1. DepthStar's Verethragna (6.22 stars, 1896 notes)

Depths wrote:

My Angel Skystar (Beef)

VINXIS wrote:

add tot ags: taishi cosmic record electro muster sinker electro.sinker dnb drum and bass drumstep

Kalibe wrote:

=w=

1. 03:25:929 (1) - is "acceptable", could be a little surprising in a 1st play tho, would not hurt to ask for more thoughts about it.
2. 03:37:072 (1) - is ok, quite easy to read even if speed makes it a little harder than it looks.
3. 05:14:443 (1) - so this one is a big no for me. The high SV combined with the previous jumpy section makes it super hard to aim for, and to follow it properly. Also an other issue is readability of the next circle who have the same color than the slider 05:16:672 (2) - who is hardly visible. I highly suggest to change it.
4. 05:17:014 (1) - I don't think this one is rankable since it change the slider length on the start. More opinion for this one would be appreciated too.

• 
  06:02:614 (1,2) - move this down a bit?
  06:02:614 (1,2,1) - why did you nc here

Syph wrote:

shitty mod as promised

00:21:298 (1,2,1) - spacing here is kinda weird, i'd say 00:21:298 (1,2) - should have less spacing than 00:21:470 (2,1) - since sound is a lot stronger on this, making it similar to 00:22:327 (1,2,1) - would be good changed
00:27:984 (1) - sv feels too much not really LOL
00:29:184 (1) - idk if you should really place something here, there's pretty much nothing in the music here hi hat LOL
00:43:927 (1,2) - why are these stacked but 00:44:270 (3) - is seperated, I'd probably like make some distance between 1 and 2 ok stack 2 on 3
00:44:955 - would do a slider here to follow vocal or atleast a note since theres such a strong sound nah prefer to keep for the pause in between dumbeats
00:45:984 - ^ ^
01:07:927 (2) - slider looks kinda bad imo lol, also i'd space these more cuz they like juuust overlap atm 01:07:927 (2,1) - fixed the slider and overlap
01:08:270 (3) - there's no real beat here, you could maybe just extend the previous slider nope
01:08:270 (3,3) - overlap (if u didn't change ^ lol) fixed
01:09:470 (2) - move to 405|104 so it aligns with 01:09:127 (1) - ok
02:21:643 (2,1) - uh, maybe you should try 2 circles instead of (1) because of the guitar, there's not really a hold sound in the bgm anyway
02:18:900 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - this seems just a little bit too much, maybe reduce spacing a bit
03:17:700 (1,2) - i mean.. >_>
03:30:557 (4,5,1) - inconsistent spacing looks really weird here // 03:41:528 (4,5,1) - spacing is consistent here too so why I thought I fixed this already
03:31:415 (1,2) - i'd switch these, sounds better Cx
03:57:472 - not sure why you ignore this sound since you literally mapped them right before 03:56:957 (1,2,3) - maybe
04:04:072 - would start spinner here tbh. also you could also gradually decrease volume, would sound a lot better ok dad
04:10:843 (2,1) - overlap ;_; fixed
04:21:129 (2) - this is juuuust a little bit too close to 04:20:443 (1) - ^
04:26:444 (1,3) - . end urself Syph Cx
04:40:843 (2,3,1) - feels overdone
05:10:157 - gradually increasing spacing in this section would be pretty cool to lead into that fuKCI NG slider
05:10:500 (3,1) - more distance? pretty strong sound on 1
05:27:300 (2) - extending this slider would be cool
05:52:500 - i'd map this beat personally

• 
  06:02:614 (1,2) - move this down a bit? ok
  06:02:614 (1,2,1) - why did you nc here different piano sound

06:02:957 (1) - would map as 2 circles for more consistency with 06:02:272 (3,4,1,2) - no vocal is more important
07:12:729 (3,4) - finishes here don't seem that fitting imo listen to the music
07:14:957 (1,3) - ingame overlap ok
07:44:872 (1) - decrease volume ok dad

~

Syph wrote:

shitty mod as promised

00:21:298 (1,2,1) - spacing here is kinda weird, i'd say 00:21:298 (1,2) - should have less spacing than 00:21:470 (2,1) - since sound is a lot stronger on this, making it similar to 00:22:327 (1,2,1) - would be good
00:27:984 (1) - sv feels too much
00:29:184 (1) - idk if you should really place something here, there's pretty much nothing in the music here
00:43:927 (1,2) - why are these stacked but 00:44:270 (3) - is seperated, I'd probably like make some distance between 1 and 2
00:44:955 - would do a slider here to follow vocal or atleast a note since theres such a strong sound
00:45:984 - ^
01:07:927 (2) - slider looks kinda bad imo lol, also i'd space these more cuz they like juuust overlap atm 01:07:927 (2,1) -
01:08:270 (3) - there's no real beat here, you could maybe just extend the previous slider
01:08:270 (3,3) - overlap (if u didn't change ^ lol)
01:09:470 (2) - move to 405|104 so it aligns with 01:09:127 (1) -
02:21:643 (2,1) - uh, maybe you should try 2 circles instead of (1) because of the guitar, there's not really a hold sound in the bgm anyway u r write acutlay
02:18:900 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - this seems just a little bit too much, maybe reduce spacing a bit nah, ez jumps
03:17:700 (1,2) - i mean.. >_> wot
03:30:557 (4,5,1) - inconsistent spacing looks really weird here // 03:41:528 (4,5,1) - spacing is consistent here too so why
03:31:415 (1,2) - i'd switch these, sounds better
03:57:472 - not sure why you ignore this sound since you literally mapped them right before 03:56:957 (1,2,3) -
04:04:072 - would start spinner here tbh. also you could also gradually decrease volume, would sound a lot better
04:10:843 (2,1) - overlap ;_;
04:21:129 (2) - this is juuuust a little bit too close to 04:20:443 (1) -
04:26:444 (1,3) - .
04:40:843 (2,3,1) - feels overdone what
05:10:157 - gradually increasing spacing in this section would be pretty cool to lead into that fuKCI NG slider that's like an alternative ya, but i also liked the current jumps so d
05:10:500 (3,1) - more distance? pretty strong sound on 1 i don't really care a particular note being too close or far, but how the whole 3-note patterns interact with each other
05:27:300 (2) - extending this slider would be cool was extended initially yeah, but i felt like a 1/2 would be more lenient so players don't have to sliderbreak/get 100 due to sliderend here
05:52:500 - i'd map this beat personally shit but i already mapped to the 1/3 layer so

• 
  06:02:614 (1,2) - move this down a bit?
  06:02:614 (1,2,1) - why did you nc here

06:02:957 (1) - would map as 2 circles for more consistency with 06:02:272 (3,4,1,2) -
07:12:729 (3,4) - finishes here don't seem that fitting imo
07:14:957 (1,3) - ingame overlap
07:44:872 (1) - decrease volume

~

1. 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - / 03:15:986 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I can't agree on how you use jumps here. To me 03:15:300 (3) - and 03:16:329 (3,3) - are the most dominant sounds on this part, so it's natural to have a stronger jump to emphase them. But you did the opposite by putting the highest one on 03:14:957 (1,2) - etc...and that's just incoherent with the song. I would just swap the spacing used between 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - and for other too.
2. 05:14:443 (2) - I would at least NC it to make it easier to anticipate, and honestly I would be glad to see more thoughts about this one. The slider is really fast and link it from high speed 1/4 pattern makes it really hard to catch. Also the NC would make 05:16:672 (3) - easier to read.
3. 05:53:700 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Seems some objects are unsnaped to guitar here (like 05:54:214 (3) - or 05:54:643 (2) - . That's true than it's probably the best option but want to hear your.
4. 05:56:100 (1) - Same you can hear guitar comes just before blue tic.
5. 06:22:843 (1,1) - Lo blanket plz
6. 06:55:072 (1,2,3) - same as 1st point.
7. 06:55:757 (1) - a little ugly could you curve more the loop like that https://puu.sh/qZy8b/7914863ce6.png ?
8. 07:23:186 - I have no idea how you build your NCs here. They're inconsistent and wrongly placed imo.
9. 07:34:500 (2) - and 07:39:643 (1) - why Normal Sampleset here ? It doesn't make any sense since the music don't even suggest that.

Nozhomi wrote:

ok /slap Skystar

1. 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - / 03:15:986 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I can't agree on how you use jumps here. To me 03:15:300 (3) - and 03:16:329 (3,3) - are the most dominant sounds on this part, so it's natural to have a stronger jump to emphase them. But you did the opposite by putting the highest one on 03:14:957 (1,2) - etc...and that's just incoherent with the song. I would just swap the spacing used between 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - and for other too.
2. 05:14:443 (2) - I would at least NC it to make it easier to anticipate, and honestly I would be glad to see more thoughts about this one. The slider is really fast and link it from high speed 1/4 pattern makes it really hard to catch. Also the NC would make 05:16:672 (3) - easier to read.
3. 05:53:700 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Seems some objects are unsnaped to guitar here (like 05:54:214 (3) - or 05:54:643 (2) - . That's true than it's probably the best option but want to hear your.
4. 05:56:100 (1) - Same you can hear guitar comes just before blue tic.
5. 06:22:843 (1,1) - Lo blanket plz ffs IVE FIXED THIS IDK HOW MANY TIMES ITS FINE
6. 06:55:072 (1,2,3) - same as 1st point.
7. 06:55:757 (1) - a little ugly could you curve more the loop like that https://puu.sh/qZy8b/7914863ce6.png ?
8. 07:23:186 - I have no idea how you build your NCs here. They're inconsistent and wrongly placed imo. fixed?
9. 07:34:500 (2) - and 07:39:643 (1) - why Normal Sampleset here ? It doesn't make any sense since the music don't even suggest that. removed

Nozhomi wrote:

ok /slap Skystar

1. 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - / 03:15:986 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I can't agree on how you use jumps here. To me 03:15:300 (3) - and 03:16:329 (3,3) - are the most dominant sounds on this part, so it's natural to have a stronger jump to emphase them. But you did the opposite by putting the highest one on 03:14:957 (1,2) - etc...and that's just incoherent with the song. I would just swap the spacing used between 03:14:957 (1,2,3) - and for other too. to me 03:14:957 (1) - definitely feels stronger than 03:15:300 (3) - and so does every other one because of the cymbals, but swapping seems fine to me so i'm changing it anyway
2. 05:14:443 (2) - I would at least NC it to make it easier to anticipate, and honestly I would be glad to see more thoughts about this one. The slider is really fast and link it from high speed 1/4 pattern makes it really hard to catch. Also the NC would make 05:16:672 (3) - easier to read. added a NC on 05:16:672 (1) - , not on the slider because 1) 05:14:272 (1,2) - should belong to a same combo to me 2) having a follow point between them makes it easier to read imo
3. 05:53:700 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Seems some objects are unsnaped to guitar here (like 05:54:214 (3) - or 05:54:643 (2) - . That's true than it's probably the best option but want to hear your. uh, my opinion is that it shouldn't really be a big deal. i mean its a pretty straightforward 1/4 layer and there's other instruments to justify the 1/4s too
4. 05:56:100 (1) - Same you can hear guitar comes just before blue tic. same here, let alone its a repeat slider which matters even less
5. 06:22:843 (1,1) - Lo blanket plz
6. 06:55:072 (1,2,3) - same as 1st point. this one is different though. the emphasis of it is not how far its placed with the previous jumps but the later spaced streams that its associated with. i'm talking about 06:55:414 (3,4,5,6,1) - , which works as an individual pattern comparing to 06:55:072 (1,2) - . i should've added a NC on it but the previous two choruses (01:33:470 (2) - and 03:17:357 (2) - ) didn't so i just left it as is for the consistency shit
7. 06:55:757 (1) - a little ugly could you curve more the loop like that https://puu.sh/qZy8b/7914863ce6.png ?
8. 07:23:186 - I have no idea how you build your NCs here. They're inconsistent and wrongly placed imo.
9. 07:34:500 (2) - and 07:39:643 (1) - why Normal Sampleset here ? It doesn't make any sense since the music don't even suggest that.

Kencho wrote:

• Black is Personal comments.
  Bold Black is Highly recommended to fix.
  Red is Unrankable that you should fix.

[DepthStar's Verethragna]

• 
  Depths :

1. 00:07:412 (1,1) - Stack? I think this is fine
2. 00:24:727 (2) - The slider tail is downbeat so I suggest you change this to two circles for better playability, like 00:23:527 (2,3) - . o ok~
3. 00:29:184 (1,2) - Swap NC and just put 00:29:184 (1) - other place, like this. ok
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:40:498 (2,2) - I don't recommend you to stack these because too hard to read, also 00:41:527 (5) - , just see my screenshot. fixed ~
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:47:184 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - In generally, you should make 4 of them in one combo set because downbeat always on white tick, so the right way is like that. well I like to group them in 5, but ok~
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:24:212 (1) - I think ctrl+G will better. I really didnt like this pwp but ok
7. 01:31:070 (4,1) - Swap NC yes
8. 01:35:355 (2) - NC? ^
9. 03:57:643 (1,2,3,4) - Try this? because I think 03:57:300 (3,1) - are too close. very nice idea! thanks!
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 04:11:186 (1,2) - Stack I didnt notice this was off owo
11. 06:40:500 (4) - Move to 06:38:614 (1) - slider head? Because current one the angle seems too obtuse. I agree
12. 07:43:586 (2) - I suggest you to change this to 1/2 slider, or maybe you can move 07:43:929 (1,2,3) - far away because 07:43:586 (2,1) - are empty 1/1 beat, but the DS same as 1/2 beat which is hard to read. fixed the distance
    
    星爺 :
13. 02:44:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - 這段和depths太像了，不如ctrl+J一下
14. 03:19:243 (2) - NC?
15. 05:16:672 (3) - 這遮擋不太好，要麼疊在滑條尾要麼放到遮不到的地方吧

Kencho wrote:

• Black is Personal comments.
  Bold Black is Highly recommended to fix.
  Red is Unrankable that you should fix.

[DepthStar's Verethragna]

• 
  Depths :

1. 00:07:412 (1,1) - Stack?
2. 00:24:727 (2) - The slider tail is downbeat so I suggest you change this to two circles for better playability, like 00:23:527 (2,3) - .
3. 00:29:184 (1,2) - Swap NC and just put 00:29:184 (1) - other place, like this.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:40:498 (2,2) - I don't recommend you to stack these because too hard to read, also 00:41:527 (5) - , just see my screenshot.
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:47:184 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - In generally, you should make 4 of them in one combo set because downbeat always on white tick, so the right way is like that.
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:24:212 (1) - I think ctrl+G will better.
7. 01:31:070 (4,1) - Swap NC
8. 01:35:355 (2) - NC?
9. 03:57:643 (1,2,3,4) - Try this? because I think 03:57:300 (3,1) - are too close.
   
   SPOILER

   
10. 04:11:186 (1,2) - Stack
11. 06:40:500 (4) - Move to 06:38:614 (1) - slider head? Because current one the angle seems too obtuse.
12. 07:43:586 (2) - I suggest you to change this to 1/2 slider, or maybe you can move 07:43:929 (1,2,3) - far away because 07:43:586 (2,1) - are empty 1/1 beat, but the DS same as 1/2 beat which is hard to read.
    
    星爺 :
13. 02:44:786 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - 這段和depths太像了，不如ctrl+J一下 上到下比較好看
14. 03:19:243 (2) - NC? ok
15. 05:16:672 (3) - 這遮擋不太好，要麼疊在滑條尾要麼放到遮不到的地方吧 然而現在這樣比較順手啊

Dedicated to 11t

IamKwaN wrote:

do you have relevant source about not using Noriko Mitose as the romanised artist?

http://www.snowblanc.net/

Lavender wrote:

gratz