Changed the diffname
[Undine's Reveire]
[Both Difficulties]
Applied all HS
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6vgf1njbmnuognz/sakuzyo%20-%20Suiren%20%28Tidek%29%20%5B7K%20Fairy%20Dance%5D.osu?dl=0
[Undine's Reveire]
- one thing about the diff name, it isn't the prettiest change but since it's in the RC that GDs should clearly indicate who's mapping them (and Undine is a little vague) I suggest making it "_Undine's Reveire" to make it a little more clear
- 00:22:221 (22221|2) - I'd move this to 2 for PR since it's a lower pitch than 00:21:089 (21089|2) - I want to avoid 121 minitrills whenever possible, so it will stay on 3 for playability; also the stairs should be unbroken whenever possible
- 00:34:398 (34398|2) - I think this should be layered as a double for the chord, it'll still have less impact than 00:33:838 (33838|0,33838|6,33838|4) - or even 00:34:959 (34959|3,34959|1) - but it feels more accurate imo applied
- 01:12:093 - I think you could simultaniously represent the chords going down in pitch here and the single notes going up in pitch by doing something like https://puu.sh/CChjp/475325ef2e.jpg oki
- 01:24:718 (84718|3,84718|5) - related to the next suggestion even though it's at an earlier timestamp but just wanna check to see if this double is intentional, if it is (I'm guessing it's to represent the increased volume of the note) that's cool. yep it is
- 01:24:093 - same idea here, you could do something like: https://puu.sh/CChu0/ddefb99d54.jpg (though it might change slightly depending on whether the double in the previous section stays a double or not) I like the current pattern more
- 01:32:343 - this represents pitch a little better imo since both chords and single notes are going down in pitch idkthismightbeuncomfortablethoughidontmap7k: https://puu.sh/CChIz/3879bf8e97.jpg while it's a nice idea, I like my pattern more because it just looks more "full"
- 01:56:339 - you could add a note here if you want, there's a single soft note here in the music I'll stick to the main piano
- either 02:00:151 (120151|6,120151|2,120151|4) - should be a quad or 02:01:955 (121955|5,121955|0,121955|4,121955|2) - should be a triple imo for consistency used a triple for the latter
- 02:14:942 (134942|3) - I kinda think adding a note on 1 would be good for representing that lower pitched note that plays here hasn't heard it, added
- 03:11:785 (191785|0) - Should be deleted imo since you didn't add any notes for the low pitched notes at 03:12:439 (192439|3) - or 03:13:093 (193093|2) - (or those latter timestamps could be made doubles) these latter timestamps are significantly more silent, so I added the double to emphasize the big chord energy
- 03:59:485 - I'd suggest doing this for aesthetics and more importantly pitch ( 04:00:137 (240137|6,240354|6) - is lower than the previous trilled notes on 6 plus since both trills aren't dissonant...well except for the actual dissonant part at 04:00:137 (240137|5,240354|5) - I think it makes sense for them to be symmetrical: https://puu.sh/CCihO/4abe3f66e1.jpg oki
- 04:01:984 - I may be wrong due to lack of playing experience but this part seems rather brutal especially 04:02:527 (242527|2,242636|1,242636|2,242745|1,242745|0,242853|0) - , I think you could balance playability and comfort here especially since even though it's dissonant here the music is pretty light and flowy (though I still think it should be jacky). however the powerful dissonant shift at 04:03:071 - and the drastic pitch deserves to be more jacky and more challenging than the previous part in the music imo since it's so pronounced in the music and...I can't really come up with something that combines those myself like this is the best I've got: https://puu.sh/CCiwG/e27f33bd04.jpg so feel free to no change it lol, but if you have something better to describe this feeling I am totally down for that. made a nice pattern
- 04:17:739 (257739|6,257739|4,257739|3,257739|5) - since the lowest note of this chord is the same pitch as the lowest note of 04:16:810 (256810|1,256810|0,256810|2,256810|4) - I think that can be implemented while keeping PR in the other chords by moving 04:17:739 (257739|3) - to 1. Applies to 06:29:437 - as well moved the rightmost notes instead
- 04:31:969 (271969|1) - it's a soft chord but I still think it deserves a double by adding a note to 6 or 7 6
- 04:51:023 (291023|0) - I'd move this to 6 for PR I don't see an issue here
- 06:03:990 - and 06:04:080 - so the jacked notes on 7 are fine as is but to fully represent these chords I think you should add 2 more jacked notes on 2, and then add a note on 1 at 06:05:062 - and move 06:05:151 (365151|2) - to 1 to fully represent this chord (but maybe move 06:04:972 (364972|1) - to 3 if that proves uncomfortable?). ofc this applies to this part: 06:21:020 - done
- 06:18:069 (378069|3,378069|6,378069|4) - aaa this chord is so strong it deserves a quad imo especially since it's louder than the previous chord more notes jej
- 06:45:851 - definitely suggest adding a note here since the piano note is pretty noticable. ok
- 08:38:439 (518439|2,518439|5) - personally I think this should be a triple due to note amount in the chord and its volume agree
- 00:22:221 (22221|2) - I'd move this to 2 for PR since it's a lower pitch than 00:21:089 (21089|2) - I want to avoid 121 minitrills whenever possible, so it will stay on 3 for playability; also the stairs should be unbroken whenever possible
- 00:34:398 (34398|2) - I think this should be layered as a double for the chord, it'll still have less impact than 00:33:838 (33838|0,33838|6,33838|4) - or even 00:34:959 (34959|3,34959|1) - but it feels more accurate imo applied
- 01:12:093 - I think you could simultaniously represent the chords going down in pitch here and the single notes going up in pitch by doing something like https://puu.sh/CChjp/475325ef2e.jpg oki
- 01:24:718 (84718|3,84718|5) - related to the next suggestion even though it's at an earlier timestamp but just wanna check to see if this double is intentional, if it is (I'm guessing it's to represent the increased volume of the note) that's cool. yep it is
- 01:24:093 - same idea here, you could do something like: https://puu.sh/CChu0/ddefb99d54.jpg (though it might change slightly depending on whether the double in the previous section stays a double or not) I like the current pattern more
- 01:32:343 - this represents pitch a little better imo since both chords and single notes are going down in pitch idkthismightbeuncomfortablethoughidontmap7k: https://puu.sh/CChIz/3879bf8e97.jpg while it's a nice idea, I like my pattern more because it just looks more "full"
- 01:56:339 - you could add a note here if you want, there's a single soft note here in the music I'll stick to the main piano
- either 02:00:151 (120151|6,120151|2,120151|4) - should be a quad or 02:01:955 (121955|5,121955|0,121955|4,121955|2) - should be a triple imo for consistency used a triple for the latter
- 02:14:942 (134942|3) - I kinda think adding a note on 1 would be good for representing that lower pitched note that plays here hasn't heard it, added
- 03:11:785 (191785|0) - Should be deleted imo since you didn't add any notes for the low pitched notes at 03:12:439 (192439|3) - or 03:13:093 (193093|2) - (or those latter timestamps could be made doubles) these latter timestamps are significantly more silent, so I added the double to emphasize the big chord energy
- 03:59:485 - I'd suggest doing this for aesthetics and more importantly pitch ( 04:00:137 (240137|6,240354|6) - is lower than the previous trilled notes on 6 plus since both trills aren't dissonant...well except for the actual dissonant part at 04:00:137 (240137|5,240354|5) - I think it makes sense for them to be symmetrical: https://puu.sh/CCihO/4abe3f66e1.jpg oki
- 04:01:984 - I may be wrong due to lack of playing experience but this part seems rather brutal especially 04:02:527 (242527|2,242636|1,242636|2,242745|1,242745|0,242853|0) - , I think you could balance playability and comfort here especially since even though it's dissonant here the music is pretty light and flowy (though I still think it should be jacky). however the powerful dissonant shift at 04:03:071 - and the drastic pitch deserves to be more jacky and more challenging than the previous part in the music imo since it's so pronounced in the music and...I can't really come up with something that combines those myself like this is the best I've got: https://puu.sh/CCiwG/e27f33bd04.jpg so feel free to no change it lol, but if you have something better to describe this feeling I am totally down for that. made a nice pattern
- 04:17:739 (257739|6,257739|4,257739|3,257739|5) - since the lowest note of this chord is the same pitch as the lowest note of 04:16:810 (256810|1,256810|0,256810|2,256810|4) - I think that can be implemented while keeping PR in the other chords by moving 04:17:739 (257739|3) - to 1. Applies to 06:29:437 - as well moved the rightmost notes instead
- 04:31:969 (271969|1) - it's a soft chord but I still think it deserves a double by adding a note to 6 or 7 6
- 04:51:023 (291023|0) - I'd move this to 6 for PR I don't see an issue here
- 06:03:990 - and 06:04:080 - so the jacked notes on 7 are fine as is but to fully represent these chords I think you should add 2 more jacked notes on 2, and then add a note on 1 at 06:05:062 - and move 06:05:151 (365151|2) - to 1 to fully represent this chord (but maybe move 06:04:972 (364972|1) - to 3 if that proves uncomfortable?). ofc this applies to this part: 06:21:020 - done
- 06:18:069 (378069|3,378069|6,378069|4) - aaa this chord is so strong it deserves a quad imo especially since it's louder than the previous chord more notes jej
- 06:45:851 - definitely suggest adding a note here since the piano note is pretty noticable. ok
- 08:38:439 (518439|2,518439|5) - personally I think this should be a triple due to note amount in the chord and its volume agree
[Both Difficulties]
Only snapping and ghost note stuff here any note additions will be placed in individual diffs. I'll need to check for more rankability related stuff once the timing is fixed though
- 00:25:954 - the note here should be placed on the 1/12 interval at 00:25:942 -
- 00:32:691 - hmm, I'm fairly sure a note doesn't play at this spot, I only hear the chord at 00:32:727 - . Same situation with 00:34:924 -. first one is probably around 1/32 snap that is 1/16 because it can't be 1/32 in osu LOL
and the second one is actually here, very minor sound though
- 01:34:780 - 'tis a ghost note, can't hear any sounds here only the 1/8 grace (will be 1/16 grace in the new timing) at 01:34:811 - yeah...
- Prefacing this by saying that I think it's a really good concept and I'm only saying this because I have to for the sake of rankability but in both this section: 02:39:242 - and this section: 02:39:242 - the grace notes on blue lines are unfortunately not present in the music and should be deleted. Sorry about this, I know that it's lame. fixed
- 00:25:954 - the note here should be placed on the 1/12 interval at 00:25:942 -
- 00:32:691 - hmm, I'm fairly sure a note doesn't play at this spot, I only hear the chord at 00:32:727 - . Same situation with 00:34:924 -. first one is probably around 1/32 snap that is 1/16 because it can't be 1/32 in osu LOL
and the second one is actually here, very minor sound though
- 01:34:780 - 'tis a ghost note, can't hear any sounds here only the 1/8 grace (will be 1/16 grace in the new timing) at 01:34:811 - yeah...
- Prefacing this by saying that I think it's a really good concept and I'm only saying this because I have to for the sake of rankability but in both this section: 02:39:242 - and this section: 02:39:242 - the grace notes on blue lines are unfortunately not present in the music and should be deleted. Sorry about this, I know that it's lame. fixed
Applied all HS
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6vgf1njbmnuognz/sakuzyo%20-%20Suiren%20%28Tidek%29%20%5B7K%20Fairy%20Dance%5D.osu?dl=0