This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on domenica 18 novembre 2018 at 23:54:51

Artist: Demetori
Title: Desire Drive ~ Desire Dream
Source: 東方神霊廟　～ Ten Desires.
Tags: tokiko BEGIERDE DES ZAUBERER Touhou Project Kaku Seiga ZUN C81 doujin shinreibyou
BPM: 178
Filesize: 10535kb
Play Time: 06:32
Difficulties Available:

1. Extra Stage (5,4 stars, 1829 notes)

Download: Demetori - Desire Drive ~ Desire Dream
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Collab with tokiko (I mapped evens he mapped odds)

hello mom

EvilElvis wrote:

hello mom

hi dad

HDSUFHSDLKFJDAKFLJDASKLFJDSAKLFSJF'LSDKFJASDKLFJDSALKFJSDFKSDAJKLFSAJFLKSJFKLSDJFSKLAFJSKLFAJSDKLFJSKLFJASDKLJFKLFJSDLKFJSALFJSLFASDJKLKFJSKLAFJSKLFJDKLFAJKLFSDJ


I fully modded your diff


closed chrome completely forgetting I was modding this

and lost all of my work

-----------------------------

m4m from #modreqs


time to remod everything


FINAL STAGE

I would suggest renaming to 'dominance'

00:00:647 (1,2,3) - instead of stack maybe triangle?

00:01:152 (1,2) - bad flow, look at (big purple x show's where you messed up in flow)

00:18:511 (5,6,1) - don't stack like this please

00:27:106 (6) - less curve please

00:56:937 (2,3,4,5,6) - stay away from linear jumps please

01:16:319 (5,6,7,8,9,10) - instead do
02:02:667 (10,1,2) - 10 overlapping 2 in a weird way

02:14:128 (4) - less curve please

02:19:521 (2) - ^

02:58:454 (2,3,4) - make these jumps rather then just a straight line

03:02:667 (2,3,4) - ^

03:05:195 (2,3,4,5) - this would work better as a stream

03:15:645 (1,2,3,4) - curve 1 more and blanket 234 in it

03:30:813 (5) - nc and 03:30:982 (1) - remove nc for obvious reasons

04:01:993 (2,3) - I personally disagree with this stack

04:03:341 (2,3,4) - seperate more

04:10:083 (2,3) - stack ruins the flow

04:13:790 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - make these gradually get bigger

04:25:588 (1,2,3,4) - more spacing

05:58:959 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - I think this should be 1.6 spacing to emphasis the LAST kiai of the whole entire song!







sorry for the long delay

I don't know how to format so sorry about that :/ but here you go :3

00:27:949 (2,3,4,5,6) – Keeping burst like this straight just feels boring, especially with when they start getting longer like 00:33:173 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) – and 04:13:116 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - giving them a tiny bit of curve would make them more engaging and less repetitive. Something like 04:59:128 (4,5,6,7,8,9) – is a great example of what I mean.

00:05:702 (2) – The distance from that to 00:05:027 (6) – doesn’t match the pattern of 00:04:690 (4,5,6) -

03:39:914 (1) – Should be from the red to white tick and bounce back.

03:41:431 (1) – Should end on the blue tick

03:44:128 (1) – Should be from white to red tick and bounce back

03:49:015 (5) – and 03:50:701 (1,2) – Can be moved up a tiny bit to make the distance between 03:51:038 (2) – and 03:50:364 (4,5) – even while still keeping 03:49:015 (5) - ‘s location relative to 03:50:701 (1) –

03:51:543 (4,5,6) – This one is just personal opinion, but having them in a straight line looks horrible. Two different angles going into a curve just doesn’t fit. It would look a lot better if the angle between 03:51:543 (4,5) – was more obtuse, but I’d still prefer it to be curved.

04:14:802 (3,4) – Should be on 1/6 notes not 1/8

04:44:128 (3) - Should be from white to red tick and bounce back

04:45:139 (2) – and 04:45:476 (3) – should switch times

04:52:218 (4,5) – Why are these so close? They’re at a pretty consistent distant (at least within their own patterns) in other places like 04:49:690 (4,5) – and 04:51:038 (5,6) - . IIRC you did the same thing before, but idk the exact timing. I’m not saying it’s necessarily bad, but you should do the same sort of thing in each pattern, switching it up doesn’t make sense.

05:49:521 (1) – Should end on the white tick

This modding thread has been migrated to the new "modding discussions" system. Please make sure to re-post any existing (and unresolved) efforts to the new system as required.