00:58:069 (58069|0,58069|1,58069|2,58194|0,58194|2,58194|3,58319|0,58319|3,58319|1,58444|1,58444|3,58444|2,58569|1,58569|0,58569|3) - well about that section, I think it is fine. You could've chosen jumpstream (and maybe something like this
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4403203), but this also plays good and is reasonable. However, 01:44:069 (104069|0,104069|1,104194|2,104194|1) - those are 2-chords, and you usually map 3-chords for crashes. This may be treated as inconsistent by a BN I think.
Yeah, i'm gonna stay the pattern like this, I like the idee of switching between JS and hands.For the 2 chords, I have added one notes to each of them (at 4 then 1).01:16:319 (76319|0,76319|3,76381|2,76444|0,76444|1,76506|3,76569|1,76569|2,76569|0) - I'd ctrl+H that. The previous pattern of this type looks equally the same, why not mirror it to make it different?
100% yup, I don't know why I didn't do this before01:18:569 (78569|2,78569|1,78631|3,78631|0,78694|1) - rather a nitpick, but I find the [14][23] easier and less mindblockable than [23][14]. Consider that.
Uh, yeah why not. Mindblocko is real.01:26:194 -
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4403235 try something like this? the toms could make a nice transition, and patterning them the same as 01:26:569 (86569|0,86569|3,86631|2,86694|1,86756|0) - isn't really utilising it. I see a trilly pattern here.
All applied, you're right about the trills, it's kinda cool like this.01:26:569 (86569|0,86569|3) - oh, another thing, that should be a triple chord.
Fixed01:28:319 (88319|3,88319|1,88569|3,88569|2) - shouldn't those be triples too? You use those for crashes. I don't actually know why you stopped using 3-chords. I can clearly see why those aren't existent near latter trills, but there?
Ok note for the others peoples of MMT and BNs: I have added one note (so all of them are 3 chords now) for almost all crash sounds in the map except for the trills parts because it's just impossible to make something good and fun here with 3 chords. So it's FIXED. 01:28:819 - 01:29:069 - 01:29:319 - What do you think about adding notes here to make [12] chords in the trill? This would keep the layering constant while utilising your nice trills
good idee01:30:319 (90319|3,90319|0,90569|3,90569|2) - those triples too?
01:32:319 (92319|1,92319|0,92569|3,92569|2) - ^
01:32:819 - 01:33:069 - 01:33:319 - same idea as before - creating [34] chords. Also, move 01:33:381 (93381|3) - to 1 to keep consistency (and you can insert a chord then). And the following part should be rearranged like this:
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4403292 Rearranged ! <:01:36:444 (96444|0,96506|2,96569|0) - I would move those notes to 3-1-3 in order to start the trill with [34] chord which makes it flow better.
really good catch01:38:319 (98319|2,98319|0,98569|1,98569|0) - triples?
01:42:069 (102069|3,102131|2,102194|1,102319|2,102381|1,102444|3,102506|2) - another trilly pattern to accent the toms?
Kinda prefer my pattern on this one01:46:569 (106569|1,106569|2,106569|0) - I'm not sure if this should be a triple. There is no crash here.
Oh yeah right01:47:069 - add a note on 4 (you missed a double)
01:47:569 - same, why did you stop putting doubles on this sound? add 1, and move 01:47:631 (107631|0) - to 3
01:49:069 - 01:49:569 - 01:50:069 - I see doubles here too.
Applied some of them^ In case you decide not to apply that, it's fine. However 01:48:819 - is 100% missed double.
If you apply that, make sure to apply it also in later section.
Ok all of the section is fixed and constant now01:50:069 - why is this single but 01:50:319 (110319|3,110319|2) - is double?
^01:54:569 - 01:54:819 - they can be triples. 01:45:819 (105819|2,105819|1,105819|0,106069|1,106069|3,106069|0,106319|2,106319|0,106319|3,106569|2,106569|1,106569|0) - is all triples (sure, there are no 1/4s between but the crashes are kind of analogical). This will make it a bit harder, your choice.
02:18:069 -
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4403411 what do you think about this?
Yup, gonna take this one02:22:569 (142569|1,142569|0,143069|3,143069|2) - look at the first jumpstream. Those should be triples. Apply this in the whole part.
02:24:506 (144506|1) - not consistent with first jumpstream. Also, apply wherever possible (those two jumpstreams should be the same)
02:39:084 (159084|3) - What is this LN mapped to? Shouldn't it end on 02:39:271 - ?
Snare echo02:39:770 - same length. Map all of those LNs with equal length (cool thing you did here, but that isn't Stepmania sadly :/ )
Gonna stay it like this, it's actually ok and create some kind of echo effect.02:50:671 - you missed a note here (1/8 snap).
fixed03:05:631 (185631|3,185631|1) - wouldn't this be better on [13]?
No, It's making some kind of snare effect/jack effect03:06:662 (186662|1,186662|0) - That's not the same sound as previous chord, I suggest to make it this way:
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/4403501 I map the drum here, it's for the mini jack snare03:10:412 (190412|2,190412|3,190506|1,190506|2,190506|0) - ^
^03:14:819 - add a note. This should be 3-chord.
Yup03:18:569 - ^
03:19:037 (199037|2,199037|3,199131|0,199131|1,199131|2) - like before
03:21:194 - why are there no LNs like before? It's a bit inconsistent.
I don't see the problem here since I focus on the drum. Add LN would just destroy the fun on this part03:22:694 (202694|2,202694|3,202787|3,202787|2,202881|2,202881|0,202881|1) - like before
04:01:286 - that's a triple
04:12:086 (252086|1,252206|1,252326|2,252446|2) - I would ctrl+H to show that the drums are sort of "descending".
Good idee04:13:046 (253046|3) - a mini change, put this in 3? Mainly aesthetics.
Yea !04:16:646 - triple chord.
04:16:886 (256886|0) - same aesthetics, put in 2?
Yea !04:25:886 (265886|1) - I think this note is unnecessary if you focus on drums here, I may be wrong though.
Flow better with this little note imo04:25:886 (265886|1) - Move to 2, this trill is really odd here.
Made some change, it's better now04:40:766 (280766|2,280886|0) - move first note to 1 and second to 3. This is to avoid a sudden 3 after a trill with 3 column. If you don't like the right hand 1/2 trill that is created, change the pattern a bit.
+1, Fixed04:50:246 (290246|1,290246|3,290246|0,290306|2,290366|0,290366|1,290426|3,290486|1,290486|2,290546|0,290606|3,290606|1,290666|2,290726|3,290726|0,290786|1,290846|2,290846|0,290906|3,290966|1,290966|2,291026|0,291086|1,291086|3,291146|2,291206|0) - This sounds dumped. I can't hear any sounds for the 1/4. It would be better with chords I think.
+1, since I map the guitar too like at 04:42:596 - I have added 1/4. Rearranged the pattern to something more classic (jumptrill)05:04:406 (304406|2,304466|1) - CTRL+H this, plays better.
Yes05:09:686 (309686|3,309686|1) - are those chords justified? I think single notes would suffice. Especially when in later parts the doubles from drums appear, those look random.
Uuuuh no ? I think a chord is actually good here, I mean it flows really good + Make it single note would make this part a looooot more boring to play and very underrated compared to the rest of the map.05:09:326 (309326|2) - maybe I am just deaf but I cannot hear sounds for those.
Yes you are 
05:13:526 (313526|0,313526|2,313646|1) - same remarks ^
Time to buy a new headset I guess 05:27:926 (327926|2) - I feel it should be a single LN to make the [34] kick harder.
+105:35:366 (335366|1,335486|1) - I don't know if intentionally, but I think you missed a 1/4 here.
There are actually 3 1/4 I have missed, time to buy a new headset I guess <:05:39:926 - add 3, and move 05:39:926 - to 4 (crash)
fixed05:43:766 - a triple here?
05:45:206 - ^
05:45:686 - ^
05:47:366 - I think that should be triple too.
05:49:526 - triple
05:50:246 - 05:50:486 - ^
05:52:886 - 05:53:366 - 05:56:726 - another triples. It shouldn't get too dense even if you add them.
05:59:570 (359570|3,359570|2,359570|1) - I don't think it is needed, doubles suffice for that.
fixed all06:01:348 (361348|3,361348|2,361348|1) - ^
06:02:681 - this stream is 1/3, not 1/4
Oh shit right, RIP star rating lol06:04:903 (364903|1,364903|2,364903|3) - like before. Just find all of those and change to doubles.
06:08:014 - this stream 1/3 too
06:10:237 (370237|2,370237|3,370237|0) - triples here are okay
Yup06:10:014 (370014|3,370014|2) - are the triples mapped to the higher sounds? if yes, change this to triple too.
fixed the section, it's better now06:13:126 (373126|0,373126|2) - 06:16:237 (376237|2,376237|0) - 06:19:348 (379348|0,379348|1) - this too
06:25:308 (385308|2,385308|0) - I don't get it. Would be better with a single note.
06:30:451 (390451|2,390451|1) - 06:32:165 (392165|2,392165|3) - Same as above, maybe I don't hear a sound or something?
Yup, If you listen closely at 25%, you can hear a double snare. Also I have changed the patterning of these a little bit, playing better now.07:01:665 - I know you don't map 3-chords in this fragment, but this is just calling for it.
07:32:522 - I feel this should be a double. In general, when you start those fragments with chords on 1/4, I would put doubles in every of those at the beginnings, you sometimes do it and sometimes not.
07:39:584 - should be a double I think
It's actually a crash, so 3 chord haha. Nice catch.07:44:022 (464022|2,464084|3,464147|1,464209|2,464272|0,464334|1,464397|2,464459|3) - calls for a trill! Even the guitar does that.
Dude nice idee07:52:522 - 4-chord is possible here. I'm not sure though.
ooooh hell yea07:57:397 (477397|0) - ghost note?
Piano08:13:522 (493522|3) - It is full 1/1 length I think. At least 1/2.
No, this LN is sexy08:15:397 (495397|0) - all of those in fact
Nononononono
