From my modding queue.
Remember that these are only suggestions. Feel free to ignore them.
You'll notice that I'm focusing mostly on note density in the higher diffs.
[Futsuu]
00:21:375 (14) - Change to k, since the next pattern starts with kdk?
00:21:625 (15) - Change to d. You also did this at 00:29:625 (37).
00:29:375 (36) - Change to k. Same reasoning as 00:21:375.
00:46:625 (82) - Use d instead?
00:32:375 (46) - You normally map this pitch with a d [ex: 00:16:375- 00:24:375- and 00:40:375]. I don't hear anything in the music to justify the change, though.
00:41:125 (69) - Move to 00:41:625? It's consistent with 00:33:625. If you change it to k, at least.
00:45:125 - Add a note here to be consistent with 00:37:125.
00:49:125 (90) - Change to k? Mirrors the pattern at 00:50:375 (93,94,95,96), which is good imo.
00:55:375 (106) - Change to k? It mirrors the pattern at 00:54:875 (104,105,106).
00:55:875 (107) - Finisher?
00:57:125 (110) - Change to k? Same reasoning as 00:49:125.
01:03:375 (126) - Change to k? Same reasoning as 00:55:375.
[Muzukashii]
I think there should be more 1/2 breaks in this diff. Muzu players are generally still learning how to deal with 1/4 patterns.
00:19:625 (13,14) - Switch these around?
00:20:125 (15) - Delete for a break?
00:28:125 (44) - ^
00:30:375 - I'm not entirely sure why you switched to triples here. I'd recommend doubles like you used at 00:22:375.
00:32:125 (61) - Delete for a break.
00:32:125 (61) - Delete? Note density could cause problems for newer players.
00:33:500 (68) - Delete? This triple isn't really necessary imo.
00:36:375 to kiai - A new set of patterns? Variety is good, of course, but I'd suggest using the patterns from before. This song isn't very long.
00:53:500 (148) - Delete? Same reasoning as 00:33:500.
00:56:125 (158) - Delete for a break.
01:01:500 (181) - ^
[Oni]
00:18:625 (11,12,13) - kdk to mirror the following pattern?
00:20:125 (20) - Delete? The bpm is low, but I think you should be consistent with the breaks.
00:26:625 (48,49,50) - kdk? Same reasoning as 00:18:625.
00:28:125 (57) - Delete? Same reasoning as 00:20:125.
00:34:625 - The break here is a bit strange, especially since there's no similar break in the next section [00:34:875 to 00:39:375]. Maybe move the break to a different spot?
00:39:250 (115) - This pattern is better suited for the Oni, in my opinion. Consider deleting this note.
00:42:625 (130,131,132) - There is no difference in the song, but you used a break at 00:34:625. I'd recommend changing something.
00:50:125 (166) - Consider deleting this note. The bpm is low, but the note density is much higher than the muzu.
00:52:125 (178,179) - Consider deleting these notes. Same reason as above.
00:56:125 (199) - ^
00:58:125 (211) - ^
01:00:125 (223) - ^
01:02:125 (233) - ^
This modding might've been a bit extreme
Good luck with ranking it, though!
Remember that these are only suggestions. Feel free to ignore them.
You'll notice that I'm focusing mostly on note density in the higher diffs.
[Futsuu]
00:21:375 (14) - Change to k, since the next pattern starts with kdk?
00:21:625 (15) - Change to d. You also did this at 00:29:625 (37).
00:29:375 (36) - Change to k. Same reasoning as 00:21:375.
00:46:625 (82) - Use d instead?
00:32:375 (46) - You normally map this pitch with a d [ex: 00:16:375- 00:24:375- and 00:40:375]. I don't hear anything in the music to justify the change, though.
00:41:125 (69) - Move to 00:41:625? It's consistent with 00:33:625. If you change it to k, at least.
00:45:125 - Add a note here to be consistent with 00:37:125.
00:49:125 (90) - Change to k? Mirrors the pattern at 00:50:375 (93,94,95,96), which is good imo.
00:55:375 (106) - Change to k? It mirrors the pattern at 00:54:875 (104,105,106).
00:55:875 (107) - Finisher?
00:57:125 (110) - Change to k? Same reasoning as 00:49:125.
01:03:375 (126) - Change to k? Same reasoning as 00:55:375.
[Muzukashii]
I think there should be more 1/2 breaks in this diff. Muzu players are generally still learning how to deal with 1/4 patterns.
00:19:625 (13,14) - Switch these around?
00:20:125 (15) - Delete for a break?
00:28:125 (44) - ^
00:30:375 - I'm not entirely sure why you switched to triples here. I'd recommend doubles like you used at 00:22:375.
00:32:125 (61) - Delete for a break.
00:32:125 (61) - Delete? Note density could cause problems for newer players.
00:33:500 (68) - Delete? This triple isn't really necessary imo.
00:36:375 to kiai - A new set of patterns? Variety is good, of course, but I'd suggest using the patterns from before. This song isn't very long.
00:53:500 (148) - Delete? Same reasoning as 00:33:500.
00:56:125 (158) - Delete for a break.
01:01:500 (181) - ^
[Oni]
00:18:625 (11,12,13) - kdk to mirror the following pattern?
00:20:125 (20) - Delete? The bpm is low, but I think you should be consistent with the breaks.
00:26:625 (48,49,50) - kdk? Same reasoning as 00:18:625.
00:28:125 (57) - Delete? Same reasoning as 00:20:125.
00:34:625 - The break here is a bit strange, especially since there's no similar break in the next section [00:34:875 to 00:39:375]. Maybe move the break to a different spot?
00:39:250 (115) - This pattern is better suited for the Oni, in my opinion. Consider deleting this note.
00:42:625 (130,131,132) - There is no difference in the song, but you used a break at 00:34:625. I'd recommend changing something.
00:50:125 (166) - Consider deleting this note. The bpm is low, but the note density is much higher than the muzu.
00:52:125 (178,179) - Consider deleting these notes. Same reason as above.
00:56:125 (199) - ^
00:58:125 (211) - ^
01:00:125 (223) - ^
01:02:125 (233) - ^
This modding might've been a bit extreme
Good luck with ranking it, though!