It's true!
English < Maths and Science
English < Maths and Science
forum
Maths and Science > English
posted
Total Posts
23
Topic Starter
So the above image has always been my signature.I agree
abraker wrote:
I agree
el
psy
Is math related to science?
May I inquire as to which language you posted this thread in?
That's of non importantsjohnmedina999 wrote:
May I inquire as to which language you posted this thread in?
And this is why English is so important—at least in English-speaking countries.abraker wrote:
That's of non importants
I wouldn't pick on your English so much if you didn't live in the US.
You can argue lies with English
Try doing that with math
Try doing that with math
Bless Gödel's incompleteness theorems I guess?abraker wrote:
You can argue lies with English
Try doing that with math
First I hear of them so had to look them up. To make sure I got the gist of it, I'll summarize: Anything in logic is a prediction that doesn't allow you to know for certain something is true until observed, and there are things that may never be observed.Endaris wrote:
Bless Gödel's incompleteness theorems I guess?
Then why stop there and argue that all we observe is a lie and are being tricked to experience things the way we do? We construct a fundamental framework which is based on axioms, made up truths, and derive "truths" from there. Absolutely, everything is a lie down at the core. We are great at noticing patterns, and we base the fundamental framework upon those observed patterns¹. To say a lie is to say something that is not observed and doesn't follow the fundamental framework. To observe a lie is to prove what you know is an incomplete truth.
¹ - Observations are often associated with perception of the physical world, however observations can go beyond the physical. One of such is the perception of generic information and our ability to create arbitrary relations between that generic information. Consider true and false, 1 and 0. It is an imaginary concept, but we create a relation between such concept: truth and false such that truth is truth and not false, and false is false such that it is not true. There is great deal of relations based on practically nothing going on in that sentence, but so are things like our perception of color and the likes.
abraker wrote:
First I hear of them so had to look them up. To make sure I got the gist of it, I'll summarize: Anything in logic is a prediction that doesn't allow you to know for certain something is true until observed, and there are things that may never be observed.Endaris wrote:
Bless Gödel's incompleteness theorems I guess?
Then why stop there and argue that all we observe is a lie and are being tricked to experience things the way we do? We construct a fundamental framework which is based on axioms, made up truths, and derive "truths" from there. Absolutely, everything is a lie down at the core. We are great at noticing patterns, and we base the fundamental framework upon those observed patterns¹. To say a lie is to say something that is not observed and doesn't follow the fundamental framework. To observe a lie is to prove what you know is an incomplete truth.
¹ - Observations are often associated with perception of the physical world, however observations can go beyond the physical. One of such is the perception of generic information and our ability to create arbitrary relations between that generic information. Consider true and false, 1 and 0. It is an imaginary concept, but we create a relation between such concept: truth and false such that truth is truth and not false, and false is false such that it is not true. There is great deal of relations based on practically nothing going on in that sentence, but so are things like our perception of color and the likes.
This thread is beyond retardedness
This thread is not beyond retarded.
Compared you the things you'll see elsewhere, I mean.
Compared you the things you'll see elsewhere, I mean.
Lol wat?GSG95 wrote:
This thread is not beyond retarded.
Compared you the things you'll see elsewhere, I mean.
szkiller wrote:
Lol wat?GSG95 wrote:
This thread is not beyond retarded.
Compared you the things you'll see elsewhere, I mean.
Chapter 1: Identifying the Information Given
Let's suppose a statement S is of some arbitrary value V which has N-dimensions of possible impacts I on the reader R. The transfer funtion as such:
- S(V) -> R
- This thread is not beyond retarded.
Compared you the things you'll see elsewhere, I mean.
- Lol wat?
Chapter 2: Identifying the Value of the Statement
Need funding for further research
Topic Starter
Yes in a way...ColdTooth wrote:
Is math related to science?
Topic Starter
I don't go to a STEM school but I have done STEMcitremi wrote:
haha dae stem??? LOL
Topic Starter
English! I just think that the subjects Maths and Science are > than the subject English.johnmedina999 wrote:
May I inquire as to which language you posted this thread in?
Topic Starter
So true...szkiller wrote:
This thread is beyond retardedness
Dude you don't have to post for each reply, you can use one post, with all four replies in one.