00:22:249 (60,61) - 00:42:530 (157,158) - 02:23:939 (297,298) - its better to use d ?
00:24:784 (69) - d>k
00:55:629 (31,32,33,34,35,36,37) - isn't dddkkkd better?
01:05:347 - kkd d dkk
01:23:094 (194) - k->d sound samesame
01:24:150 (201,202) - k d same as 01:25:840 -
01:28:376 (219) - d->k
01:30:488 (227,228,229,230,231) - kkkdk
01:32:178 (239,240,241,242,243) - kkddk
01:39:150 (11) - delete
01:43:481 (32) - delete
01:52:038 (101) - d>k
01:58:164 (140,141,142,143,144) - 02:01:545 (164,165,166,167,168) - kdkkd
02:07:249 - add k
02:07:671 - ddk
02:08:094 (200,201) - d k
02:20:664 - add d ?
02:25:840 (308) - d->k
02:30:277 (336,337,338,339,340) - kkddk
02:31:545 - kdddk kdk
02:32:812 - D k kkddk ddk
02:36:192 - this part ddk ddk
if you want to put finish you can put like (375,378) add finish *its rankable now
also 01:55:418 - 03:09:784 - 04:35:129 - 04:41:889 - part
but you can just put D k D k?
02:58:798 (13,14) - k d
03:04:080 - kkkd d kkkd ?_? (1/6 1/4)
03:06:404 (11) - d>k
03:11:474 (44) - k>d
03:12:319 (50) - k>d
03:13:164 (55) - d->k
03:38:094 - dddk k k ? DXXX
04:30:904 (6) - k>d
04:31:749 (12) - d>k
04:36:819 (45) - k>d
04:37:664 (51) - k>d
04:38:509 (57) - d>k
04:42:523 (82,83,84) - ddk
04:45:270 (100) - d>k
04:52:030 (144) - d>k