing as in the Insane diff.
6. 01:50:681 - You're skipping out on some notes.

All of these were pretty simple, so they've all been fixed!

Pentori wrote:

hey. nm from q

[ANiMAte]
00:12:588 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - you should use polygon tool to make squares so they're equal in spacing and look neater
00:18:310 (8) - use a normal sampleset finish for the cymbal crash
00:19:618 (6) - finish
00:23:869 (4,5,6) - if you're going to have linear flow you should keep spacing consistent. 00:23:869 (4,5) - has a 2.0x spacing while 00:24:032 (5,6) - has 1.8x and this can be awkward to play Huh. Didn't see that when I first made it.
00:24:850 (4,5,6) - ^
00:25:831 (3,4) - i dont hear finishes here. try keep your finishes for downbeats and cymbal crashes in the music
00:27:629 (1,2) - ^ use whistles instead Alright, just made the volume 100% for each of these
00:35:313 (6,7,8,9,10) - not a big fan of all this linear flow here. could you introduce angles into ur jumps? eg. http://puu.sh/qpfQc/aca5a22679.jpg (just did this roughly dont copy that lol) Interesting idea. I've modified it slightly and replaced the original pattern.
00:45:653 (2,1) - space this out. looks as if the 1/3 continues but it doesnt
00:45:708 - unsnapped timing point
00:50:885 (2,1) - ^
01:05:395 (1) - hitsounds seem really soft here compared to the 95% you had last timing pointChanged the timing volumes to make it better.
01:13:242 (9) - nc becos of finish
01:19:128 (9) - ^
01:20:435 (9) - ^
01:48:541 (1) - unsnappedWonder how that happened. Fixed.

hope this helped

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello fattypikachu,
NM

Tuturuuuu
Not a big deal, but prev point unsnapped

Easy
In Easy diffs spacing's changes looks clearly so...
00:17:983 (2) - 1.0 and 1.0 pls

hit me

00:36:621 (2) - Can You increase angle pls? I'm guessing you're talking about the angle between the 3 points...
00:47:084 (1,2,3) - You could make it thee same i guess, seems better
00:48:392 (3,4) - 00:49:700 (1,2) - same visual spacing
00:51:662 (4) - ^
00:49:700 (1,3) - avoid overlap
01:10:953 (2) - ^ 0.98->1.0 You're really nailing down on the DS! (Not that that's a bad thing! )
01:21:416 (2) - improve i by making 2nd note close to 1st
01:21:416 (2,3) - 1,07? Whoops.
01:26:321 (1,2) - blanket? Pretty sure this is, but I tried to fix it

Norml
00:13:079 (3,4) - improve
00:21:580 (1,3) - can You make this sliders equal?
01:10:953 (2,3,4) - same spacing pls

click

01:12:915 (6,1,2) - like here Okay, that was kinda confusing before you had the picture. Fixed!
01:41:689 (1) - blankets could be better I'm pretty sure it's blanketed the best it can be, but...

Advanced
check AImod
00:17:983 (4) - mb make it 2 circle instead ? I actually prefer the slider here.
00:22:888 (1,2,3,4,1) - same spacing here pls
00:27:629 (4) - avoid overlaps like this will be nice
00:33:024 (5,1) - better space it more
00:36:294 (6,1,4,5) - ^ You know... after sliders You can use a bit increased spacing it will be much better also in streams You can decrease it (a bit). Because now your streams(1/2) feels weird. i ll stop pointing it here.
00:41:852 (1,2) - avoid overlap
00:43:651 (3,4,5) - oh 1/4... unexpected
01:07:356 (4) - increase angle of slider plss
01:42:179 (2,3,4) - improve
overall fine

Trying to go through it quick, so I fixed most of it.

Hyper
Hello Kuro Fuyusaki,
1.12 and 1.18 sv xD?
00:29:427 (3,5) - can You make them visual symmetry?
00:31:389 (1) - You can rotate this part o the left a bit for blanker 7's head 00:30:408 (7,1) - will be cool.
00:38:583 (8) - ^ same thing here 00:37:602 (5,8) -
00:44:141 (5) - crl+g better flow?
00:49:536 (9,1) - don't wanna stack it?
01:06:539 - why miss beat here? 4->slider mb?
01:24:196 (2) - improve blanket a bit
01:35:640 (2,3) - This spacing change really necessary?
01:47:247 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - im dead here nvm

fun diff, well done.

mmm, I'm stop here because i can't play streammy maps right now

Goodluck!

Kisses wrote:

1 year hype

1. 00:16:348 (4) - Would look better if you made symmetrical with (3).
2. 00:20:599 (2,3,4,5,1) - This triggers me because the curvature doesn't look even.
3. 01:06:049 (5) - NC [sounds like it begins a new measure of the build up like how it is with 01:06:702 (1)]
4. 01:07:356 (5) - ^
5. 01:11:280 (2,3,5,6,7,8,9) - The curves should be more smooth. There's no excuse for this as it looks ugly.
6. 01:11:444 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
7. 01:12:670 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
8. 01:13:896 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
9. 01:14:550 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
10. 01:15:204 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
11. 01:18:474 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
12. 01:15:858 (1,2) - Why don't these have the same DS as (3,4,5,6)?
13. 01:16:512 (3) - Should be NC'd to emphasize the louder sound.
14. 01:17:820 (3) - ^
15. 01:26:321 (1) - Should really have the exact same curve as (2). Just copy/paste it.
16. 01:29:918 (6,7) - I don't understand why the spacing gets smaller from (1,2,3,4) when the music doesn't get quieter.
17. 01:34:495 (3,4,1,2) - I don't like how these are barely touching. These don't improve the aesthetics of the pattern.
18. 01:35:149 (3,4,1,2) - ^
19. 01:36:784 (1,2) - Shouldn't these be spaced further apart to match the 1/1 gap with 01:36:294 (2,1)?
20. 01:37:438 (3,4) - For the sake of aesthetics, move this slightly further away from (2).
21. 01:40:054 (1,2) - This flows horribly. (2)'s slider body goes in a left-upward direction while 01:39:727 (2,3,4,5,1) goes in an opposite direction; this goes against the momentum you're coming in after doing the burst. Make 01:39:727 (2,3,4,5,1) a circular burst so that it has that circular flow.
22. 01:45:286 (4) - You should really just make this symmetrical with (3) for better flow into 01:45:613 (5,6,7,8,1).

F1r3tar wrote:

ANiMAte

1. 00:16:348 (4) - Would look better if you made symmetrical with (3).
2. 00:20:599 (2,3,4,5,1) - This triggers me because the curvature doesn't look even. Huh. Doesn't look like it, but I tried.
3. 01:06:049 (5) - NC [sounds like it begins a new measure of the build up like how it is with 01:06:702 (1)]
4. 01:07:356 (5) - ^
5. 01:11:280 (2,3,5,6,7,8,9) - The curves should be more smooth. There's no excuse for this as it looks ugly.
6. 01:11:444 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
7. 01:12:670 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
8. 01:13:896 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
9. 01:14:550 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
10. 01:15:204 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
11. 01:18:474 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^Alright, alright I'll just redo most of these steams.
12. 01:15:858 (1,2) - Why don't these have the same DS as (3,4,5,6)? Don't know, fixed.
13. 01:16:512 (3) - Should be NC'd to emphasize the louder sound.
14. 01:17:820 (3) - ^
15. 01:26:321 (1) - Should really have the exact same curve as (2). Just copy/paste it.
16. 01:29:918 (6,7) - I don't understand why the spacing gets smaller from (1,2,3,4) when the music doesn't get quieter.
17. 01:34:495 (3,4,1,2) - I don't like how these are barely touching. These don't improve the aesthetics of the pattern.
18. 01:35:149 (3,4,1,2) - ^
19. 01:36:784 (1,2) - Shouldn't these be spaced further apart to match the 1/1 gap with 01:36:294 (2,1)?
20. 01:37:438 (3,4) - For the sake of aesthetics, move this slightly further away from (2).
21. 01:40:054 (1,2) - This flows horribly. (2)'s slider body goes in a left-upward direction while 01:39:727 (2,3,4,5,1) goes in an opposite direction; this goes against the momentum you're coming in after doing the burst. Make 01:39:727 (2,3,4,5,1) a circular burst so that it has that circular flow. It does match the next pattern, so it looks pretty nice.
22. 01:45:286 (4) - You should really just make this symmetrical with (3) for better flow into 01:45:613 (5,6,7,8,1).

• [General]

1. Check AiMod.
2. End of all difficulties:
   Easy - 01:53:787
   Normal - 01:53:787
   Advanced - 01:53:787
   Kuro's Hyper - 01:53:950
   Insane - 01:53:787
   ANiMAte - 01:53:787

• [Easy]

1. 01:14:822 (2,1) - They contact:
   
   Here.

   
2. 01:17:166 (2,1) - Imperfect blanket

• [Normal]

1. 00:41:198 (2,3) - Not a blanket, I think it would be better.
2. 00:55:258 (2,3) - Inconsistent spacing (x1.07)
3. 01:10:953 (2,2) - This is the same instrumentals but not the same pattern, the sliders are not similar.
4. 01:22:724 (5,6,7) - Why here you didn't new combo but here 01:25:340 (1,2,3) There is one. I suggest to remove NC here 01:25:340 (1,2,3) , NC at 01:25:994 (9) - And remove NC here 01:26:321 (1)
5. 01:40:871 (4,1) - Imperfect blanket
6. 01:47:247 (1,2) - ^ and Inconsistent spacing (x0,94)

• [Advanced]

1. Check AiMod..
2. 00:17:002 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - We here the same rythm with your notes and it's so boring (lol)... So I suggest to try something like this:
   
   Here.

   
3. 00:26:158 (1,2,3) - Inconsistent spacing, the lines arounds sliders (maybe you don't have the lines because of skin but you can see this) are not properly fixed especially here 00:26:649 (2,3) - Not at all the same spacings. Make as here 00:28:773 (1,2,3,4)
4. 00:43:487 (2) - You can remove it and extend the slider 00:43:160 until 00:43:487 It's better for a advanced diff I find.
5. 00:52:316 (1,2,3,4) - The sliders are so loud and they are the same sound, this is very irrited, so I have a nice suggestion for this, try this solution:
   
   Here.

   
6. 01:15:858 (1,1) - Replace these notes by sliders renverse:
   
   You choose what you prefer both sound very well.

   OR
7. 01:21:743 (3,1) - Imperfect blanket
8. 01:39:564 (2,4) - ^

• [Kuro's Hard]

1. 00:47:411 (2,3) - I'm not fan of this spacing, it's so big.. And inconsistent spacing with 00:48:065 (4,5)
2. 01:00:163 (1,3) - Imperfect blanket

ShogunMoon wrote:

Hi!
NM from my Queue~

• [General]

1. Check AiMod. Can't really fix the kiai problem...
2. End of all difficulties:
   Easy - 01:53:787
   Normal - 01:53:787
   Advanced - 01:53:787
   Kuro's Hyper - 01:53:950
   Insane - 01:53:787
   ANiMAte - 01:53:787 Not really sure what to do with this...

• [Easy]

1. 01:14:822 (2,1) - They contact: Urg... fixed.
   
   Here.

   
2. 01:17:166 (2,1) - Imperfect blanket

• [Normal]

1. 00:41:198 (2,3) - Not a blanket, I think it would be better. Don't really like it as a blanket, but I did change it slightly
2. 00:55:258 (2,3) - Inconsistent spacing (x1.07)
3. 01:10:953 (2,2) - This is the same instrumentals but not the same pattern, the sliders are not similar.
4. 01:22:724 (5,6,7) - Why here you didn't new combo but here 01:25:340 (1,2,3) There is one. I suggest to remove NC here 01:25:340 (1,2,3) , NC at 01:25:994 (9) - And remove NC here 01:26:321 (1)
5. 01:40:871 (4,1) - Imperfect blanket
6. 01:47:247 (1,2) - ^ and Inconsistent spacing (x0,94)

• [Advanced]

1. Check AiMod..Fixed.
2. 00:17:002 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - We here the same rhythm with your notes and it's so boring (lol)... So I suggest to try something like this: What makes it boring? Used your idea, though.
   
   Here.

   
3. 00:26:158 (1,2,3) - Inconsistent spacing, the lines arounds sliders (maybe you don't have the lines because of skin but you can see this) are not properly fixed especially here 00:26:649 (2,3) - Not at all the same spacings. Make as here 00:28:773 (1,2,3,4) Yeah, that looks really awkward. Fixed!
4. 00:43:487 (2) - You can remove it and extend the slider 00:43:160 until 00:43:487 It's better for a advanced diff I find.
5. 00:52:316 (1,2,3,4) - The sliders are so loud and they are the same sound, this is very irrited, so I have a nice suggestion for this, try this solution:
   
   Here.

   
6. 01:15:858 (1,1) - Replace these notes by sliders reverse: That actually sounds really nice. Fixed.
   
   You choose what you prefer both sound very well.

   OR
7. 01:21:743 (3,1) - Imperfect blanket
8. 01:39:564 (2,4) - ^

• [Kuro's Hard]

1. 00:47:411 (2,3) - I'm not fan of this spacing, it's so big.. And inconsistent spacing with 00:48:065 (4,5)
2. 01:00:163 (1,3) - Imperfect blanket

That's all for me!
GOOD LUCK!

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello mod from my queue~

General

1. I would get rid of those occasional whistles. Maybe it's just me but they fit really badly. Or alternatively make em drastically quieter. I kinda like having some of the whistles there to empasize notes not strong enough for a finish, so some of them are still there.
2. Like almost every diff had nothing clickable on the last distinct sound, instead having spinner begin there. I would add a circle there and make the spinner begin little later
3. why does the last kiai begin at 01:44:632 - instead of 01:39:400 - or more like it could begin at many other places so that it captures some whole chorus concept from the map, the current just kinda randomly begins in the middle of a section, and at like quieter parts of that section too
4. Nothing too notable on Easy so I'll move on

Normal

1. 00:27:792 (3,4,5,1) - keep the spacing equal
2. 00:27:792 (3,4,5,1) - unnecessary overlap. Also could just triangle these Triangle doesn't really work here imo, so it's just a straight line.
3. 00:41:198 (2,4) - could blanket
4. 00:47:411 (2,3) - more these slightly so that they blanket each other instead of almost overlapping as they now are lol Whoops xD

Advanced

1. 00:07:847 (3,4) - fix blanket
2. 01:31:553 - since you've gone for pretty dense advanced here and have all kind of cool stuff mapped already, this pattern feels very lame compared to the intensity of the song. Like, you had similar pattern already in Easy, you can do smth more interesting here.Fixed. Old me didn't know how to map relative to intensity.

Kuro's Hyper

1. 00:52:316 (1,2,3) - could do smth with this, preferably blanket 1 and 2
2. 01:15:858 (1) - not like these are really bad or anything, but somehow they jumped at me when they first appeared. Perhaps you could use smth little less uncommon looking since you haven't really used anything like these elsewhere in the map. At least line 01:18:474 (1) - up so it follows the same shapestyle Sure, though my sliders aren't nearly as good as Kuro's...

Insane

1. 00:21:907 (3,4,5,6,7) - should this be straight? Nevertheless it doesn't look too good atm
2. I ended up not really linking any places here, but the visuals could use work all over the map. There are lot of places where there are unnecessary overlaps such as 01:44:305 (7,2) - blankets off or not done such as 00:30:081 (3,4) - or just otherwise not visually too good looking patterns such as 01:18:474 (1,2,3) - Also many streamshapes were visually not too pleasing such as the one I mentioned earlier or 01:35:803 (2,3,4,5,6) - Remapped a whole bunch of the map, hopefully it looks better.

ANIMAte

1. 00:19:945 (7,8,1) - I would have equal spacing from 7 to 8 as from 8 to 1, would play better
2. 00:28:773 - would also have more spacing from the kicksliders, since at section like this they essentially play as 1/2 jumps, now it plays little uncomfortable as the spacing changes randomly due the kicksliders and the circle after them being positioned like that
3. 00:41:525 (4,1) - why are you suddenly having so lenient patterns when earlier you had some dank jumpstreams like 00:40:217 (4,5,6,7,1) - The music is actually going up at intensity, why is your map going down?
4. 00:45:122 (1,2) - either space em equally all the time or then so that the circle is closer to the next one than the objects before. Due slider leniency and all that it will play okay. This, however, is the worst playing option of these, since the highest spacing is located where the pattern is least lenient Didn't think of that, fixed!
5. 01:05:068 (3,4,5,6,1) - this patterning isn't good choice here, especially as you have mapped the next jumps so that they look very much like this last 1/4 here. Could play better
6. 01:09:318 (3,4,5,6) - nothing wrong really with this but you are ending a buildup in the music with easy kickslider pattern. No reason not to use smth little more interesting
7. 01:09:318 (3,4,5,6) - and then you have longish streams here, when this section is intensity-wise the one you should have more kicksliders in than the last pattern. I would add some kicksliders here and there to these streams.
8. 01:42:179 (2,3,4,5) - same spacing with 1/2 and 1/3, very confusing
9. 01:50:190 (1,2,3,4,5) - same spacing with these 1/4 as the 1/3 before, very confusing as well. I know tho that you are going for the climax here, but maybe you can figure out a way to make it less confusing without losing the emphasisUsing a reverse 1/4 should do it...

Good luck!

Enkrypton wrote:

M4M from my queue. check bottom of queue for the m4m map

Insane

00:05:558 (4) - NC (choir like sound changes to piano, NC will emphasize this)
00:35:640 (3,4) - the flow here feels really weird, try making 3 just curve into 4 instead of an awkward reversal. Trying to move just 4 didn't look well, so I moved both 3 and 4.
---
00:39:154 (9,1) - and 00:40:462 (4,5) - map the same Rhythm, i don't see a need to change the DS here. keep one of the patterns. That was an oversight I didn't realise. Fixed.
00:40:544 (5) - NC here
00:41:198 (1) - remove NC
00:41:444 (2) - add NC
its good to maintain consistency in a "streamy map" first start by making the DS is constant on what i listed.
Your first pattern had a NC and those 3 sliders in a NC to map the loud violin part. Its good to do the exact same thing when the song repeats itself, thats the reason for the NCs
01:13:242 (8) - this is clearly a "jump" in the music. it would be cool if u can play with the DS here to emphasize this beat.
01:16:512 (3) - ^
01:17:820 (3) - ^
01:19:128 (3) - ^
01:23:705 (1) - ^
01:26:975 (3,4) - ^ same as above but remove that reverse slider, its not really mapped to a beat The reverse arrow is mapped to the piano bass, so I'm keeping it.
01:28:283 (3,4) - ^ ^ ^
01:29:591 (3,4) - this is done pretty well
01:33:514 (3,4) - it would be good to have big spacing here too Sure. Moved some of the other sliders as well.
01:50:681 (1) - remove
01:54:114 - end spinner here

ANiMAte

00:22:888 (1,2,3,4,5) - this looks really awkward when using on an angle.
00:41:444 (4) - NC here to separate from the 3 sliders that are mapped to the loud violin part.
01:13:241 (7) - refer to what i said in insane, play with DS here to emphasize this beat.
01:16:512 (1) - ^ The DS between it and the last object is 2.00, but it's been increased slightly.
01:17:820 (1) - ^
01:26:975 (3) - you managed to do the above well here and here 01:28:283 (3) -
01:54:114 - end spinner here

1. Make the ending times consistent across the whole set, to me 01:53:787 - sounds like the best spot
2. yeah

1. Really disagree with the Ar choice here, 9.2/9.3 is enough (not trying to force my opinion or anything)
2. HP could be like 6/6.5 for a better spread too
3. 00:07:847 (2,3,4) - Make the blanket spacing consistent here
4. 00:17:329 (2) - Hmm i can understand why you didn't map the 1/4 background sounds but to me these sounds warrant the usage of circles here rather than a simple reverse slider, it's a build-up so you can afford having a more dense rhythm
5. 00:23:542 (1,5,1,5) - When making a pattern like this it's better to have consistent overlaps here, if you use symmetry on the vertical axis you need to consider the horizontal one too
6. 00:27:956 (3,4,5,1) - Here the blanket spacing is also slightly inconsistent, also it would look more structured if you made 3 the same visual spacing from 4 and 5 aswell (using the same spacing you used for the blankets) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7227574
7. 00:28:937 (2,3,5,6,2,3,5,6) - Stacks are off here, more noticeable on the pair of 2,3s
8. 00:41:198 (3,1) - Swap the NC here, consistency with 00:41:852 (1,2) -
9. 00:45:326 (2,2) - Are you sure that these are snapped correctly? I'm pretty sure you intended to snap them on the 1/3 tick not the 1/8 tick, maybe you had a reason for that but it's a looooot more intuitive to stay on the 1/3 snap here because going from 1/3 to 1/8 is really awkward to read and play
10. 00:50:231 (2,2,2) - ^
11. 00:51:662 (3) - Kind of an awkward rhythm here, the slider end should definetely be clickable imo because downbeat+finish, delete the reverse arrow and add 2 circles instead? (also NC on the downbeat)
12. 01:05:068 (3,4,5,6,1) - This stream looks kinda unpolished, it feels like it's meant to be straight but it's not, try redoing it using the slider convert tool
13. 01:13:241 (7) - NC here, downbeat and very strong sound
14. 01:22:561 (2,2,2) - Spacing here could be made better, like this 01:22:397 (1,1,1) -
15. 01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I can see why you used the same pattern but tbh you could vary the angle a bit, idk feels kinda redundant when you play especially since vertical back and forths like this get old really fast when you're playing
16. 01:36:294 (2) - Considering the theme of the map wouldn't it be better if this were centered on the playfield?
17. 01:36:784 (1) - You could ctrl+h 01:36:130 (1) - to have a symmetry here with ^ being the axis
18. 01:40:054 (1,2) - These could be stacked, for structure
19. 01:42:016 (1,2,3) - This pattern has some kind of lack of "meaning" i guess? If you compare it to 01:40:381 (3,4,1,2) - which was coherent in its spacing and design. 01:42:016 (1,2) - I feel like the overlaps here with the previous notes are easily avoidable but what bothers me the most is the spacing difference here 01:42:179 (2,3) - 01:42:343 (3,4) - the 1/2 gap has less spacing than the 1/3 gap, it would feel better if it were the opposite
20. 01:42:343 (3,1) - Center these on the playfield and stack them?
21. 01:49:863 (7) - NC here for downbeat and strong sound
    
    I like the old symmetric style but i feel you could make it even more obvious sometimes, if you pick a theme and stop following it at some point some of the notes/patterns can feel really random, just my 2 cents

LeeSinOrAfk wrote:

Hi!

[General]

1. Make the ending times consistent across the whole set, to me 01:53:787 - sounds like the best spot
2. yeah=P

[Anime]

1. Really disagree with the Ar choice here, 9.2/9.3 is enough (not trying to force my opinion or anything)
2. HP could be like 6/6.5 for a better spread too
3. 00:07:847 (2,3,4) - Make the blanket spacing consistent here
4. 00:17:329 (2) - Hmm I can understand why you didn't map the 1/4 background sounds but to me these sounds warrant the usage of circles here rather than a simple reverse slider, it's a build-up so you can afford having a more dense rhythm Sure, though I'm still trying to keep it lower intensity.
5. 00:23:542 (1,5,1,5) - When making a pattern like this it's better to have consistent overlaps here, if you use symmetry on the vertical axis you need to consider the horizontal one too Just old me being careless =p
6. 00:27:956 (3,4,5,1) - Here the blanket spacing is also slightly inconsistent, also it would look more structured if you made 3 the same visual spacing from 4 and 5 aswell (using the same spacing you used for the blankets) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7227574^
7. 00:28:937 (2,3,5,6,2,3,5,6) - Stacks are off here, more noticeable on the pair of 2,3s^
8. 00:41:198 (3,1) - Swap the NC here, consistency with 00:41:852 (1,2) - I'm just going to remove the NC to keep consistency with 00:39:237 (1,2,3) -
9. 00:45:326 (2,2) - Are you sure that these are snapped correctly? I'm pretty sure you intended to snap them on the 1/3 tick not the 1/8 tick, maybe you had a reason for that but it's a looooot more intuitive to stay on the 1/3 snap here because going from 1/3 to 1/8 is really awkward to read and play
10. 00:50:231 (2,2,2) - ^ I have no idea how long it's been that way... ^_^;
11. 00:51:662 (3) - Kind of an awkward rhythm here, the slider end should definetely be clickable imo because downbeat+finish, delete the reverse arrow and add 2 circles instead? (also NC on the downbeat)
12. 01:05:068 (3,4,5,6,1) - This stream looks kinda unpolished, it feels like it's meant to be straight but it's not, try redoing it using the slider convert tool
13. 01:13:241 (7) - NC here, downbeat and very strong sound
14. 01:22:561 (2,2,2) - Spacing here could be made better, like this 01:22:397 (1,1,1) -
15. 01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I can see why you used the same pattern but tbh you could vary the angle a bit, idk feels kinda redundant when you play especially since vertical back and forths like this get old really fast when you're playing
16. 01:36:294 (2) - Considering the theme of the map wouldn't it be better if this were centered on the playfield?
17. 01:36:784 (1) - You could ctrl+h 01:36:130 (1) - to have a symmetry here with ^ being the axis Huh... that's a good idea ^-^
18. 01:40:054 (1,2) - These could be stacked, for structure I'd rather keep the momentum coming from the spacing.
19. 01:42:016 (1,2,3) - This pattern has some kind of lack of "meaning" I guess? If you compare it to 01:40:381 (3,4,1,2) - which was coherent in its spacing and design. 01:42:016 (1,2) - I feel like the overlaps here with the previous notes are easily avoidable but what bothers me the most is the spacing difference here 01:42:179 (2,3) - 01:42:343 (3,4) - the 1/2 gap has less spacing than the 1/3 gap, it would feel better if it were the opposite
20. 01:42:343 (3,1) - Center these on the playfield and stack them?
21. 01:49:863 (7) - NC here for downbeat and strong sound
    
    I like the old symmetric style but I feel you could make it even more obvious sometimes, if you pick a theme and stop following it at some point some of the notes/patterns can feel really random, just my 2 cents. Alright, I'll keep that in mind for later maps...

I'd love modding more but yeah songs without vocals get really old really fast for me when I'm modding so I'm gonna stop here. If you have any questions regarding the mod feel free to find me

Good luck

-Jordan- wrote:

Me and Menda tag team mod incoming.

[Easy]

00:19:659 (1) - Spinner comes too soon after 00:19:618 (6) - . This can be confusing to new players especially when playing at low AR. I recommend you move this to 00:19:945 - .

01:01:471 (2,3,4) - Snap these perfectly to 1.00x as the follow points are currently visible for some of them. Keeping the follow points in makes the map look untidy.

01:06:702 (3) - Change this to 1 circle at 01:06:702 - and non reverse slider starting at 01:07:029 - . I don't know seems weird the way it is now.
I think you're meaning to repeat the pattern of 01:05:395 (1,2) - , so I added the reverse.

01:15:858 (1,2) - This looks a lot nicer.

Did have to flip the next few objects around, but it's a nice suggestion.

Are the slider whistle hit sounds intended in last Kiai? They seem out of place. In a way, they were, though I did remove some of them because they didn't feel right.

Well made Easy difficulty, not much else to say. (Apart from it's above the 1.5* boundary for an Easy difficulty, but I don't really see this as an issue. Maybe find any places where SR spikes and nerf them? But I don't think there are any.)

[Normal]

00:06:212 (3,1) - Have this be a larger jump to emphasize downbeat?

00:10:463 - This SV change seems sudden, I know it fits the music, but it wouldn't kill you to also use SV 1.00x in the intro too. Just seems out of place for a Normal difficulty. Eh. Feels like it'll ruin the whole intro. Hoever, I did move things around so the SV change occurs on the slider. Hopefully that'll make it easier.

00:19:659 (1) - Same as Normal diff, move it forward 1/2 beat.

00:50:027 (2,3,4,5) - Just pointing out this rhythm could be confusing to new players. I can't think of any suggestions though unfortunately.Yeah, I can't think of anything either. At least the rhythms aren't confusing.

01:15:858 (1) - These slider repeats aren't recommended to be mapped in normal difficulties, as some players may prematurely release thinking it is only repeating once as they don't come across sliders like this often, and then break their combo. True. Does make for some better spacing after fixing it.

01:18:474 (3) - NC? Sure, now with the new pattern.

01:39:400 (1,2) - These overlaps confusing, maybe space the 2 notes. Yeah, it does feel out of place for me now that I see it again.

01:49:863 (5,1) - Switch NC.

01:51:253 (1) - Move forward 1/4 beat.

Have spinner end at the same volume with finish + clap for all difficulties. Ended up deleting the hitsounds for the end. Feels out of place now.

Again, well made map. No major issues I can see.

[ANiMAte]
Wow fun map!

00:15:040 (2,3) - Larger spacing since it switches from 1/2 to 2/1 jumps? Maybe. Unfortunately, I can't make it go that far.

00:12:588 (2,3,4,1) - I'd have all of these square patterns be part of their own combos. Sure, though I kept the NC at 00:14:387 (1) -

00:23:542 (1,2,3,4) - Here you have the stream following the flow of the jump, then 00:24:032 (5,6,7,8) - here it is opposing it. I think they should do the same thing since there is a symmetry element here. You could fix this by 00:24:196 (6,7,8) - CTRL+G. That's a good idea, especially since it makes the flow better! Thanks! ^-^

00:25:504 (1) - Have this follow the downward pattern of 00:23:542 (1,5,1,5) - .

00:26:158 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - Love this pattern!

00:28:446 (5,1) - Seems really close to last object compared to all the other 1/2 jumps in this section.

00:39:155 (6,1) - These jumps seem unnecessary. Trying to prepare for the huge jumps after.

00:42:506 (7) - If you do keep these jumps in, I think you should remove all of the NC to make them more readable, like here.

00:43:732 (6,7) - Why do you jump the others but not this?

01:09:237 (5) - Delete, then increase spacing of 01:08:991 (4,1) - ?

01:13:569 (1) - I think the sliders in this section could be more subtly curved it doesn't look good now in my opinion.

01:22:397 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - 01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - Have these jump patterns have symmetrical placement? It would really fit your aesthetic style. Nice subtle rotation by the way. No, but I made it that way.

01:29:591 (1,2) - Space this like the others.

01:30:899 (3,4) - I predict a lot of lost slider ends here. Nothing in the music especially calls it to be a constant 1/4 rhythm so maybe only have them repeat once?

01:31:226 (4,1) - If you do the above, increase spacing here.

01:33:678 (2,3) - Have this slider point directly opposite of the next note so it is parallel with the follow point, looks untidy like this.

01:34:005 (3,2) - Move closer like this? Ooh, stacking. I like it!


01:35:803 (3,4,1) - Move these up and to the left a bit so they aren't as close to the other sliders before them.

01:39:400 (1,1) - Are these NC intended? Deleted the second one.

01:40:544 (4,1) - 01:41:852 (4,1) - Keep these spacing consistent. I'd have them like the first one with the larger jump.

01:43:978 (8,9) - NC/widen this jump, It looks really similar to the stream jump from earlier in the map.

01:44:795 (2,3) - Increase spacing here?

01:47:247 (1,2) - And here? Trying to do the polygon aesthetic.

01:48:555 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Umm, what? So sudden! Don't get me wrong its a cool pattern, but you should ease the player into it more, maybe with some none repeating 1/3 sliders that then lead into a 01:49:209 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - .

01:49:863 (1) - Remove NC?

01:50:435 (2,3) - Looks like the 1/3 from before, move them closer.

I hope this mod was some use to you because this set is so cool, I want to see this ranked in the near future!

+1 Star for you <3 Thank you!

MrMenda wrote:

Second part of the tag team. Set looks really good imo, only some things to point out

Advanced

-00:01:307 (1,2,3) - Curve Sliders
-00:06:539 (1) - ^ I want to keep the cross shape that the objects form.
-00:19:618 (1) - Move it a bit away
-00:22:888 (1,2,3,4) - Turn 1,2 in a slider and 3,4 in another slider. Might be too fast for a <
3* Diff I'm only going to turn 1 and 2 into a slider, because I want
-00:36:621 (1,2) - Turn it into a slider Ended up changing the rhythm on this section.
-00:54:277 (1,2,3,4) - Same process as the previous one Did this one though.
-01:31:553 (1,2) - Might consider changing it to a 1/4 back and forth slider
-01:32:207 (1,2) - ^
-01:32:861 (1,2) - ^
General Comment: Good rhythm emphasis imo.

Hyper

-00:01:307 (1,2,3) - Might consider changing circles to 1 2/1 slider so it fits the song better
-00:06:539 (2) - ^
-00:07:847 (1,2,3,4) - Change them to 1/1 sliders.
-00:19:945 (2,3) - Would change it into a 1/4 back and forth slider that gets 2 white ticks. Trying to emphasise the drums.
-00:25:013 (7) - Might Consider a New combo here I feel like the current pattern follows the phrasing of the music.
-00:27:629 (7) - ^^
-01:39:727 (2,3,4,5,6) - maybe a bit too complex finger control section for a 3.5*? Consider
giving one more time to the 1/4 slider and removing 5. I did the first part, but (3,4,5) are emphasising the piano.
-01:41:035 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - consider removing 6 and 3 Can't find a good way of doing it better.
-01:47:247 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - good section but maybe mapping ¼ back and forth sliders
would make it better for the diff. I feel like keeping the momentum here.
Good structure and pretty solid.

Insane

-00:05:558 (1,2,3) - 1/2 sliders could work better
-00:09:155 (4,5) - Turn 4 into a 1.5/1 slider and 5 into a 1/1 slider, fits much better
-00:19:618 (1,2) - Turn them into kicksliders and introduce a stream in the 2nd and 4th white
ticks. That actually looks good.
-00:33:351 (6) - New Combo
-00:33:759 (11,12,13,1) - Might consider changing this into a ¼ kickslider The stream it maps to is the melody, so I'll keep it.
-00:42:098 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - Introduce 1 in the stream
-01:04:087 (1,2,3) - Maybe Keeping 1 as a kickslider, changing 2 to a stream and end it in 3
might be better
-01:05:558 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Instead of making circles in a curve line consider
introducing some jumps so it looks better.
-01:11:934 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - small jump section, so it doesnt look so linear.
-01:14:550 (5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^
-01:22:397 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Maybe change one of those groups of 4 as a
kickslider. Aesthetically that circle does not look good at all imo. Try another pattern 01:25:013 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - ^ I like the circle pattern, so unless there's another reason, I'll keep it.
-01:31:553 (1,2,3,4) - For this pattern consider alternating kicksliders and streams, so it
doesnt get as repetitive.
-01:34:495 (2,3,4,5,1) - I have seen you have done it, but keep it alternating might be better
imo.
-01:46:267 (2,3,4) - You could introduce sliders that end in the 2nd white tick and start
another one in the white tick.
Concept is good imo.

Keep the good work at it and good luck!!

Alright, I really gotta find a BN for this, can't keep asking for more mods...

squirrelpascals wrote:

M4M as requested (from my q)
all screenshots are purely examples of how the problem can be fixed

anImatE

• 00:07:847 (2) - 00:09:155 (4) - nc both of these because it breaks the nc pattern you use at 00:01:307 (1,1,1,1,2,3,1) -

• 00:12:588 (1,2,3,4) - space this close to 00:11:771 (1) - , because this looks like a 1/2 jump, compared to 00:11:444 (4,1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7655840
Decided to rotate 00:11:771 (1) - over and move down 00:12:588 (1,2,3,1,1,2,3,1) - so i could keep the symmetry

• 00:12:588 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) - either nc 00:13:079 (4) - or move the nc from 00:14:386 (1) - to 00:15:040 (2) - its not consistent atm

• 00:27:629 (1,2,3,4) - space evenly?

• 00:32:370 (5,1) - space these?

• 00:36:130 (10,1) - Space these more also. The speed variation in the pattern 00:35:967 (9,10,1) - is awkward atm https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7655865

• 00:41:852 (6,6,7) - even out these slider curves

• 00:42:833 (7,8,9) - this feels a lot nicer to hit when 8 is placed at an even distance from 00:42:833 (7,9) - I know you do this in streams, but this is only one note, so it plays differently

• 00:45:122 (1,2,1,2) - 00:50:027 (1,2,1,2,1) - Same here. It gives the map an awkward stop-and-go type flow. What you did at 00:50:899 (2,1) - is much nicer, as jumping from a slider is a lot more comfortable for a player Ended up spacing them out evenly, since someone else had suggested it the way it was with this as an alternative.

• 00:54:604 - Make this clickable?

• 00:56:730 (1,2,3) - Give this triple the same curve as all of the others http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7655908

• 00:59:019 (1,2,3) - Move this down, to flow to and from other patterns more nicely

• 01:10:953 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - For all of these patterns, I'm not sure why you chose to make some parts streamy and some parts with repeats. None of these notes in the song sound different to me. Please rethink your rhythm here and all of these other parts. It's been something I've kept changing. I think I've set my mind on a long stream here.

• 01:14:714 (2,3,4,5) - Direct this more downward so that it doesn't interfere with 01:13:896 (2,3,1) -

• 01:26:321 (1) - make this slider shape flow more nicely from 01:26:158 (2,3) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7655949

• 01:49:209 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - please make this stream shape look nicer and more organized. right now it shows lack of structure tbh https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7655975 (this particular example tried to mimic the flow in your current stream. Its just multiple rotations of 01:49:209 (1,2) - )

Insane

• 00:09:155 (4) - nc here. breaks current nc pattern

• 00:17:329 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - The only way i am able to read this pattern is because of the overlapping in the triple. That being said, the contrast of your spacing is very low. You should make these spacing differences more noticable https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7656063 (lowered ar for viewability) This happens other times throughout the map and I make some comments on it

• 00:25:504 (7) - nc

• 00:24:523 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:26:158 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - The rhythm for these patterns aren't bad, sure, but the aesthetics are far from organized. The slider+double patterns don''t "fit in" amongst each other very well because of their differences in appearance. It's fine to use different sharpness in curves but these particular patterns don't look nice together atm. Try using keyboard transformations of one slider+double pattern to place these, which will result in more similar curvature and give the patterns more structure https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7656190 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7656203

Not that all curves like this in the map have to be the same, but patterns should look more uniform alongside each other

• 00:23:542 - Starting here your nc patterns are also off. It doesn't make sense to use a 2,3,2,3 nc pattern (2 beats, 3 beats), but 2,2,1 in this case does make sense. 00:25:504 (7) - 00:28:119 (7) - 00:30:735 (7) - nc these. If you don't want this nc pattern then just do a 4,4,4,4 pattern Went ahead with the 2/2/1 spacing, guessing because these divisions all divide into 4.

• 00:35:313 (1,4) - space these

• 00:40:462 (4,1) - 00:39:154 (9,1) - space closer, like you did with 00:41:771 (5,1) - and 00:43:732 (6,7) -

• 00:52:561 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - Same case here with streams, as far as similar curvature goes.

• 01:33:188 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same thing with the low spacing contrast. I don't really know why 01:33:514 (6) - is spaced like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7656261

• 01:35:395 (5,1) - same with the spacing

• 01:36:130 (3) - nc here? because of the difference in these two 01:36:130 (3) -

• 01:41:117 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - same comment with the uneven curvature

• 01:45:286 (2,3,4) - space these more, looks like it can be a 1/4 jump

Lack of spacing contrast and structural aesthetics are the two main things you should really think about when going over this diff

Kuro

• 00:13:732 (4,5,1) - These repeats on the sliders barely even apply to the song yet. Use a more direct form of rhythm

• 00:32:370 (3) - blanket with 00:31:880 (2) -

• 01:42:670 (3) - nc here because its 1/3 now

rest looks good

Advanced

• 00:18:147 (4,5,6,7,8) - Compared to the rest of all of your other patterns, the path the player is supposed to follow is less clear. Make this easier to read? (even if it already is) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7657705

• 00:54:604 (2,3,1) - move this down to line up with 00:54:277 (1) - ?

• 01:05:395 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Same comment about similar curvative in sliders. It just shows structure. The shapes i see in this chain of circles and sliders feels random

• 01:13:079 (4,1) - HIGHLY recommend lowering spacing here. You don't do this anywhere else in the map, very unexpected to an advanced player

• 01:15:858 (1) - Move it up to line up wtih 01:15:531 (7,8) - ?

• 01:34:168 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - this double stack pattern is also not used anywhere in the map and, while ds allows for it, can also confuse the player

better

Norm

• 00:05:558 (1,2,3,1) - Space these evenly. Normal players still rely on time-distance correlation b/t objects. ALso, theres 2 ds errors in automod

• 00:27:792 (3) - move this up to line up wtih 00:26:648 (2) - ?

• 00:52:643 (2,3,4) - Make these the same curve? like you did with 00:54:931 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - etc. It shows nice organization and structure

• 01:39:400 (1) - Make this a 1/2 slider and move 01:39:564 (2) - to 01:39:727 - ? Maybe start 01:40:871 (4) - at the next white tick as well some how I'm leaving this as 2 lands where the melody begins 4 is similar to that.

• 01:47:247 (1) - make this wave more symmetric https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7657804

Eas

• 00:19:618 (6) - nc

• 00:29:754 (2) - make this a ctrl + h of 00:28:773 (1) -

• 01:48:555 (3,1) - fix blanket

Alright, I really gotta find a BN for this, can't keep asking for more mods...

Yes, you seem to have devoted a lot of energy into modding this lol. If you've reached the point where you are denying a lot of mods because of your intentions, then that means go ahead and find a bn. Although, i found a lot of fundamental / aesthetic errors in this map when modding so, while you honestly may not get an icon, almost nobody does on their first check, but the advice will still be valuable! You have been working on this set for a year, maybe push for rank on another map then come back to this (That what i'm doing right now)

That being said. Good luck!


Good luck!

Chriz wrote:

Ill be trying a mod, cant be hurting

Insane

00:19:618 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this looks a bit off because of the repetetive slider. maybe make em show away like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7983556 so you can have a better circular shape Don't really like the way the slider juts out. I did move the circles a little though
00:21:580 (2,3,4,5,6) - ^ or make the stream shape more stretched out
00:34:168 (2) - there is no sound on the red tick, move the slider 1/4th beat to the right ( so its starts on the blue tick, you might have to adjust the space between both repetetive slider ) There is a beat here, I can show you with the original chart -> https://youtu.be/peqj4gv1QL0?t=40s
00:38:909 (6,7,8,9,1) - slider has a too sharp curve
00:40:217 (1,2,3,4,1) - slider doesnt connect with the shape of the burst correctly
00:41:198 (3,1,2,3,4,5,1) - this stream is too sharp in its movement from first slider to burst compared to 2nd slider transition
00:42:098 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - this looks weird? ( unsure tho ) It looks fine to me.
00:43:405 (2,3,4,5,6) - 2 3 and 4 have too little of an shape compared to 4 5 and 6
00:47:084 (1) - lower 1 a bit, not perfect connection to stream I tried moving 2 up a bit instead.
00:47:983 (2,3,4,5,6) - as for 00:43:405 (2,3,4,5,6)
00:48:392 (1) - i dont know what to think of the shape of this slider going into another direction than the stream before and after, might be ok? unsure tho I'm not really sure how I would fix this, and I honestly like the snaking look.
00:52:316 (1) - too much of a circular shape i would say Can't really straighten it, it would hit the top of the screen.
00:53:297 (1,2,3,4,5) - connection is not perfect
01:02:779 (1,2,3,4) - does not flow perfectly, start 3 above 2
01:04:087 (1) - as for 00:19:618 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6)
01:21:416 (2) - this one has too many repeats, only 1 on the red tick
01:22:234 (5,1) - transition between 5 and 1 is not perfect, doesnt look nice, dunno if you wanna change it
01:23:705 (1) - make this 1/4th jump bigger maybe (?)
01:24:850 (5,1) - as for 01:22:234 (5,1)
01:26:321 (1) - ctrl+j and reposition
01:31:880 (2,3,4,5,6) - ok some advice over several diffs. Animate and Insane have the same pattern on 2 seperate parts of the map, and since Animate should be harder, the pattern as in this place should be in Animate aswell, but NOT vice versa ( you might add it tho if you want to ) ( im talking about the 1/4th jump onto the slider )
01:32:207 (6) - NC
01:31:880 (2,3,4,5,6) - and 01:32:861 (1) - should have the same shape, they play to the same sound
01:33:678 (7) - this one uses 1/6th beats from either red to 2nd violet or white tick ( you even used it here 01:36:294 (2) - )
01:35:476 (1) - use here a 1/4th jump aswell, as for 01:32:207 (6) -
01:44:141 (1,2,3) - make it more "anti jumpy" with a sharper circular movement in the burst starting with the 1 on the highest position like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7983733
01:50:681 (7) - place a circle here on 256 192 if you want to
01:51:253 (1) - again, make the end of your slider silent with 5% volume at the sliderend

Animate

00:28:119 (4) - ctrl+g
00:28:446 (5) - ^ ( make this change together with ^ )
00:43:813 (5,6) - oh, 2 objects on the same tick!
00:44:795 (1) - to make this pattern more consistent ( since its done with the same sound as the following slider ) turn it by 180° and ctrl + g like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7983358
00:52:970 (6) - this ( and the upcoming ones ) have the same sound as these 00:40:544 (5) - 00:41:852 (6) - 00:42:506 (6) - for consistency you might wanna change it I don't get what you mean... the sliders are very similar...
00:53:623 (5) - ^
00:54:277 (5) - ^
00:53:297 (1,2,3,4,5) - this shape looks a bit ugly imo
00:53:950 (6,7,8,9,10) - the circles don't look like they flow perfectly onto the slider
01:05:068 (3,4,5,6,1) - ctrl +g and move it a bit to the left, starting at 338 59, will lead into an anti-jump to 01:05:558 (2) - which is something you want to ( looking at the upcoming pattern ). while i understand your movement as well, it only occurs once and consistency wise, i would rather change the movement fitting to the upcoming pattern than to one that only plays once. I do sort of understand your idea, but I think it's better if I just ctrl+G 2 and 3
01:09:318 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - i like the idea, but its a bit unround in the 01:09:726 (2,3,4) - section. i would recommend you to make it more aesthetic using a fibonacci stylish pattern http://raganwald.com/assets/images/fibonacci.png , so you can see how a perfectly expanding circle should look like =D I was thinking of fixing the spiral, hope this works.
01:11:443 (4,5,6) - looks a bit off aswell (sadly, to fix this shit, its a whole lot of work)
01:11:688 (7,8,9) - if you wanna change the direction, you have to have an angle between 7 and 8 and 8 and 9
01:12:424 (7,8) - adjust 7, to make it good looking, i would adjust 8 as well ( because of 7 )
01:13:242 (1) - don't make 1 as sharp, place it somewhere at 396 135
01:13:569 (1,2,3) - this does not look good aswell, more circular movement in these 3 please
01:18:474 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - if you wanna have this stream movement, you have to adjust the slider as well, so it looks symmetrical ( since that is what your map is about )
01:19:782 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - ^
01:21:907 (5) - is not on an active sound, either map 4 as a slider or just leave 5 away
01:23:542 (2,3,1) - you could make these with higher ds ( just an idea to highlight the harsh sound in this part )
01:24:032 (2,3,4) - this flows bad, make maybe 2 and 3 same shape just mirrored and 4 in the middle of it? ( around 255 161 )
01:26:158 (2,3,1) - use the same shape for at least the circles as for 01:23:542 (2,3,1) -
01:36:294 (2) - this is wrong timed, place it at the next white tick
01:49:100 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this looks fancy, but is kinda hard to hit ( is imo the hardest pattern in the map, while not being symmetrical ), also you have a nice change of sounds in this pattern
01:49:536 (1) - NC
01:51:253 (1) - make the end of the spinner silent with 5% volume
map is cool, keep the fun work up!=)

The most stuff in Insane and Animate is either Aesthetic or Consistency in Patterns.

Kuro

00:01:307 (1,2,3) - ctrl + j 2 and make them more spaced
00:25:504 (8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - in this whole pattern you have used 3 different styles of slider without any logical pattern ( goes on for the whole map,
as an idea, you could use straight repetetives for 1/4th repetetives and curved ones for 1/3rd. same goes for slider, make them differ in mapping style with their appearance. Players, who play a Hard Diff might be confused when using several stylish slider for the same purposes without finding out why.
^for some reason, you do it for 1/1th beat slider tho I didn't make this map originally, so I have no idea behind Kuro's reasoning, but I did change some of the sliders.
00:59:673 (4,5) - make this jump sharper compared to the previous movement ( somewhere to the bottom right of 3 and 4)
01:02:452 (4,5) - ^ I would like to preserve the triangle being made here.
01:09:318 (4) - ?? explain please Again, this was originally Kuro's, and I don't really have a problem with it. I'll only change it if more people ask that.
01:15:858 (1,2) - good ear to make these slider follow the music, just make them a bit friendlier for the eyes Not really sure what you mean by this...
01:18:474 (1) - ^this one is missing this main aspect of the previous 2 slider? Same as above, but I tried to improve it
01:31:553 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1) - this kiai looks fun to play, great job
01:50:190 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - make this flow a bit different maybe(?) , except for this pattern, flow looked good imo =DNot sure if I was supposed to fix something here...

Advanced

00:19:291 (8,1) - make this a line
00:36:294 (6) - let this flow into the next circle
00:38:256 (2) - dont make this special, no need for specialty here
00:52:316 (1,2,3) - shape of 3 looks weird compared to 1, also 2 doesnt line up with either slider
00:57:874 (2,3) - small mistakes like these are easily fixable, make them line up correctly

Normal

00:16:675 (3,1) - not lined up properly
00:19:291 (4,5) - DS, i wrote something in Easy, look it up ( 00:53:623 (3,4) - )
00:26:158 (1,2) - ^
00:26:648 (2,3) - weird movement a newbie wouldnt be able to comprehend, make it a line or drop the circle
00:41:525 (3,4) - why suddenly this slidershape? :< I wanted some variety in the sliders when I first made this
00:47:411 (2,3,4) - ^Movement is kind of ridiculous here, so I'll change this one.
01:05:395 (1,2,3,4) - ^Same as first one
00:44:795 (2,3,4,5) - make these half a beat long, 2 hard for normal The land on 1/3 beats here
00:50:027 (2,3,4,5) - ^^
01:47:247 (1) - you could use cooler shapes like this for longer slider

easy

you have some patterns that are not lined up properly like 00:37:602 (4,5) - , 00:28:119 (3,1) -
01:26:321 (1,2,3) - why do you use a different slidershape for 3? please fix
00:53:623 (3,4) - too far away, from previous element. small tip for this: go into AiMod and check "check distance snap" to see on lower diffs if you have made mistakes with the DS like this https://puu.sh/vDzGh/bd3fa288fa.png

uuh, was more than i expected, anyway fun maps with fun diffs
gl with mappo

There we go. Finally finished! Thanks for the mod, Chriz!

1. 00:07:847 (1,2,1,2) - Doesn't follow the piano since the piano holds for half a measure. How about this instead?
   
   
   
   
2. 00:15:694 (3,4) - These are undermapped. It's clearly a different section of the music from 00:11:771 (1) and more intense.
3. 00:17:329 (2,3,4) - Shouldn't this follow the same rhythm as 00:17:983 (5,6,7,8,9) since they're mapped to the same 1/4 beats?
4. 00:35:640 (8) - This sharp angle really contradicts all your previous flow (circular movement). I know it's only meant to be held down, but can you justify why you angled this so unnaturally coming out of (7)?
   
   
   
   
5. 00:41:852 (6) - 00:42:833 (7) - where's your clap and finish? i'm assuming that since they have the same shape as the hitsounded sliders, they're supposed to indicate the same instrument
6. 00:44:795 (1,1,2,1,2) - Every quarter measure is the same, repeated sound. You're not really expressing those repeated sounds, since the reverse slider and 1/3 jumps {00:45:122 (1,2,1,2)} are completely different patterns; they conflict with each other. Maybe keep things simple and do this to express that idea?
   
   
   
   
7. 00:58:692 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Kind of a sharp drop between these bursts, which makes it uncomfortable compared to the rest of the pattern.
   
   
   
   
8. 01:02:288 (1,2,3) - you should raise this so it flows nicely into 01:02:615 (1)
   
   
   
   
9. 01:04:087 (1) - stack with 01:03:433 (1) slidertail
10. 01:04:414 (3) - i'd recommend to NC, because these jumps look like they lack structure as one combo
11. 01:04:904 (2,3) - not really a fan of how you flow into the burst, it just doesn't feel right imo
    
    
    
    
12. 01:09:319 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - you could make the curve more appealing
13. 01:17:166 (1,2) - inconsistently placed compared to 01:15:858 (1,2). like all you have to do is ctrl+g and ctrl+j 01:15:858 (1,2).
14. 01:26:321 (1,2) - i don't think these have any type of symmetry. also, (1) could be angled better from 01:26:158 (2,3). kind of like this
    
    
    
    
15. 01:37:765 (4) - would look more appealing if you copied (3)'s direction
16. 01:45:940 (1,2,1,2,1) - 1/1 doesn't reflect the music as well
17. 01:50:681 (1,1) - why do you ignore the piano between these notes?

Shishou wrote:

Hi from my mod q
mod this map
link : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/610738

[Easy]
00:09:155 (2) - use ds
00:19:618 (1) - finish?
00:52:316 (1,2) - fix blanket
01:08:010 (1,2) - ^
01:10:953 (2,1) - stacking this two would be betterSee the next comment
01:10:953 (2) - 1/1 reversed slider would be better
01:13:569 (1) - ^ I can't really get this one to work
01:21:416 (2) - use dsThese were already using the right DS
01:20:762 (4) - use ds^
01:22:070 (3,1) - stack this two
01:30:245 (5) - ctrl+h then use ds? I'm trying to blanket 01:28:937 (3) -
01:38:092 (2,4) - stack this two
01:51:171 (2) - finish
01:51:253 (1) - i think putting a spinner on a blue tick in an easy diff is prohibited While I don't think it's prohibited, I will move it.
[]
[Normal]
your slider velocity is kinda slow try making it to 1.0
https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/Normal
I don't think the 0.1x SV difference will make much of a difference, also it will mess up every single slider I have so far.
00:12:752 (2) - use ds Which it is...?
00:14:386 (1) - make this a 2/1 slider. It's weird. I don't here a significant sound here
00:15:694 (2) - same here ^
00:19:618 (5) - nc
00:40:217 (4) - make it a 1/2 reversed slider? since you used it here 00:38:910 (1) - and they just sound the same
00:44:795 (2,3,4,5) - using a blue tick in a low diff is a bit hard for beginners It should be fine, as they're on sliderends.
00:50:027 (2,3,4,5) - ^^
01:00:163 (1) - use ds
01:10:953 (2) - i think using a 2/1 slider here is a bad idea. your missing an important note try using a 1/1 reversed slider
01:13:569 (2) - ^
01:22:724 (1,2) - make this a 1/2 slider It doesn't really work well... I'll consider it.
01:39:564 (2,3) - fix blanket

that's all too lazy to mod all your diff you can mod whatever diff you want to mod in my map
good luck

F1r3tar wrote:

highest diff

1. 00:07:847 (1,2,1,2) - Doesn't follow the piano since the piano holds for half a measure. How about this instead?
   
   
   
   
2. 00:15:694 (3,4) - These are undermapped. It's clearly a different section of the music from 00:11:771 (1) and more intense.
3. 00:17:329 (2,3,4) - Shouldn't this follow the same rhythm as 00:17:983 (5,6,7,8,9) since they're mapped to the same 1/4 beats?
4. 00:35:640 (8) - This sharp angle really contradicts all your previous flow (circular movement). I know it's only meant to be held down, but can you justify why you angled this so unnaturally coming out of (7)? It was mostly to keep aesthetics. The way it was first would stack on 00:34:495 (5,6,7) - and avoid colliding with 00:34:986 (2,3,4,5,6) - . However, I rotated it 180 degrees to (hopefully) fix the flow problem.
   
   
   
   
5. 00:41:852 (6) - 00:42:833 (7) - where's your clap and finish? i'm assuming that since they have the same shape as the hitsounded sliders, they're supposed to indicate the same instrument Not sure about 00:42:833 (7) - , but yeah I missed the first one.
6. 00:44:795 (1,1,2,1,2) - Every quarter measure is the same, repeated sound. You're not really expressing those repeated sounds, since the reverse slider and 1/3 jumps {00:45:122 (1,2,1,2)} are completely different patterns; they conflict with each other. Maybe keep things simple and do this to express that idea?
   
   
   
   00:44:795 (1) - is really only there to signal that they're in 1/3 polarity.
7. 00:58:692 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Kind of a sharp drop between these bursts, which makes it uncomfortable compared to the rest of the pattern.
   
   
   
   
8. 01:02:288 (1,2,3) - you should raise this so it flows nicely into 01:02:615 (1)
   
   
   
   
9. 01:04:087 (1) - stack with 01:03:433 (1) slidertail
10. 01:04:414 (3) - i'd recommend to NC, because these jumps look like they lack structure as one combo
11. 01:04:904 (2,3) - not really a fan of how you flow into the burst, it just doesn't feel right imo
    
    
    
    I've tried scaling up the stream and ctrl+J'ing it.
12. 01:09:319 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - you could make the curve more appealing I've already done that a few times, I think it looks good now xD
13. 01:17:166 (1,2) - inconsistently placed compared to 01:15:858 (1,2). like all you have to do is ctrl+g and ctrl+j 01:15:858 (1,2). :facepalm:
14. 01:26:321 (1,2) - i don't think these have any type of symmetry. also, (1) could be angled better from 01:26:158 (2,3). kind of like this
    
    
    
    
15. 01:37:765 (4) - would look more appealing if you copied (3)'s direction
16. 01:45:940 (1,2,1,2,1) - 1/1 doesn't reflect the music as well
17. 01:50:681 (1,1) - why do you ignore the piano between these notes?I hope my compromise works...

JeirYagtama wrote:

Hyper

00:38:910 (9,10,11,12,1) - not sure if its still allowed to put streams in a hyper/hard soooo stand to be corrected There's only one, so I don't think it will be too big of a deal.
00:49:046 (7,8,9) - a bit overkill on the spacing imo It's actually very similar to the notes around it.
kinda suggest a little bit of equal spacing soo
01:02:452 (4,5) - hmm why not stack 5 like what you did to the others? 00:57:220 (4,5) - for example
01:15:858 (1) - a bit of a nazi mod but kinda suggest to remove the 3rd red point
wew
01:05:395 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - density between advanced and this is pretty questionable The music climaxes at this point, so the higher intensity is justified.
this diff is gud sorry for the short mod on this one doe wew

Insane

00:35:640 (3,4) - kinda suggest to ctrl g them seperately cos imo it has bettter flow than what it is now
00:51:498 (3,4,5) - pattern doesnt make sense to me cos the pitch of the sounds are pretty high but the pattern is set down to bottom right corner
00:54:277 (5,6) - spacing is a bit too low imo very strong sounds with really low spacing sooo fix that i guess
01:13:079 (7,1) - I get the aesthetics but this is awkward spacing cos 1 is a pretty strong sound with low spacing as well
00:26:158 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - shouldnt this kind of spacing/buildup be in 00:28:773 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - its pretty obvious that this part should get that spacing cos the song intensifies more than the last part
00:43:814 (7,8) - yep spacing again.
00:46:267 (3,4,5) - just space out 4 and 5 between 3
01:02:615 (5,1) - alsooooo yea this is more of a spacing mod now sooo Guess I put aesthetics before function ;^-^
only concern is the spacing since you've been putting strong sounds with low spacing and stuff

gl

Sidetail wrote:

[ANiMAte]
00:15:694 (3) - would add NC here since atmosphere is much different from previous notes
00:27:138 (1) - not sure why this deserves an NC while previous parts like 00:26:158 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - doesnt. Have a look at 00:31:389 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - these are similar to previous example and this has unified NCing
00:39:155 (6,7) - really not necessary to have spacing emphasis here, would make a bit more sense if it was atleast kiai. ( you never even had this things in kiai before ) Probably not going to put kiai here because there's already too much kiai.
00:44:795 (1,1,1) - unNC these since 1/3 are held passively (sliderend) and does not require reading attention. Randomly spamming NC does bring down in polishedness of the map in my perspective. also current spacing is really uniform so that also adds to the point that you dont need NC there. I'll keep 00:44:795 (1) - because it signals the 1/3 rhythm.
00:50:027 (1,1,1) - ^ ^
00:51:989 (4) - missing a lot of things around this note Not really, the melody sort of lulls here.
00:59:509 (3) - missing clap? just before that note 00:58:855 (3) - and 00:59:182 (3) - had it tho .-. Probably forgot to hitsound it correctly after replacing the note
01:05:068 (3) - if you had it something like this 01:04:087 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - would be natural to have NC there since consistency and notes after that has very different spacing than before (spaced streams)
01:03:433 (1,2) - music hasnt changed drastically so not sure why these are much lesser ds than 01:02:779 (2,3) - . each pair`s ds difference is entire 1.0x which is a lot of change.
01:05:722 (3) - missing clap
01:05:395 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - this is highest diff so you should really show ups and downs with the song. if song is growing suspense you should show that by slightly increasing the ds Good idea.
01:08:010 (1,2,3,4) - really really unsure why these are much easier than previous notes since they are still part of kiai (kiai didnt end yet!)
01:09:318 (1,2,3) - would be nicer if these are more uniformly increases in ds. another such example is 01:09:564 (4,1) - . this does not look good since sudden increase breaks the aesthetics I really don't want to remap this curve, it took quite a bit so to make it correct.
01:11:280 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^ I am just pointing this out since 01:11:934 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - is a lot well done in terms of how it looks and overall curvature
01:19:128 (1,1) - remove NC since parts before are quite similar to aim moving speed of slider velocity (excessive nc). tho one point i would make is that i am curious to know why you increased the ds for streams since song suggests that they are similar volume and feeling of previous streams It just made the slider easier to place.
01:12:914 (5,6,7,8,1) - show that there is much higher emphasis than previous rest of stream. You can probably hear the highlight of these five notes in the song clearly. increase of ds and single nc to denote there is ds change would be nice edition tbh.
01:23:623 (3,1) - please avoid doing this since there is really nothing to emphasize this to. just doesnt fit somewhere in middle of non-kiai part...
01:22:397 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - doesnt really fit with the song, dont you think? tho might work better if these are smaller distance and slowly increasing in terms of ds so that you have more emphasis on 01:23:705 (1) - rather than having weird 01:23:623 (3,1) - jump issues like current point points outThat actually makes for a really nice pattern. Thanks!
01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1) - ^^
01:34:495 (3,4) - these are much easier to play than 01:31:880 (3,4,5,6,1) - . switch places in terms of rhythm. I figured...
01:50:190 (1) - this shouldve been clickable since 01:50:435 (2,3) - these are (both following piano but one is rather weirdly passive)
01:50:681 (1) - this is not even in the song especially reverse portion. real clickable should start at 01:50:844 -

you probably need more mods from more experienced modders/mappers since something simple like 01:35:313 (4,1) - has sudden increase of 0.5x compared to 01:34:659 (4,1) - pair and 01:35:967 (4,1) - pair... :c

[insane]
00:17:329 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - not sure what youre trying to follow here since music clearly hints something like chain of short sliders with reverses. current one feels like you are producing a new rhythm, delete the notes and hear it if you dont believe it!
00:28:283 (2) - strong hits at like 00:28:446 should`ve really been clickable, not passive hit (sliderend)
01:11:607 (4,5) - what happened to spacing :l compared to 01:12:098 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - , if you are going to emphasize the song, make sure you lower entire portion of the mapping too (lowering ds for anything after 01:10:626 (1) - in example)
01:12:915 (6,7,1) - shoulve been expressed atleast in short sliders with reverse denoting the melody which differentiates from 01:14:713 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - which doesnt have those highlight notes
01:23:623 (8,1) - really, save these for highest diff, streams are pretty long enough for insane
01:26:239 (8,1) - ^ (etc, find and apply for other places too)
01:27:629 (1,2) - each of these shouldve been triples in slider form. you even have them like this for other parts 01:30:245 (1,2) -
01:27:138 (4) - really doesnt fit there, there is nothing that starts at that point. just having 01:26:975 (3) - as https://puu.sh/wohNW/cee46ce4b2.jpg is quite respectable since its quiet portion of the song　It feels too empty like this, so I made a slight change
01:28:283 (3,4) - ^ (etc)
01:32:125 (5,1) - overkill as usual (please fix the rest)
01:33:514 (6,7) - really unsure of rhythm choice here.. doesnt follow anything, try this https://puu.sh/wohYU/2178737a22.jpg
01:48:555 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - simple sliders with reverse would work just fine. you never introduced these 1/3 streams until very end which is bit odd.. for each NC there, make new slider with reverse.

i think current is enough to really show what i think about where this map stands. feel free to ask me questions if you like. try to poke experienced modders like Naxess for quick guidance. kudos to you for mapping almost entire mapset by you. Thanks!

Ayato_k wrote:

Hi from Mod Q o/

[Kuro's Hyper]

01:41:280 (3,4,5,6) - This part didn't felt natural playing it , I think you should try something like you did here : 00:41:362 (4,1) - Thought so, and that's a good idea

Seaweed wrote:

nm from queue

[Animate]
00:07:847 (1,2,1) - use ctrl shift d to make a triangle with even spacing instead. Currently it looks messy with random spacing
00:11:117 (3,4) - copy paste this pattern instead 00:10:463 (1,2) -
00:13:079 (1) - I'm assuming you want to use NC for each square pattern, if that's the case then remove this NC to keep the pattern neat
00:14:387 (1) - ^
00:17:656 (6,7,8) - there's clearly mappable beats on each 1/4 tick here, it would make much more sense to the player to just stream the whole thing
00:18:310 (12,1,2) - same with this section but I recommend using kick sliders or repeat sliders (or both) Skipping this one since I don't hear enough to warrant it.
00:18:310 (12) - NC and remove NC for 00:18:637 (1) -
00:19:618 (6) - nc
00:20:272 (1) - remove nc
00:27:956 (7,1) - spacing on this blanket is uneven to this one 00:28:446 (2,1) - I would consider having the same spacing, looks nicer
00:29:100 (3) - I think you can increase the spacing for this, the cursor's momentum supports that better
00:29:591 (6) - ^
00:30:081 (3,6) - ^
00:37:929 (1,2) - ctrl g and ctrl h, that angle flows much better with the previous slider then keep the movement consistent throughout the pattern so, ctrl g 00:38:583 (1,2) - aswell
00:39:237 (7) - inconsistent spacing, player can't recognize that this is still part of the 1/4 burst and will choke Originally there to artificially increase SR, but I agree xP
00:40:544 (5) - ^
00:41:852 (6) - ^
00:42:506 (6) - ^
00:43:487 (1) - ^ player will think it *is* part of the 1/4 burst and choke again Made it part of the stream.
00:45:122 (2,3,4,5) - you can use this part for a 1/3 stream instead, I find patterns like this pretty weird to play plus it gives a little variety in stream speeds.
00:50:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^
01:10:299 (1,2,3,4,5) - this part opens too wide. Also I found inconsistent spacing there as well. If you're going to increase the ds, first indicate it with an NC and then keep the same ds throughout that section. For example 01:09:564 (4,1) - ds is 0.7 but 01:09:645 (1,2) - is 0.6 and 01:09:727 (2,3) - is 0.8
I would recommend starting at 0.5x going up by 0.1x each section. It should look something like this https://gyazo.com/0269a5b5056ae4e39acfcd0a4e2b1401 (try using sliders to make the shape then ctrl shift f) Not exactly the way you suggested, but I tried to recreate it with your ideas in mind
01:11:280 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - I found some parts with inconsistent spacing, you might want to check it's all equal
01:13:896 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
01:47:247 (1,2) - there should be something on the red tick
01:50:516 (5,1) - this spacing suggests that the circles are on a 1/1 scale, you should nerf the spacing or use a slider Tried placing them closer, hope it works.

[Normal]
you might want to check ai mod

00:06:539(1) - remove nc
00:07:847 (5) - add nc
00:27:792 (3) - way too close in the timeline for a circle I suggest splitting it up like this Felt too sparse, did something different.
00:43:160 (2,3,4) - ^ this would fit better ^
00:44:795 (2,3,4) - make all these on 1/2 scale. People who play normal can't swap between 1/2 and 1/3 properly yet All the clickable parts land on the white tick, so it should be fine.
00:50:027 (2,3,4) - ^^
01:31:553 (1,2) - not enough space in timeline split up the sliders like this instead Feels too weird since Easy would have a more complex rhythm. I made them 1/2 repeats instead.
01:34:168 (1,2,3,4) - ^
There's a lot more parts that use 1/2 scale but you should keep it all to 1/1 instead. Like easy but just more spacing and sometimes the occasional 1/2 repeat slider

Ayato_k wrote:

Hi from Mod Q o/
It was pretty hard to find things to say because of the big amount of passed mods ><

[Normal]

01:08:664 (2) - I would've seen this slider a little bit more on the left for the flow
01:31:716 (2,3,4) - I think there should be more space between those sliders because there's a little pause. and earlier in the map you used kind of same Slider stacking pattern (00:44:795 (2,3,4) - ) So it can be confusing
01:34:332 (2,3,4) - Same Done in the previous mod

[Advanced]

00:11:771 (1) - Remove NC ?
00:19:618 (1) - Same ? This is a new phrase, so I'll leave it.
01:22:397 (1) - This circle should be sticked to this 01:22:561 (2) - one too , like it's the case for all following ones (short : Theres a tiny gap between 1 and 2)

[Kuro's Hyper]

01:41:280 (3,4,5,6) - This part didn't felt natural playing it , I think you should try something like you did here : 00:41:362 (4,1) -


[Insane]

01:32:125 (5,1) - Spacing felt wierd here
01:35:395 (5,1) - Same Fixed.


Great mapset ! Good luck with you map dude !

MaridiuS wrote:

wew that's a lot of mods okay, will do a quick one on hardest difficulty

[ANiMAte]
So basically one thing I noticed is spacing emphasis in my opinion not being correctly utilized. Flow and rhythm seems to have no errors so I will now comment on spacing, will now explain my thoughts. Also some patterning issues that are often related to not using spacing emphasis correctly. Please bear in mind that when people see a lot of star priority, they will usually keep their thoughts to themselves instead of doing core criticism because it would probably feel bad putting this much time into a set, now to having a reason to remap some parts. I'm putting my honest opinions, and trying to help, at least before BN's reach you. And after this mod, think it will be in a nice state. I'm glad that I can get constructive criticism of any type. It's been quite a journey modding this map for 2 years now.

Spacing emphasis
00:31:880 (1,1,1) - for example these notes, they are rather loud don't you think? You've even put finish hitsound to emphasize them, however, it also needs some spacing emphasis, like it is fairly stronger than 00:32:043 (2) - this random beat which doesn't have any special sound or hitsound on it, but it has the same spacing, which leads to boring stuff on a extra difficulty of 6*. http://i.imgur.com/OX1rhUV.jpg doing something like this should give proper emphasis to (1), and low spacing to (2) which deserves it.
00:34:822 (1,2) - moments later you have this kinda huge jump, but the (1)'s I mentioned are kinda special having finish and stuff.
00:23:542 (1) - these two notes could also use some special things, but it is patterned in such a way that it isn't possible I think, or you will need some idea to break the pattern, same for 00:25:504 (1) - but i will not be persistent in changing them, since they are kinda hard to emphasize while preserving similar pattern. Yeah, unfortunately I don't want to break the pattern, so this will have have to stay. :/
00:26:975 (8,1) - but this jump vs 00:27:138 (1,2) - is even lower, meaning that (1) gets less emphasis than a random filler note 00:27:302 (2) - which is kinda not productive. Angled 00:26:321 (2,3,4) - sections up to lower DS
00:27:629 (5,6,7) - this pattern for example, it has 2 finishes on 5 and 6 , but they also have same spacing as 6 to 7, 7 isn't a finish or a special note. In fact, 6 should be a slider, since it is so much stronger than (7)
00:29:100 (3,4,5) - here it is again, 4 having less spacing than 5, 00:29:591 (6,1,2) - think that this was done correctly though. Flipped 00:28:773 (1,4) -
00:35:967 (9,10) - kinda random big jump, its a bit of a problem that you did such low spacing here 00:37:929 (1,2,3,4) - since if basic filler jumps are big spaced, 2 and 4 are also filler but have 0 spacing.
00:54:931 (1) - random low spacing? Probably a mistake I made.
01:05:885 (4,1) - YES YES 01:06:539 (4,1) - YES HOT 01:07:193 (4,1) - meh, change the pattern needs spacing as previous ones.
01:22:397 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - wow these are overscaled af. The beats they're following aren't intense as the map shows them to be. I suggest selecting them and doing ctrl+shift+s on 0.8 or less. After going through your mod, yeah, it's a bit over-dramatic.
01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - ^
01:28:283 (3) - this note is really strong, probably the strongest in the whole song, yet you give it 0 complete emphasis with spacing
01:29:591 (1,3) - ^
01:44:141 (9,10) - huge ass jump, but this deserves more emphasis 01:44:632 (1) - and it gets a lot less. If you listen in slow motion you can hear that 10 is only a kick, not even accompanied with a strong piano or something.

Structure
00:37:929 (1,2,3,4) - a set of two should be more practical than a set of 3 for patterning, what I mean here is that its okay to break the pattern here in order to follow 00:38:664 - this and 00:38:828 - into making a stream, which suits your piano following in the section.
00:39:237 (7,8,9) - Since the only issue isn't spacing, i'll put this into structuring. All of the 3 sliders are the same, and contain big spacing. However, on similar notes here 00:40:544 (5,6,7) - they change angle, curve, and have even lower spacing than previous sliders. I recommend doing same shape and huge jumps like you did on previous pattern.
00:49:373 (6) - this doesn't look appealing, i see no reason to make it different than (5). So make it the same and put a proper blanket with 00:49:373 (6,7) -
00:50:027 (1,4) - blankets, if 80 mods or something didn't at least make this map have perfect blankets, then I dunno what they did Haha,
I guess I'm always careless xD
00:51:335 (2,3) - ^
00:58:692 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - make them all have same curve please, like you did in previous pattern. I'm sure they are already,
but I double-checked.
01:18:474 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Fix the curve, as you see, 01:18:474 (1,2,3,4,5) - has a more light curve, while 01:18:801 (5,6,7,8,9) - is sharp, and doesn't even form a circle, make them all like first one. http://i.imgur.com/3vkYVuV.jpg Thanks for helping me fix this, I've had a lot of trouble about this.
01:21:743 (4,5) - this seem like a mistake, look at how fast (4) is compared to 5. That is not repeated here 01:24:032 (2,3) - , and also compare their spacing, it should be the same in both instances. Changed SV too late originally, so DS was broken.
01:31:880 (3,4) - see how you did this? Well that's how you should do 01:32:534 (3,4,3,4) - , meaning copy and paste, and rotate. If it looks really similar, but not the same it really kinda feels meh, if you want to make a difference, then make an obvious one.
01:37:438 (3,4) - since these two aren't touching, so shouldnt 01:37:765 (4,1) - . Whoops, they should be touching.
01:41:035 (3,2) - don't overlap Argh.
01:42:343 (3,4) - blanket please
01:45:613 (5,6,7,8,1) - Don't really like the zigzag stream used for this sounds, I recommend something more usual.

good luck. Also, i gave a quick look at insane, and it seems like spacing emphasis is kinda not used there too. It could be made a more fun map if you play with it a little. I've tried to apply some of them there.

MyAngelMeinter wrote:

Hi

Easy

00:27:629 (2) - instead this 1-beat slider (started half beat earlier) It's probably not what you were saying, but I did move it back.

Normal

00:06:539 (4) - 1 beat slider instead this circle I don't see why I'd do that, there's nothing for the tail to land on.
00:05:558 (1,2,3,4) - Why is it in a straight line? Put it in some interesting way I wanted to keep the beginning rigid and symmetrical in the beginning, so I made it like that.
01:03:106 (2,3,4) - Set it in a straight line Trying to make triangles with 01:02:779 (1,2,3) - and 01:03:433 (3,4,5) -
AR: 5 is better there Sure.

Advanced

AR can be little smaller

Insane

01:36:130 (1,2) - Too high a distance here

ANiMAte

00:47:738 (7) - i think 1/4 beat slider with arrow is better there I don't hear anything that would warrant a 1/4 repeat slider here.
HP: 7

[lucky:1337]Good Luck [/lucky:1337]

Ohwow wrote:

from q

[ANiMAte]
00:27:956 (7,1) - spacing emphasis not found :/ Yeah... fixed.

00:50:027 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this pattern doesn't look great. Extremely difficult to play for a <6* map. You emphasized 00:50:572 (5,6) - but not 00:50:899 (8,1) Pattern is not consistent with 00:44:795 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - (which also has some same problems) Yeah i have too many problems with these 1/3 piano section. Yeah, I've been on the fence with the way it was. I've toned it down now.

00:51:662 (3,4) - these 2 notes are kinda awkward, just make them 1/2 sliders. While it does feel empty, having them being circles emphasizes those notes more. There also isn't any held sound or something else for the tail to snap to.

00:54:768 (7,1) - not liking how this has smaller spacing than 00:54:604 (6,7) - when it should be bigger, or at least the same spacing

00:57:547 (3) - make it a 1/2 slider, it's really awkward to have some missing beats 00:57:711 - Even though there are no distinguishable beats there, its best to fill them up with sliderends to make it feel like the music is still going.

00:59:836 (3) - loud big white tick beat is mapped on a slider end :/

01:22:397 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - way too big spacing. Fixed in the earlier mod.

the things i listed about may (most likely) occur more than once so better check over the whole map for similar problems that i listed above. gl

Xinchii wrote:

Hihi ~
come from q for CN , so I will mod by Chinese some

[ANiMAte]

1. 00:26:158 (1,5,1) - I think some thing like this will better fit and symmetry with previous part
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:34:986 (2,3,4,5,6,8) - 包起來感覺比較好看 Originially I was blanketing with 00:34:659 (7) - , but yours makes more sense.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:38:583 - 這一串的弧度感覺有點轉太急了 , 放在這裡看起來有點突兀 , 建議平緩一點 Decided to move the stream entirely, flattening the curve wouldn't work with 00:39:564 (2,3) -
4. 00:49:373 (6) - ctrl+G ? 其他部分的flow都是順的 , 這個就有一點突兀了
5. 00:50:354 (2,3,4,5,6) - Although this diff is for Extra player , but this pattern is too hard and different with other part imo.
   maybe normal stream with bigger spacing or arrow slider will be fine. Good to know, can't exactly play at this level yet xD Made it a stream,
   since all the other diffs used arrow sliders
6. 00:59:346 (1,3) - maybe finish should be on (3) , I guess.
7. 01:01:307 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 覺得移動有點乏味 , 把中間兩組的3連打互換試試 ? flow也滿合的
   
   SPOILER

   
   雖然前面幾組像這樣的3連都差不多 , ignore if you don't want to fix I did fix these as best I could.
8. 01:09:318 (1) - according to your hitsound style , I guest add a finish here will be better.
9. 01:13:242 (1) - , 01:16:512 (1) - , 01:17:820 (1) - , 01:19:128 (9) - finish ? these places are enough strong for this. Was against this at first because it was a calmer section. Decided to just lower the volume on the section instead.
10. 01:15:858 (1,2) - increase some spacing like 01:15:776 (8,1) - will be neat
11. 01:17:166 (1,2) - ^
12. 01:22:397 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - and 01:25:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - are both from right to left , I will better like if one of them can come from another direction. Interesting, makes sense.

one diff modding , hope it can help

Good luck ~

KanpanRin wrote:

Hi, from queue.
General

Snapping

[Normal]
01:09:994 snap to 01:09:972
01:10:726 snap to 01:10:708
[Kuro's Hyper]
01:05:578 snap to 01:05:558
01:10:811 snap to 01:10:790
[Advanced]
01:21:278 snap to 01:21:253
[Insane]
01:44:745 snap to 01:44:713
[ANiMAte]
00:11:692 snap to 00:11:689
00:25:604 snap to 00:25:585

Small fixes, done!
Easy

01:28:937 (3) - NC?

ANiMAte

00:10:463 (1,2,3,4) - uses the same distance?
00:12:752 (2,3) -

Incosistency.

00:14:060 (2,3) - ^ I have no idea what you mean here.

???

00:43:731 (6,7) - uses the same distance?
00:45:449 (1) - NC It's already has an NC...?
01:13:160 (8,1) - why don't place them with same distance? Trying to emphasize the last circle with spacing difference
01:34:740 (6,1) - ^^
01:35:394 (6,1) - ^^
01:36:048 (6,1) - ^^
01:45:940 (1,2,3,4) - It is necessary to using such high distance spacing?The section is supposed to be super intense, though I removed a reverse arrow on 01:46:594 (3) - since slider leniency won't apply here.

Not much to say, hope it can help you.
Good luck with it.