forum

YUC'e - Future Candy

posted
Total Posts
58
show more
Doormat
ok

[Normal]
  1. 01:10:479 - song intensity and map density starts to pick up when the heavy kicks come in, so you could add a circle here
  2. 01:45:479 (3) - could probably balance out the slider nodes to look more like 01:47:479 (3,4) -
  3. 02:45:479 - to 02:48:146 - no break here like the other difficulties?
  4. 03:07:312 (2,3) - based on your previous patterning, shouldn't this 1/2 spacing be 0.8x?
  5. 03:10:479 - could add another circle here due to song intensity ramping up
[Hard]
  1. 01:00:146 (4) - 01:05:479 (5) - 03:08:146 (4) - should probably NC these to keep your NC structure more consistent
  2. 01:13:646 (2,3,4,5,6) - a bit too dense with 1/4 rhythms imo; you could probably change 01:13:812 (4) - into a 1/2 slider to make it less demanding. also applies to 03:13:646 (2,3,4,5,6) -
  3. 01:18:146 (1,2) - might be worthwhile to make this into a single repeat slider like 01:17:479 (1) - , but this is probably fine. also applies to 03:18:146 (1,2) - and 04:01:479 (1,2) - if you decide to change it
  4. 02:30:701 (6) - 02:41:479 (5) - probably NC these, combos are starting to get unusually long
  5. 03:02:146 (4) - you should probably NC this since it's the start of a new vocal phrase
[Insane]
  1. 01:50:479 (5,1) - unusually large spacing after coming off of 01:49:812 (5,1) - could come off as unexpected and make hitting this stream a bit more uncomfortable than it needs to be. is it possible to make them closer to each other?
  2. 02:04:146 (5) - missing NC by any chance?
  3. 02:57:146 (3) - you could probably make this a double repeat, since there's still a sound on 02:57:396 -
[Sugar Rush]
  1. 02:01:896 - 02:47:562 - might want to fix manual break blue line thing
  2. 02:12:146 (1,4) - i'd consider using a lower SV for the 1/8s since it looks nearly identical to the 1/4 you used not even a second ago at 02:11:479 (4) -
  3. 02:27:812 (1,2,3) - part of me wants this to be equal spacing like 02:27:146 (1,2,3) - but i understand if it compromises gameplay too much. maybe you can move (1) to x206|y266
  4. 02:30:479 (1,2) - spacing here might be a bit too overkill considering that there's only 1/12 snap in between these two
get karen to bubble, i'll qualify
VINXIS
ctrl h plays 14627836587345t83x Beter
Topic Starter
Nathan

Doormat wrote:

ok

[Normal]
  1. 01:10:479 - song intensity and map density starts to pick up when the heavy kicks come in, so you could add a circle here
  2. 01:45:479 (3) - could probably balance out the slider nodes to look more like 01:47:479 (3,4) -
  3. 02:45:479 - to 02:48:146 - no break here like the other difficulties?
  4. 03:07:312 (2,3) - based on your previous patterning, shouldn't this 1/2 spacing be 0.8x?
  5. 03:10:479 - could add another circle here due to song intensity ramping up
[Hard]
  1. 01:00:146 (4) - 01:05:479 (5) - 03:08:146 (4) - should probably NC these to keep your NC structure more consistent
  2. 01:13:646 (2,3,4,5,6) - a bit too dense with 1/4 rhythms imo; you could probably change 01:13:812 (4) - into a 1/2 slider to make it less demanding. also applies to 03:13:646 (2,3,4,5,6) -
  3. 01:18:146 (1,2) - might be worthwhile to make this into a single repeat slider like 01:17:479 (1) - , but this is probably fine. also applies to 03:18:146 (1,2) - and 04:01:479 (1,2) - if you decide to change it yea I think this is a much more important buildup than the previous point so I'll keep these
  4. 02:30:701 (6) - 02:41:479 (5) - probably NC these, combos are starting to get unusually long
  5. 03:02:146 (4) - you should probably NC this since it's the start of a new vocal phrase
[Insane]
  1. 01:50:479 (5,1) - unusually large spacing after coming off of 01:49:812 (5,1) - could come off as unexpected and make hitting this stream a bit more uncomfortable than it needs to be. is it possible to make them closer to each other? it's clear enough from the previous two streams that it's a buildup, and it's just one simple motion since it's coming from a short repeat slider which players stay still on
  2. 02:04:146 (5) - missing NC by any chance?
  3. 02:57:146 (3) - you could probably make this a double repeat, since there's still a sound on 02:57:396 -
[Sugar Rush]
  1. 02:01:896 - 02:47:562 - might want to fix manual break blue line thing
  2. 02:12:146 (1,4) - i'd consider using a lower SV for the 1/8s since it looks nearly identical to the 1/4 you used not even a second ago at 02:11:479 (4) -
  3. 02:27:812 (1,2,3) - part of me wants this to be equal spacing like 02:27:146 (1,2,3) - but i understand if it compromises gameplay too much. maybe you can move (1) to x206|y266 too much spacing
  4. 02:30:479 (1,2) - spacing here might be a bit too overkill considering that there's only 1/12 snap in between these two
get karen to bubble, i'll qualify
thank
no reply = fixed

btw before anyone brings this up: it's wrong you can check the folder yourself
Karen
extend the length of soft-hitclap2, the current length is 47ms which is unrankable
fix that then i'll bubble
Topic Starter
Nathan
fixed
Karen
g
Doguu
c:
Doormat
dreamy
pishifat
as requested
Doormat
we forgot to fix artist name LOOOOOL
Topic Starter
Nathan
forgot to put in ゆーしえ as the actual artist somehow lol
Toy
godmode
pishifat
re-loved
akavat

pishifat wrote:

re-loved
is it happening? monkaS
Exote
sweet
neonat
For the record, ゆーしえ is not necessary, it's like how t+pazolite has unicode so that people can know how to say his name https://twitter.com/tpazolite
You don't see it used for the Future Cake http://miraicharecords.com/futurec%CE%B1ke
or Magical Mixer for examples
Kurai

neonat wrote:

For the record, ゆーしえ is not necessary, it's like how t+pazolite has unicode so that people can know how to say his name https://twitter.com/tpazolite
You don't see it used for the Future Cake http://miraicharecords.com/futurec%CE%B1ke
or Magical Mixer for examples
He's right.
Fix that and call me back so that I can requalify it asap
Topic Starter
Nathan
uhhh I don't think neonat meant that it was explicitly incorrect lol... like it's not absolutely needed but it's still acceptable

at least that's how pishi and I interpreted it, otherwise pishi would've insta dqed again right after neonat's post

if you're dqing based off of neonat's words I wanna see what he says first
Topic Starter
Nathan
alright neonat said to remove it so I did
Doormat
so you’re telling me we got metadata correct the first time?


。。。。


(☝︎ ՞ਊ ՞)☝︎

(for the record i believe that japanese or english name for the artist field is fine since the artist goes by either on her official website but whatever)
Kurai
Back!

Doormat wrote:

(for the record i believe that japanese or english name for the artist field is fine since the artist goes by either on her official website but whatever)
better keep consistency with other ranked maps
Topic Starter
Nathan
the 2 other ranked yuc'e maps do have the japanese name though, but w/e thanks
Monstrata
Artymis
naise, rank hype
MrSpuriz
where's the background image from? If it is from a anime I would appreciate it if anyone could tell me which one it is
Topic Starter
Nathan

MrSpuriz wrote:

where's the background image from? If it is from a anime I would appreciate it if anyone could tell me which one it is
http://seiga.nicovideo.jp/seiga/im4385379

oops im late
Please sign in to reply.

New reply