1. osu! forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Beatmap Graveyard
posted
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
posted
Hey, M4M.
// = Suggestion
Bold = Must change/strong suggestion

[ General]
Add "Awake" in beatmap tags. It's the album's name. Source: http://jshardcore.net/JSHSA003/
Change artist to "DJ Myosuke & Remo-con". Remo-con has lowercase C instead of uppercase
In general volumes were pretty low when I playtested it, please consider changing them to around +10% at least
[ Oni]
00:05:074 - The wave sound thingy starts there and ends on 00:05:945 - So, you could map it like this maybe?

00:49:687 - Why the lower volume change here? The kicks are around the same volume or even higher than the previous part of the song
01:26:266 (97,98) - Change to d K? For consistency with 01:14:267 and 01:20:266
01:50:944 - Change to k? There's a weird reverse cymbal there
02:16:105 (50,51) - Ctrl+G? Melody goes down then up
02:52:008 - Same as 00:05:074 - But kinda like this? (Last note is a K)

03:05:556 - Change to K? Most of the time this loud kick thing you mapped it as a K
04:32:264 - 04:44:651 - ^
04:47:651 (150,151) - Ctrl+G? Melody in the background has higher pitch in 04:47:748 - and it's reinforced by a hi-hat

Overall nice and well structured map, not much to say otherwise
Good luck! :)

EDIT:

01:12:912 - You could decrease the highest SV to 1.35x and do a gradual SV decrease from here, so you avoid the overlapping issue:



01:25:299 - This one is a bit optional, but if you want stay consistent i'd follow a similar SV change thing


01:37:686 - Free one Kappa


03:35:361 - You can do a similar thing here as 01:12:912
04:12:522 - Same as 01:37:686

That's all I think lol
posted
No comment = Fixed

Midnaait wrote:

Hey, M4M.
// = Suggestion
Bold = Must change/strong suggestion

[ General]
Add "Awake" in beatmap tags. It's the album's name. Source: http://jshardcore.net/JSHSA003/
Change artist to "DJ Myosuke & Remo-con". Remo-con has lowercase C instead of uppercase
In general volumes were pretty low when I playtested it, please consider changing them to around +10% at least
[ Oni]
00:05:074 - The wave sound thingy starts there and ends on 00:05:945 - So, you could map it like this maybe?
>I prefer to be consistent with previous patterns, as sudden new patterns will ruin the flow.
00:49:687 - Why the lower volume change here? The kicks are around the same volume or even higher than the previous part of the song
01:26:266 (97,98) - Change to d K? For consistency with 01:14:267 and 01:20:266 >This is intentional, I want to keep the 1/1 d patterns as it is very obvious in the music.
01:50:944 - Change to k? There's a weird reverse cymbal there >did this in 01:44:741 (213) - as well
02:16:105 (50,51) - Ctrl+G? Melody goes down then up
02:52:008 - Same as 00:05:074 - But kinda like this? (Last note is a K)
>Same as above
03:05:556 - Change to K? Most of the time this loud kick thing you mapped it as a K
04:32:264 - 04:44:651 - ^
04:47:651 (150,151) - Ctrl+G? Melody in the background has higher pitch in 04:47:748 - and it's reinforced by a hi-hat >04:47:739 (151) - has to be d to express the crash sounds.

Overall nice and well structured map, not much to say otherwise
Good luck! :)

EDIT:

01:12:912 - You could decrease the highest SV to 1.35x and do a gradual SV decrease from here, so you avoid the overlapping issue:



01:25:299 - This one is a bit optional, but if you want stay consistent i'd follow a similar SV change thing


01:37:686 - Free one Kappa


03:35:361 - You can do a similar thing here as 01:12:912
04:12:522 - Same as 01:37:686
^I rejected all because I don't like SV flow, I dont see it necessarily to have such drastic change on SV.
That's all I think lol
Thanks for modding.
posted
[teenage mutant ninja turtles]
00:48:420 - How come you didnt turn this into a triple? I can see that you might want to be the same as 01:00:517 (59) - but the 1/4 sound here is pretty important :^(

01:15:806 (24) - change this and wherever it repeats to k? there's a weird cynth sound on top of the bass here and I think k would be a lot more fun when playing

02:22:870 - same as 00:48:420 -
02:29:064 - ^

04:03:029 (476) - same as 01:15:806 (24), but here I don't get why not, since you did it in the previous kiai??
posted

Raphalge wrote:

[teenage mutant ninja turtles]
00:48:420 - How come you didnt turn this into a triple? I can see that you might want to be the same as 01:00:517 (59) - but the 1/4 sound here is pretty important :^( >Actually I am following vocal here

01:15:806 (24) - change this and wherever it repeats to k? there's a weird cynth sound on top of the bass here and I think k would be a lot more fun when playing >Clearly I am following the same fx 01:14:838 (17,20,23,25) - do

02:22:870 - same as 00:48:420 -
02:29:064 - ^ >It's literally different part of the song.

04:03:029 (476) - same as 01:15:806 (24), but here I don't get why not, since you did it in the previous kiai?? >Yes I did not do that in 1st kiai
Thanks for modding.
posted
heya, mod from my queue.

  1. Could add Hardstyle to tags since it's the style of the song.
  2. 01:25:483 - maybe add a kat so the kd doesn't repeat twice? kkd kd variation feels better than kd kd imo.
  3. 04:13:868 - finisher kat to go together with the previous finisher don? There's a strong snare sound here similar to the one you mapper here 04:32:255 (46) -
  4. 04:50:836 - kat finisher? strong sound but I think you're avoiding it as it's kind of impossible to miss it.


sorry for the small mod orz
map is well structured and consistent so I didn't find much here.
good luck choco boi o/
posted

Marm wrote:

heya, mod from my queue.

  1. Could add Hardstyle to tags since it's the style of the song. >Done
  2. 01:25:483 - maybe add a kat so the kd doesn't repeat twice? kkd kd variation feels better than kd kd imo. >I could, but I am more willing into emphasizing the 1/1 d rhythm instead.
  3. 04:13:868 - finisher kat to go together with the previous finisher don? There's a strong snare sound here similar to the one you mapper here 04:32:255 (46) - >This note is however not obviously when I am mapping along with vocal in 04:12:513 (543,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551) -
  4. 04:50:836 - kat finisher? strong sound but I think you're avoiding it as it's kind of impossible to miss it. >My intentional was to have 4/1 break to have a contrast between and after it as it is extremely calm, but I guess it does no harm to add this note.


sorry for the small mod orz
map is well structured and consistent so I didn't find much here.
good luck choco boi o/
Thanks for mod.
posted
why do you even want mods for this, this is freaking good !
posted
Hi

[tnatuM]

00:55:097 (34,35) - why are these notes big? they are just two kicks like the others (00:49:678 (10,12) - for example)
01:00:710 (60,61) - ctrl + g, 01:00:710 - that note has higher pitch imo
01:25:483 - 01:25:870 - adding k notes would be nice, idk
01:26:451 - i think that sounds like K, ---> 01:14:258 - like this. if you accept, consider 01:26:257 - changing this to d(?
01:38:838 - ^
02:47:161 - ^, 02:46:774 (8,9) - ctrl+g if you accept.
02:52:967 (41,42) - ^ (ctrl+g) ---> 03:05:161 (111,112,113) - like that
03:11:932 - why not K? and 03:11:740 - why is this K???
04:01:287 - u know
04:13:868 - no K here? 04:13:674 - why D?

god map.
posted
hi

-General-
Maybe add "JSHSA003" to tags? its the album's category number

-Oni-
00:01:097 (4) - delete? i dont hear a sound here
00:04:194 (19) - ^
00:06:323 (31) - Maybe finisher? to emphasize the strong sound here
00:07:291 (34) - same as first
00:07:968 (37) - maybe d? to emphasize the difference between this and 00:01:678 - for example
00:10:388 (50) - same as first
00:12:420 (61) - could remove this note so you could put a finisher at 00:12:517 (62) - for the cymbal sound
00:18:710 (96) - ^
00:24:904 (130) - ^ but for the large *trump* sound, and maybe make it K? sounds a bit familiar with 00:25:291 (131) -
00:31:097 (155) - finisher? i heard a quiet cymbal here

and thats the only thing i found
good luck w
posted

Ulqui wrote:

Hi

[tnatuM]

00:55:097 (34,35) - why are these notes big? they are just two kicks like the others (00:49:678 (10,12) - for example) >Those notes are not the usual constant 1/1 kicks. Therefore I indicate it as finisher
01:00:710 (60,61) - ctrl + g, 01:00:710 - that note has higher pitch imo >I tend to be consistent with 00:48:323 (2,3) -
01:25:483 - 01:25:870 - adding k notes would be nice, idk >No, it cuts the emphasizing effect on 1/1 kicks.
01:26:451 - i think that sounds like K, ---> 01:14:258 - like this. if you accept, consider 01:26:257 - changing this to d(? >The note you hl'd for reasoning isn't in 1/1 snapping. For 01:26:451 it is on main snapping so a don will emphasize main beat better.
01:38:838 - ^
02:47:161 - ^, 02:46:774 (8,9) - ctrl+g if you accept. >Fixed in my own way.
02:52:967 (41,42) - ^ (ctrl+g) ---> 03:05:161 (111,112,113) - like that >Emphasize main snapping
03:11:932 - why not K? and 03:11:740 - why is this K??? >Main focus is on vocal
04:01:287 - u know >no
04:13:868 - no K here? 04:13:674 - why D? >For consistency of occasional 1/1 break in 1st kiai. Same as before.

god map.
Thanks for modding.
posted

Vulkin wrote:

hi

-General-
Maybe add "JSHSA003" to tags? its the album's category number

-Oni-
00:01:097 (4) - delete? i dont hear a sound here
00:04:194 (19) - ^ >That would make the patterns boring to play.
00:06:323 (31) - Maybe finisher? to emphasize the strong sound here >Fixed for consistency on 00:00:130 (1) -
00:07:291 (34) - same as first
00:07:968 (37) - maybe d? to emphasize the difference between this and 00:01:678 - for example >Fixed to emphasize 00:08:065 (40) -
00:10:388 (50) - same as first
00:12:420 (61) - could remove this note so you could put a finisher at 00:12:517 (62) - for the cymbal sound >I think current pattern plays better tho. It would be boring if I simply follow main snapping.
00:18:710 (96) - ^ >There aren't any strong percussion sound here tho.
00:24:904 (130) - ^ but for the large *trump* sound, and maybe make it K? sounds a bit familiar with 00:25:291 (131) - >No change, the part after this note is actually weaker than before. Finisher will make it not suiting the song's mood
00:31:097 (155) - finisher? i heard a quiet cymbal here >Yes but too weak to have finisher on

and thats the only thing i found
good luck w
Thanks for mod.
posted
hello~

[Oni]
  1. 00:05:936 (32) - remove or 00:05:742 (31,32) - ctrl+g? bass is stopped at 00:05:742 - .
  2. 00:40:194 (206) - may be moved to 00:40:291 - to follow the bass.
  3. from 02:47:354 - to 03:00:128 - could more increase from the first part.

    • add k?
      02:48:032 - 02:50:354 - 02:50:645 - 02:50:741 - 02:51:032 - etc...
  4. from 03:12:126 - to 03:23:932 - how about swaping all notes in this part? there is no bass sounds like other parts, it would work to show transition of the tone.
  5. 03:58:577 (444,445,446,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454) - swap for the same reason as ^
  6. 04:48:126 (152,153,154,155,156,157,158) - ^
  7. 03:27:513 - may be added d to follow the bass.
  8. 04:13:674 (551) - remove finisher + 04:13:868 - add k with finisher? there is the strong drum sound.
  9. 04:51:900 - may be added k to follow the synthesizer. also, it would work as differentiation from other parts.
  10. 04:54:997 - 04:58:094 - 05:01:190 - ^


good luck for app.
posted
Sorry for late

This song is perfect overmapped. I mean that I can't find where something wrong and etc.
But from 01:51:612 (246) - to 02:03:999 I would suggest map this strange melody on the background

02:51:999 (32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - i think this is ddkkddkkd

good luck
posted

ASPIRIN wrote:

Sorry for late

This song is perfect overmapped. I mean that I can't find where something wrong and etc.
But from 01:51:612 (246) - to 02:03:999 I would suggest map this strange melody on the background >There is no reason for me to map those off-beat sounds, it's not feasible.

02:51:999 (32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) - i think this is ddkkddkkd >This is for consistency on 00:01:678 (6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - and similar parts with it

good luck
Thanks for modding.
posted
01:02:065 (68,69,70,71) - I hear subtle 1/4, change to regular 1/4? If you want to emphasize 01:02:452 (72) - then how about changing to kkk d
01:14:451 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - Consider SV transition from fast to slow here because k finisher overlaps with d finisher and is a bit hard to read
02:47:354 (11,12,13,14,15) - ^ same
04:45:707 - add k
04:48:803 - ^
04:51:900 - ^
04:54:997 - ^
04:58:094 - ^
05:01:190 - ^
05:04:287 - ^
05:07:384 - ^

good luck :)
posted

_yu68 wrote:

hello~

[Oni]
  1. 00:05:936 (32) - remove or 00:05:742 (31,32) - ctrl+g? bass is stopped at 00:05:742 - . >Well I guess this couldn't be avoided. Changed
  2. 00:40:194 (206) - may be moved to 00:40:291 - to follow the bass. >Changed, but it is because it creates special emphasizing effect.
  3. from 02:47:354 - to 03:00:128 - could more increase from the first part.

    • add k?
      02:48:032 - 02:50:354 - 02:50:645 - 02:50:741 - 02:51:032 - etc... >Following main beat bass is my 1st intention
  4. from 03:12:126 - to 03:23:932 - how about swaping all notes in this part? there is no bass sounds like other parts, it would work to show transition of the tone. >I prefer maintaining 1/1 beat as d here
  5. 03:58:577 (444,445,446,447,448,449,450,451,452,453,454) - swap for the same reason as ^
  6. 04:48:126 (152,153,154,155,156,157,158) - ^
  7. 03:27:513 - may be added d to follow the bass. >No change as this breaks the consistency of the main snapping dons
  8. 04:13:674 (551) - remove finisher + 04:13:868 - add k with finisher? there is the strong drum sound. >Changed
  9. 04:51:900 - may be added k to follow the synthesizer. also, it would work as differentiation from other parts. >^
  10. 04:54:997 - 04:58:094 - 05:01:190 - ^


good luck for app.
Thanks for mod
posted

tkdLolly wrote:

01:02:065 (68,69,70,71) - I hear subtle 1/4, change to regular 1/4? If you want to emphasize 01:02:452 (72) - then how about changing to kkk d >1/6 has extra emphasizing effect on rushing 01:02:452 (72) - compared to 1/4.
01:14:451 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25) - Consider SV transition from fast to slow here because k finisher overlaps with d finisher and is a bit hard to read
02:47:354 (11,12,13,14,15) - ^ same >Need more opinion about this
04:45:707 - add k
04:48:803 - ^
^Rejected, doing density flow here
04:51:900 - ^
04:54:997 - ^
04:58:094 - ^
05:01:190 - ^
05:04:287 - ^
05:07:384 - ^
^Refer to my reply on yu68's post

good luck :)
Thanks for modding
posted
yo chocolaaaaaaa NM from my quese
may my opinion it bad
03:00:805 I think it's should add d here .same as 03:02:257
03:03:902 ^
03:11:739 I don't think it's should use big note may change to k and add K here 03:11:932 . it's look make sense

03:58:577 - 04:00:126 I'm sure you should change the format because the sound is not heard. it's unlike before
posted

Cocoaaa wrote:

yo chocolaaaaaaa NM from my quese
may my opinion it bad
03:00:805 I think it's should add d here .same as 03:02:257
03:03:902 ^ >Both no change, imo having 03:00:805 - blank providing variation on patterns will sound better..
03:11:739 I don't think it's should use big note may change to k and add K here 03:11:932 . it's look make sense
>No change as I want to make a contrast btw 03:11:740 (144,145) - since 145 is where transitional part commence in the song.
03:58:577 - 04:00:126 I'm sure you should change the format because the sound is not heard. it's unlike before >Fixed
Thanks for modding
show more
Please sign in to reply.