1. Taiko Stage (5,34 stars, 2045 notes)

m1kado wrote:

Thank for very much for your support
This map is very good. So please forgive me for not having little written

mod

00:42:615 change d i did here guitar emphasizing 00:41:865 (179,181,182,185,187,188) - , so i'll keep it here

01:09:865 change k fixed

01:11:365 cange k fixed

01:25:865 change k fixed

01:41:032 change k fixed

01:41:198 change k fixed

02:19:698 - 02:20:365 .1/3 change dkkdkkd fixed

02:59:365 change d

02:59:865 change d

03:00:365 change d

03:00:865 change d

03:03:865 change d

03:04:032 change d fixed all that moments, thanks

03:39:365 - 03:40:032 .1/3 change kddkddk fixed

04:02:198 change d oh, sure, drum here D:

04:24:782 change d

04:24:865 change k 04:24:782 (1733,1734) - changed it to dk, yeah

good luck! owo

Nepuri wrote:

Hey! M4M!

Metadata seems fine!

00:21:699 - to 00:43:032 -
I dont really like this section.
You place notes where you hear drum.
But you color to guitar, when sometimes the drum's kick and snare are more important to be listened to (00:30:865 (97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111) - ) i think, that guitar is main instrument here, because it's louder and by that tonality - mixing well with sounds of drums, which i emphasized as kats before this section

00:58:365 (285,286) - change to d? Same kick sound as 00:57:865 (281) - changed only 00:58:532 (286) -

01:14:032 (384) change the kat to don? Its a kind of lower snare noise than the others
01:15:032 (390) - same here 01:14:032 (384,390) - changed that and other similar

01:24:365 - to 01:27:032 -
In this section you should either pay attention to guitar OR instruments, the way it is right now switches between those two too often.
Please decide on one where you put the kats :/ fixed a bit stream; actually i mapped guitar, than drums here
fixed some kats

01:37:532 - to 01:48:198 - Is again confusing why the kats are put that way...
It doesnt fit the drums or the guitar very well, please make your emphasis more clear.
okay, cause of that notice i decided to remap 30% of map with better drum rhythmics, thanks

03:04:115 - and 03:04:282 -
I think you can bridge this gap, since the 1/4 is still souding here. yeah, forgot about that

Rest of the map is pretty fine.
But what you should pay more attention to is what you focus on in the other parts.
Sometimes it sounds very confusing if the guitar is the focus or the Drums are the focus.

frukoyurdakul wrote:

Hello, M4M promise.

[General]

01:16:365 - The kiai point should be here, not on the next pattern. This way it starts late. sure, forgot about that lol

About hitsounds: Below 60% they are pretty hard to hear (except for the beginning), so I recommend increasing them by 10%, like if you have 55 change it to 65, if you have 50 change it to 60 etc... done, changed a bit

I believe you need to shift the beginning offset about -13 ms, that way it will fit with 00:21:699 - this timing point, and the notes will come on time as well. I didn't notice a big difference on the beginning but I'm pretty sure after 00:20:378 - this spot the notes start to come late. And, after you do that you can delete 00:21:699 - this one as well, since there are no measure resets. Check the offsets though after editing that part, some notes could be unsnapped due to the rounding errors. Remember to snap the inherited points as well. i think it's fine then, but thought is useful - if someone will say me about this,
i'll change

[Inner Oni]

00:31:032 - Hmm, to follow the drums how about kkddddkkddddk D ? The don finisher will be consistent with 00:26:865 (70) - this and the stream will sound better. well, i got your offer - but won't that part more related to guitar? I mean except drums here the backgorund sound is empty,
so guitar better to emphasize. Anyway, i'll try this one, but like kkddkdkkddkdk. The idea with emphasizing 00:32:198 (112) - is good, tho. Let's see if someone will decide to discuss about that part.

00:48:198 (222) - How about a finisher? I believe it's neccessary to make it consistent with other patterns plus there is a different crash cymbal. sure

00:53:532 (254) - ^ sure

00:58:865 (287) - ^ sure

01:03:365 (314) - I'll suggest a kat because of the pretty strong snare sound. you are right

01:25:365 (450,451) - How about ctrl + g on those? The second one has a snare sound and with this way it sounds better. hm, looks nice

01:42:865 (566) - I also suggest a finisher here for the same reasons as above. right

01:46:199 (588,589,590,591) - You can also have a 5-plet here, due to the guitar sound and make it consistent with 01:44:199 (573,574,575,576,577) - this pattern. put ddkdk here, thanks.

01:48:199 (602) - Finisher will be better on this. you should be my personal expert for finishers :^)

01:53:532 (638) - ^ right

01:55:282 - I think you can add a note here. If you do that, changing the stream to kdkkddk will fit the guitar and drums better. fine

01:56:532 (657,658,659) - Instead of this, how about deleting 01:56:532 (657) - this one and making this 01:56:699 (659) - k? There is a snare sound on the last note and no sound on the first one. It'll create some variation between these simple patterns and will fit the song better. fixed + 01:57:199 (664) - made it kat to follow kat's line here then

02:09:532 (732) - You can add a finisher for the same reasons as above. r

02:14:865 (766) - ^ r

02:19:476 (795) - How about making this kat? Will sound better with the snare drum on it. i think it's fine there

The suggestions I've made about kiai (patterns) also applies on the 2nd one.

02:53:032 - This feels a bit odd. The drums are not continuous, and you have a stream. The drums are continuous on 02:59:032 - this part and yet you divided into patterns. Maybe reversing them will be good. i did that because of emphasizing guitar here as main instrument + also gaps for 02:59:532 (1071,1075,1079) - those kats are the best (imo) way to emphasize them and sound there; but idea is useful, if people will talk about it - i will change , thanks

03:21:115 (1280,1281) - You can reverse this one, since you already mapped 03:20:615 (1277,1278) - this one reversed, It'll create a more challenging rhythm and follow the drums better. If you apply this, change 03:23:782 (1302,1303) - this one also. looks like it's good like this

03:25:698 - End the kiai here, it flashes for nothing. Also it'll arrange the SV change on the bar line. yes

03:35:365 (1378,1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384,1385,1386) - This pattern is a bit long. The drums are in 1/2 after 03:35:698 - this note (excluding 1/8 snare hit) and you used 5-plets to provide a better structure, and deleting 03:35:782 (1383,1385) - those two and making 03:35:865 (1384,1386) - those two dons will follow the drums properly and create a better structure. sure

03:41:032 (1416,1417,1418) - Because you are following guitar, I should mention these notes should be in 1/4, not 1/3. However, I don't support combining instruments like this, guitar and drums are pretty much different on there and following them both makes these weird snappings. Not maybe on this spot, but 03:49:032 - this one sounds weird. Either follow drums or guitar, it'll be better. it's subjective part, but i'll leave it for another mention of other people; i just emphasize guitar here, but only 03:49:532 (1470,1471,1472) - is higher in tonality enought to make it triple of emphasized drums.

03:52:365 - The kiai is starting late. It should start here, on the measure start. fixed

04:05:532 (1601) - Finisher will be good, since there is a crash cymbal. yeah

04:07:032 - This pattern does not suit with any of the instruments, I'd say follow drums because they are more clear to hear and map. leave it for another mention; looks fine to me, +guitar 1/3 is rare and make this part's variability better

04:52:198 (1904) - You can put a finisher on this one, it'll be better. r

04:56:198 - Same pattern suggestion with 00:31:032. done already

05:02:865 (1984) - Finisher also. r

05:08:115 (2028,2029,2030) - I hear those as 1/6, but i'm not entirely sure. However I'd like to suggest changing 05:08:365 (2031,2032,2033,2034,2035) - this pattern to ddddK, with this way I didn't understand the song is ended it is almost impossible to hear that 1/6 during the play, but i'll remember that moment, ok; i will not change 05:08:532 (2032) - , but i'll put 05:08:698 (2034) - here big note, let's try it

Cool map, nice song! Good luck on the ranking way, I hope it helps :^) [b]helped a lot :>/b]

1. k = kat d = don K = big kat D = big don
2. It's just suggestions/corrections, you are free to accept them or not.
3. If you accept my suggestions/corrections, apply also in similar parts.
4. If you don't accept my suggestions/corrections, clarify why you do not accept them.

[ General]

1. Fix SliderMultiplier: 1.39999991989136 -> 1.4
2. 00:00:379 - This isn't the BPM. In the STD ver. the BPM here is 165 until 00:21:045 - . Probably do not feel much at first, but these notes 00:19:712 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34) - do not fall on the tick
3. 01:16:532 - The kiai time start here 01:16:365 -
4. Unmark "Widescreen Support" on Setup. This haven't a storyboard
5. Check snap all notes, some is +1ms like 01:26:699 (461) - 01:26:949 (464) - . To fix this go to "timing" menu (above) and select "Resnap All Notes" (Warning: You need put the divisor on 1/12, to snap also the 1/3 and 1/6 in yours correct place)
6. A perzonalized diffname would not be bad

[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:26:448 (66,68) - These haven't particular sound. It 00:26:448 (66) - may be that the guitar is somewhat heard, but it is somewhat minimal. If you want to keep you could delete only 00:26:615 (68) - to emphasizes the drums snare
2. 00:30:448 (94,95) - Ctrl + G. This notes 00:30:365 (93,95) - hear the same, also make consistency with 00:31:865 (109,110,111) -
3. 00:37:115 (143,145) - Same as 00:26:448 (66,68) -
4. 00:41:115 (171,172) - Also the same as 00:30:448 (94,95) -
5. 00:42:615 (187) - This is the same reason that 00:30:448 (94,95) - . Here have no sound, I would delete to emphasizes the snare
6. 00:43:365 (191) - The finisher isn't necessary imo. Haven't a stronger sound and is similar to 00:46:032 (208) -
7. 00:45:365 (204,205,206) - The sound is not what it seems, would have to go k d 1/2 only
8. 00:47:532 (217,218,219,220,221) - This 00:47:532 (217,218) - would have triplet for the guitar sound (kkd can be). And I would delete 00:47:948 (220) - for the same reason that before, no sound and emphasizes the snare
9. 01:03:532 (315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324) - Believe me, this would sound better if you follow the battery. A pattern like ddkkkkdddd i think
10. 01:04:365 (325,326,330,332) - This is your preference, but you could add finisher to emphasize the guitar. I think it sounds good
11. 01:06:365 (334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341) - Same as 01:03:698 - , kkkkdddd
12. 01:09:198 (353) - I think it would keep the consistency of the break here. I understand have drum sound, but it is very low compared to the rest
13. 01:09:365 (354,355,356,357,358,359) - Maybe it's me, but personally I do not really like the string of dons here. It would change 01:09:698 (356) - to kat to follow the guitar
14. 01:09:698 (356,363) - I think is better if you make the same that 04:19:032 -
15. 01:11:448 (366) - This haven't sound, remove
16. 01:16:282 (399,400) - Delete 01:16:282 (399) - and add finisher 01:16:365 (400) - . It would be good to mark the beginning of kiai
17. 01:17:198 (406) - The don here don't like me. I listen the guitar here, so I think change this to kat
18. 01:26:032 - After you followed the guitar here 01:24:365 -, is some weird this notes 01:26:032 (455,456,457,458) - . I think is more comfortable follow the guitar again than drum
19. 01:26:782 (462) - To vary a bit, I would chage to kat
20. 01:26:949 (464,465) - Delete 01:26:949 (464) - and add finisher in 01:27:032 (465) -. Same as 01:16:282 (399,400) -
21. 02:19:032 (792,793,794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,802,803,804) - The sound does not fit very well, you could change it to dkkkddkddkddk to notice the decrease of the sound
22. 02:21:032 - ~ 02:24:365 - It feels weird. I think delete the kats to emphasizes the drum on 02:21:698 (808,813,818) -
23. 02:24:365 (818) - Do you forgot add finisher?
24. 02:53:448 (1000) - I liste this as don
25. 03:36:198 (1386) - Finisher?
26. 03:49:143 (1467,1468,1469) - Is weird if you don't follow all the guitar I think
27. 03:52:198 - Remove this sv
28. 04:02:365 (1578,1579,1580,1581,1582,1583,1584) - I think it would be kat to follow better the drum snare
29. 04:46:532 (1867) - The finisher isn't neccesary imo. Haven't stronger sound
30. 05:08:198 (2028,2029) - 1/6? lol (If you apply this delete 05:08:448 (2031) - to make more easy to play)
31. 05:08:365 (2030,2031,2032,2033,2034) - I think it is better to end up with a k k D without trying to continue the stream

gaston_2199 wrote:

Hi!
Inaugurating my new format xD ow, i think it's good :>

M4M from IRC ~
Some clarifications:

1. k = kat d = don K = big kat D = big don
2. It's just suggestions/corrections, you are free to accept them or not.
3. If you accept my suggestions/corrections, apply also in similar parts.
4. If you don't accept my suggestions/corrections, clarify why you do not accept them.

[ General]

1. Fix SliderMultiplier: 1.39999991989136 -> 1.4 fixed
2. 00:00:379 - This isn't the BPM. In the STD ver. the BPM here is 165 until 00:21:045 - . Probably do not feel much at first, but these notes 00:19:712 (25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34) - do not fall on the tick leave it before someone's mention too; i had extra timing point, but decided to delete it,
   cause it looks i can put here stable bpm
3. 01:16:532 - The kiai time start here 01:16:365 - sure
4. Unmark "Widescreen Support" on Setup. This haven't a storyboard though it needs for 16:9 resolutions lol
5. Check snap all notes, some is +1ms like 01:26:699 (461) - 01:26:949 (464) - . To fix this go to "timing" menu (above) and select "Resnap All Notes" (Warning: You need put the divisor on 1/12, to snap also the 1/3 and 1/6 in yours correct place) not sure for fixing or not, but let's try
6. A perzonalized diffname would not be bad

can't find perfect diffname, need to ask someone for help

[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:26:448 (66,68) - These haven't particular sound. It 00:26:448 (66) - may be that the guitar is somewhat heard, but it is somewhat minimal. If you want to keep you could delete only 00:26:615 (68) - to emphasizes the drums snare good idea with emphasizing that snare, leave it till someone will point that too
2. 00:30:448 (94,95) - Ctrl + G. This notes 00:30:365 (93,95) - hear the same, also make consistency with 00:31:865 (109,110,111) - i did that to emphasize 00:30:698 (96)
3. 00:37:115 (143,145) - Same as 00:26:448 (66,68) -
4. 00:41:115 (171,172) - Also the same as 00:30:448 (94,95) - same as above
5. 00:42:615 (187) - This is the same reason that 00:30:448 (94,95) - . Here have no sound, I would delete to emphasizes the snare it looks fine + dons here are as 'fillers', i guess
6. 00:43:365 (191) - The finisher isn't necessary imo. Haven't a stronger sound and is similar to 00:46:032 (208) - comparing with others kats after it - this one has higher tonality + this finisher is kind of "talking" to player, that new part is coming; idk how to describe it in right way....
7. 00:45:365 (204,205,206) - The sound is not what it seems, would have to go k d 1/2 only oh, yes, also made finisher in the end of this part
8. 00:47:532 (217,218,219,220,221) - This 00:47:532 (217,218) - would have triplet for the guitar sound (kkd can be). And I would delete 00:47:948 (220) - for the same reason that before, no sound and emphasizes the snare well, looks fine for me; maybe it's not the perfect way of emphasizing that sound, but i can't find any better
9. 01:03:532 (315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324) - Believe me, this would sound better if you follow the battery. A pattern like ddkkkkdddd i think drums are so loud here and for me are as main instrument, so i emphasized them, reather than anything else
10. 01:04:365 (325,326,330,332) - This is your preference, but you could add finisher to emphasize the guitar. I think it sounds good i think that will overfill map by finishers; maybe fix that, if someone will notice that too
11. 01:06:365 (334,335,336,337,338,339,340,341) - Same as 01:03:698 - , kkkkdddd ^
12. 01:09:198 (353) - I think it would keep the consistency of the break here. I understand have drum sound, but it is very low compared to the rest disputed issue, leave it for another's mention
13. 01:09:365 (354,355,356,357,358,359) - Maybe it's me, but personally I do not really like the string of dons here. It would change 01:09:698 (356) - to kat to follow the guitar for me it's good, + if i will change that place i will break overall rhythmics of this part and need to cardinally change full part
14. 01:09:698 (356,363) - I think is better if you make the same that 04:19:032 - they are different on that beats, so no
15. 01:11:448 (366) - This haven't sound, remove 01:10:698 (360,361,362,363,365) - are the same with it + it's filler to make stream pattern here, which emphasize this sound better rather than simple triple
16. 01:16:282 (399,400) - Delete 01:16:282 (399) - and add finisher 01:16:365 (400) - . It would be good to mark the beginning of kiai sorry,
    so loud sound to not emphasize it with don here
17. 01:17:198 (406) - The don here don't like me. I listen the guitar here, so I think change this to kat i mained here drums, so mixing with guitar emphasizing here will create an odd feelings
18. 01:26:032 - After you followed the guitar here 01:24:365 -, is some weird this notes 01:26:032 (455,456,457,458) - . I think is more comfortable follow the guitar again than drum 01:24:532 (443,455) - is well-mixed guitar+drums here, so i map them both here, but stream is another question -
    as i map mainly drums in that map, so better to keep consistancy and to not put another emphasizing in inexact moments
19. 01:26:782 (462) - To vary a bit, I would chage to kat 01:26:782 (461,463) - surely deaf sounds, so dons here will be better
20. 01:26:949 (464,465) - Delete 01:26:949 (464) - and add finisher in 01:27:032 (465) -. Same as 01:16:282 (399,400) - actually, i am not fan of making finishers emphasizing in prejudice of pattern structure and some rhythmics, so i'll keep that place as it is
21. 02:19:032 (792,793,794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,802,803,804) - The sound does not fit very well, you could change it to dkkkddkddkddk to notice the decrease of the sound 02:19:810 (798,801) - fixed in some way by making them dons; don't want to change kat's role here, so as 02:20:365 (803) - is clearly deaf sound, i should emphasize it by kat; i think that these things are strongly connected here
22. 02:21:032 - ~ 02:24:365 - It feels weird. I think delete the kats to emphasizes the drum on 02:21:698 (808,813,818) - leave it for another's mention
23. 02:24:365 (818) - Do you forgot add finisher?no, just not wanted to
24. 02:53:448 (1000) - I liste this as don well, looks good
25. 03:36:198 (1386) - Finisher? yep
26. 03:49:143 (1467,1468,1469) - Is weird if you don't follow all the guitar I think 03:49:476 - is clearly 1/3, so i don't know what to do here D:
    i think you are right, but my version is also the way to do it; leave this place for some discussion with others
27. 03:52:198 - Remove this sv it's for kiai and not to changing SV for next part
28. 04:02:365 (1578,1579,1580,1581,1582,1583,1584) - I think it would be kat to follow better the drum snare 04:02:865 (1584) - changed to don here, let's try this one
29. 04:46:532 (1867) - The finisher isn't neccesary imo. Haven't stronger sound it gives more emphasizing than just simple don here, so...
30. 05:08:198 (2028,2029) - 1/6? lol (If you apply this delete 05:08:448 (2031) - to make more easy to play) already discussed with some people,
    they think it's should ne 1/6 too, but i was complaining about "it's not enough loud to hear that, when you play"; but if so much people talk about it, so why not to try 1/6 here, it's true that emphasizing of 05:08:365 (2031,2032,2033,2034,2035) - that part will be better
31. 05:08:365 (2030,2031,2032,2033,2034) - I think it is better to end up with a k k D without trying to continue the stream i guess i'll keep it like it is

That's all, nice map!
Good luck~

Greenshell wrote:

HELL YEAH THIS SONG

just posting here to let you know the spacing in the source is wrong.

Right now, the spacing looks like this: 東方風神録～ Mountain of Faith.

Should be this instead: 東方風神録　～ Mountain of Faith.

You can also add Team Shanghai Alice to the tags


Good luck fam (no kds of course)

~ Taiko Mod #4 ~
Привет, Remus. Карта очень хорошая, поэтому мод получился небольшой. Но я старался как мог.

1. 00:21:045 (33,34) - Ctrl + G - второй звук выше чем первый и звучит так, по-моему, лучше.
2. 00:23:365 (46,47) - Ctrl + G или измени 00:23:532 (47) на k .
   > 00:34:032 (124,125) - ^
   > 01:50:198 (619) - ^
3. 00:28:865 (84,85) - снова Ctrl +G
   > 00:39:532 (162,163) - ^
   > 01:55:532 (656) - k
4. 00:48:532 (34) - измени на k, чтобы соответствовать 00:49:865 (43)
   > 00:53:865 (66) - ^
   > 00:59:198 (100) - ^
5. 01:19:532 (231) - k. Дальше идёт длинный высокий звук, поэтому k здесь больше подходит, я думаю.
   > 01:30:198 (490) - ^
   > 02:35:532 (893) - ^
   > 02:46:198 (961) - ^
   > 04:28:865 (1762) - ^
   > 04:39:532 (1830) - ^

1. 01:37:865 (534) - k
2. 01:38:698 (539) - k
3. 01:39:532 (545) - k
4. 01:41:532 (558) - k
5. 01:44:032 (575) - k
   

1. 01:52:198 (631) - k - чтобы соответствовать 00:36:365 (137)
2. 03:04:365 (1128) ~ 04:25:698 (1743) - как по мне, идеальная часть. Стримы играются отлично, странных паттернов нет. Извини, я не смог найти каких-то недочетов в этой части.
3. 04:46:865 (1873) ~ 04:57:532 (1951) - тут почти то же, что и в начале.

teaMblack19 wrote:

~ Taiko Mod #4 ~
Привет, Remus. Карта очень хорошая, поэтому мод получился небольшой. Но я старался как мог.
[ Inner Oni]

1. 00:21:045 (33,34) - Ctrl + G - второй звук выше чем первый и звучит так, по-моему, лучше. Оставлю, так как эта часть очень хорошо подходит по флоу, да и по мне 00:21:212 (34,35) - оба глухие, а вот 00:21:045 (33) - ярко выраженный кат
2. 00:23:365 (46,47) - Ctrl + G или измени 00:23:532 (47) на k . Мне кажется тут должны быть два дона, потому что единственная разница между 00:23:532 (47,48) - это только маленькое изменение тональности, почти не существенное. А вот на 00:23:365 (46) - есть очень громкий звук, который я почти весь сонг буду выделять катом.
   > 00:34:032 (124,125) - ^ ^
   > 01:50:198 (619) - ^ ^
3. 00:28:865 (84,85) - снова Ctrl +G В сравнение с предыдущим моментом, сама часть отличается от нее более выраженной гитарой,
   так что тут уже изменение тональности достаточное, чтобы 00:29:032 (85) - был катом
   > 00:39:532 (162,163) - ^ ^
   > 01:55:532 (656) - k ^
4. 00:48:532 (34) - измени на k, чтобы соответствовать 00:49:865 (43) 00:48:698 (226,231,235) - единственная ритмика для катов, так что....
   > 00:53:865 (66) - ^ Объяснял про каты и их выделение во втором пункте
   > 00:59:198 (100) - ^ ^
5. 01:19:532 (231) - k. Дальше идёт длинный высокий звук, поэтому k здесь больше подходит, я думаю. Надо подумать, потому что я решил в этой части выделять только барабаны, потому миксовать с гитарой - менять полностью всю часть в более сложную структуру, к тому же миксовать будет крайне сложно, чтобы оно было еще лучшего качества, чем есть сейчас
   > 01:30:198 (490) - ^ ^
   > 02:35:532 (893) - ^^
   > 02:46:198 (961) - ^^
   > 04:28:865 (1762) - ^^
   > 04:39:532 (1830) - ^ ^

Дальше я буду предлагать слишком много синих нот для этой части 01:37:532 (533) ~ 01:48:198 (607) , чтобы подчеркнуть более высокие звуки. Если тебе не нравится такая "идея", можешь отклонить это всё >_<

1. 01:37:865 (534) - k
2. 01:38:698 (539) - k
3. 01:39:532 (545) - k
4. 01:41:532 (558) - k
5. 01:44:032 (575) - k Прости, но тут так же я выделяю только барабаны, и несколько нот гитары лишь под конец, и то, когда на 01:47:198 (600,601) - звуках есть и барабаны тоже
   

1. 01:52:198 (631) - k - чтобы соответствовать 00:36:365 (137) Так как у меня идет другая структура тут (не стрим + нота + стрим + нота, а стрим + тройка + 1/2 ноты), то думаю, что менять тут необязательно +немного вариативности
2. 03:04:365 (1128) ~ 04:25:698 (1743) - как по мне, идеальная часть. Стримы играются отлично, странных паттернов нет. Извини, я не смог найти каких-то недочетов в этой части. Все ок
3. 04:46:865 (1873) ~ 04:57:532 (1951) - тут почти то же, что и в начале. Посмотрю, но думаю что тоже ничего не поменяю

Удачи в продвижении! \o/

RevengeZ wrote:

What do you thinknabout Extra Oni or Oni Stage for diffname? It kinda relates to touhou

• - 01:16:365 - 01:16:365 - In first half of kiai parts density of notes seems too low compared with other parts. You should do improvisation like 00:43:032 / 01:59:032 - these parts.

1. 00:21:045 (33,34) - I highly recommend changing the color in order to emphasize the song. kdkdkdkd was kinda boring. kk or dk would be nice.
2. 02:27:698 (844) - I usually recommend that mappers do not use 1/4 finishes. but it's up to you

tasuke912 wrote:

Hello there!

[ Taiko Stage]

• - 01:16:365 - 01:16:365 - In first half of kiai parts density of notes seems too low compared with other parts. You should do improvisation like 00:43:032 / 01:59:032 - these parts.

1. 00:21:045 (33,34) - I highly recommend changing the color in order to emphasize the song. kdkdkdkd was kinda boring. kk or dk would be nice.
2. 02:27:698 (844) - I usually recommend that mappers do not use 1/4 finishes. but it's up to you

Patterns are pretty well made. You may ask me for nomination after solving the structure issue.

tasuke912 wrote:

Hello there!

[ Taiko Stage]

• - 01:16:365 - 01:16:365 - In first half of kiai parts density of notes seems too low compared with other parts. You should do improvisation like 00:43:032 / 01:59:032 - these parts. as fruko already said, i didn't want to overmap and mess up the rhytmics; in that place i prefered rhythmics to density; i REALLY don't want to overfill that part by unnecessary triples or other patterns, cause it will break musicality of this part; also, this song provide not so "dense" kiai (comparing with other musical parts of this song) due to lack of worth to be mapped sounds (in other case it would just spoil the sounding); i tried to map all of them, so i guess density is enough as it is now

1. 00:21:045 (33,34) - I highly recommend changing the color in order to emphasize the song. kdkdkdkd was kinda boring. kk or dk would be nice. the reason i did kd in the end is 00:21:212 (34,35) - similarity of these sounds, so in therms of consistency i did that; but after your pointing now i am thinking about changing 00:21:212 (34) - that to kat to emphasize next 00:21:545 (35) - and diversify a bit this part, as you already said (dk isn't nice because of opposition of 00:20:878 (32,33) - tonality of those two - so better to make them different, imo)
   
2. 02:27:698 (844) - I usually recommend that mappers do not use 1/4 finishes. but it's up to you i guess it won't confuse player, because it is 1/3 and the ending isn't something like dddD, but ddkD; also that was made to keep consistency of big notes during this part (02:20:365 (809,813,818,823) -
   ), so if that suggestion isn't necessary to change - i think i'll keep that as it is :>

Patterns are pretty well made. You may ask me for nomination after solving the structure issue.

Remus wrote:

tasuke912 wrote:

Hello there!

[ Taiko Stage]

• - 01:16:365 - 01:16:365 - In first half of kiai parts density of notes seems too low compared with other parts. You should do improvisation like 00:43:032 / 01:59:032 - these parts. as fruko already said, i didn't want to overmap and mess up the rhytmics; in that place i prefered rhythmics to density; i REALLY don't want to overfill that part by unnecessary triples or other patterns, cause it will break musicality of this part; also, this song provide not so "dense" kiai (comparing with other musical parts of this song) due to lack of worth to be mapped sounds (in other case it would just spoil the sounding); i tried to map all of them, so i guess density is enough as it is now
  
  I can understand why you made these part easy, and yet I consider that difficulty curve is not suitable for the song. Please understand difference between "overmap" and "improvisation". Assuming that you are not familiar with playing expert taiko maps but standard maps, an example of standard would be easier for you to understand how to keep difficulty curve in taiko mode.
  In standard or ctb mode, during kiai times, which don't provide much 1/2 sound, mappers would use more distant patterns in order to keep suitable difficulty curve, but in taiko mode mappers can't do. That's why we do "improvisation". If improvisational notes work for keeping suitable difficulty curve or emphasizing specific sounds, they never be called as overmaped. (95%+ of recent ranked extra taiko maps have them.)

1. 01:19:698 - could have a triplet in order to keep density and emphasize the guitar.
2. 01:22:365 - could have a note since the guitar sounds here. it's not overmap, right?
   Only two points work enough. I am one of them who don't want to make them too dense.
   
3. 02:53:698 - Another solution is to make these streams easier. Actually the guitar provides 1/4 sound but shorter streams work for the difficulty curve and emphasize the drums.

Thanks for that!
If you insist about first one, ok, i would change that, but i think that you should know the reason of low density of all kiai parts first before changing it, so...
Waiting for your reply

tasuke912 wrote:

[*]Also I noticed that 00:20:378 (29,30,31,32,33,34) - these notes have much delay. 00:21:699 - Remove this red line and move first red line to +13ms

tasuke912 wrote:

1. 01:19:698 - could have a triplet in order to keep density and emphasize the guitar. well, you are right here; did that for all same parts
2. 01:22:365 - could have a note since the guitar sounds here. it's not overmap, right? sure, added that note do all same kiai parts.
   Only two points work enough. I am one of them who don't want to make them too dense.
   
3. 02:53:698 - Another solution is to make these streams easier. Actually the guitar provides 1/4 sound but shorter streams work for the difficulty curve and emphasize the drums. thought that better to change kiai a bit, than streams
   
4. Also I noticed that 00:20:378 (29,30,31,32,33,34) - these notes have much delay. 00:21:699 - Remove this red line and move first red line to +13ms moved, but for -13, cause +13 will increase delay

Loreley wrote:

грац с ранком

Greenshell wrote:

LOL, I was making this post when it was bubbled and when I was done realized the map is qualified. Welp, what the post contains are still concerns of mine, better mention them sooner than later, right?

While the song's timing is at 180bpm constantly, the notes mapped to the guitar intro are noticeably off. You can notice that on 00:00:878 (4) - already, it is played way too early compared to the actual instrument. Looking at GoldenWolf's ranked mapset (from which you probably have taken the mp3), I figured that the guitar certainly plays at a pace of 165bpm, but that would mess up the barlines entirely. Be sure that this is solved, as it is musically inaccurate at the moment. i discussed that with tasuke and he said to delete one additional red point and move offset, so i did that

Still referring to the source thing I've mentioned in one of my former posts. This should really be changed. the reason of adding "Team Shanghai Alice "? you said "you can add" but i didn't get why should i add this

I honestly don't understand your concept behind the SV usage. Why is the first Kiai (the chorus thing) 1x, while the second one is 1.1x, and the third chorus is 1.05x, whereas the guitar / solo parts are 1.1x? To me, it's not clear what you want to make stand out just from looking at the SV settings, can you explain this a little further? it looks a bit unconsistent, but you should look to the parts before - i don't want to make that transition of slow parts to kiai so fast,
it yould be confusing lol

Another thing I want to mention is the finisher usage. I see you put priority on percussion, but at the same time, you've left out some significant spots which could've been an opportunity for a strong and spicy finisher and mapped these a normal note, sometimes causing inconsistencies. For example, why did you leave 02:04:198 (709) - out, while you mapped 02:14:865 (776) - as a finisher although both represent the same measures within this stanza (just that both are in different halves of this respective stanza)? overfilling by big notes is very unnecessary (even bad) thing, also it is very subjective; again, i discussed finishers usage with fruko; my rhythmics vision can be different comparing with yours, because we all could emphasize (not like emphasize, but maybe mark out) different sounds
Mentioning this stanza, there's also a noticeable inconsistency in the finisher usage as a whole. (e.g. 00:43:365 (193) - is a finish despite being an ordinary snare kick, while 01:59:365 (678) - is a normal kat note, same sound, different emphasis). These parts are pretty much the same music-wise, therefore some consistency wouldn't hurt really. all about finishers i've already said, i really want you checking last mods, that were done before yours, they contain things about finishers

01:37:532 - this part should have a hit volume of 80%, it is essentially the same compared to 01:58:865 - on that term. do you really think, that 10% difference (SV that chang volume) is that necessary? what about 75%? 76%? 79%?


additional pattern suggestions:

01:57:032 - I'd still put emphasis on the drums by removing this note, I don't see a reason to let the guitar interrupt a rather outstanding percussion pattern that sound emphasize guitar and acts like filling.

02:41:032 (921,922,923) - I don't get why this is kkd, it sorta contradicts the whole drum emphasis + guitar improvisation thing. ddk sounds more intuitive to me. discussed it with fruko like a hour ago; that was made for divesifying that parts and growing emphasizing tonality's level from low to high to the end; sure, i can't make it super smooth, but i did as i could

03:16:532 - This note could be removed for the sake of consistency. It's the only pattern in this stanza that ignores the douplet played by the drummer an see no reason to ignore drums here, sorry

03:34:698 (1379,1380,1381,1382,1383,1384) - Both the snare kick and the guitar kinda get lost here, kdkkd k would work better to capture these. idk, but kdkdk sounds fine to me

04:02:782 - Again, for the sake of consistency, consider removing this note so the next one can be a finish. The cymbal is still there, the kick is strong and so is the guitar, like all the other finisher notes mapped in this kiai. not enough loud to be finisher, it's quiet; plus making here finisher will eventually break the concept of finishers that were made before - i can make all notes on the end of streams by finishers, and what will it be? overfilling, that i was trying to evade all the map

04:08:198 - Same deal with the finishers, you should get the idea by now. as i said before, my finisher's concept is different to yours, so see no reason to change all the finishers due to this


Concluding from what I've mentioned above, I think the map still lacks some consistency here and there.

Sorry if my attitude appears a bit rude, this is absolutely not intended. i saw no rude, but much of subjective things :>

Sorry for interrupting the party, I hoped I'd be done before the qualify

MashaSG wrote:

Man, are you seriously? Couldn't you write to Remus about your mod? You thought that it'd be done before quals, so how many hours you need to write mod?
That's just unkind and embarassing imo.

Vell wrote:

He has every right to take however long he needs to make his mod

Namki wrote:

ого, поздравляю!