I kinda agree with Gezo and Okotaru here, if anything setting more values would lower the "freedom" part of guidelines. The prob here is more about those who apply guidelines as if they were rules without considering the song's settings.
"Rhythm related guidelines and rules apply to approximately 180 BPM maps. If your song is drastically faster or slower, some variables might be different. Apply reasonable judgment in these cases."
This means common sense should be used for bpms that are higher or lower than 180. BNs and QATs exist to prevent the ranking system from being defined by values that can't cover all situations because of subjectivity. Thought from my personnal experience some members of these groups (Nardoxyribonucleic and Aloda, if not more) have a pretty mysterious way of "applying reasonable judgment in these cases".
What i understand from this is that it would be perfectly normal to apply the current values of guidelines for a very high bpm song even thought those guidelines were designed for songs around 180bpm. If i understood this correctly that is.
"Rhythm related guidelines and rules apply to approximately 180 BPM maps. If your song is drastically faster or slower, some variables might be different. Apply reasonable judgment in these cases."
This means common sense should be used for bpms that are higher or lower than 180. BNs and QATs exist to prevent the ranking system from being defined by values that can't cover all situations because of subjectivity. Thought from my personnal experience some members of these groups (Nardoxyribonucleic and Aloda, if not more) have a pretty mysterious way of "applying reasonable judgment in these cases".
What i understand from this is that it would be perfectly normal to apply the current values of guidelines for a very high bpm song even thought those guidelines were designed for songs around 180bpm. If i understood this correctly that is.