Enter Shikari - The Last Garrison

posted
Total Posts
77
show more
Topic Starter
Hectic

josh1024 wrote:

From the queue:

This is beyond me, sorry.
only a few suggestions.
To me this is better thought out than what I can map.

Normal
00:18:570 (6) - perhaps line this up with the half hexagon. maybe later
03:21:200 (5) - not sure what this curve stands for maybe mirror it to stress the following circle? don't want any overlaps, also i think blanket work fine

DeviousPanda wrote:

Form Modreqs:

M4M with this map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/638443

00:11:370 (2,3) - this jump feels a tiny bit too big to play into a triple and then jumps with lower spacing was mentioned before, nerfed a bit now

00:11:713 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these jumps feel a bit boring with how intense the music is here, something like this could help i don't really think that they are boring, there are many consecutive jumps which makes this section relatively hard

00:15:313 (6,7,8,1) - this should flow the other way, like you did here 01:20:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - this is another structure, i think it plays almost the same

00:17:198 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - try and vary the jump lengths to make them more interesting to play 00:21:313 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - this is a good example of what i think most of the jumps in this map should look like maybe ill vary them later

00:33:647 (2,3,4,5) - 00:35:003 (2,3,4,5) - these are good, but i think they should be spaced out a tiny bit more like you did here 00:36:359 (3,4,5,6,1) - because the small spacing is boring here kinda answered with previous mods, also these circles are for background guitar, while other ones are for vocals

00:44:495 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1) - ^^

01:17:121 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - same as my first point i think if works fine here since it is jump from slider, not circle, and its not that big

01:29:806 (1) - maybe don't curve this i want to :(

02:04:356 (1,2,3,4) - 02:15:327 (1,2,3,4) - weird to play didn't have troubles with this, testplays were fine

02:41:127 (1,2) - delete these, they make no sense and aren't timed properly they are timed properly, maybe ill delete later

02:54:413 (2,3,4) - this is good, but going back to what i said about these 02:55:776 (2,3,4,5) - being too low spaced, at this part it's even more noticable because you've just gone through a huge build up and then your 1/4 is spaced more than your 1/2 but it sounds absolutely the same

03:15:776 (3,4) - this ruins the jump pattern, please space this out a lot more i don't make jumps to bass drum in this section 03:14:082 (1,2) -

03:29:336 (2) - stack this properly ok

03:37:471 (3) - rotate this like 20/30 degrees clockwise for better flow i think it flows fine
personally i would name this Light Insane because it's too hard for a hard diff but too easy for an insane maybe, tho "light insane" and custom diffname after it looks weird

00:37:715 (2,1) - put a note in between these, your ignoring the rhythm that you've been using for this exact same sound before like 00:36:359 (2,3,1) - i try not to put circles where are no sound :)

00:41:105 (1,2,3,4) - keep these the same distance distance for snare, also makes good flow kinda

00:42:461 (1) - tiny bit too curved imo i think its fine

00:43:139 (2,1,1) - i get what your doing here, but the SV change is a bit too drastic, try reducing it a tiny bit combo colours help

00:51:953 (1,2,3,4) - same distance

most of these problems are repeated throughout the map so i'm not going to list all places where they occur

02:41:127 (1,2) - again don't have this here

02:52:356 (1,2,1,2) - decrease the spacing on these 1/4 gaps why, it plays good D:

02:53:384 (2,3,1) - this doesn't play well at all try doing this i think its fine, im following some pattern here

looks good! I hope this helps!! :):):):):)thank youu

S o a p wrote:

m4m

[Still Alive]
00:19:256 (3,4) - too close why D:
00:20:627 (4,5) - ^
00:21:656 (4,1) - ^
00:41:783 (3,4) - ^
00:46:529 (1) - x:379,y:333 im keeping ds here
01:10:092 (3) - x:159,y:78
01:55:498 (2,3) - 1/2 slider pls extended sliders for vocals
01:56:896 (3,4) - ^
02:08:984 (5,6) - ^
02:14:470 (3) - ^
03:01:200 (2,3) - ^
03:12:048 (2,3) - ^
02:04:527 (2,3) - too close
02:11:042 - add a note im trying to keep object density here
02:41:127 (1,2) - emmmm......it would be better if you delete that.. ok..
02:45:499 (5) - NC? nah
02:48:242 (5) - ^
02:53:642 (3,4,1,2,3) - too noisy hm? i think its pretty readable
03:29:844 (3) - y:69
03:31:370 (5) - x:467,y:40

[Insane]
02:41:127 (1,2) - delete? yeah
nice diff thanks

[Hard]
01:16:606 (1) - y:0 ?? i think its ok

[Normal]
nothing wrong
Thanks for modding guys!
Lian-
M4M

The source song is: '' The Mindsweep '', which is the fourth album from the group, Enter Shikari

Normal

*The AR Should be between 3 and 4 For Normal Difficulties
*I think the DO is rather high, it should be between 2 and 3

*You should use a combo color palette more attractive for the view

*The preview should go here 03:16:793 -

*But you can also do this and it will be less work: 00:39:749 (2) - This slider should be so arched upward https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8657795 00:41:105 (1) - And this slider inverts (ctrl + G)= https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8657809

Because I say this? Well, the difficulties of minors should not have errors of distance, You can verify this with the Distance Snap

The rest of your map does not have any flow or sound problems (All difficulties)
Topic Starter
Hectic

Lian- wrote:

M4M

The source song is: '' The Mindsweep '', which is the fourth album from the group, Enter Shikari not sure about this one, ill put it in source if will be mentioned

Normal

*The AR Should be between 3 and 4 For Normal Difficulties ill see
*I think the DO is rather high, it should be between 2 and 3 ^^^

*You should use a combo color palette more attractive for the view they follow some idea

*The preview should go here 03:16:793 - i think preview is fine

*But you can also do this and it will be less work: 00:39:749 (2) - This slider should be so arched upward https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8657795 00:41:105 (1) - And this slider inverts (ctrl + G)= https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8657809 i think these things are fine as they now

Because I say this? Well, the difficulties of minors should not have errors of distance, You can verify this with the Distance Snap oh, i had hard time figuring out what does this mean, but got it, yes, you are right

The rest of your map does not have any flow or sound problems (All difficulties) Thanks for modding!
J1_
Heyo, from M4M queue

Normal:

01:25:521 (2,3) - Blanket opportunity

Hard:

02:07:442 (2,1) - Same here

Insane:

02:48:927 (7) - Why not also a slider here, like 02:46:184 (7) -

Still Alive:

01:18:664 (1) - I'd say circle for better playability

02:58:149 (2,3) - Flow can be better

Nothing else much to say, great map!

GL!
MoodyRPG
m4m

General
  1. You need a Easy, the spread in Normal is too high imo


Normal
  1. Good


Hard
  1. 00:43:139 (2) - Stack this with (3), looks clean
  2. 01:07:006 (1) - Remove NC
  3. 01:12:492 (1) - ^
  4. 02:12:584 (1) - ^
  5. Meh, I don't agree with those NC, but is up to you


Insane
  1. 03:26:624 (2) - The reverse arrow touch a little the previous slider, why you don't move the third tick?


Still Alive
  1. ok


nice~
Topic Starter
Hectic

xJ1 wrote:

Heyo, from M4M queue

Normal:

01:25:521 (2,3) - Blanket opportunity don't want to make it here

Hard:

02:07:442 (2,1) - Same here same response

Insane:

02:48:927 (7) - Why not also a slider here, like 02:46:184 (7) - i made sliders for vocals here, on this tick there are no vocals

Still Alive:

01:18:664 (1) - I'd say circle for better playability i pretty like this moment and really want to keep it

02:58:149 (2,3) - Flow can be better i think it ok atm

Nothing else much to say, great map!

GL!

MoodyRPG wrote:

m4m

General
  1. You need a Easy, the spread in Normal is too high imo hm, im pretty sure my normal has very basic rhythm structure and can go as easy


Normal
  1. Good


Hard
  1. 00:43:139 (2) - Stack this with (3), looks clean i want to keep ds here
  2. 01:07:006 (1) - Remove NC
  3. 01:12:492 (1) - ^
  4. 02:12:584 (1) - ^
  5. Meh, I don't agree with those NC, but is up to you woah, what the heck, i don't agree with them too, how did this even happen


Insane
  1. 03:26:624 (2) - The reverse arrow touch a little the previous slider, why you don't move the third tick? i think this overlap is fine, i use it sometimes


Still Alive
  1. ok


nice~
Thank you for modding people!
Jemzuu
Hello M4M from #modreq
here's my map: t/620490

Still Alive

  1. 00:20:284 (2) - stack it to 00:18:570 (1) - ?
  2. 00:24:570 (2) - this is pretty much hard to hit after that first slider, perhaps stack 00:24:227 (1) - to it
  3. 00:36:359 (3,4,5,6) - this flow could be better maybe u wanna ctrl g 00:36:529 (4,5) -
  4. 01:15:235 (1) - unnesccary NC
  5. 01:15:578 (1,2) - i suggest ctrl+ging this two for better emphasis since song since it has same rhythm as 01:14:721 (3,1) - like what u did on 02:21:156 (1,2,1,2) -
  6. 01:46:006 (3) - ctrl g this perhaps since u did it on 01:43:294 (3,4) -
  7. 01:52:447 (2) - like i said, consider ctrl+ging this too
  8. 02:03:842 (3) - i suggest u to ctrl g this and overlap it to (4) cus it gives better flow imo
  9. 02:15:670 (3,4) - maybe place this two elsewhere cus i think it doesn't suit in with the flow perhaps try other patterns
  10. 03:37:980 (2,2) - i suggest to make these 2 notes placed in the opposite direction since i think it suits as the end part.


das all, everything else is gud.
goodluck~
Topic Starter
Hectic

AJamez wrote:

Hello M4M from #modreq
here's my map: t/620490

Still Alive

  1. 00:20:284 (2) - stack it to 00:18:570 (1) - ? eh, why? it won't be noticed
  2. 00:24:570 (2) - this is pretty much hard to hit after that first slider, perhaps stack 00:24:227 (1) - to it theres strong beat, so i think its ok if its hard to hit and i like how they interact now more than stack
  3. 00:36:359 (3,4,5,6) - this flow could be better maybe u wanna ctrl g 00:36:529 (4,5) - keeping ds here
  4. 01:15:235 (1) - unnesccary NC ill see
  5. 01:15:578 (1,2) - i suggest ctrl+ging this two for better emphasis since song since it has same rhythm as 01:14:721 (3,1) - like what u did on 02:21:156 (1,2,1,2) - but this follows the same idea as 02:21:156 (1,2,1,2) - ...
  6. 01:46:006 (3) - ctrl g this perhaps since u did it on 01:43:294 (3,4) - ds (i make jump to drums)
  7. 01:52:447 (2) - like i said, consider ctrl+ging this too
  8. 02:03:842 (3) - i suggest u to ctrl g this and overlap it to (4) cus it gives better flow imo i think its fine now, i don't use stacks in these sections
  9. 02:15:670 (3,4) - maybe place this two elsewhere cus i think it doesn't suit in with the flow perhaps try other patterns i think its ok,
    ds again

  10. 03:37:980 (2,2) - i suggest to make these 2 notes placed in the opposite direction since i think it suits as the end part. i think it suits now too


das all, everything else is gud.
goodluck~ you too, thank for modding!
Zxozmo
From my modding queue!

General
Easy mode please!, i feel like the spacing on normal and object amount isn't too nice or that much simplistic for a normal (1.73* tho)


Normal
No Problems at all but just a suggestion : try following the vocals a bit at 02:20:813 (4) - 02:44:127 (1) cause have a 20 sec break really is too long
03:38:488 (1) - move the spinner end 2 ticks back

Hard
02:21:841 (2,1) - lonnnng pause again, maybe it's just me though
03:38:149 (3,4) - make this into a stack on its own? cause in my opinion since it repeats that in a short time it would flee as if it's detatched from 03:37:810 (1,2) -
03:38:488 (1) - also spinner 2 ticks, move it back

Just a suggestion, but anyhow no problems

Insane
00:11:027 (1) - i know that this is to emphasize but it's a bit loud (since it's in the beginning of a song)
00:20:456 (2) - this slider's reverse arrow is being partly covered by 00:19:941 (1) but if it is intentional, it's fine
00:21:827 (6) - is being covered a bit by 00:21:313 (4) -
00:31:427 (3) - isnt being caught by 00:30:913 (2) -
00:39:071 (2,1) - slider ends overlapping try blanketing them?
00:43:308 (1,1) - nothing i just like this part
02:21:842 (2,1) - 20 seconds breaks still suck since i tried playing through this
03:38:488 (1) - move this 2 white ticks backwards to the actual end sound

Not really much here im just saying that the way how they overlap is just giving me a bit of ocd

Still Alive
03:38:488 (1) - spinner move the end by 2 white ticks
also, that 20 second break feels too long

So that's all i can spot here mostly just stacking or overlapping things that gave me ocd but if it's intentional go ahead and keep that in
Also that 20 second break, this my 5th time saying but, why (at least for me especially if you're trying to fc it or somethin)

And that's all, its a good song too good luck! :)
Topic Starter
Hectic

Zxozmo wrote:

From my modding queue!

General
Easy mode please!, i feel like the spacing on normal and object amount isn't too nice or that much simplistic for a normal (1.73* tho) i really think normal is easy enough :( ill make easy tho, no problem, but if its /really/ needed


Normal
No Problems at all but just a suggestion : try following the vocals a bit at 02:20:813 (4) - 02:44:127 (1) cause have a 20 sec break really is too long i think it fits there quite well
03:38:488 (1) - move the spinner end 2 ticks back i think it would feel unnatural

Hard
02:21:841 (2,1) - lonnnng pause again, maybe it's just me though
03:38:149 (3,4) - make this into a stack on its own? cause in my opinion since it repeats that in a short time it would flee as if it's detatched from 03:37:810 (1,2) - uh, im sorry, i didn't get your point :(
03:38:488 (1) - also spinner 2 ticks, move it back

Just a suggestion, but anyhow no problems

Insane
00:11:027 (1) - i know that this is to emphasize but it's a bit loud (since it's in the beginning of a song) eh?
00:20:456 (2) - this slider's reverse arrow is being partly covered by 00:19:941 (1) but if it is intentional, it's fine yeah, i use overlaps in this diff pretty often
00:21:827 (6) - is being covered a bit by 00:21:313 (4) -
00:31:427 (3) - isnt being caught by 00:30:913 (2) - its ok, plays well
00:39:071 (2,1) - slider ends overlapping try blanketing them? intended
00:43:308 (1,1) - nothing i just like this part im glad :)
02:21:842 (2,1) - 20 seconds breaks still suck since i tried playing through this
03:38:488 (1) - move this 2 white ticks backwards to the actual end sound

Not really much here im just saying that the way how they overlap is just giving me a bit of ocd

Still Alive
03:38:488 (1) - spinner move the end by 2 white ticks
also, that 20 second break feels too long

So that's all i can spot here mostly just stacking or overlapping things that gave me ocd but if it's intentional go ahead and keep that in
Also that 20 second break, this my 5th time saying but, why (at least for me especially if you're trying to fc it or somethin)

And that's all, its a good song too good luck! :)Thanks for modding!
Blan_C
Hello, M4M from my modding queue. For now i haven't map to mod, ill just PM when i have one if its okay with you, and also if you consider things listed below as not helpfull/not enough - treat is as NM.

I know it isnt much, but its not because of my laziness - this map is just really good and i enjoyed playing this a lot. Now onto the mod:

Still alive

  1. 00:36:698 (5,6,1) - I really like how you do emphasis on your map but here something is weird - 00:36:868 (6) - I dont know why you put small DS on this circle. I mean... i get it that you increased spacing here compared to 00:33:647 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4,5) - because you want to emphasize vocal. The thing is that 00:36:868 (6) - there is louder vocal compared to 00:36:359 (3,4,5) - so maybe space it more?
  2. 00:47:207 (3,4) - Similar thing here
  3. 02:52:356 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1,2,3,4) - Stream fit here really good but i kinda dont like its shape - its...too simple to me. Try placing slider, curve it in some nice way and then ctrl+shift+f. Also i think cracking it two times is too much, try working on it more. In spite of that, incrasing DS on 02:52:356 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - is something i cant understand - intensity of instruments is the same. Maybe put the same DS until 02:53:384 - and then make sharp angle+NC with higher DS. Some bursts/repeat sliders would work too.
  4. 03:15:776 (3,4,1) - I read in previous mod that you want to keep this like that but still i see no reason in it - 03:15:776 (3) - there you go with DS x0,75 and then 1/4 gap with x4,84 03:15:946 (4,1) -


Good luck with ranking!

Edit: my english suck. fixed some grammar :V
Topic Starter
Hectic

Blan_C wrote:

Hello, M4M from my modding queue. For now i haven't map to mod, ill just PM when i have one if its okay with you, and also if you consider things listed below as not helpfull/not enough - treat is as NM. yeye, just write me, i'll be happy to mod

I know it isnt much, but its not because of my laziness - this map is just really good and i enjoyed playing this a lot. I'm really glad to hear that, thank you Now onto the mod:

Still alive

  1. 00:36:698 (5,6,1) - I really like how you do emphasis on your map but here something is weird - 00:36:868 (6) - I dont know why you put small DS on this circle. I mean... i get it that you increased spacing here compared to 00:33:647 (2,3,4,5,2,3,4,5) - because you want to emphasize vocal. The thing is that 00:36:868 (6) - there is louder vocal compared to 00:36:359 (3,4,5) - so maybe space it more? i just put circles for vocal, spacing is for drums
  2. 00:47:207 (3,4) - Similar thing here
  3. 02:52:356 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1,2,3,4) - Stream fit here really good but i kinda dont like its shape - its...too simple to me. i think increasing ds make it not so simple, also shape reflects music pretty well imoTry placing slider, curve it in some nice way and then ctrl+shift+f. Also i think cracking it two times is too much, try working on it more. i did it on purpose, there are differences in volume of drums, if listen to the song In spite of that, incrasing DS on 02:52:356 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - is something i cant understand - intensity of instruments is the same. but does overall intensity? Maybe put the same DS until 02:53:384 - and then make sharp angle+NC with higher DS. Some bursts/repeat sliders would work too.
  4. 03:15:776 (3,4,1) - I read in previous mod that you want to keep this like that but still i see no reason in it - 03:15:776 (3) - there you go with DS x0,75 and then 1/4 gap with x4,84 03:15:946 (4,1) - yeah, gap is for snare drum, since it far more powerfull than kick in this section D:


Good luck with ranking! Thanks, I hope I won't need it that much. You too!

Edit: my english suck. fixed some grammar :V :V
Rin Desu
Heyhey :)

Normal:

00:35:681 (1,3) - blanket
01:58:887 (2,3,4,1) - this looks kinda not from your map u never did 90° degrees angles before, change it a bit that it fits better :)
02:59:166 (3) - u can find a better shape xD for example blank the curve towards 1
03:04:590 (2,3) - i would blank them
03:12:726 (2) - place it higher on the playfield

Hard:

AR8 is to high for this diff go for 6 or 7
00:38:393 (1,1) - not parallel
00:54:664 (1) - there is nothing special this shape is kinda random imo
01:45:328 (1,1) - repeat point and the slider curve are to close togheter, that doesnt look that good

Insane:

ar 9 idk... go for 8
thats all for this diff^^

Extra:

Go for Ar 9 here

in general i dont see any objects as a problem but in parts where u did the slow sliders (i like it btw) 01:38:549 (1) - 02:00:243 (1) -
u should space and emphasize more. it feels kinda to boring while playing^^

for example emphasize the voice:
01:46:006 (3) - jump to 01:46:345 (4) -
01:48:718 (2,1,1) - here the same... i would space them


anyway í like your map and gl ranking it fast :D!
Kirylln
asjdosadjasodjsa;lasjdls
Some of these suggestions can be applied to similar sections of the song as it repeats itself quite a few times
[Still Alive]
Not really a fan of the overall aesthetics here, it’s a bit uhm…messy, i suppose
  1. 01:14:721 (3) –maybe shorten this slider to the blue tick and put a circle to the red tick would be better emphasis to the drum
  2. 00:11:713 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) –I feel like the nc doesn’t really do enough emphasis here, maybe try 00:12:398 (1,2,3,4) – space this away from the last 4 to make them 2 separate patterns or sth .Look 00:17:198 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) –you did it right here, although slightly different sounds but similar structure
  3. 00:46:529 (1) –this would be better if represented by a slider, since the guitar stretches out a bit here
  4. 01:20:035 (1,2,3,4) –these represents the same set of sounds, so suddenly putting (4) out of the pattern doesn’t really represent it right, try this http://puu.sh/wQXTR/ced00758d0.png ,also nc 01:20:721 (5) –since it’s a lower pitch set of sound, different from the previous 4,
  5. 02:46:356 (8) –you might want to nc this, to signal the vocal
  6. 02:53:813 (1) –overmap. Also this messes up the drum emphasis of 02:53:899 (2,3,4) –pretty much entirely
  7. 02:58:488 (3) –probably better to change this into 2 circles, to make it consistent with 00:36:359 (3,4,5,6) –
  8. 03:18:488 (2,3,4) –I have no idea what you’re following or emphasizing in here, would be better if you just put a jump like you did 03:19:844 (2,3,4,5,6) –here
  9. 03:27:132 (1,2,3) –spacing might be a bit underwhelming here, maybe space it out a little?
    Sorry for messing up your color hax ><

[Insane]
This diff is somehow better executed than Extra, gj :thumbsup:
  1. 00:38:224 –don’t see much reason to ignore this
  2. 02:52:356 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) –wow, this is actually done right here, gucchi
  3. 03:37:810 (1,2) –a bit underwhelming here, why not try to do something similar to 03:16:115 (4,5,6,7) –this?

[Hard]
And the list just getting smaller along with my concentration ~sign~
  1. 00:33:647 (2,1) –this is…uhh, kinda weird, especially when it is 00:35:003 (2) – here since it’ll make 00:35:681 (1) – quite unexpected, here, try this http://puu.sh/wQZr5/b6e1d31995.png
  2. 00:38:393 (1) –have no idea what this is, just follow the guitar, vocal or sth

I’ll skip normal cause I have no idea how those lower diffs work ><
the number of words is actually just a cover up for the actual shitty mod made by a shitty modder
Best of luck~
hohol454
M4M from my queue

Hitsounds:
The normal hitfinish is too goddamn loud. Also the jumps from 35% volume to 75% are too sudden. 02:49:613 - to 02:53:727 - gradually increasing volume would be much better

Still Alive:
00:29:713 (1) - remove NC or add here 01:34:778 (6,7,8) -
01:15:235 (1) - Remove NC. The nc makes it look like it's 1/1 distance from both sides. made me missread the rhythm after I switched to skin with combo colours when I read it correctly before
02:20:813 (1) - same here
02:49:442 (9,1,2) - would flow better if 1,2 went up, right now you have a medium jump into slowdown and then back and forth motion starts at 2. It would be more intuitive if you ctrl+G 1,2 3,4 etc.
02:53:470 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the changes in direction don't correspond to anything in the music
03:16:793 - SV is too fast imo 1.15x would be enough.

Insane:
NC stuff applies to this as well
00:29:713 (1,2) - lower spacing here. It shouldn't be the same as 00:31:598 (1,2) - for example
01:04:778 (4,5) - move 5 lower please. it just looks super ugly to me for some reason
02:53:384 (2,3,1,2,3) - now this represents the music nicely, much better than this part in Still Alive
03:16:793 - same as highest diff

Nice map and song
Topic Starter
Hectic

Rin Desu wrote:

Heyhey :)

Normal:

00:35:681 (1,3) - blanket oh, fixed
01:58:887 (2,3,4,1) - this looks kinda not from your map u never did 90° degrees angles before, change it a bit that it fits better :)i think its ok as it is
02:59:166 (3) - u can find a better shape xD for example blank the curve towards 1 i can't see anything wrong with this shape, i think its fine
03:04:590 (2,3) - i would blank them eh, i think it doesn't make any difference - the same idea
03:12:726 (2) - place it higher on the playfield why, its ok as it is now D:

Hard:

AR8 is to high for this diff go for 6 or 7 ah, you are low ar lover, but i think these numbers fit fine
00:38:393 (1,1) - not parallel its intended
00:54:664 (1) - there is nothing special this shape is kinda random imo i think if fits pretty well to change of intensity
this helped me fixed something further
01:45:328 (1,1) - repeat point and the slider curve are to close togheter, that doesnt look that good im pretty sure its unnoticable while playing but fixed anyway

Insane:

ar 9 idk... go for 8
thats all for this diff^^

Extra:

Go for Ar 9 here

in general i dont see any objects as a problem but in parts where u did the slow sliders (i like it btw) 01:38:549 (1) - 02:00:243 (1) -
u should space and emphasize more. it feels kinda to boring while playing^^ i think just sv change works fine for these moments and theres no need to make this difficult

for example emphasize the voice:
01:46:006 (3) - jump to 01:46:345 (4) -
01:48:718 (2,1,1) - here the same... i would space them i decided not to make jumps for vocals in this section to keep consistency and made jumps only for drums


anyway í like your map and gl ranking it fast :D! thank you!

Kirylln wrote:

asjdosadjasodjsa;lasjdls
Some of these suggestions can be applied to similar sections of the song as it repeats itself quite a few times
[Still Alive]
Not really a fan of the overall aesthetics here, it’s a bit uhm…messy, i suppose :c they follow some idea, they are consistent, so i think they work fine
  1. 01:14:721 (3) –maybe shorten this slider to the blue tick and put a circle to the red tick would be better emphasis to the drum thats a good suggestion!
  2. 00:11:713 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) –I feel like the nc doesn’t really do enough emphasis here, maybe try 00:12:398 (1,2,3,4) – space this away from the last 4 to make them 2 separate patterns or sth .Look 00:17:198 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) –you did it right here, although slightly different sounds but similar structure ill keep for now because in first case its just instrumental without vocals. also i think nc is needed for hp boost since its relatively hard section. also i just wanted to make some variety
  3. 00:46:529 (1) –this would be better if represented by a slider, since the guitar stretches out a bit here i cant hear it
  4. 01:20:035 (1,2,3,4) –these represents the same set of sounds, so suddenly putting (4) out of the pattern doesn’t really represent it right, try this http://puu.sh/wQXTR/ced00758d0.png ,also nc 01:20:721 (5) –since it’s a lower pitch set of sound, different from the previous 4 i make space to snare drum
  5. 02:46:356 (8) –you might want to nc this, to signal the vocal i think it would be pretty confusing
  6. 02:53:813 (1) –overmap. Also this messes up the drum emphasis of 02:53:899 (2,3,4) –pretty much entirely compare empty gap further to this one - i don't think its an overmap at all. also drum emphasis shown by change of direction
  7. 02:58:488 (3) –probably better to change this into 2 circles, to make it consistent with 00:36:359 (3,4,5,6) – you are absolutely right
  8. 03:18:488 (2,3,4) –I have no idea what you’re following or emphasizing in here, would be better if you just put a jump like you did 03:19:844 (2,3,4,5,6) –here i think its quite obvious, drums in first case, and drums+vocals in second D:
  9. 03:27:132 (1,2,3) –spacing might be a bit underwhelming here, maybe space it out a little? no, its not that hard
    Sorry for messing up your color hax >< eh? i dont know what are you talking about :)

[Insane]
This diff is somehow better executed than Extra, gj :thumbsup:
  1. 00:38:224 –don’t see much reason to ignore this theres no audible sound tho
  2. 02:52:356 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) –wow, this is actually done right here, gucchi
  3. 03:37:810 (1,2) –a bit underwhelming here, why not try to do something similar to 03:16:115 (4,5,6,7) –this? i dont like such stuff in the end of the map

[Hard]
And the list just getting smaller along with my concentration ~sign~
  1. 00:33:647 (2,1) –this is…uhh, kinda weird, especially when it is 00:35:003 (2) – here since it’ll make 00:35:681 (1) – quite unexpected, here, try this http://puu.sh/wQZr5/b6e1d31995.png i think its good now
  2. 00:38:393 (1) –have no idea what this is, just follow the guitar, vocal or sth i think those long sliders represent vocal quite well

I’ll skip normal cause I have no idea how those lower diffs work ><
yeye, ill mod it soon
the number of words is actually just a cover up for the actual shitty mod made by a shitty modder
Best of luck~ tons of words <> good mod. yours actually helped quite a lot (at least comparing to others). Thank you and good luck you too!

hohol454 wrote:

M4M from my queue

Hitsounds:
The normal hitfinish is too goddamn loud. Also the jumps from 35% volume to 75% are too sudden. 02:49:613 - to 02:53:727 - gradually increasing volume would be much better didn't have any other mentions on normal hitfinish volumeill make smooth transition,
good point


Still Alive:
00:29:713 (1) - remove NC or add here 01:34:778 (6,7,8) - im following some idea here
01:15:235 (1) - Remove NC. The nc makes it look like it's 1/1 distance from both sides. made me missread the rhythm after I switched to skin with combo colours when I read it correctly before reworked with previous mod
02:20:813 (1) - same here
02:49:442 (9,1,2) - would flow better if 1,2 went up, right now you have a medium jump into slowdown and then back and forth motion starts at 2. It would be more intuitive if you ctrl+G 1,2 3,4 etc. i think its basically the same
02:53:470 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - the changes in direction don't correspond to anything in the music they do, listen to drums
03:16:793 - SV is too fast imo 1.15x would be enough. it would be pretty massive rework basically for nothing since this sv workes well

Insane:
NC stuff applies to this as well
00:29:713 (1,2) - lower spacing here. It shouldn't be the same as 00:31:598 (1,2) - for example space for snare drum
01:04:778 (4,5) - move 5 lower please. it just looks super ugly to me for some reason why :D its ok i think
02:53:384 (2,3,1,2,3) - now this represents the music nicely, much better than this part in Still Alive
03:16:793 - same as highest diff

Nice map and song Thanks for modding!
-Zeraora

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

Lian- wrote:

M4M

The source song is: '' The Mindsweep '', which is the fourth album from the group, Enter Shikari not sure about this one, ill put it in source if will be mentioned
Albums aren't put as sources of songs. Just to make it clear lol.




Anyway, M4M!
[Still Alive]uhh. i modded this (and insane) before the update you did. there may be things i pointed out that got fixed or changed so idk :(

  1. 00:20:627 (4,5) - imo, aesthetic aspect here could be improved by making 00:20:627 (4) - look like the vertical opposite of (5).
  2. 00:29:541 (8,1,2) - Would be nice if 00:29:713 (1) - were to be put in where the vocal starts (00:29:541 (8) - position). The vocals in 00:29:541 - to 00:29:713 - seems to be more connected and more fitting to be a slider than 00:29:713 - and 00:29:884 - . (01:35:121 (7,8,1) - )
  3. 00:32:798 (10) - I suggest putting this at (440,312). Mostly because of aesthetics (and a bit of emphasis on 00:32:970 (1) - ). Also doing so may lessen the probability of a player to be surprised with the sudden SV drop, due to the low DS.
  4. 00:48:563 (3,4) - Parallel?
  5. 01:29:806 (1,2) - How this entire part is mapped is similar to the first one. And in terms of "structure", 01:29:806 (1) - seems to be the only one different... I think. Reference being 00:24:227 (1,2) - .
  6. 02:46:184 (7) - NC this one to make the change in the part more apparent. Maybe this one too, 02:49:270 (8) - .
  7. 02:53:556 (2,2) - Actual vocals hit in these two objects. I think these should serve as the turning points in the stream instead.


[Insane]
  1. 00:19:941 (1,2,3) - These three could use a bit more space imo.
  2. 00:29:541 (5,1) - 01:35:121 (5,1) - The same thing as the one I said in the previous difficulty.
  3. 00:43:817 (1) - Put this one a bit more to the right for it to be seen more.
  4. 01:29:806 (1,2) - Really minor thing. A blanket seems nice for aesthetics.
    Can't see any glaring issues in this difficulty.


[Hard]
  1. 00:20:284 (2,3) - I feel like these two work better as a stack than 00:20:456 (3,4) - . Reasoning here being kinda the same as my connected-sounds thingy from the first difficulty.

Nothing much here (=w=;
That's all. Hope it helped ;w;

Good luck!
Topic Starter
Hectic

-Harpuia- wrote:

Albums aren't put as sources of songs. Just to make it clear lol. Thanks for clarifying!

Anyway, M4M!
[Still Alive]uhh. i modded this (and insane) before the update you did. there may be things i pointed out that got fixed or changed so idk :(

  1. 00:20:627 (4,5) - imo, aesthetic aspect here could be improved by making 00:20:627 (4) - look like the vertical opposite of (5). i use this shapes quite often
  2. 00:29:541 (8,1,2) - Would be nice if 00:29:713 (1) - were to be put in where the vocal starts (00:29:541 (8) - position). The vocals in 00:29:541 - to 00:29:713 - seems to be more connected and more fitting to be a slider than 00:29:713 - and 00:29:884 - . (01:35:121 (7,8,1) - ) im following drums tho..
  3. 00:32:798 (10) - I suggest putting this at (440,312). Mostly because of aesthetics (and a bit of emphasis on 00:32:970 (1) - ). Also doing so may lessen the probability of a player to be surprised with the sudden SV drop, due to the low DS. made better aesthetics, but differently
  4. 00:48:563 (3,4) - Parallel? no, parallel is too basic
  5. 01:29:806 (1,2) - How this entire part is mapped is similar to the first one. And in terms of "structure", 01:29:806 (1) - seems to be the only one different... I think. Reference being 00:24:227 (1,2) - .oh, this is pretty odd observation, i think their similarity is not critical at all
  6. 02:46:184 (7) - NC this one to make the change in the part more apparent. Maybe this one too, 02:49:270 (8) - .i think it would really confusing in terms of readability
  7. 02:53:556 (2,2) - Actual vocals hit in these two objects. I think these should serve as the turning points in the stream instead. i made turning points for drum sounds tho


[Insane]
  1. 00:19:941 (1,2,3) - These three could use a bit more space imo. i think they are ok atm
  2. 00:29:541 (5,1) - 01:35:121 (5,1) - The same thing as the one I said in the previous difficulty. same response
    this helped with hitsounds tho :)
  3. 00:43:817 (1) - Put this one a bit more to the right for it to be seen more. im pretty sure its readable ingame..
  4. 01:29:806 (1,2) - Really minor thing. A blanket seems nice for aesthetics. i follow another idea there
    Can't see any glaring issues in this difficulty.


[Hard]
  1. 00:20:284 (2,3) - I feel like these two work better as a stack than 00:20:456 (3,4) - . Reasoning here being kinda the same as my connected-sounds thingy from the first difficulty. but druuums dude

Nothing much here (=w=;
That's all. Hope it helped ;w; Thank you!

Good luck! You too~
Crimmi

M4M



General (Metadata, Timing, etc.)


_________________________________________________________



  1. Why are the kiai in "Insane" and "Still Alive" separatedand the ones in "Normal" & "Hard" aren't?

Normal



  1. 00:27:484 (1) - Why not place this 1/2 back like you did with 00:24:570 (1)?
  2. 00:41:105 (1) - CTRL+G this slider, it'll play better flipped.
  3. 01:25:521 (2,3) - Suggestion.
  4. 02:22:184 (x) - Perhaps a note can be added here?

Hard



  1. 00:53:308 (1) - Remove NC.
  2. 00:56:378 (4) - Align this with 00:55:864 (2).
  3. 01:01:864 (4) - Same as above.
  4. 01:25:178 (4,5,1) - Suggestion

Insane



  1. 00:16:513 (1) - Maybe move this to x:408 y:120.
  2. 00:32:970 (1) - This hit sound here is a bit loud, jarring and distracting than the other drum hitsounds you've used.
  3. 00:43:312 (1) - This slider is kind of obscuring the slider maybe this would solve it?
  4. 03:24:590 (4) - Slightly obscured by a slidertail.

The map just needs a rechecking of patterns and hitsounds, especially on the Insane difficulty, sorry for the wait.

Topic Starter
Hectic

Crimmi wrote:

M4M



General (Metadata, Timing, etc.)


_________________________________________________________



  1. Why are the kiai in "Insane" and "Still Alive" separatedand the ones in "Normal" & "Hard" aren't? i thought too many visual effects would confuse beginners

Normal



  1. 00:27:484 (1) - Why not place this 1/2 back like you did with 00:24:570 (1)? i think it represents music better as it is now
  2. 00:41:105 (1) - CTRL+G this slider, it'll play better flipped. i think it doesn't make much difference, some patterns would be ruined tho
  3. 01:25:521 (2,3) - Suggestion. was suggested before, applied now
  4. 02:22:184 (x) - Perhaps a note can be added here? i don't think its needed

Hard



  1. 00:53:308 (1) - Remove NC. reworked nc for this section, should be better now
  2. 00:56:378 (4) - Align this with 00:55:864 (2). yup
  3. 01:01:864 (4) - Same as above. did something better
  4. 01:25:178 (4,5,1) - Suggestion i think it works quite well atm

Insane



  1. 00:16:513 (1) - Maybe move this to x:408 y:120. um, does it really matters?
  2. 00:32:970 (1) - This hit sound here is a bit loud, jarring and distracting than the other drum hitsounds you've used. i guess ill have to make it quieter..
  3. 00:43:312 (1) - This slider is kind of obscuring the slider maybe this would solve it? i still think its easily readable
  4. 03:24:590 (4) - Slightly obscured by a slidertail. yeah, i use this kind of overlap quite a lot

The map just needs a rechecking of patterns and hitsounds, especially on the Insane difficulty, sorry for the wait. you are right, found a few issues with hitsounds. Thanks for modding!

show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply