1.Wuhua -Godlike speed and accuracy
2.Rampax -ever seen malaysia sonic?
3.Desumond - adapt,improvise,overcome
2.Rampax -ever seen malaysia sonic?
3.Desumond - adapt,improvise,overcome
MEANIE :HamaCry:ClawViper wrote:
Hi,
This might sound extremely mean/elitist but I don't think votes from Jack0Jack, IceFireNinja and Rico007 should be included in the points. From their profiles (36 playcount, 580 playcount, and 255 playcount respectively), the legitimacy of their votes can be called into question as it is clear that none of these players have actually played the game enough to form a judgment on anything. I think a system needs to be put in place in order to prevent potential abuse (I am not bringing any accusations of multi-accounting/people asking their friends to vote for them, just a general thought.)
I suggest that we should set a minimum play count before the player is eligible to vote. Number is pretty variable, although I would think 3,000 plays would be a rather fair number. Any feedback on this point?
:Sha Sha Sha:TequilaWolf wrote:
MEANIE :HamaCry:
Thanks for the suggestion. I agree that a player should at least be "active" in this game in order to be able to judge other players' skill. Based on what I know, the Chinese community also set a similar rule for it. To avoid any suspicious votes again, I think I will take your suggestion into consideration. Hopefully this will keep the voting stage fair. I feel really sad that I have to add this kind of rule to prevent any abuse.ClawViper wrote:
Hi,
This might sound extremely mean/elitist but I don't think votes from Jack0Jack, IceFireNinja and Rico007 should be included in the points. From their profiles (36 playcount, 580 playcount, and 255 playcount respectively), the legitimacy of their votes can be called into question as it is clear that none of these players have actually played the game enough to form a judgment on anything. I think a system needs to be put in place in order to prevent potential abuse (I am not bringing any accusations of multi-accounting/people asking their friends to vote for them, just a general thought.)
I suggest that we should set a minimum play count before the player is eligible to vote. Number is pretty variable, although I would think 3,000 plays would be a rather fair number. Any feedback on this point?
wot kagareKagari wrote:
1. Gilochan
2. Gilochan
3. Gilochan
4. Gilochan
5. Gilochan
6. Gilochan
7. Gilochan
8. Gilochan
9. Gilochan
10. Gilochan
honorable mention(s)
Gilochanit's a joke desu eksdee
MEAN :HamaCry:Vexine wrote:
amazingly able to improve rapidly despite his poor mentality to the game.
player = ['VGVxdWlsYVdvbGY=', 'VHplbWV0YWw=', 'S2luZyBIb25n', 'd3VodWE=', 'emlzYW1Fcg==', 'UnVtaWEt', 'LSBWeXggLQ==', 'Q2xhd1ZpcGVy', 'RXg2VGVuWg==', 'UmFtcGF4']
rank = []
for i in range(1, 11):
rank.append((i * 3) % 11)
for i in range(10):
for j in range(10):
if rank[j] == (i + 1):
print rank[j], player[j].decode('base64')