1. you sure about having the countdown before song starts? cuz the song kind of does a similar thing to the countdown thing tfw my skin has no countdown sound or images so i never notice
2. you can clean up some of the unused timing points across all diffs if you want, e.g. 01:08:622 – in your extra diff but this doesn’t really impact the map it just makes the bottom timeline a little cleaner lo kinda pointless lol
3. 00:35:508 – to 00:37:565 – you might want to consider playing with timing a little bit here because the notes sound a little late in comparison to the music; not sure if it’s offset or bpm, but i think it’s bpm (tl;dr i think the bpm for this part might need some tweaking) ya timing is definitely wrong. i use my red lines here as base timing then edit details through the audio file rather than red lines (so like these super off things are going to work with 175bpm when i get around to that)

1. 180bpm at 00:35:508 –
2. 177.5 bpm at 00:36:174 –
3. 175 bpm at 00:36:850 –
4. 172.5 bpm at 00:37:535 –

1. 00:51:908 – maybe put a circle here because polarity is kinda bad ye es
2. 01:05:055 (3,4) – reversing order here (circle at 01:05:055 – and slider at 01:05:379 – ) is good idea because “self” isn’t a held vocal but “more” is (y) ur right
3. 01:42:447 (3) – no break time here? ops

1. 00:23:832 (1) – maybe try 1/1 slider + circle to better capture the vocals ajaja ja
2. polarities during first verse after the mariachi part feels a bit weird because of all the polarity shifts ajaja maybe place circles at 00:49:348 –, 00:50:628 –, 00:51:908 (3) –, and 00:53:188 (6) – repeated the same 3/2 in same places on this diff so ill let scrubs interpret that instead
3. 01:04:730 (4,5) – two sliders instead of repeat slider + circle would fit more nicely because i already explained this in the normal ya
4. 01:47:599 (1,2,3) – minor aesthetic thing that kind of triggers me but why isn’t this a straight line (tbh not really a big deal) i like how it plays when 3->4 is sharper so 2->3 dip makes that sharper g

1. 00:19:001 (3) – i think doing slider + circle like 00:20:373 (3,4) – is just a little more fitting because “limit” and “but” are two different words so making them distinct from each other would be nice eyes

1. 01:06:514 (1,2) – the (1) doesn’t look like it's centred in the curve of (2) and i’m not sure if that was intentional or not but yeah maybe move the (1) to x356 y288 to better centre it if that was what you were going for here i just dont look closely at these things

1. looks fine to me dat cs2 hoyl i saw the cs3 edit ur not sneaky

1. 00:24:005 (2,3,4) – actually i think it’d make more sense to make these have equal spacing and then larger distance from (4,5) to emphasize the different word ya
2. 02:22:050 (1,2,3) – i kind of expected something like 02:20:717 (1,2,3) – over here but ok this works too they are similar in design just not in movement lolz

1. 00:19:687 (1) - remove nc for consistency xd yes
2. 00:20:373 (3) - 1/2 slider+reverse maybe reflecting the object 3 of combo cuz it repeats thing which is why copy paste which is why nc inconsistency
3. 00:35:508 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - sliders instead like hard diff cuz timing is fucked up timing wont be soon pls
4. 02:35:931 (5) - too hardcore pls use a circle probably yes

1. 02:32:249 (2,1) - stack them properly hoyl shit stack urself

1. 00:04:681 (1) - every diff is like http://puu.sh/oHQx9/0de3c636f7.jpg well beginning in general is less dense than some lower diffs i guess thats o k dumb rhythm choice for dumb circle size ty

multi reverse 1/2 sliders are super frowned upon tho because u got no time to read the second reverse people are always gonna assume it's 1 reverse since that's what they see when hitting leslider

1. 01:03:920 - 01:05:217
2. 01:22:048 - 01:23:301

1. 00:42:986
2. 01:59:393

1. 00:35:193(5,6)
2. 01:26:747(5,6)

1. 02:21:383(1)
2. 02:22:681(1)

VINXIS wrote:

sik 128 kbps mp3 washboard music

general

1. g

ez

1. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
2. im dnoe moddign this map

normal

1. 00:35:508 (1,2,3,4) - i feel lik u sud jsut make these circles cuz the combination of the sliderend sounds + the fukd up trumpet makes me go D and tilts me hard rkw4h5tguifieav more confusing than it should be by clicking so much id think. diff focuses 1/1 so clicking white ticks only yees
2. 02:35:931 (5) - mayb nc for MAX EDGE XDXDxdXDxd min edge
3. 01:32:217 (1) - sik hp bar overlap http://puu.sh/oYiSe/9e47bea605.jpg tfw my skin has no hp bar lowered
4. 02:16:967 (3) - http://puu.sh/oYiUD/78fba2a3cc.jpg ys
5. hp bar overlaps dont evn mattr do they lozl fuk thm agree

adv

1. sik

hrad

1. g

ins

1. 00:20:716 (4,1) - i feel lik itll b visually bettr if u lower the position of this based off of the slider dropoff/pattern befor these 2 notez lo did
2. gh

extrarg

1. 00:14:218 (1,2,3) - tui feel lik u forgot 2 hitsound ths pattrn btu idk the lak of hitsounds si rlyl weird ther whistles are vocals and there are no vocals so zzz
2. 00:47:428 (3,4) - it hikn this wud b easier 2 play if u ctrlgd each of these so ther sliderheadz r at the sliderendz cuz then 3 has the same play as 00:46:788 (2) - while also making a back and forth movement with 4 and then to 1 after d more impact if not ctrlgd tho cuz bigger distance
3. 01:38:848 (3,4) - same thign for here btu yhjea
   

extrsne

1. 00:54:788 (1,2) - wathgin this with that kinda ncing is werid wen u hav it paly wit the hitsoundz lozl i put a whistle is that better

G

Deppyforce wrote:

siq pro

[General]
00:26:405 - / 01:19:163 - delete useless green lines in ez - hard diffs in these area pls
volume tho
[Easy]
yo cs3.7 for 0.8* ez diff rly dont want overlapping objects g
cool

[Normal]
01:13:487 (4) - mayb split to 1/1 + circle to follow vocals idk yes
01:50:118 (1,1) - nazi stack yes

[Adv]
00:05:357 (2) - circle + 1/2 for vocals? since this is adv diff xd too many steps up
00:39:513 (4) - im being nazi but the curve looks bit weird imo http://puu.sh/oZLXG/2b5eaba5d5.jpg i guess
01:29:362 - add slider so its different with 00:37:908 - cuz theres extra 1/4 sounds yes
02:16:648 (3) - could change to 1/2 slider tbh yes

[Hard]
00:35:193 (4,5) - could be a triple if u make triple on somethin like 00:35:193 (4,5) -trying to bring out the 2 trumpet things
01:26:747 (4,5) - same
01:42:282 (3,1) - imo making straight flow before break feels bad man try make sharp angles instead! unusual movement for transition is so normal tho
02:30:952 (1,2,1) - overlap them like 01:27:061 (1,2,3,4) - instead of stacking would be cooler i stack all triples pls

[Insane]
cool

[Extra]
01:27:061 (1,2,3,4) - why isnt this spaced like 01:27:061 (1,2,3,4) - ? what lol
01:39:006 (4) - lol https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5203646 o
02:00:351 - missing kiaiiaiaiaia o

[Extreme]
cool

ok ok

Bonsai wrote:

Ä
Extreme

1. 00:27:930 (1,2) - toning down the very first one down would be very kind, but I guess I'm just a bit too bad to really judge this diff xd cant put 3 between 1 and 2 without big spacing g
2. 00:35:193 (1,2,1,2) - tbh for me that doesn't fit the mapping style at all, and also I feel like making those two basically the same distance+movement when there's a BPM-change happening might not be the best way to handle that imo (also (2,1) is like whut but again I'm bad) not sure what u mean by not fit mapping style
   also nobody will notice the bpm change regardless of what i do:(
   and 2->1 is harder cuz emphasis pls
3. 00:58:645 (1,2,3,4) - Switching the order of 1/2-slider and 1/4-slider would indicate the section-change right at the beginning which I think would be better, the 1/4-slider surprised me there and I think I would've handled it better at (1) kinda disagree, going into new section with longer slider gives more time to figure out whats going on. a 1/4 slider shouldnt really throw anyone off if they managed everything prior too g
4. 02:33:660 - Maybe time from here until 02:34:315 - a bit earlier bc like vocals are super-early which makes me 100 the (1) everytime, and seems like instrumentals are only early too (I mean they are constantly all over the place but here I don't hear single one being late but all being early) did it through mp3magic
5. 02:20:717 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - silence tails? : \ (Extra too obv) yes x2

Extra

1. lol what is intro rhythms, I mean I understand it but it still seems kinda weird when playing bc it switches around so much xd its based on wherever vocalemphasis is
2. 00:28:877 (5,6,7,1) - for me, all of these patterns play really weird/forced bc it emphasizes (6) a lot but there's not really anything to emphasize there : \ really think it's fine. jumps to any triples that lead into downbeats are so common pls
3. 00:27:252 (1,2) - imo switching NC would fit better bc differentiation; maybe adding NC on 00:27:591 (2) - in all other diffs would be cool too? did it on here and insane. i like how it looks on extreme dont kill me
   
4. 01:00:623 (1) - remove NC? yes
5. 01:57:159 (6) -you NC'd that in Extreme, dunno removed otehr ncs in this section for consistency with last thing u mentioned
   Actually I don't wanna check all the NCing bc it's all situational n stuff in all diffs, maybe go through that yourself again to be confident that it's right
   (Extreme is the only diff to NC 02:32:249 - for example bc I noticed it) that's cuz there would be a follow point on extreme only lol

Insane 01:22:674 (4) - you NCd that at 00:41:407 (1) -so idk, yeah pls just check again doubling the amount of normalhitnormals in the second one so doubling ncs z
(well mostly because i dont like how follow poitns from 4 to 5 look lol)
Advanced 01:38:848 (5,1) - ngh; also check your privilege before complaining about other's wave-sliders when yours aren't the tidiest either lulz ur a wave i fixed
Normal 00:21:747 (3,1) - stack maybe maybe

Easy

1. 00:50:948 - whistle would be cool imo yes
2. Tbh I find it really weird that you'd do this, I mean this completely destroys the integrity of your set, and also it doesn't seem like you put a lot of effort into making it nice bc like 00:12:847 (1,2,3) - doesn't seem very evenly spaced, smth about 00:31:719 (2,1,2) - is not diagonal, 00:34:245 (2,1) - isn't diagonal either, 00:39:513 (2,1) - isn't same y-coordinate, 00:43:302 (1,2) - isn't even close on the same x, I don't really know what 00:44:565 (2,1) - should be, probably nothing bc there's a lot more that are nothing, wth is 01:14:298 (1,2) - blahblahblah is there any kind of concept to this
   Maybe you should've had a look at my map after all bc I actually did cool stuff with the grid(level1), but this just really seems out of place to me, I'm not gonna nominate that tbh
   i gave objects normal angles/curves cuz i really dont care about perfect grid nonsense
   why