forum

Sunstroke Project - Hey Mamma (Radio Edit)

posted
Total Posts
2
Topic Starter
ShirollNecough
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 6:36:58 PM

Artist: Sunstroke Project
Title: Hey Mamma (Radio Edit)
Tags: epic sax guy, ultra sax guy, huh?
BPM: 110
Filesize: 4321kb
Play Time: 02:59
Difficulties Available:
  1. sax guy is back! (4.81 stars, 608 notes)
Download: Sunstroke Project - Hey Mamma (Radio Edit)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
welcome back our legend!
Madolva real winner!
Pushkin
You wanted a mod? Take it
[sax guy is back!]
First, I think AR should be higher, smth like 9.5, 'coz in other way that'll be unreadable. And (this is advice) CS should be smaller, e.g. 3.5-3.7.
Second, strange jumping from 00:21:818 (1,2,3) till the end.
Well, did u hear 'bout the variety of spacing? This 00:16:227 (7,8,9,10) probably can be read and correctly clicked, but that'll take over 3 tries - it isn't cool, you know. As for me, I could swap 8th and 9th objects or simply snap 8th to 9th, just as 00:11:863 (7,8,9,10) this.
Next, this 00:21:818 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - what is this? I got ur point that u wanna go like samba, but others probably wouldn't get it. So, if u wanna follow this rhythm, pls enlarge spacing in here 00:21:818 (1,2) or reduce here 00:22:090 (2,3) and here 00:22:500 (4,5,6,7).
00:24:000 (1) - why so slow?
00:25:636 (6) - same
also, 00:24:954 (3,4) - here it'll be better to snap.
00:31:636 (6,7,8) - why here's this SUDDEN (omg) space enlargement? Music isn't supposed for it as far as I can hear in this moment.
00:32:727 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - another spacing problem. Man, wtf, it's not fair
00:39:272 (6) - new combo
00:40:363 (2,3) - slider is better, trust me
00:40:636 (4,5) - same
00:41:318 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ???
00:42:409 (1,2) - better do 1 for note and 2 for 1/2 slider
00:43:090 (3,4,5) - 3 for slider, 4 for emphasised note
00:43:636 (1,2) - change to 1/4 slider
00:44:181 (5) - change to 1/4 slider, if this moment follows sax
00:44:590 (1,2,3) - why? change to note-slider pattern
00:46:363 (6) - same as for 00:44:181 (5)
00:47:454 (3) - 1/4 reverse: listen to music, bro!
00:48:000 (1,2,3,4,5) - *sigh* note-slider-note-slider
00:48:954 (6,7,8) - ^
00:50:045 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ^
00:51:136 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - spacing
00:52:909 (5) - slider
00:54:409 (1) - note-slider again. single pattern if you want, but NEVER start a slider on blue tick.
00:55:500 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - spacing again
and so on when it comes to note set - improve your spacing to more readable
Specific:
00:58:909 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - what's this? Samba moves? Man, it doesn't look good even if you think different. do some curve sliders and again, don't forget about spacing related to rhythm
01:06:136 (2) - 2 notes instead of 1 slider should be better
01:09:818 (1) - wha-what's this with all of a sudden? not so sharp but more smoothly on corners
01:15:545 (4,5) - sorry, but WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?! move 5 to another place - it's impossible to do this in such a rhythm! at least to this slider's 01:16:363 (1) head!
01:20:181 (7) - what's with this slider? straighten it out pls, it looks like it's downtrodden
*2x sigh*
Well, other part of map contains the same mistake set. The main your problem is spacing - that's in conclusion of my revision
Improve yourself and don't forget: never try to shift dance moves to mapping - it does look very terrible, trust me
Please sign in to reply.

New reply