squirrelpascals wrote:

hi there

tales

• 00:36:028 - seems bad to skip over this note, its pretty strong and you had rhythms on it previously Yea, someone had already said the exact thing about this patter, so Fixed!

• 00:50:995 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - would recommend starting this with more spacing to indicate 1/3 here, it looks too similar to the stack on 00:49:195 (6,7,8) - I didn't like this pattern tbh, so now it's changed to 2 1/3 sliders

• 01:05:937 (8) - move nc here, downbeat is here and holds more weight Ok, Fixed!

• 02:14:614 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this stream shape looks pretty lopsided Eh uhh.... it looks pretty fine to me, but if you show something better I would change it ofc

• 02:58:264 (1) - same as the first mod about skipping over this guitar beat These are different situations + this way I feel like I'm emphasizing 02:58:639 (2,3,4) - much more than by your way

• 03:03:389 - would like this to be clickable, since it seems to be the stronger part of this slider because of the extra flute note. plus it feels weird in general to skip over after you map to it here 03:03:514 (2,3) - Ok, changed to a 2 circles instead of a slider, it should be not so hard to hit I think

• 03:06:514 (6) - would like an nc here because its an obvious downbeat, but i see the symmetry youre going for. 03:06:139 (5) - would work too for this if you dont want to ruin symmetry because you start covering lower notes here Fixed by NCing (5)

• 03:14:614 (5) - nc to indicate 1/4 -> 1/3 change

• 03:18:214 (7) - same, nc for downbeat Sure!

• 03:18:814 (3) - this seems to be better represented by a slider because its the highest pitched of the ascending tone at 03:18:214 (7,1,2,3) - ,so the note has a stronger impact . this is more of a suggestion than anything though I just wanna emphasize these triples, so yea

• 03:25:564 (7,8) - this whole thing 03:25:114 (5,6,7,8,1) - would feel better flow-wise if these two were swapped You are second who tells me this, Fixed!

• 03:37:414 (1,2) - looks like a bigger gap, can you space these to be closer? Fixed!

• 03:49:260 (1,2,3) - because of your different use of beat snaps here, time distance equality will make this part much more readable Ok,
I think it's good now

• 04:03:983 (4) - nc here, or better indicate the change to 1/3. same for 04:06:983 (4) - Sure, tho applied this on first KIAI too

• 04:18:683 (7,8) - smpother gameplay if these two were swapped, would give really good circular flow from 04:18:533 (6,7,8,1,2,3) - Ok,
I agree

• 04:20:933 (5,1,2,3,4) - can you make these two look more structured together? the slider direction looks random lmao Hmmm it's just a perfect triangle consists of 3 sliders, I do have this pattern in 1st KIAI as well tho
https://puu.sh/xDHOj/88a6842fc8.png
https://puu.sh/xDHPC/644dc5e5d9.png

• 04:50:543 - hitsounding feels really loud in this part, can you lower it all by like 2- (sorry ) UHHHH Ok, I lowered them all by -15, I really think this should be enough

• 05:04:761 (1,2,3) - why these different snappings here? all these notes really sound the same Fixed!

• 05:05:715 (1,2,3,4) - this part is pretty deceiving because of the all similar spacing with different timeline gaps, would suggest adding time distance equality. Also, 05:06:029 (2) - geels like it should be extended to the blue tick, it doesn't feel any different from this note at 05:05:715 (1) - Changed!

Good quality, call me back

squirrelpascals wrote:

00:51:595 (1) - snap this so i can bubble

1. 00:16:845 - and 00:16:995 - the 40% volume changes at the intro are really hard to hear in contrast with the 80%. do you think it's possible to make the volume change less extreme, maybe to something like 60%?
2. 04:52:310 (1,2,3,4) - honestly i think this pattern would be more appropriate as a plus shape instead of the curved slider + triangle shape; since the piano is going down an arpeggio using the same slider shape for each piano note fits more nicely imo
3. 05:01:183 (1) - finish here is too loud since there's not really a cymbal crash here; a whistle on its own is perfectly fine
4. 05:23:773 (2,1) - the double here feels kind of extreme; it basically plays as a 1/12 double which is already kind of insane, and this late into the song i don't really recommend blindsiding players with something like that lol. consider deleting the (2)?

Monstrata wrote:

Congrats!

TheMefisto wrote:

Поздравляю~

Sieg wrote:

крутая карта

DendyMudak wrote:

грац

Yuii- wrote:

Interesting map, hope to see more stuff like this from you in a near future