ztrot wrote:

hello note anything I say is just to improve your map and make it as best as it can be feel free to use this at your own pace.

[Fun Facts]

This map is timed right

ouran is a older mapper
is this good or bad D:
ouran is in love with TERRA

[Easy]

00:01:134 (2) - not sure why you need a ki burst in here.
;~;
00:22:884 (2) - have the end point of this slider center with the arc of 00:22:134 (1) -
its already centered?

00:31:134 (1) - you can shape this curve a bit more make it sexy baby!
:D?
00:34:134 (1) - ^
:D?
00:42:009 (4) - tighten up this blanket up a bit more.
did my best
00:47:446 (1) - I don't know why but I think this looks better two ticks to the right.
probably because it would make the hitcircle symmetrical to the slider end. also No change
01:04:134 (1) - remove the new combo here.
nah
01:20:634 (2,1) - you can make these look a bit better if you take a bit of time on the shape.
fixed
01:23:634 (3,4,5) - gotta say I love stuff like this.
:D
01:26:634 (1) - I suggest making this slider wrap around 01:27:384 (2) -
changed the pattern

[Hard]

00:01:134 (2) - silly ki time.
;~;
00:46:884 (4) - center this guy to the slider underneath it.
Not quite sure what to centerbut i hope this is okay

00:59:634 (1,2,3) - maybe put some space in between this combo.
fixed
01:02:634 (1,2,3) - ^
fixed
01:30:384 (2) - STACK THIS.
i guess i'll stack it here, since i stacked it in similar patterns
Hard is really nice good job.

[Insane]

00:01:134 (3) - SILLY KI TIME YOU AGAIN.
;~;
00:06:384 (1,2) - space these out a bit.
done
00:09:759 (4) - maybe stack and curve this possibly?
I'll curve it, but i'm not stacking it
infact insane looks decent so your good to go

1. you should add preview point
2. delete bookmarks

1. 00:30:759 (7) - whistle at start?
2. 00:38:071 (5) - change to triple hits?
3. 00:39:384 (1,2) - whistle at start?
4. 00:45:009 (7) - whistle
5. 00:49:134 (1) - normal-finish at start
6. 01:03:759 (4) - why no finish here?
7. 01:27:290 - make normal sampleset volume lower here :3

1. 00:21:009 (2) - whistle at end?
2. 00:25:134 (1) - finish at start
3. 00:49:134 (1) - ^

1. fine to me.

RLC wrote:

Hard

00:30:759 - add note here? maybe it's just me but i tend to hit 00:30:946 (1) - 1/2 too early XD
01:28:884 (3) - make this blanket slightly larger? it feels a bit tight/cramped

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Hello~
Modding as you requested. (hopefully M4M <3)

[General]

Those hitcircles are really nice.

Remove the bookmarks? They are unsnapped and look bad. Doesn't matter though I guess.

[Normal]

00:36:384 (3,1) - Increased spacing here? Maybe make the 3 a curved slider leading into the 1. done

00:41:634 (3,4) - Did you increase this spacing to accent the vocals? No need for this I don't think. the circles are the same distance and (1,2)'s head to tail

01:40:134 (2) - Finish on head? done
01:46:134 (2) - ^ ^

[Hard]

00:30:759 (1) - Remove NC nty
00:31:134 (3) - NC nty
The new verse starts on the 3 there. NC there as you did with 00:28:134 (1) and 00:25:134 (1).

00:32:634 (5,6,7,8) - Super awkward rhythm. Please don't suddenly switch to the vocals when you were mapping to the bass hits. Please replace this with another long slider. You should just repeat the 00:28:134 (1,2,3,4,1,2) pattern again here. done-ish

00:45:759 (1) - NC here breaks the pattern of 00:43:134 (1) and 00:40:134 (1). Idk if that bothers you.nty

00:47:446 (5) - Maybe NC here and not 00:48:196 (1)? This vocal line begins with the 5 here. done

01:49:134 (1) - Finish on head? done

01:46:134 (1) - Finish on head? done

01:52:134 (1) - Finish? done

[Insane]

00:38:446 (8) - NC here and not 00:39:384 (1) imo nty
New idea is at the 8 there.

01:20:259 (7) - Do you want to stack properly under the 6's tail? nty

01:28:509 (2) - Finish on head?

01:30:384 (1) - Really need this NC here? Still the same verse there.


Ok. Sorry couldn't find much. I love your rhythms for the most part, and the insane plays very nicely. Awesome maps, I'll leave star. <3

M4M map if you have time

http://osu.ppy.sh/s/68399

1. 00:05:259 (3,1) - Not a big deal,though what about making this slider curvy so that it continues the flow given by 00:05:259 (3) - until 00:07:134 (2) - ? Imho,this "wave" created fits and flows really good,especially with 00:07:134 (2) - ! Here's what I have done here,see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   296,176,6384,6,0,B|240:160|200:200,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   120,240,7134,2,0,B|80:168|120:96,2,150,2|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   56,304,8634,6,0,B|104:344|160:320,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,264,9384,2,0,B|320:264,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   360,184,10134,2,0,B|512:184,2,150,2|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   280,136,11633,1,2,0:0:0

2. 00:20:634 (1,2,3,4) - That's again a pretty much little thing to smooth the flow out there: what about making here an arc-shaped pattern instead continuing with 00:22:134 (1) - oval flow? That ascendent transition there imho doesen't flow that naturally,and I would see this better ;_; Again,here's what I have done here:
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   256,312,20634,5,2,0:0:0
   336,272,21009,1,2,0:0:0
   336,184,21384,1,2,0:0:0
   256,136,21759,1,2,0:0:0
   168,136,22134,6,0,B|114:141|86:186,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   56,272,22884,2,0,B|63:325|111:350,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   152,264,23634,6,0,B|216:264|216:264|184:320|200:360|240:384|272:384|312:360|328:320|296:264|296:264|360:264,1,400,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:30:946 (x)- Wouldn't it be better if instead of skipping these kicks you mapped mapped them by adding a circle here and at 00:33:946 - ? It shouldn't be that hard to play and it would complete the rhythm. As now just these sliders without anything following the drum before sound quite strange imho :U
4. 00:31:134 (1,1) - I guess you forgot a whistle at the repeat for both the sliders? These should have followed the kicks being played there,and as you already used them for the same reason it's a bit strange not hearing them here xD
5. 01:00:009 (2) - Another little and subjective thing here,fix just if you want: as before, you could use a bit more flowing approach by making a waveish pattern by flipping this horizontally and by putting it at x:328 y:104? Imho,it is really cool to play and it flows pretty good,especially with the returning circle 01:01:134 (3) - ! Here's the outcome!
6. 01:30:384 (3) - As seen in 00:05:259 (3,1) - , wouldn't it be better if this was curved to follow 01:29:634 (2) - 's dropoff and to continue the flow with 01:31:134 (4) - ? That's again a really little thing,though
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   136,48,89259,5,8,0:0:0
   72,112,89634,2,0,B|112:152|168:136,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   256,120,90384,2,0,B|304:104|352:136,1,100,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   416,192,91134,2,0,B|456:264|416:336,2,150,4|4|12,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   352,128,92634,1,0,0:0:0
   208,280,93384,5,0,0:0:0
   144,344,93759,1,8,0:0:0
   64,312,94134,2,0,B|8:256|8:176,2,150,0|0|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   Really nice diff <3 Sorry for my quite useless mod there,as you see these are all just a bunch of suggestions

1. 00:02:634 (4) - What about using a New Combo here? It's a pretty much little thing,though it emphatizes pretty well the synthesizer's phrases,and as you followed them after this slider it doesen't make much sense to leave it there as it is. The same applies for 00:14:634 (2) - !
2. 00:32:634 (5) - I guess you forgot again to add a whistle at the beginning which should have followed the kicks. As you have already used them it would be better if you added it here,too :U
3. 00:33:946 (x)- Again,I don't see why not following at least the kick there by adding a note,as this time you have already followed them, and keeping the rhythm here wouldn't be bad at all
4. 01:10:134 (2) - It's a really little thing, but anyways what about adding a New Combo here? Following the vocals ---> kicks transition using this New Combo would actually fit pretty good and it would delimitate the pattern created there too
5. 01:22:134 (2,3) - This time instead of following simply the drums I would prefer following a bit more the vocals by splitting 01:22:134 (2) - into 2 1/1 sliders that go 1/2 along with 01:23:259 (3) -. Imho,they fit much better here as the vocals are taking place here and as you are totally following them with 01:23:634 (1,2,3) - :
   
   A possible pattern to use with this setting could be a pattern using crossing sliders,that could go wery well here!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   352,288,82134,2,0,B|312:224|320:144,1,150,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   388,192,82696,2,0,P|320:220|248:192,1,150,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   232,124,83259,1,2,0:0:0

6. 01:28:884 (3) - Hmm... That's a pretty much subjective thing,but anyways what about using CTRL+G on the top of this slider? Using a totally linear flow here imho would benefit for this slider,as it follows pretty good the descendent-ascendent transition there,and the oval flow created there could flow pretty good with 01:29:634 (1) - !
7. 01:43:134 (5,6) - Using 1/1 sliders here is fine,but anyways as above I would prefer if you followed a bit more the vocals,as you litterally followed them with 01:42:384 (3,4,5) -. What about using a 2 sliders ~ 1/2 note combination? Here's what I have done here:
   
8. 01:47:634 (1,2,3,4) - What about reverting these notes so that they continue the right to left flow created by 01:46:696 (2,3) - ,going into a zig-zag structure finishing with 01:49:134 (1) - ,which completes the pattern? Here's what I have done here
   Another awesome diff <3

1. 00:18:384 (1,2) - I have a little idea there: why don't you curve these a bit out and place 00:18:759 (2) - stacking it on 00:19:134 (1) - 's end? It's a quite little thing,but it will make the flow there smoother to play because of the oval flows created by these sliders,which fit really good with 00:19:134 (1) - ! Here's what I have done,see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   112,304,18384,6,0,B|144:344|200:352,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,320,18759,2,0,B|360:280|304:272,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   198,351,19134,6,0,B|302:375|390:319,1,200,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 00:22:134 (1) - After your whole 00:20:634 (1,2,3,4) - pattern playing there,I actually expected this to play from the right to the left,instead of up--->down. After having said so,what do you think about making a little symmetric pattern,which uses this setting I stated above? Imho,this does actually play more naturally than the current setting!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   368,112,22134,6,0,B|272:64|176:112,1,200,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   136,192,22696,1,2,0:0:0
   176,272,22884,2,0,B|272:320|368:272,1,200,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   448,312,23446,1,2,0:0:0

3. 00:33:946 (x)- As already said in the other diffs,a note here would not hurt at all,especially since there is a kick you can clearly follow and since it keeps your 1/2 pattern mantained for all over the part.
4. 00:37:134 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Well,this pattern does actually play kinda "meh" imho. Combining triangular patterns with that straight slider doesen't really flow that naturally,while I would see better something more arc-shaped.Here,I modified the pattern in this way and I also tweaked 00:38:446 (8) - so that it flows more naturally with 00:39:384 (1,2) - . See if you like this!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   488,248,37134,5,2,0:0:0
   472,160,37321,1,0,0:0:0
   392,120,37509,2,0,P|344:112|296:136,1,100,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   288,224,37884,1,2,0:0:0
   200,208,38071,1,0,0:0:0
   200,208,38165,1,0,0:0:0
   200,208,38259,1,0,0:0:0
   184,296,38446,2,0,P|128:256|160:128,2,200,2|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

5. 00:57:196 (6) - I don't like really much how this flows overall,because of 00:56:634 (5) - totally going upwards while this note is going downwards. I have a little idea here: what about making this instead go upwards to make it flow pretty good with 00:57:384 (7) - ? I also unstacked 00:56:446 (4) - from 00:55:884 (3) - ,to make the whole pattern work better. See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   168,160,56446,1,0,0:0:0
   192,248,56634,2,0,B|192:312|256:328|320:312|320:248,1,200,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   344,160,57196,1,0,0:0:0
   416,216,57384,2,0,B|464:120|416:24,2,200,0|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,304,58321,5,0,0:0:0

6. 01:09:196 (1,2,3,4,5) - Starting the whole pattern from this red tick sounds quite... strange,as the vocal does actually start 1/2 later and I can't really find any instruments which could start the whole pattern there. Beginning the whole pattern from 1/2 before would instead be the best choice,imho. You have two options here: you could move 01:09:196 (1) - 1/2 backwards in the timeline,until 01:09:009 - ,or you could just add a note here. See what's the best option by yourself!
7. 01:15:384 (1,2,3,4,5) - Uh...Why the triplet at 01:15:571 (2,3,4) - ? It does not make really sense,as there are some 1/4 drums which are being played 1/2 after the current pattern. Imho,you should delete that triplet and instead structure a stream from 01:15:759 (3) - to 01:16:134 (1) - ,as seen in this image:
   
   And here's a possible pattern which could use this setting:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   16,192,75384,5,2,0:0:0
   56,272,75571,1,0,0:0:0
   120,208,75759,1,2,0:0:0
   136,192,75852,1,0,0:0:0
   152,176,75946,1,0,0:0:0
   168,160,76040,1,0,0:0:0
   184,144,76134,6,0,B|232:144|232:144|272:176|272:176|328:176,1,150,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

8. 01:33:009 (8) - I guess you missed a clap here,as this kinda breaks your 2/1 clap consistency and you used that clap in the next phrase. Add it?
9. 01:41:634 (1,2,3,4) - Wouldn't it be better if you actually used CTRL+G on the top of 01:41:634 (1) - ? Imho,that would flow much more naturally,as it follows 01:40:884 (5) - 's oval flow much better than the current pattern,and you could make a pretty fun to play pattern using these 2 reversed sliders. Here's a pattern made using these suggestions: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   281,296,101634,6,0,B|320:328|376:312,1,100
   240,224,102009,2,0,B|201:192|145:208,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   104,288,102384,2,0,B|0:288,1,100
   112,112,102759,2,0,B|216:112,1,100,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

10. 01:43:134 (5) - Shouldn't a New Combo be added here? I see you have used this on the top of the previous pattern so adding it here wouldn't hurt at all,on the other side it helps delimitating this pattern pretty good!