not mentioned is somehow fixed
@Josh123uaJ On easy i am making the combos bigger than usual, that's why there's a lot of NC potential that i missed, but that was intentional, don't worry.
On insane, nc is on 00:25:810 (1) - instead of 00:26:195 (5) -, 00:27:156 (1) - NC is another thing more related to avoid put it on 00:27:541 (3) -. Also 00:44:465 (6,1) - spacing differece is something like intensity reasons i guess
@Net0 no easy eu dei um melhor cover em partes como 00:05:041 - e 00:17:349 -, as pausas restantes eu pretendo manter por ser uma dificuldade tecnicamente mais fácil. Também n mudei a parada do combo color branco porque vc sabe. No normal eu n vi nenhum som relevante em 01:33:118 - pra fazer um reverse, e 00:56:964 (1,3) - foi intencional, eu faço isso normalmente, que é fazer a simetria certinho e dar ctrl h, fica top, coisa minha eu acho (vou ver sobre as variações mas n vejo problema).
@Mirash On insane: nerfed 00:07:733 (1,2,3) - i don't know if it's better though, i just don't want to make 00:07:733 (1,2,3,4) - all equal spacing :SsSsS. About 00:21:195 (1,2,3,4,5) - u gay ????. 00:51:965 (4) - main intention wasn't to follow that part accurately as you can see on another sounds as 00:53:310 - and 00:53:695 - that has such a high intensity if you compare with another ones on the same section, i just tried to follow it on a simplified way but i'm not so sure about it right now.
thank you guys!!
@Josh123uaJ On easy i am making the combos bigger than usual, that's why there's a lot of NC potential that i missed, but that was intentional, don't worry.
On insane, nc is on 00:25:810 (1) - instead of 00:26:195 (5) -, 00:27:156 (1) - NC is another thing more related to avoid put it on 00:27:541 (3) -. Also 00:44:465 (6,1) - spacing differece is something like intensity reasons i guess
@Net0 no easy eu dei um melhor cover em partes como 00:05:041 - e 00:17:349 -, as pausas restantes eu pretendo manter por ser uma dificuldade tecnicamente mais fácil. Também n mudei a parada do combo color branco porque vc sabe. No normal eu n vi nenhum som relevante em 01:33:118 - pra fazer um reverse, e 00:56:964 (1,3) - foi intencional, eu faço isso normalmente, que é fazer a simetria certinho e dar ctrl h, fica top, coisa minha eu acho (vou ver sobre as variações mas n vejo problema).
@Mirash On insane: nerfed 00:07:733 (1,2,3) - i don't know if it's better though, i just don't want to make 00:07:733 (1,2,3,4) - all equal spacing :SsSsS. About 00:21:195 (1,2,3,4,5) - u gay ????. 00:51:965 (4) - main intention wasn't to follow that part accurately as you can see on another sounds as 00:53:310 - and 00:53:695 - that has such a high intensity if you compare with another ones on the same section, i just tried to follow it on a simplified way but i'm not so sure about it right now.
thank you guys!!