(Delete Me) Merged posts
Crap, this pic made my day. It's too funny and cute. xDRBRat3 wrote:
Cheesus this is was way too tight for my taste XD
the idea is great but i don't know ._. the face looks weird.RBRat3 wrote:
XD I been doing them native rez, Looks great & Good luck!!!!Ballance wrote:
http://puu.sh/YnY6
im also doing my best !
Has a few pixel overhangs, will be adjusted eventuallybomber34 wrote:
the idea is great but i don't know ._. the face looks weird.RBRat3 wrote:
The rest looks great
Derekku wrote:
I love this thread more and more each day. Great job to both of you!
transparent background? heart outlines?Ballance wrote:
image
its 1:30 now ,i find some problem with it but i submit it in advance
go to sleep Zzz
getup! fixed!theowest wrote:
transparent background? heart outlines?Ballance wrote:
image
its 1:30 now ,i find some problem with it but i submit it in advance
go to sleep Zzz
Huh I didnt even notice, Probably would have never noticed XDMercurial wrote:
Congratz RBRat3
wow ,osu!painterRBRat3 wrote:
Huh I didnt even notice, Probably would have never noticed XD
I don't think the new "Stumbler" achievement has enough pippi as well.JInxyjem wrote:
Hm, maybe the older secret achievements could get some touch-ups too, like Non-stop Dancer. Not enough Pippi there I'd say
but ofcourseXK2238 wrote:
What does 'non-flattened' mean? Do we have to keep all the layers as they were from the template?
Maybe have the fingers facing forward. This would also make it much more visible at the resolution it'd eventually be shrunk down to.Doodley wrote:
Still not sure if it's obvious that she's doing the "rock on" hand positions, but maybe I'm overthinking it.
Yeah, I was considering doing that, either forward or backward. I haven't sized down the achievement to the smaller res, I should probably do that and give it a thicker outline as a result.Soaprman wrote:
Maybe have the fingers facing forward. This would also make it much more visible at the resolution it'd eventually be shrunk down to.Doodley wrote:
Still not sure if it's obvious that she's doing the "rock on" hand positions, but maybe I'm overthinking it.
Love it! But gosh, what a huge forefingerBallance wrote:
There are a lot of problems with it, mostly the lack of a definite light source (the shading just sort of comes from nowhere) which bugs the hell out of me, and the lack of details on Pippi's outfit (missing the black hair, the star on her chest, the gloves, etc.). I really like the idea though, but I would love it more if she improved on it a lot as it is right now.XPJ38 wrote:
Love it! But gosh, what a huge forefingerBallance wrote:
image
That would be lovely, considering a lot of these achievements' art is killed at a lower res. If we did the image hover thing, it would actually be absolutely grand to just have it scale to a much bigger size than 266x206.RBRat3 wrote:
Heres somewhat of a feature request but more of an idea to throw around. what about doubling the rez to 266x206 but keeping its physical size representation the same as it is now on the page and having the image scale to size on mouse hover?
I know a few artists who love working at smaller res, one of them even working traditionally, creating comics on a very small scale. For me, I can never manage to get in enough details at a small res.RBRat3 wrote:
XD am I the only one that does? I hate collapsed pixels...Doodley wrote:
I can't say I like it when it's small though, I think it lacks defined outlines. I'm not sure. I could never work at a res as small as the achievement graphics, so I just drew it at a size similar to Ballance's.
http://i.imgur.com/i7xLo.png
Cute, but we're looking for original artwork. :pinverness wrote:
May I try?
I know this one sucks and needs moar improvements ><
Genius. Simply awesome.Doodley wrote:
Actually, there's another achievement (that hasn't been listed in this thread yet) that your "Obsessed" art would be PERFECT for! If multiple people are going to be making artwork, then we should try to avoid duplicates/overlapping each other. :pDoodley wrote:
Thanks.
Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.
I thought they were chosen by how aesthetically fitting it was not by first come first serve? If they are then why would dupes matter?Derekku wrote:
Actually, there's another achievement (that hasn't been listed in this thread yet) that your "Obsessed" art would be PERFECT for! If multiple people are going to be making artwork, then we should try to avoid duplicates/overlapping each other. :pDoodley wrote:
Thanks.
Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.
Sounds good to me!Derekku wrote:
Actually, there's another achievement (that hasn't been listed in this thread yet) that your "Obsessed" art would be PERFECT for! If multiple people are going to be making artwork, then we should try to avoid duplicates/overlapping each other. :pDoodley wrote:
Thanks.
Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.
It's more like there's a lot of good art being contributed for one achievement, and it would be better to use all of the art for different achievements rather than just take one of them and skip the others.RBRat3 wrote:
I thought they were chosen by how aesthetically fitting it was not by first come first serve?