b
Thanks a lot!!!Hobbes2 wrote:
02:05:479 (4,5,6) - I don't really like this overmap...it sounds noisy and the music is very calm. I dont see a reason for it. To contrast 02:07:469 (3) - is fine because I hear it in the piano so it doesn't feel out of place.
| There is a sound in the blue tick which I notice its a pitch change in the piano. Which is also similar to 02:07:308 (2,3,4) -
02:13:592 - kinda disappointing you didnt map this when its really audible
| I gave more emphasis to the vocal instead so I can give emphasis to the word ki-bun where the bold text is the syllable being emphasized
a lot of the triplets sound like they're actually 1/6 (04:42:215 (4,5,6), 04:35:480 (5,6) etc)
04:55:072 (7,8,1) - sounds like 1/5 lol
I guess with all of these varying snapping, simplifying everything to 1/4 isnt too bad.
| Yeah I did notice that too. I didn't use it for simplification reasons. The first half which used also 1/8 piano sounds is made passive instead. One time I ignored this rule is 03:16:033 (2) - just to give emphasis to introduce drums in the latter half.
rest is okay I guess.
Double check the timing I pointed out, most importantly. There are things I don't like about this map, such as the fact that different sections in the music feel like they're mapped the same way. But that's not too big of an issue and kinda subjective, so I suppose I'd be okay with bubbling this. There's a lot of overmapping in this map, but since it's used for rhythm simplification that's okay with me.
| All timing is in the first half is fixed and done with the help with MrSergio
Call me back