Sonnyc wrote:

01:27:841 (1) - 04:02:324 (1) - There exists a small sound here, but imo deleting to fit the drum sounds would fit the song better since the previous pattern goes with the drums.

Hikan wrote:

01:28:212 (1,3) -

Stingy wrote:

Hikan wrote:

01:28:212 (1,3) -

• 
  YAMICCHI, MAKE SURE TO GO BACK THROUGH AND LOOK FOR SLIDEREND STACK! Remember last time that happened xDD

1. 00:24:591 (4,1) - This pattern here is similar to 00:35:626 (4,1) - , right? Why is 00:35 spaced like this when 00:24 is stacked? fixed
2. 00:31:143 (4,1,2,3) - Same thing as above with 00:39:591 (7,1) - . this is to emphasize 00:39:764 (1) - pattern
3. 00:45:108 (1,2) - Stack is off!~ fixed
4. 01:25:108 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - YES YAMICCHIIII IT'S YOUR SLIDER PATTERN:TM: <3 I LOVE YOU SCREEEEEEE
5. 01:51:660 (1,5) - Stack is off!~ k
6. 01:54:074 - This rhythm isn't very accurate... It somewhat follows the synths, but not very well. I highly suggest something like this. It is much more intuitive and can still play well. (Note: the 3/4 sliders are optional. You should be fine having them as just 1/2.) discussed ingame
7. 02:00:539 - Why not have a triplet here? This one is much more noticeable than some of the others, so it would make sense. This is completely optional though!~ pattern fixed
8. 02:19:936 (6,2) - Stack! oWo

<33333

1. HS with possible delay : soft-hitwhistle2.wav
2. Why is there an osb file in the folder, its doing nothing

1. 00:29:763 (3) - would be nicer to bring this closer to 00:29:246 (1,2,4) - these because the song is much more faint than it is at 00:27:867 -
2. 02:09:505 (1,1) - Kind of unnecessary NC's since the sliders are easily readable as 1/4 even without NC's
3. 02:14:936 (2) - kinda weird how the slider starts on a very weak sound and ends on a really strong sound
4. 02:19:936 (6) - i suggest you change this slider to two circles instead because both sounds on slider stand out equally
5. 02:34:591 (3,1) - Either start NC from 02:34:591 (3) - or just remove the NC because having both sliders in same combo looks better. Gonna be better if you just remove it since 0.2 change in sv isn't that drastic and is still easily readable
6. 02:39:591 (4) - Can you make it so the slider curve near the end doesn't go too out of the place ,basically make is symmetric from both ends, The way you made 02:50:626 (4) - is much cuter so yea
7. 03:02:350 (1,2,3) - These should really be emphasized a bit more in terms of spacing. if you compare this section with 00:27:867 (1,2,3,4) - the section at 02:57:522 - has a much stronger baseline yet the spacing is pretty low
8. 04:21:919 (1,1) - Same NC thing

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

Rank spider already SoonTM
[General]

1. HS with possible delay : soft-hitwhistle2.wav changed a bit in hitsound files
2. Why is there an osb file in the folder, its doing nothing what the issue? I don't think I have any osb file when I upload though

[Pressure]

1. 00:29:763 (3) - would be nicer to bring this closer to 00:29:246 (1,2,4) - these because the song is much more faint than it is at 00:27:867 - as for what I understand about echo, it's the level of the sound, as to be said - volume, is what gradually decrease and not the sound itself,
   so having smaller spacing is imo changing the sound. I think lowering the volume is already enough
2. 02:09:505 (1,1) - Kind of unnecessary NC's since the sliders are easily readable as 1/4 even without NC's ya sure? Ok
3. 02:14:936 (2) - kinda weird how the slider starts on a very weak sound and ends on a really strong sound following the rhythm mostly I believe
4. 02:19:936 (6) - i suggest you change this slider to two circles instead because both sounds on slider stand out equally ukey
5. 02:34:591 (3,1) - Either start NC from 02:34:591 (3) - or just remove the NC because having both sliders in same combo looks better. Gonna be better if you just remove it since 0.2 change in sv isn't that drastic and is still easily readable sure, fixed
6. 02:39:591 (4) - Can you make it so the slider curve near the end doesn't go too out of the place ,basically make is symmetric from both ends, The way you made 02:50:626 (4) - is much cuter so yea my bad
7. 03:02:350 (1,2,3) - These should really be emphasized a bit more in terms of spacing. if you compare this section with 00:27:867 (1,2,3,4) - the section at 02:57:522 - has a much stronger baseline yet the spacing is pretty low increased a bit
8. 04:21:919 (1,1) - Same NC thing did

Cute set, call me
i still prefer on my way a lot more tho d

1. 00:25:798 (1,2,3,4) - notably a lot easier to play than 00:23:039 (1,2,3) - , given the simpler flow and spacing. Something like this would be a nice fix: http://puu.sh/yu44i/1cd6659d15.jpg which gives it a little sharper flow and more spacing
2. 00:47:005 (4,5,6,7) - You set a larger precursor for spacing here, but when the vocals are strong again at 00:49:074 (4,5,6) - the spacing/rhythm disparity is pretty noticeable. Could you space 00:49:074 (4,5,6) - more? 01:00:108 (4,5,6) - is better, for example
3. 02:35:453 (1,2) - and 02:46:488 (1,2) - the stop and go motion here and here feel kinda out of place. The way you map out the synth here makes these kinda stand out for no particular reason, why not just space this out like the rest?
4. 03:11:315 (1,2,3,4) - Lacks a lot of movement compared to 03:08:557 (1,2,3,4) - , maybe ctrl+j and ctrl+h some of these
5. 03:23:557 (4,5,6) - Back to my other point regarding spacing here, these definitely could use more. If you wanted to make this one less emphasized (im guessing so) the rhythm already does that, but the spacing makes this feel a lot weaker than necessary.
6. 04:52:005 (5,6) - You were following vocals more at 04:50:971 (1,2,3) - , here too maybe include them a little more? :< feels empty
7. 05:27:522 (3,4) - What do you think about spacing these more instead? You had a great buildup for the high pitched synth at 05:25:798 (7,8,9) - , making these jumps larger would match this section really well I think

Plaudible wrote:

sorry for late

Pressure

1. 00:25:798 (1,2,3,4) - notably a lot easier to play than 00:23:039 (1,2,3) - , given the simpler flow and spacing. Something like this would be a nice fix: http://puu.sh/yu44i/1cd6659d15.jpg which gives it a little sharper flow and more spacing little but neat fixed :3
2. 00:47:005 (4,5,6,7) - You set a larger precursor for spacing here, but when the vocals are strong again at 00:49:074 (4,5,6) - the spacing/rhythm disparity is pretty noticeable. Could you space 00:49:074 (4,5,6) - more? 01:00:108 (4,5,6) - is better, for example done for you
3. 02:35:453 (1,2) - and 02:46:488 (1,2) - the stop and go motion here and here feel kinda out of place. The way you map out the synth here makes these kinda stand out for no particular reason, why not just space this out like the rest? as you wish
4. 03:11:315 (1,2,3,4) - Lacks a lot of movement compared to 03:08:557 (1,2,3,4) - , maybe ctrl+j and ctrl+h some of these not much but still fixed
5. 03:23:557 (4,5,6) - Back to my other point regarding spacing here, these definitely could use more. If you wanted to make this one less emphasized (im guessing so) the rhythm already does that, but the spacing makes this feel a lot weaker than necessary. not sure though... I think the spacing is ok here, as other similar spacings are not really different to this
6. 04:52:005 (5,6) - You were following vocals more at 04:50:971 (1,2,3) - , here too maybe include them a little more? :< feels empty well the kick snares there is quite unique compare to the other classic drum snare goes with the vocal on (1,2,3), so I wanted to make them a bit different. Also I think it's pretty good for a measure transition
7. 05:27:522 (3,4) - What do you think about spacing these more instead? You had a great buildup for the high pitched synth at 05:25:798 (7,8,9) - , making these jumps larger would match this section really well I think done~

another great map by the yamyam call me back!