StoryBoard

1. 歌詞好像都延遲了些 ... 歌手唱了之後才出現 ... 一般不是提早出現麼
   由於FADE(淡入)的效果，應該要把整個部分提前好幾秒的，要不然就會變成上述那樣
2. 01:07:597 ~ 01:13:925 - 這裡的歌詞一下就消失了要給誰看啊/.\
   嘛，雖然可讀但是如果在遊戲中就堪稱不可能了啊/.\
3. 歌詞的效果的想法很好，就是上述那些可惜了點lol

Hard

1. 強烈建議AR7或6；HP5；OD5或6，原有設定值無疑太高，這難度本身也不難，所以很不適合
2. 00:28:222 (1,2) - ctrl + R。00:27:519 (4,1)之間的間距有些小了(將近1/2拍的間距)，這麼做能拉大一些
3. 00:36:425 (7) - 移到(240,224)才會是在00:35:722 (2,3,4,5,6)的正中間
4. 00:45:800 (3) - 沒意義的大跳，而且夠坑，nonono
   間距拉小點，像這樣 ? 做個對稱也美觀點
5. 00:51:425 (1) - 這轉盤對Hard來說太短了 ... auto才勉強轉出個3000
   把它換成00:50:488 (1,2,3,4,5)相同的節奏，00:52:363再補個note這樣
6. 01:12:988 (1) - 換成5個notes好多了 ... 還能跳一下呢 ...
   說真的這短spinner還不如不存在，我差點轉個100出來orz
   後面若還有我就不挑了，自行考量啊
7. 01:18:027 (7) - 這節奏稍微難掌握了。如果是我，我會在01:18:144加個note跟人聲
   然後把01:17:675 (6,7,1)之間的間距都調成一樣
8. 01:32:909 (4) - 因為你前面用了個折返3次的短slider，後面那個卻用個1折返
   這對「玩得起」這難度的人來說，有些難判斷了點；對技術強點的人來說，也有點不舒適
   所以把這個換成3連我覺得會好點
9. 01:40:409 (4) - 同上
10. 唔...我看不出妳NC想要跟什麼耶，歌詞也不是，重音也不是/.\
11. 音效方面我的想法跟妳完全不同呢，我覺得多用預設的2種whistle會有不錯的效果，但你的也不錯就是了:3
    
    

Normal

• 
  
  關於這diff，我就提幾點我認為重要的

1. 00:02:211 (6,7) - 折返2次後馬上接著1/2 slider，這對新手來說相當棘手，normal難度別這麼放
2. 空著的地方盡量用slider帶過，這是簡單難度的慣例模式，像00:06:429 (5,1,2,3,4)
   如果只用幾個note填充，不是不行，就是感覺不好打，這種情形在我玩2009年的圖看到挺多
   但是大空檔當然就不用裡它了 ~
3. 這難度多次出現1/2拍和1/4拍的重疊，如果真要重疊就選擇其一，不要兩個一起用，會讓新手confused
   EX : 00:27:519 (3,4) and 00:44:863 (1,2)
4. 00:44:159 and 00:44:394 - 這兩個明顯的音還是別空著好，slider連接建議

Easy

1. 相較之下這diff好多了，我看不出什麼大問題(嘛，也許是我不擅長mod Easy)
   就是這難度有些太簡單了，BPM也才128，白線上可以再填多點，偶爾紅線也無訪
   因為你這難度跟normal之間難度跳躍太大
   然後Hard和Normal又過於接近
   導致diff spread挺差的，這點也要注意一下

1. 00:04:086 (3) - I prefer a new combo for this one. If you follow this suggestion, please remove the new combo on 00:06:429 (1).
   
   
2. 00:08:773 (2) - This slider is not symmetrical. Move 2nd point one grid right and one up then move 3rd point one grid up so that it's on the center.

1. 01:05:722 (3) - This kick slider feels out of place. I highly suggest you follow the vocals here instead of the music itself.
   
   
2. 01:25:644 (5) - I think a new combo should be marked here so the combo won't reach up to 7. 7 is too long i believe for a Normal Diff.
   
   
3. 01:36:659 (1) - I think a new combo here is not necessary. I'll remove it if I were you.
   
   
4. 01:42:988 (4) - This note is overlapping with the previous slider. Please try to avoid this one for better gameplay.

1. 00:06:429 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - Why is the spacing here suddenly becomes 1.0 from 1.2?
   
   
2. 00:14:164 (1,2) - Too hard for a Hard Diff. I suggest use x2.0 spacing instead.
   
   
3. 00:30:331 (2,5) - These sliders overlap a little. Try to avoid this one please.
   
   
4. 00:34:784 (1) - I'll remove this new combo if I were you to maintain the combo count.
   
   
5. 00:39:472 (6) - This slider doesn't fit with the music at all. Please replace this one with a 1/2 slider instead. Don't forget to maintain your spacing.
   
   
6. 00:44:628 (1,2,3) - This part is completely unreadable. At least try to make the spacing consistent here so players won't be confused.
   
   
7. 00:51:425 (1) - I don't think this is a good place to place a spinner. Please map this section instead.
   
   
8. 00:54:003 (3,4,5) - Watch your spacing here too. Make them consistent.
   
   
9. 01:10:644 (7) - A new combo fits this note in my opinion. If you followed this one, please remove the new combo on 01:12:284 (1).
   
   
10. 01:12:988 (1) - This spinner is just too short. I would highly suggest you map this section instead.
    
    
11. 01:21:659 (1,2,3,4) - I think this little curve pattern could still be improved. Just try moving 2 and 3 and I think it'll be good now.
    
    
12. 01:42:753 (3,4) - Move 3 one grid up and a grid more to the right then move 4 one grid up to maintain a symmetrical pattern.

• Song Setup
  (Suggestions for appropriate difficulty based on the song to offer more fluent and comfortable playing.)
  

1. Song is sort of slow, resulting in semi-easy diff. OD +1 and/or HP Drain +1 maybe?

1. None.

1. 00:01:976 (1,1,1,1,2,1,2) - How about following the melody a little more closely? I would suggest ooooooo
2. 00:09:945 (1,1,2) - Unnecessary use of triple since it follows no exact sound. Just remove 00:10:062 (1) - simply, or if you really really want to keep it (which I really think is a bad idea), you could use ooo. To add, 00:09:945 (1) - should be o to follow the melodic pattern you've established.
3. 00:10:414 (3,1) - Switch to follow the melody; should be oo. Now look! It's consistent with 00:01:976 (1,1,1,1,2,1,2) - this way! \:D/
4. 00:12:289 (1) - If you listen closely, 00:11:820 (1) - is the exact same pitch and tone so in order to be musically correct, this definitely needs to be a o.
5. 00:13:226 (1,2) - Please remove these ._. They're floating notes with no music to back it up ><
6. 00:14:750 (3) - Same as above. This is optional though, it sounds fine but it would be wise to remove this since it technically follows no sound whatsoever and it's easier to read this way xD
7. 00:16:972 (2,3,4,5) - It follows the melody more by becoming oo oo :v The (2) is a snare sound which should automatically make it a o, but the (4,5) could potentially be a oo combination as well. Personally, I think the first suggestion is better since the clap is placed on (5), making it more obvious to place a o there. Not only that, but it flows better ^^
8. 00:18:847 (x) - A o here for consistency would be awesome ; ;
9. 00:18:964 (4) - Since there is no sound to follow this directly and making it harder to play, move this to 00:19:081 - and change it to o in order to keep consistent with your clap patterns.
10. 00:19:550 (1,2,1) - Really bad transition from following the bells to the clap pattern. I'd suggest you try to follow one instrument @ @ In order to fix this, I'd suggest a consistency with the previous pattern, such as starting at 00:19:784 - oo oo
11. 00:20:253 (1) - Follows the music better being a o since there's no actual rise in pitch, it's actually lower than the note before. See previous example to lead into this.
12. 00:20:722 (x) - Consistency in following the right sounds is key: o to accentuate the snare here, as well as 00:21:073.
13. 00:21:425 (x) - Why is there no note here at all? This is totally obvious, please fill it in with a o.
14. 00:22:714 (2,1,1,1) - I can tell you're attempting to follow the clap pattern in the background, not the bells, however the output is terrible. Some notes are on sections where no sound is played. How about trying something like 00:22:597 - ooo o o?
15. 00:23:886 (x) - o here for consistency with clap pattern as suggested before, for example. If those light, soft snare sounds are being hear through o, it's good to put one here, too, like 00:22:597 (2,3,1). A 00:23:534 - oo here might help with playability and helping to accentuate the right sounds (I actually highly recommend this).
16. 00:24:823 (1,1) - Would flow a lot better and follow the snares if you reversed this to oo
17. 00:25:761 (1,1) - Again, reverse these to accentuate the latter note's heavy drum sound, and to adhere to flow more efficiently. (oo) You could also fill in the leftover ticks inbetween 00:25:409 (1) - and 00:26:113 (1) - with o's to follow the consistent faint snare sound, making this pattern ooooooo. Both work fine, but if you prefer less density then the first suggestion is better (sounds less muddled too, and it gives more focus on the o).
18. 00:26:716 (1) - Just a suggestion but since 00:26:581 (1) - is the same sound as this, why not make this a o?
19. 00:27:284 (x) - To make this section easier to read and to flow and play better, how about a o here? It follows the melody, which is the only withstanding sound at this point. In order to keep that consistency, I suggest a change of 00:27:753 (1) - to a o as well.
20. 00:29:159 (1,2) - To be consistent with your previous clap patterns, try making this O O
21. 00:29:628 (3,4) - To indicate that you are indeed not following the vocals, I suggest you remove these, otherwise that's the hint players will take.
22. 00:29:863 (1) - This calls for a o does it not? There's a deep bass sound ._.
23. 00:30:097 (x) - Shouldn't there be a o here so that you are following the background instruments? If there isn't a note here, the next few phrases are hard to read because of the inconsistency.
24. 00:30:566 (1) - 00:36:425 (2) - It becomes really unclear what exactly you're trying to follow. Please address this issue and map to solely one sound so it's readable x.x It seems like it's going back and forth between vocals, strings and bells :v Also, 00:36:425 (2) - should be o to indicate that rise in pitch.
25. 00:36:425 (x) - o to keep consistent with previous sections.
26. 00:36:659 (1,2) - Same consistency issue: make these O O
27. 00:37:831 (1,1) - Either you're following the strings, drums, or both. The first indicates you follow the strings, which would mean you should switch these two to make o o. However, the latter follows the drums, which indicates you should delete the previous note to keep consistent.
28. 00:38:769 (1,2) - What is this following? ;w;
29. 00:42:988 (1) - Inconsistencies all the way up to here from 00:30:566 (1). I suggest you look it over to be more consistent and choose a sound to follow firmly.
30. 00:42:988 (1,2,3,4) - Remove (3) since the others follow the drums.
31. 00:43:925 (x) - o to be consistent like before.
32. 00:44:628 (1,2) - Remove these so you don't indicate you're following the vocals since that's the only sound there.
33. 00:47:323 (x) - A o would help consistency, and make 00:47:441 (1) - a o to accentuate the clap here. 00:47:675 (2) - Should also be a clap, it's quite obvious, right?
34. 00:47:909 (1) - A o since this has no clap, and it helps focus the clap sounds on the actual claps themselves.
35. 00:48:847 (2,3,1,1) - Is this supposed to be following the vocals?
36. 00:50:722 (1,2,1) - Reverse for consistency: should be ooo Or you could remove 00:50:956 (1) - and make 00:50:839 (2) - a o so that it can be consistent with the next pattern: add a o here o: This makes this section consistent with the rest of the map.
37. 00:51:425 (5) - Obvious clap; o
38. 00:51:425 (5) - This should be an obvious section to be consistent with: a o for here so it follows all other sections, which is o O O
39. 00:51:659 (1,1) - Make the first a O like mentioned above and remove the latter.
40. 00:51:894 (x) - Like above, a O
41. 00:52:011 (1,2) - Remove the first for inconsistency issues and the second because it follows the vocals.
42. I'd really like to suggest you look over your patterns. I'm going to stop here so that you can execute this (you're an experienced taiko mapper) a little better, more consistently and focusing on making patterns that are playable and readable. From half point, I'd just like to point out a few things you should think about:
43. 01:06:425 (2,1,1,1,1) - Be consistent. Like this, it should be o O O to indicate the similarities of this part of the song and the previous spots.
44. 01:14:863 (1) - For kiai I suggest some copy/paste of previous parts to keep consistent.
45. 01:28:925 (2,3,4,5) - No reason for a 4-plet like this. There is nothing in the music that indicates one, especially for a song like this.
46. 01:29:863 (1) - A copy/paste here from previous sections might help as well, since it's repetitive. At least look over your patterns and take a few parts to mess around with. Being creative does not have to come from inconsistent mapping. Transitions from different instruments and vocals makes this map excruciatingly hard to read u~u

1. If you happen to use the authentic taiko hitsounds/skin, this map is quite loud at the beginning, especially since it's the same volume throughout yet the song is significantly louder during the kiai, for example @ @. Do you think you could lower it to about 60% up until about 00:13:929 or so? 00:14:863 is fine, too. This way, it's a comfortable volume in contrast to the volume of the song throughout. :3

1. No problems