Well, that's useless
forum
Replays Watched History
posted
Total Posts
46
eldnl wrote:
Seems unnecessary as it is.
Guys, I have watched 6 replays. ~~ OMG IMPORTANT!
BD so stalker
I see. So that means it's a measurement of player's "stalking" level, eh? 
I forgot who's replay data I've watched, and which beatmap... 
Nevermind. I think I know who and where.
This is a troll from peppy. Instead of introducing something that people would be interested in he gives us this useless feature.
Very nice troll
.
Very nice troll
.We have been trolled.Metro wrote:
This is a troll from peppy. Instead of introducing something that people would be interested in he gives us this useless feature.
Very nice troll
Um, oops?
Honestly, i think a feature like this would be much more useful (shows the trend of "Replays watched by others"), people won't care how many replays he has watched just like no one cares how many videos he has watched on youtube.
Topic Starter
that means?peppy wrote:
Um, oops?
That was my intention.
Topic Starter
then, you will not fix it?peppy wrote:
That was my intention.
Of course I will fix it.
oh you
So was this the request i've seen from the other forum page? Or is it just another idea of peppy? Sounds great to me
Topic Starter
Is working correctly now ♥ Cookiezi wtf
This was a private request from someone I know. I may change it to daily rather than monthly, depending on what people want.
Gonna add 'Most Watched Replays'?
Like 'Most Played Beatmaps'
Like 'Most Played Beatmaps'
I like that idea.ykcarrot wrote:
Gonna add 'Most Watched Replays'?
Like 'Most Played Beatmaps'
Weekly is the bestpeppy wrote:
This was a private request from someone I know. I may change it to daily rather than monthly, depending on what people want.
And finally my site could go RIP
Your graphs are still prettier. I need to fix the styling up a bit on the profile graphs.
Wait. Those replays are the replays that YOU"VE (as in myself) have watched of OTHERS? o-o
I thought it was how many replays other people watched of your top 40.... o-o
If it's how many I've watched, isn't that kind of... useless? o-o
Kind of confusing .. People are always talking about how many replays the pros get... but that just really shows how many THEY'VE watched of other players...? o-o *so confused*
I thought it was how many replays other people watched of your top 40.... o-o
If it's how many I've watched, isn't that kind of... useless? o-o
Kind of confusing .. People are always talking about how many replays the pros get... but that just really shows how many THEY'VE watched of other players...? o-o *so confused*
I believe this has been fixed around last week. I haven't even turned on osu! for some days, yet I got the graph shooting up from plain 1 to tens.Yuki Hana-Chan wrote:
Wait. Those replays are the replays that YOU"VE (as in myself) have watched of OTHERS? o-o
I thought it was how many replays other people watched of your top 40.... o-o
If it's how many I've watched, isn't that kind of... useless? o-o
Kind of confusing .. People are always talking about how many replays the pros get... but that just really shows how many THEY'VE watched of other players...? o-o *so confused*
Even if I do, I often watch my own Top 40 replay data than others just to check for inconsistencies. (As you know... replay bug could exist
)How about removing December 2011 from the graphs?
The figures aren't accurate and don't look very good on the graph (sudden jump in January for most people) since it only started recording during late December.
The figures aren't accurate and don't look very good on the graph (sudden jump in January for most people) since it only started recording during late December.
agreed
why bother, it started in late december anywayxsrsbsns wrote:
How about removing December 2011 from the graphs?
The figures aren't accurate and don't look very good on the graph (sudden jump in January for most people) since it only started recording during late December.
umm exactly. it's not accurate if it starts LATE in december. If it had been EARLY december then sure keep it.
exactly, it won't be accurate either way, so why would anyone even put trouble into the process of deleting the history of December? You're simply asking for something that is irrelevant and thus has no priority.YodaSnipe wrote:
umm exactly. it's not accurate if it starts LATE in december. If it had been EARLY december then sure keep it.
hey man, if you can't see the logic that's cool
I have removed december '11 stats to make this graph more readable.
It's still there.peppy wrote:
I have removed december '11 stats to make this graph more readable.
may take some time to clear caches.
need to fix Maximum 65535 bug?
Done.
Kay so I wasn't the only one who thought replays watched meant how many people watched your replays, I don't feel so silly now. And wtf 65535? OMG