I get up. Bubbled

smallboat wrote:

I get up. Bubbled

Thx a lot dude

mod modmo dmo dmodmo dmomodmodmod om


normal

00:25:210 - adding something there is gonna be lit, fam
00:43:684 (3) - this isn't following the music objectively speaking. http://i.imgur.com/Q8qzGKJ.jpg makes more sense

hard

oh please nerf the od

00:06:578 - o hey everyone, look!!! sotarks is placing the most important beat of the section on the tail!!!
00:21:894 (7,8) - slider makes more sense if you want to emphasize 00:22:210 (1) - more (and trust me, you want to!)
00:26:947 (4,5) - don't stack them when it's about spacing and emphasis!!!

insane

00:05:473 (5,6) - i don't comprehend this jumpu
00:05:947 (7,8,9,10,11) - would look better if you would make an actual star pattern, thius looks ew
00:09:736 (2,3) - o
00:10:842 (1) - 00:15:894 (1) - nc remove (also applies for the jumps difficulty, it's like none of these ncs are on n/h but they appear on i/e? hi police?)
00:16:368 (2,3) - if you nerf this pattern you can achieve more emphasis towards 00:16:842 (3,1) - the real emphasis!!
00:26:947 (7) - tail is clickable on every difficulty but this one?
00:44:947 (9) - you nc'd this one on n/h due to your nc rule but not here

jumps

00:09:736 (2) - tail sounds awful, ctrl+g'ing 1,2 sounds better
00:13:842 (6,7,8,9,10) - truly makes a lot of sense to have this spacing when 00:11:315 (6,7,8,9) - is clearly louder, right? yes!! also fix 00:14:315 (9,10,1) - because 1 is clearly more emphasized than the rst
00:15:894 (1) - nc remove
00:16:368 (2,3) - read insane ee ee
00:22:526 - what is that sampelset doing right thereeeeeee
00:26:000 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - osu map. at least make it gradual instead of... this
00:28:210 (4) - just move it to the left do it doesn't look like ass with 00:28:526 (5) -
00:44:473 (6,7) - spacing seems fine if you are trying to emphasize 00:44:868 (8,9) - , but it truly doesn't make too much sense with 7
00:44:947 (9) - i'm triggered

Yuii- wrote:

mod modmo dmo dmodmo dmomodmodmod om
insane

00:05:473 (5,6) - i don't comprehend this jumpu it's fine jumpu
00:16:368 (2,3) - if you nerf this pattern you can achieve more emphasis towards 00:16:842 (3,1) - the real emphasis!! like the current emphasis

jumps

00:22:526 - what is that sampelset doing right thereeeeeee there's a kick
00:44:473 (6,7) - spacing seems fine if you are trying to emphasize 00:44:868 (8,9) - , but it truly doesn't make too much sense with 7 ah it make ssense for me xd

thx!

best tier 2 bn objectively speakign :ddddddddd

agree

oh the 90s

00:30:578 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - 00:35:631 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - what are you following?

your rhythms and hitsounds are not mapped to the song.

finishes at first half of kiai but not the other half despite the kiai being basically the same thing 3 times .-.

00:34:842 (1) -
00:37:368 (3) -
00:38:631 (8) -
00:39:894 (1) -

add finishez

done thx

nice bass emphasize k_hand:

Confirm hitsound added, reb it again.

00:31:684 (10) - 00:36:737 (10) - if you are following the bass, delete these. Or rather, don't delete them, but make 00:31:526 (9) - 00:36:579 (9) - sliders.

Then, call me back!

Yuii- wrote:

00:31:684 (10) - 00:36:737 (10) - if you are following the bass, delete these. Or rather, don't delete them, but make 00:31:526 (9) - 00:36:579 (9) - sliders.

Then, call me back!

I don't want, I want to keep consistency with the 2 jumps since it's the same vocal pattern.

.

Alright, we talked for a long while, found an agreement. The jumps will remain because his explanation made sense (after 50 hours of discussion lul).

Yuii- wrote:

.

Alright, we talked for a long while, found an agreement. The jumps will remain because his explanation made sense (after 50 hours of discussion lul).

Thanks buddy

00:32:789 (4) - ew

00:33:578 (1) - 00:41:157 (1) - whats up with these random nc in insane, it breaks your pattern

fun map tho