1. 00:34:378 - make the volume lower here? the ticking and piano sounds is weak. maybe make it 25%, then 40% again at 00:37:621 -
2. 04:05:188 - hmm why cut the kiai here? while 02:01:945 - here is not. maybe make agreement between you two

1. 02:00:648 - d is more suitable for the drum here imo
2. 02:21:567 ~ make longer pattern here? it would make the end of kiai more intense. maybe try ddkdkdkkddk-k-d (1/4 snapping)
3. 02:33:810 - consider to change to d? will follow the drum and wind instrument more closely.
4. 02:41:351 (1,2,3) - you might want to change to ddk instead to emphasis piano sound at third note
5. 02:43:621 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - how about change to ddk-d-kdkkd? this will follow the drum more closely imo
   >> on side note i wouldn't complaint if you make 1/6 dddk at 02:43:296 - and 02:43:621 - lol
6. 05:03:567 - same as 02:00:648

1. 03:15:729 - add d? different than 01:12:486 - , there is drum sound there. might be good to add the pace
2. 03:10:540 - and 03:20:918 - might want to add k because of ^

Volta wrote:

yahallo~ yahallo~~ :3

[General]

1. 00:34:378 - make the volume lower here? the ticking and piano sounds is weak. maybe make it 25%, then 40% again at 00:37:621 - that's true, fixed
2. 04:05:188 - hmm why cut the kiai here? while 02:01:945 - here is not. maybe make agreement between you two Added break in my section cause I feel that 02:03:242 - need a bit of emphasis, also I don't remenber what I didn't cut kiai at this part if I did timing points for the whole diff xd

[Collab]
> Sh1n1

1. 02:00:648 - d is more suitable for the drum here imo orz my bad, also I found some consistencies with my previous patterns, fixed
2. 02:21:567 ~ make longer pattern here? it would make the end of kiai more intense. maybe try ddkdkdkkddk-k-d (1/4 snapping) ohh, I really like it so much <3 also I added some changes ad the last notes, for example 02:22:540 - is d and 02:22:702 - changed to K, I hope you like it.
3. 02:33:810 - consider to change to d? will follow the drum and wind instrument more closely. wow nice catch, fixed
4. 02:41:351 (1,2,3) - you might want to change to ddk instead to emphasis piano sound at third note I wanna add more enphasis on guitar (idk if it's guitar but sounds like that xD) as I did on 02:41:026 (408,409,410,411,412,413) -, also feels like a mirrored pattern with such notes.
5. 02:43:621 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - how about change to ddk-d-kdkkd? this will follow the drum more closely imo you are right, the transition between notes is more natural, also 02:43:621 (427,428,429) - as ddk for the reason mentioned above
   >> on side note i wouldn't complaint if you make 1/6 dddk at 02:43:296 - and 02:43:621 - lol mmm they are not at all bad but I prefer to keep in 1/4 for the reason mentioned above.
6. 05:03:567 - same as 02:00:648 Consistency yay, you understand me <3

not much to say. really nice map. you may call me back~

Volta wrote:

yahallo~ hi~

[Collab]> Nardo

1. 03:15:729 - add d? different than 01:12:486 - , there is drum sound there. might be good to add the pace fixed
2. 03:10:540 - and 03:20:918 - might want to add k because of ^ No change at these spots as there is no distinct sound to map with.

not much to say. really nice map. you may call me back~

1. 02:54:810 - this note seems a bit out of place because you've been following the drum previously and the k should land on 02:54:972 - instead, how about you move this note, use a finish on 02:55:134 - and just let the spinner start later, eg. on 02:57:729 - for the high sound that ends at 02:59:675 - as well? Would work better for the drums imo.
2. I feel like the 1/6 should start on 04:31:945 - instead of 04:31:783 - because the sound this is mapped to gets stronger at 04:31:945 - , not at 04:31:783 - .
3. I think you should better remove 04:47:026 (95,96) - these two like you did previously, I'm not a fan of the vocal emphasis here. If you really want to make this part stand out I think you could just do something with the instruments, like make 04:47:675 - K and add a note on 04:47:837 - .
4. The second half of the kiai feels stronger if you compare the sections of 01:50:269 (42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - and 02:08:432 (182,183,184,185,186,187,188) - . How about changing 02:08:432 - to D and adding a d on 02:08:594 - ? The beats are much stronger, so I think it would sound nice to have a difference here. Similar at 04:11:675 - and 05:29:513 - (change these to D and add d on the red tick after these notes like this.
5. I don't think it's good to start off the stream at 04:45:486 - with 4x k, I feel like instruments get more intense at 04:45:729 - , how about you try something like this, cursor on 04:45:405 - ?
6. 01:13:134 - the dkd at the end of this stream feels off because you let it end with d on a strong clap, how about you remove 01:13:540 - and change 01:13:621 - to k for following the instrument better? You could also add a d on 01:23:918 -, I think it fits better to have the longer pattern later for a better build-up.

snowball112 wrote:

Heya, recheck time.

1. 02:54:810 - this note seems a bit out of place because you've been following the drum previously and the k should land on 02:54:972 - instead, how about you move this note, use a finish on 02:55:134 - and just let the spinner start later, eg. on 02:57:729 - for the high sound that ends at 02:59:675 - as well? Would work better for the drums imo. well my mapping style is always based on consistency and spin is keeping consistency with 03:00:324 (1) -, and because I won't add a finish at 02:55:134 - I feel that skiping 02:54:972 - will add more emphasis to cymbal followed with spinner
2. I think you should better remove 04:47:026 (95,96) - these two like you did previously, I'm not a fan of the vocal emphasis here. If you really want to make this part stand out I think you could just do something with the instruments, like make 04:47:675 - K and add a note on 04:47:837 - . Removed such notes
3. The second half of the kiai feels stronger if you compare the sections of 01:50:269 (42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - and 02:08:432 (182,183,184,185,186,187,188) - . How about changing 02:08:432 - to D and adding a d on 02:08:594 - ? The beats are much stronger, so I think it would sound nice to have a difference here. Similar at 04:11:675 - and 05:29:513 - (change these to D and add d on the red tick after these notes like this. nope, first of all cause sounds bad and second (the real reason) cause I'm adding an extra enphasis to vocals, if you take a look to the high vocal pitches like 01:50:269 - 01:51:242 - 01:52:864 - 01:55:459 - etc, I'm adding a break to add more order, also I preer consistency tbh uwu.
4. I don't think it's good to start off the stream at 04:45:486 - with 4x k, I feel like instruments get more intense at 04:45:729 - , how about you try something like this, cursor on 04:45:405 - ? Sounds good, changed

You may call me back~

Thank you very much snowball Waiting for Nardo senpai

snowball112 wrote:

Heya, recheck time.

1. I feel like the 1/6 should start on 04:31:945 - instead of 04:31:783 - because the sound this is mapped to gets stronger at 04:31:945 - , not at 04:31:783 - . Hmm, I think the current position is also fine since the rhythm twitch occurs at 04:31:783 -
2. The second half of the kiai feels stronger if you compare the sections of 01:50:269 (42,43,44,45,46,47,48) - and 02:08:432 (182,183,184,185,186,187,188) - . How about changing 02:08:432 - to D and adding a d on 02:08:594 - ? The beats are much stronger, so I think it would sound nice to have a difference here. Similar at 04:11:675 - and 05:29:513 - (change these to D and add d on the red tick after these notes like this. Retained for vocal emphasis.
3. 01:13:134 - the dkd at the end of this stream feels off because you let it end with d on a strong clap, how about you remove 01:13:540 - and change 01:13:621 - to k for following the instrument better? You could also add a d on 01:23:918 -, I think it fits better to have the longer pattern later for a better build-up. The variation between 01:13:621 and 01:23:999 - is intentional as the flow of music is different. Keeping this would make the increase in note density at 03:17:026 and 03:27:161 - more intuitive as well.

You may call me back~

Xinely wrote:

Congrats jean baka :3~

ajeemaniz wrote:

wait woooot grats!!