forum

cosMo@BousouP - Aurora Requiem

posted
Total Posts
14
Topic Starter
Meftly
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on mardi 30 mai 2017 at 00:22:51

Artist: cosMo@BousouP
Title: Aurora Requiem
Tags: Diverse System C.H.S with Lick Dom Records AD:PIANO IV Monochrome 1/3
BPM: 195
Filesize: 10628kb
Play Time: 04:41
Difficulties Available:
  1. Aurorae (5,49 stars, 1111 notes)
Download: cosMo@BousouP - Aurora Requiem
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
reminds me a lot Broccoly's Oceanus so i've mapped it to enjoy the music!

hardly playable... ;w; at least let's enjoy this beautiful piano

i tried-
Realazy
with Lick Dom
18:15 *Realazy is playing [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1299926 cosMo@BousouP - Aurora Requiem [Aurorae]]
18:16 Meftly: o
18:16 Meftly: notlikethis
18:17 Realazy: allo
18:17 Realazy: les streams jumps sont grave durs :(
18:17 Meftly: me frappe pas plox XD
18:18 Meftly: cette part là
18:18 Meftly: j'ai screen cette part sur le serv de linada
18:18 Meftly: c'était dur à lire non?
18:18 Realazy: c'est pas que c'est dur à lire
18:18 Realazy: mais faut différencier les streamjumps avec des sliders
18:18 Realazy: de ceux avec des cercles
18:18 Realazy: ça se joue vraiment pas de la même façon
18:19 Meftly: a
18:19 Meftly: rip :'(
18:19 Realazy: 01:36:273 (4,5,1,2,3) -
18:19 Realazy: ça
18:19 Realazy: c'est ok parce que ça part d'un slider
18:19 Realazy: donc t'as la leniency et t'as pas à click
18:19 Realazy: mais faut pas faire le même avec des cercles sinon ça fait une grosse diff spike
18:20 Realazy: sinon t'ignores pas mal de 1/6 qui auraient pu être map avec des buzz sliders imo
18:20 Meftly: i see
18:20 Meftly: ah
18:21 Realazy: 02:12:581 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - relativement dur à jouer
18:21 Realazy: ptetre ctrl+g 4 et 6?
18:22 Meftly: uii
18:22 Realazy: 02:18:735 (1,2) - spacing équivalent à 02:19:248 (3,1) - qui est en 1/3
18:23 Realazy: 02:19:350 (1,2) - plus petit encore a
18:23 Meftly: me tue paas aa j'ai gaffé cette part xD
18:23 Realazy: a
18:23 Realazy: j'explique juste tho
18:23 Meftly: en fait j'ai gaffé tte la map xD
18:23 Realazy: c'est pour ça que ta map est dure à read par endroits
18:23 Realazy: plz
18:24 Meftly: ui
18:25 Realazy: 03:12:889 (1,2,3) - imo c'est des 2/3
18:26 Meftly: ouais mais jvoulais rendre ça + jouable
18:26 Meftly: sinon ui j'ai mis le premier kiai en 2/3 pour test
18:26 Realazy: imo ça fit mieux
18:26 Realazy: et ça reste plus jouable que des 1/2
18:26 Meftly: mais on slider break bcp quand c'est en 2/3
18:26 Realazy: parce que la majorité est 1/3
18:26 Realazy: a
18:26 Meftly: tes sur? ;w;
18:26 Realazy: bah imo oui mais bon
18:26 Realazy: fin j'ai pas break sur les 2/3 je crois
18:27 Realazy: 01:44:684 (2,3,1) - 1/4 w
18:28 Meftly: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
18:28 Meftly: notlikethis
18:28 Meftly: fixed
18:31 Realazy: a j'suis ultra fatigué
18:32 Meftly: va siester :thinking:
18:32 Realazy: 02:54:889 (4) -
18:32 Realazy: 1/3zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
18:32 Realazy: jpeux pas
18:32 Realazy: jpeux pas aller dans ma chambre ma mère repeint les marches de l'escalier
18:32 Realazy: et jsuis sorti de mon lit y'a 2h
18:33 Meftly: AH
18:33 Meftly: oups ct 1/3 ui ;w;
18:34 Realazy: 03:07:350 (4) - https://puu.sh/vX5Ww/ba90db0bc2.png
18:34 Realazy: joli poisson btw
18:34 Meftly: X
18:34 Meftly: D
18:35 Realazy: 03:14:119 (1,2,3) - https://puu.sh/vX60S/7a440c9862.png
18:36 Meftly: mince
18:36 Meftly: XD
18:36 Realazy: 03:35:658 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - c'est du 1/44444444444444444444444444
18:36 Meftly: aaaaaaaaaa
18:36 Meftly: chut fo pas dir
18:36 Realazy: 03:40:171 (6,1) - diffspike chan
18:36 Meftly: :'(
18:36 Meftly: c trop compliqué
18:36 Meftly: ptnn
18:37 Meftly: ça va il est facilement atteingnable lui :eyes:
18:37 Realazy: 03:41:504 (2,3) - ça marche là mais 1/4 ça sonne mieux
18:37 Realazy: et puis le spacing de tes streams est souvent irrégulier
18:38 Meftly: woa bien vu pr le 1/4 c bo
18:38 Meftly: ah rip pr les streams
18:38 Realazy: alors là
18:38 Realazy: 04:13:812 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - XD
18:38 Realazy: désolé mais
18:38 Realazy: XD
18:39 Meftly: :'(
18:39 Realazy: stp
18:39 Realazy: delete moi ça
18:39 Realazy: et fais ctrl+shift+d
18:39 Realazy: merci <3
18:39 Meftly: nn :'(
18:39 Realazy: tu veux pas une vraie étoile? ?? ? ??
18:39 Meftly: jv ruin
18:39 Meftly: X
18:39 Meftly: D
18:40 Meftly: elle est pas bien cette etoile ? :'(
18:42 Realazy: :you_tried:
18:42 Realazy: non mais vraiment
18:42 Realazy: fais ctrl+shift+d
18:42 Meftly: ui jessaye mais c dur wtf
18:44 Meftly: c bon? :'( https://puu.sh/vX6s5/61bf3569b6.jpg
18:52 Meftly: ah btw tu peux post si tu veux
18:52 Meftly: frre kudo
18:52 Realazy: ah j'avais pas vu sry
18:52 Realazy: oui c'est ok
Penguiness
Not sure what I'm doing, but I think this might be helpful(?).

Aurorae
00:39:653 (3) - I think there should be a NC here.
00:39:961 (5) - ^
01:10:730 (1) - Remove this NC.
03:14:320 (2,3) - Try to make this blanket better.
04:01:191 (3,4) - ^
04:22:730 (5,3) - ^
04:38:935 (1) - I don't think there needs to be a NC here since there isn't a strong sound.

Pretty good map! Good luck on getting it ranked(if you're planning to get it ranked)!
Topic Starter
Meftly

Penguiness wrote:

Not sure what I'm doing, but I think this might be helpful(?).

Aurorae
00:39:653 (3) - I think there should be a NC here. tru
00:39:961 (5) - ^ yes
01:10:730 (1) - Remove this NC. brb kms
03:14:320 (2,3) - Try to make this blanket better. I hope it's better
04:01:191 (3,4) - ^ must be good now
04:22:730 (5,3) - ^ tried my best but not sure about this one
04:38:935 (1) - I don't think there needs to be a NC here since there isn't a strong sound. u're right

Pretty good map! Good luck on getting it ranked(if you're planning to get it ranked)!
Thanks for the mod! god dammit i'm shit at blankets :?
I don't rly know, i guess it's going for graveyard, this map has many inconsistencies that i can't help D: i'll try my best to make this map as good as it can be tho!
Silicon-Based
Quick mod:

00:32:577 (1,2,3) - that looks bland to me, maybe change into two sliders of different velocities
00:32:577 (1,2,3) - those jumps are way too difficult, especially since they are very early in the song
00:50:115 (1,2,3) - I don't like the flow here
00:53:499 (1,2) - change the direction of the circular slider, it disrupts the flow
00:55:961 (2) - I'd move that one slightly to the left to improve the flow
00:59:961 (1) - maybe emphasize like in 02:31:038 (1)
01:12:576 (2,3) - The spacing is a little too short, also the 1/4 slider distorts the flow sligthly.
01:29:499 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - This part is really hard, mostly because it's difficult to read due the clutter with the sliders
01:31:858 (4,1) - I know you want to emphasize this beat, but the spacing is just too damn high.
02:10:115 (1,2,3,4) - The song is relatively quiet, I would space those sliders close together.
02:19:653 (4,5,1,2,1,2) - No.
02:21:089 (6,1) - Spacing too large.
02:21:499 (2,3) - compare to 02:19:653 (4,5)
02:35:345 (1,2,3,1) - likewise, quite bland. Change it if you come up with something more creative.
03:07:961 (5) - I think it would look better if the whole slider would only have curved segments. And I don't like the fact that it goes through itself near the end. At least make it more visible, e.g. by creating a hole.
03:14:320 (2,3) - You're missing the beats on the white ticks.
03:21:807 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - Nice attempt at emphasizing the song through spacing.
03:31:961 (1,1,1) - Confusing to read.
03:32:371 (1,1) - A little too large of a spacing imo (can be justified though).
03:32:576 (1,1) - ^
03:34:217 (1,1) - Avoid needing to reverse your cursor by 180deg.
03:35:653 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - The middle circle is hard to read.
03:36:268 (1,2,3,4) - Confusing spacing.
03:40:166 (3,1) - Why that large space? Make it shorter or remove altogether to make the stream consistent. But the best solution would probably be to make similar spaces between the notes within the whole stream, i.e. make a segmented stream with triplets.
03:41:499 (1,1,1) - A little hard to read.
03:51:653 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ugly, I'd like a curved one more. And I can't see the justification for the increasing spacing.
03:59:653 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Seems hard to hit, although I did hit these every time. You should probably reverse the sides of the singlets to improve the flow.
04:05:499 (2,3,1,2,1,1) - No.
04:14:217 (5,6,1) - It's hard to combo those, at least move the 6th note closer to the slider.

A map like this, with lots of sliders and low-bpm streams needs flawless flow. You need to improve it. You also need to work on the aesthetiques. The map looks quite dull with those obvious symmetries. Try and experiment with triangular symmetries, for instance.
Topic Starter
Meftly

Silicon-Based wrote:

Quick mod:

00:32:577 (1,2,3) - that looks bland to me, maybe change into two sliders of different velocities changed to a 1/8 slider like this one 03:12:576 (1) -
00:32:577 (1,2,3) - those jumps are way too difficult, especially since they are very early in the song i don't think it's difficult
00:50:115 (1,2,3) - I don't like the flow here did some fixes
00:53:499 (1,2) - change the direction of the circular slider, it disrupts the flow it fits well imo
00:55:961 (2) - I'd move that one slightly to the left to improve the flow done
00:59:961 (1) - maybe emphasize like in 02:31:038 (1) done
01:12:576 (2,3) - The spacing is a little too short, also the 1/4 slider distorts the flow sligthly. fixed
01:29:499 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2) - This part is really hard, mostly because it's difficult to read due the clutter with the sliders well i have no idea how to remap this, i know how difficult it is but i can't help. also it's not that messy imo, it has great structure c'mon D:
01:31:858 (4,1) - I know you want to emphasize this beat, but the spacing is just too damn high. well then, lowered the spacing a bit
02:10:115 (1,2,3,4) - The song is relatively quiet, I would space those sliders close together.sorry i'm emphasizing this through spacing,
i could follow you but it's rly subjective

02:19:653 (4,5,1,2,1,2) - No. Well, I like the pattern I did. I'm aware of the difficulty spike but it fits the song imo, also it's rly fun to play, even tho it's hard. In addition, I woulda prefered a suggestion instead of throwing me a "No." D:
02:21:089 (6,1) - Spacing too large. decreased spacing
02:21:499 (2,3) - compare to 02:19:653 (4,5) fixed consistency
02:35:345 (1,2,3,1) - likewise, quite bland. Change it if you come up with something more creative. ikr but i have no idea atm, gonna comeback on it later!
03:07:961 (5) - I think it would look better if the whole slider would only have curved segments. And I don't like the fact that it goes through itself near the end. At least make it more visible, e.g. by creating a hole. planned to rework this slider one day, actually lack of creativity
03:14:320 (2,3) - You're missing the beats on the white ticks.I'm following the piano and the white ticks don't sound rly loud
03:21:807 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - Nice attempt at emphasizing the song through spacing. well i hope it's fine, thanks
03:31:961 (1,1,1) - Confusing to read. seems fine to me
03:32:371 (1,1) - A little too large of a spacing imo (can be justified though). wanted to emphasize the big noise
03:32:576 (1,1) - ^ seems fine, justified by the intensity of the song
03:34:217 (1,1) - Avoid needing to reverse your cursor by 180deg. well i don't see any problem with this kind of flow, w/e applied some fixes
03:35:653 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - The middle circle is hard to read. lol seems fine to me
03:36:268 (1,2,3,4) - Confusing spacing. well.. i don't know what's wrong, I emphisized the small breaks with spacing, especially these two circle 03:36:730 (3,4) - it rly fits well with the intensity of the piano sound
03:40:166 (3,1) - Why that large space? Make it shorter or remove altogether to make the stream consistent. But the best solution would probably be to make similar spaces between the notes within the whole stream, i.e. make a segmented stream with triplets. fixed
03:41:499 (1,1,1) - A little hard to read. you don't like stacks, do you?
03:51:653 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ugly, I'd like a curved one more. And I can't see the justification for the increasing spacing. well it might be subjective aswell, but i can hear an increase of the intensity so yea i decided to make the pattern like that
03:59:653 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Seems hard to hit, although I did hit these every time. You should probably reverse the sides of the singlets to improve the flow. I like how it flows, well it can be improved but it's good how it is now
04:05:499 (2,3,1,2,1,1) - No. same as above
04:14:217 (5,6,1) - It's hard to combo those, at least move the 6th note closer to the slider. mhh it's gonna destroy the pattern, so i'll let how it is now

A map like this, with lots of sliders and low-bpm streams needs flawless flow. You need to improve it. You also need to work on the aesthetiques. The map looks quite dull with those obvious symmetries. Try and experiment with triangular symmetries, for instance.yep gonna think of it, thanks!
Thanks for the mod! was a bit rude, you should be smoother with modding, just giving a friendly advice! :P
It helped me a lot tho, so thanks
Silicon-Based
Woops, made one mistake:

00:38:115 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - those were the difficult jumps, not 00:32:577 (1,2,3).
Topic Starter
Meftly

Silicon-Based wrote:

Woops, made one mistake:

00:38:115 (2,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - those were the difficult jumps, not 00:32:577 (1,2,3). oh it does make sense now! I guess you can't call them jumps, i would rather call them density's difficulties or something like that // so yeah it triggered me since the beginning, so i changed the 1/3 burts into some sliders, hope it's fine now
Thanks again!
Petithoux
hey

[General]
  1. La source c'est pour la série, le jeu, etc... d'où la musique vient, pas l'album, alors enlève "AD:PIANO IV Monochrome" de la source et mets-le dans les tags (enlève "ad:piano" qui y est déjà pour éviter qu'il y soit 2 fois)

[Aurorae]
  1. 01:09:499 (4,5,1) - y a pas de son sur le 5, supprime-le et augmente le spacing entre le 4 et le 1 ? il était plutôt grand avant cet endroit et le son sur le 1 est plus aigu et ressort plus que les sons graves sur le 4 et le 3
  2. 03:00:371 (7,8) - overmap ? j'entends aucun son là mais j'en entends un ici 03:00:422 -
  3. 03:07:961 (5) - ça fait un peu bizarre que tu finisses ce slider avant la fin d'un son imo, finis-le ici 03:11:909 - ?
  4. 01:58:422 (4) - stack avec le slider tail de 01:57:191 (2) -

j'ai regardé vite fait donc j'ai pas trouvé beaucoup de trucs, j'espère que ça t'a un peu aidée :)
Topic Starter
Meftly

Petithoux wrote:

hey hello there

[General]
  1. La source c'est pour la série, le jeu, etc... d'où la musique vient, pas l'album, alors enlève "AD:PIANO IV Monochrome" de la source et mets-le dans les tags (enlève "ad:piano" qui y est déjà pour éviter qu'il y soit 2 fois) ok enlevé

[Aurorae]
  1. 01:09:499 (4,5,1) - y a pas de son sur le 5, supprime-le et augmente le spacing entre le 4 et le 1 ? il était plutôt grand avant cet endroit et le son sur le 1 est plus aigu et ressort plus que les sons graves sur le 4 et le 3 fixed
  2. 03:00:371 (7,8) - overmap ? j'entends aucun son là mais j'en entends un ici 03:00:422 - fixed
  3. 03:07:961 (5) - ça fait un peu bizarre que tu finisses ce slider avant la fin d'un son imo, finis-le ici 03:11:909 - ? mdr yep jvais le rework quand j'aurais le temps
  4. 01:58:422 (4) - stack avec le slider tail de 01:57:191 (2) - bien vu PogChamp

j'ai regardé vite fait donc j'ai pas trouvé beaucoup de trucs, j'espère que ça t'a un peu aidée :) que du bleu : ok_hand:

Merci pour ce mod! ça m'a bcp aidé :)
Genjuro
unfortunately this is unplayable
are you kidding me? This map not only flows really well but it's also extremely fun to play duo to spacing and 1/3 to 1/4 changes etc. congrats for making a good map
Topic Starter
Meftly

Genjuro wrote:

unfortunately this is unplayable
are you kidding me? This map not only flows really well but it's also extremely fun to play duo to spacing and 1/3 to 1/4 changes etc. congrats for making a good map
oh well I'm glad some people enjoy what I did \o/ sadly it's even hard to get an A on this, so i judged it unplayable :?
thanks a lot for showing me support!!! i really appreciate it! :)
den0saur
It is totally playable, i like it too!
Topic Starter
Meftly

den0saur wrote:

It is totally playable, i like it too!
wow thx!! i'm so glad to hear that! :oops:
BanchoBot
This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply