oui00:06:560 (5) - NC here Yup
00:07:872 (9,10,1) - stacking these would look better I prefer like that, it follows the direction of the slider while stacking this looks bad at my eyes.
the inconsistencies in rhythm when the sounds are exactly the same isn't that good at 00:08:997 (4,5,6,7,1) - and 00:12:185 (5,6,1) - Yes, you're right, but this patern looks nice to me. I'll eventually change it if it's too disturbing.
00:13:122 (3) - make this a triple Again a part of this patern, but I will make triple like you said, because there were triple with this sound before.
00:13:685 (2,3,1) - stack these Like before, I prefer the visual of this, rather than a stacked triple.
00:14:622 (2) - triple Done, it's better yeah.
00:18:560 (1,2,3,4) - the intensity is nice in this part, maybe make this whole section like this (00:21:560 (1,2,3,4) - is the same sound like but the notes aren't as intense) Yup, you're totally right, I changed this part, it sound way better.
00:23:247 (1,2,3,4) - no, just use 1/2 sliders ^
00:24:560 (1) - triple I let the kick slider and added the triple before it, just like this 00:18:372 (2,3,1) -
00:26:622 (3) - triple Yes, it's better.
00:31:310 (1,2,3,4) - uncomfortable pattern Changed
00:33:560 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - same Changed
00:36:185 (1,2,1) - this should be a stream Yes, you're right
00:50:060 (1,2,3,4,1) - don't mute the sliderends here I did it because there weren't any 1/4 in the music, but it sound better as you suggested.
00:50:997 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - distance snap this Hum, yeah, it looks bad, but I wanted to follow the decrease in intensity before the slow part. I'll let it like that for the moment, but yeah, i'm not convinced of that, maybe you're right.
00:52:872 (4,1) - stack this properly Done
00:54:560 (6) - NC here Done
01:02:716 (4) - move this on top of the next slider Done, i guess it's more natural for the mouvement
01:03:560 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - this is, in my opinion, a badly copied idea from monstrata's mapset, if your going to do this keep spacing consistent, like the distance between these isn't good 01:03:747 (2,3,4) - 01:05:247 (2,3,4) -
Uhh. Yeah, I highly got inspired by monstrata's mapping to do this. For the exemple you have mentionned, I decreased the spacing progressively because there were a low (for this part) velocity slider at a moment. But this was a litle out of context for this part, so I tried to rework this.
01:09:560 (1,2) - this gap is awkward I changed the angle a little, not sure it's enough
01:26:060 (11) - make this a circle, not a slider Yeah, looks better
