Hello there!
Edge dashes are generally quite difficult jumps to hit, and so therefore their usage in overdoses is quite minimal, however I feel a certain guideline does restrict the usage of them a little too much, considering it's a case that doesn't stand out as a problem, at least comparatively to the other cases the guideline is against.
The guideline in question currently says the following:
Edge dashes are generally quite difficult jumps to hit, and so therefore their usage in overdoses is quite minimal, however I feel a certain guideline does restrict the usage of them a little too much, considering it's a case that doesn't stand out as a problem, at least comparatively to the other cases the guideline is against.
The guideline in question currently says the following:
Edge dashes may be used with caution for a maximum of three consecutive objects, and should not be used in conjunction with hyperdashes.The problem I have with this guideline is that whilst following hyperdashes with edge dashes is a problem, the usage of an edge dash followed by a hyperdash is by no means a problematic pattern, and has nearly no difference in difficulty to an edge dash followed by a dash, and is definitely easier than an edge dash followed by another edge dash. I feel like the wording should only warn against the usage of a hyperdash followed by an edge dash, something like this could work fine:
Edge dashes may be used with caution for a maximum of three consecutive objects, and should not be used after hyperdashes.Whilst this is just a guideline currently, so it's not actually an unrankable case, I feel as though guidelines should be a case of "This should only be used in exceptional circumstances", which right now the wording of this restricts a rather simplistic movement for the level of difficulty.