fartownik wrote:
Zexion wrote:
So MB is town just because she's following you?
Just look at those 3 posts p/4348898.
You can literally SEE his train of thoughts being transformed into posts there, and it looks extremely Town, at least to me. He votes rEdo, then in ANOTHER post he writes something to 'lessen his guilt' in potential Townie lynch (reading me as scum if rEdo flips Town), but then realizes that his read on me itself is actually strong enough for that to be overlooked. Especially his third post, the correction of his previous read is very convincing. Not to mention his reads are actually correct and close to what I'm thinking, but that can be counted as "sheeping", so it's not that important.
Yeah, I already saw they thought process is town-ish, but it's also extremely convenient for you, specially for the third post. I just wanted to make that remark.
Amianki wrote:
Zexion: Your first wall was pure fluff; when I voted you after it, you subtly tried to deflect it. I haven't read your other walls so I don't know whether this is consistent or not.
Amianki wrote:
Zexion wrote:
Also I can't agree more with your read on Amianki. He didn't even answer about the initial vote on me, and left me with a "when I read walls I'll tell".
This is a ridiculous statement. I've stated multiple times that I don't read walls unless I have a reason to on this site.
But not reading my other "walls" (I wouldn't even call them like that, most of them are quoted posts) its your fault there, what's so ridiculous anyways about that statement? I just recalled what you said before, and you haven't stated a single time in this game about not reading walls. Anyways, that's up to you and your time to play, but I assure you I don't write pure "fluff".
Also what does the rabbit image you posted mean? I am totally lost there.
rEdo wrote:
Zexion wrote:
I can't really tell why I'm so similar to SNB. You just left me there as scum then procceded to defend Tess and accusing SNB. Care to explain why I'm definitely scum to you?
Source: p/4345991/
...ah, okay. That wasn't too distinguishing, so I might have overlooked that. Ermm, what I saw so far in your posts was like just picking up Tess' inconsistencies and saying easy stuff like "Magic Bomb is town because X", and that would get generally accepted by people. Narrowing down just one person is not cool, you know, especially if everybody else in this game does narrow it too. That would mean you either have no idea what to do or you're scum looking for an easy opportunity to push a mislynch. Reading your ISO looks exactly like how I would play the game as scum: find a wagon that's the most accepted, scumpaint that person into a lynch and repeat the same until it's safe.
The above is also why I'm thinking SNB would be a better lynch than Tess for today, the latter seems like an easy mislynch.
Then you're not really reading my ISO because I am not reading MB as "100% confirmed town" now and I only did one time before I questioned an inconsistency in her arguments that's not letting me think of her as confirmed town. I think that you are looking again for lazy reasons to scumpaint me because you need someone else for your suspicions to go through.
(this post made me want to play 100% orange juice)Ace Timing wrote:
rEdo wrote:
I agree, but why this is a town read rather than a null read.
Until he posts something I consider suspicious in a way, I will keep him as town. Since he hasn't posted much. Think of it as "innocent until proven otherwise".
No, I think its safer to assume the other way around. Do that and lurkers will never be scum trying to slip under the radar.
fartownik wrote:
Drezi wrote:
Anyway right now I'm only considering Jess as an alternative lynch, it's due to something I can't mention because of rules, but you can all check ; )
I know what you mean, but that only tells me Jess may be Town this game. Especially because of a thing I mentioned earlier this game.
But it could also work the other way around... if I'm thinking about what you said before.
fartownik wrote:
No one is killing Jess. That'd be the most stupid thing scum could do during the Night.
This is so true it hurts. I had to bring this up again, sorry.
Drezi wrote:
Irreversible wrote:
that person won't get lynched, yet they would most likely die next night because of OPness.
Yeah that's the point kinda...
Wait what? So you just want people to claim PR's and then get killed by scum? While I do follow your logic, I think it could be a bigger damage for town if we suddenly lost all PR's.
Also how are we gonna get a counterclaim in a closed game?
