00:06:008 (2,3,4,5,1) - just a suggestion but i'd think replacing them with 1/2 sliders are better than single hit circles
00:08:508 (10,1,2,3,4) - ^
00:16:005 (2,3,4,5) - ^
00:18:192 (4,5,1,2,3) - ^
00:10:070 (5) - didnt notice this was a kick slider try to make it more visible
00:20:066 (5) - ^
00:12:881 (1,2,3) - silder 1 seems to not have a connection with 2&3
00:39:435 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - the stacking of this
01:42:228 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^
01:03:022 (1) - this doesnt look like a slower slider in the first try also the speed of the sliders change dramatically and you seem to only use this once try to make it a bit apparant that it's slower
01:04:428 (1,2,3) - using 1/8th again
01:05:678 (1,2,3) - ^
01:35:980 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) - try to make a smaller triangle first then increase in size as time goes by if you want to also try to reverse the rotation\
01:43:478 (2,3,4) - 3&4 is far away from 2 making it hard to double tap instantly
01:44:571 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - a bit confusing for me (opinionated) try to make into a combo
01:46:133 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^
01:54:568 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - ^
01:56:130 (1,1,1,1,1) - ^
that's about it but as i said in 00:06:008 (2,3,4,5,1) try to replace some of the hit circles with sliders instead youre wasting a bit of potential also some of the double taps after the silders are far from the actual slider making it a bit hard to quickly double tap. the 1's are a bit confusing too but that's jnust my opinion.
those 1/8 silders can just be replaced by hit circles
but it's your choice if you want to follow through
