hi, m4m
[Easy]
[Easy]
- 00:10:604 (3,4) - maybe blanket (4) with (3)'s sliderend?
- 00:12:582 (5,6) - personally i'd position them somewhat like this to make the flow continuous here
- 00:23:131 (3,1) - maybe make these two 100% parallel using copypaste + scaling? currently it's slightly off, their angles are like reeeeally slightly different
- 00:26:428 (1,2,3,4) - these aren't equally positioned and it bothers me a bit. a tip for these cases is to ctrl+c the first slider, ctrl+v to make the next one and then rotate it the value you want and position it where you want. then ctrl+c+v the first AND second slider, and rotate by the exact same angle as before and stack the third slider with the second one, then the fourth will be automatically placed correctly (and then delete the third one). repeat this process to make consistent slider patterns like this!
- 00:30:384 (3,1) - blanket could use some slight improving
- 00:10:604 (1) - maybe move to 40;316 for better flow with previous slider?
- 00:15:055 (5) - i think this would look better if it was a straight slider or curved more, it's soooo slightly curved that it looks a bit ugly imo
- 00:17:692 (5) - move to 184;224 for better flow with last slider?
- 00:38:956 (5) - something like this would flow better
- 00:00:879 (4) - i don't think this is sightreadable considering the other sliders are just 1 repeat and there's no time to react, i'd probably split this into 2 sliders or something
- 00:10:604 (1,2,3) - stacking is kinda broken here, maybe you'll have to manually stack or change stack leniency around here
- 00:19:835 (1) - you could try blanketing the sliderbody with (2)'s head as well here, something like this
- 00:25:769 (3,1,2) - same as before, i think splitting this into more sliders is the best solution here
- 00:30:384 (1,2) - blanket?
- 00:40:274 (2,3) - blanket could be improved
- 00:42:252 (1) - maybe place the curve halfway through the slider? makes more sense musically
- 00:46:043 (1,2,3) - i think a sharp curve here would represent the song better, something like this maybe
- 00:04:011 (1) - i'd personally make this 1/2 as well, i know it kinda turns the diff into 1/2 spam but in this case the vocals actually use the red tick so it feels kinda weird to skip over that
- 00:09:120 (1) - i wouldn't really skip the strong beat like this, maybe separate this between 2 notes
- 00:25:357 (2,1) - i'd space this a bit less because i honestly thought this was a 1/2 jump and it's 1/4 lol
- 00:45:055 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i personally think that moving the entire pattern to stack under (5) like this works better because then there isn't some kind of anti-jump movement there and flows much better
- 00:02:362 (4,1) - make these parallel? same deal as 00:23 on easy diff
- 00:09:945 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - currently the jump doesn't flow into the stream and that kinda doesn't fit with the mapping style, something like this would work better
- 00:20:329 (4) - blanket can be slightly improved by moving the last sliderpoint to 148;97
- 00:20:824 (5,6,7,8,1) - pretty poor flow with the previous slider, maybe do something like this
- 00:32:692 (6) - i think this would work better as a straight slider
- 00:33:351 (3,4,5) - weird emphasis considering (4) isn't the strong beat and is spaced much more than (5)
- 00:34:175 (9,10,1) - i'd move these somewhere around 65;25 for a better/less awkward to play angle
- 00:42:252 (1,2) - why did you decide to skip the blue tick between these two? seems as important as the other ones to me
- 00:45:714 (6,7,1) - weird emphasis again, (6,7) aren't really strong but they have the same spacing as (7,1) which is a pretty intense beat