Including PR as requested!
Most of these suggestions have playability in mind as well so probably no issues with playability for any of my suggestions.
There are a few SV suggestions included. It is highly recommended that you remove the original SVs of the indicated sections if you are to apply them to avoid the stacking of SVs.
00:01:772 - I recommend moving one of the notes, preferably the one at 2, to 3 to as the pitch of the plucked string is higher than 00:01:601 - .
00:02:287 - & 00:02:458 - I recommend moving the notes to 2 and 3 respectively to represent the change in pitch from lower to higher.
00:02:630 - ~ 00:02:887 - I recommend swapping the columns of these notes to 4-2-4-2 to better represent the high-low-high-low pitch of the plucked strings.
00:03:144 - I recommend moving the note here to column 2 to represent the upward moving pitch.
00:03:315 (3315|2,3401|1,3487|3,3572|2) - The position of these notes kind of stand out as previously you used trills to represent the same sequence of sounds. PR wise, it will also be better to make a trill here (preferably 4-2-4-2 or 3-2-3-2 considering playability) similar to the previous patterns.
00:05:201 (5201|0) - Moving this to column 2 might better represent the pitch.
00:11:887 - Putting the doubles like this might represent the pitch better, though the double after the triple at the top of the screenshot may need to be moved to reduce the anchor at column 2.
00:21:487 - ~ 00:22:172 - Are you sure about having the SVs 1.5x and 0.67x? The net change in SV is over 1x (around 1.08) which means that it's overall a speedup. Though somewhat minor, it may cause slight reading issues who weren't anticipating these SVs. I recommend either changing the 0.67x to 0.5x or the 1.5x to 1.33x to make it balance out.
00:22:087 - & 00:22:172 - On a note both of these SVs are are 1.0x, which kind of makes the latter somewhat redundant if you intend on keeping the former. One the other hand, to make the SVs of this section 1x overall (or 1.08ish overall in case you decided to reject the previous point), the SV at 00:22:087 - should be the same as the other SVs at 00:21:915 - 00:21:744 - 00:21:572 - .
00:22:172 - ~ 00:23:201 - In addition, it might be nice to add SVs on this section as well since you decided to put SVs right behind it as well. Recommendation below
00:22:172 - 2x here
00:22:258 - 0.5x here
00:22:430 - 2x here
00:22:515 - 0.5x here
00:22:687 - 1.5x here
00:22:772 - 0.5x here
00:22:858 - 1.7x here
00:23:030 - 0.3x here
00:23:201 - 1x here
00:55:258 - I think it should be a single note here, as I can only hear a hihat and vocals here. And from what I can see, you have placed a single note for hihats and nothing for vocals in this section.
00:55:601 - Same as above.
01:04:687 - ~ 01:05:715 - Again, the SVs here make a small speedup. If you do not wish to have a speedup here, it is recommended that you put 0.5x instead or 0.67x or 1.33x instead of 1.5x.
01:05:715 - ~ 01:07:087 - Also, if you wish to add SVs here (and which I recommend), my suggestion is the following.
01:05:715 - 1.5x here
01:05:801 - 0.5x here
01:05:887 - 1x here
01:06:058 - 1.5x here
01:06:144 - 0.5x here
01:06:230 - 1x here
01:06:744 - 1.5x here
01:06:915 - 0.5x here
01:07:087 - 1x here
Alternatively, if you are okay with having 1/8 SVs, which kinda makes the notes to look as if they're vibrating
01:05:715 - 1.5x here
01:05:801 - 0.5x here
01:05:887 - 1.3x here
01:05:930 - 0.7x here
01:05:972 - 1.3x here
01:06:015 - 0.7x here
01:06:058 - 1.5x here
01:06:144 - 0.5x here
01:06:230 - 1.3x here
01:06:272 - 0.7x here
01:06:315 - 1.3x here
01:06:358 - 0.7x here
01:06:401 - 1.5x here
01:06:444 - 0.5x here
01:06:487 - 1.5x here
01:06:530 - 0.5x here
01:06:572 - 1.5x here
01:06:615 - 0.5x here
01:06:658 - 1.5x here
01:06:701 - 0.5x here
01:06:744 - 1.7x here
01:06:915 - 0.3x here
01:07:087 - 1x here
01:16:687 (76687|2,76772|2,76858|3) - I personally feel that it is more comfortable to hit these notes if they have their columns swapped.
01:50:115 - & 01:50:458 - Similar to some doubles I pointed out earlier in the map, I do not think these two notes should be doubles as I can only hear hihats and vocals here (no kick.)
01:59:544 - ~ 02:00:572 - Speedup SV again. In fact it's exactly the same as the previous one. As I repeat, it is recommended that you put 0.5x instead or 0.67x or 1.33x instead of 1.5x.
02:00:572 - ~ 02:01:601 - If you had followed my SV recommendations for the previous part, it is recommended that you apply it here as well, but with a 02:01:601 - 1x here and nothing at 02:01:772 -
03:23:887 - ~ 03:24:572 - On the other hand, the SVs here create a small slowdown here (as well as including quite a few redundant SVs.) The overall SV of this section is 0.95x, which isn't big but it may catch unanticipating players off-guard. Additionally, the very minor change from 0.8x to 0.6x is somewhat redundant, as there are barely any noticeable difference between using 2 slow SVs like that and simply using one. I recommend simply alternating between 1.5x and 0.5x for each 1/4 from 03:23:887 - to 03:24:487 - .
03:24:572 - ~ 03:25:601 - For the first part of this, the SVs add up fine but it creates a pretty big slowdown which will most certainly catch most unanticipating players. I recommend putting an appropriate SV somewhere within 03:25:258 - ~ 03:25:601 - . Or alternatively, you can follow my recommendation below.
03:24:572 - 2x here
03:24:658 - 0.5x here
03:24:830 - 2x here
03:24:915 - 0.5x here
03:25:087 - 1.5x here
03:25:172 - 0.5x here
03:25:258 - 1.1x here
03:25:515 - 0.7x here
03:25:601 - 1x here
03:25:601 - ~ 03:26:972 - I also recommend adding SVs here to match the SVs before it. Suggestion below.
03:25:944 - 2x here
03:26:030 - 0.5x here
03:26:201 - 2x here
03:26:287 - 0.5x here
03:26:458 - 1.5x here
03:26:544 - 0.5x here
03:26:630 - 1.7x here
03:26:801 - 0.3x here
03:26:972 - 1x here.
If you are okay with 1/8 SVs, I also recommend adding SVs that alternate between 1.3x and 0.7x every 1/8 from 03:25:601 - ~ 03:25:901 - .
End of mod