requested in pm
literally the only diff in the mapset w
00:04:116 (1,2) - kinda weird to not have the same kind of circular motion here as you had before in 00:02:934 (1,2,3) - i mean, the song is kinda the same but then in other pitch so perhaps using consistent flow patterns wouldnt be too bad
00:10:471 (2,1) - idk about the spacing inbetween these notes, given the timing gap that is present right now it makes it pretty awkward to read as the other 1/1 breaks have larger spacing or are stacked. this is currently spaced like 1/2 and can thus cause some small problems w
00:17:121 (1,2) - the inconsistent slidershapes ;w; why not make it equal to what you had before, i mean u could also easily blanket that
00:23:624 (4,5) - personally not a fan of this kind of flow, it creates for an unnatural snappy feeling and makes it harder to play for no reason. perhaps try something like
this for flow improvement and more emphasis to 00:24:215 (1) -
00:29:831 (4,2) - bad stack fix pls w its clearly offfff
00:34:560 (4) - perhaps ctrl+g? would catch the ongoing circular movement better
00:45:496 (1,2) - felt weird on first playthrough, theres no strong indicator for the blue tick change so it kinda reads like a 1/2 slider instead of a 3/4 slider. perhaps make the curve a bit different than the rest or increase sv orz to make the timing difference a bit more clear
00:50:594 (3) - is clearly overmap pls delete note =w= also triple after 3/4 slider plays awkwardly since it then plays like a 4tap which wouldnt fit the song at the moment as well
00:52:811 (2,3) - NCs pls for polarity cus rn you have different timing at the same spacing as 1/2 notes so that makes it hard w
00:59:683 (2) - why map the same piece of music with another rythm? you had 00:52:589 (1,2,3) - before so why the change to something that's way simpler? me no get ):
01:14:904 (1,3) - bldanket iz ofv here pls ifjijsdxklx kdpls
01:18:451 (1,2) - dis spacing man, why is so small? it is currently the same distance as the 1/4 gaps in the song so why do u do dis man, i mean whers the reason to break the movement like dis
01:29:239 - why do u skip this note? it has a clear instrument going on it ;w;
01:39:141 (1) - lol why this NC? it doesnt emphasise any timing or odd movement or anything strong in the song, so why keep it w (it doesnt help with reading either)
01:45:791 (1,2) - why not use the same slidershape ww
01:50:372 (1,2) - again spacing why so small here wwww
01:55:840 (3,4) - would say spacing could be higher since stronger vocals appear and could be emphasised more imo
02:03:377 (8,2) - fixstackthanks
02:05:890 (1,2,3,1) - same problem as mentioned beforew
02:14:756 (5) - nc pls music change
02:28:944 (1,1) - wheres the nc spam in this section for w it overpressures the section and its easier to read without the nc spam tbh
02:34:560 (1) - delet.this nc
02:38:993 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - why have this all in a different shape than all similar note sections like 02:36:629 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:41:358 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
02:48:156 (5) - at all similar situations u map slider here but u dont do that here for some reason, breaks the consistency of rythm used in the section. fix plswwww
02:55:545 - until 03:14:461 - i dont get your rythm usage here, it seems a bit too random to me. i dont hear most of the 1/4 u mapped back in any instruments (especially the guitar doesnt have them w) and when the drums roll 1/4 you map a slider instead of streams. perhaps a little explenation on the overmapping would be nice to have, because currently i have no idea what you're trying to do here
03:30:569 (6,1) - why this stack? it kills all movement given to the player and emphasis in the section
04:15:347 (9,1) - swap ncs since the big musical change is on 04:15:347 (9) -
04:26:579 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - silence-sliderend.png or perhaps change them to circles, you havent used this kind of emphasis anywhere else in the map
overall i have some trouble with the spacing and rythm usage as you seem to ignore a lot of the drums (i mean like u map streams where i dont hear them and when the drum plays stream u decide not to) so perhaps a little more explenation would be appreciated.
good luck!
