1. Easy (1.42 stars, 158 notes)
2. Hard (3.27 stars, 419 notes)
3. Insane (4.43 stars, 603 notes)
4. Normal (2.11 stars, 253 notes)

MAPPING WITH REWARDS (OCT. 2015)
Higher quality bitrate is here as this is intended to be an official submission.

1. 00:09:434 (1,2) - Maybe This would be better IMO, Flow maybe (? Dunno really
2. 00:18:809 (2) - Maybe a little curved (?
3. 00:21:434 (1) - If you did the last one, you know what to do here then
4. 00:36:434 (1) - Ctrl+G for a better flow with (2) and (3), Straight instead of zig-zag movemment
5. 00:39:434 (1) - This is better like This IMO
6. 00:40:934 (3) - This too if you make the change (VERY IMO, Better flow for newbies)
7. 00:54:434 (1) - Maybe This better IMO
8. 00:55:934 (3) - The same about the last one (Just if you did the change)
9. 00:58:184 (2) - Like this fits better IMO
10. 01:02:121 (2,1) - IMO I preffer the NC on the (2) Instead of the last object since it's in a red tick, what is usually more hard to read to new players, with the NC this can help a little but, just my opinion
12. 01:27:434 (5) - Maybe better like this
13. 02:02:121 (2) - Yeah NC here too if you agree with what I say before
14. 02:03:434 (1) - This avoid the overlap.. Nah forget it looks ugly
15. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (?

1. 00:02:684 (3,4) - Why not this, it makes more sence with 00:01:184 (2,3) - figure
2. 00:04:184 (3,4) - Same, Sorry if I'm a little bit nazi
3. 00:58:934 (1,2,3) - Dunno real why buy this overlap looks not so good IMO
4. 01:18:434 (1,2) - You know what I'm about to say, no you don't. because I don't want this to change, I just want you to waste your time, making you read this large comment about nothing.
5. 02:02:121 (1) - You really want to have a stack in a normal with the next object placed in a red stick(? Señor Gero usted es diabolico
6. 02:21:434 (1) - Maybe this for avoid overlap
7. 02:22:934 (3) - Mirror if you did my last suggestion
8. 02:26:684 (5,1) - Maybe this would be better like this or this, Fits better with the music IMO
9. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (?

1. 00:00:434 (1) - Ctrl+G
2. 00:25:184 (3) - Ctrl+G
3. 00:29:496 (3,4,5) - Maybe this would be better
4. 00:35:309 (1,2) - IMO This is unnecessary, you can delete it
5. 00:38:309 (2) - For consistency, this would be better with Ctyl+G, but with the Distance not, if you want to keep consistency here You can do this or ignore me
6. 00:38:684 (3) - If you did my last change and say, BUT (3) LOOKS HORRIBLE, then Ctrl+g this too and Ctrl+H eveything next to this object, if you ignore me, the ignore this too, lol
7. 00:52:934 (1) - Maybe like this would be better
8. 00:57:152 (4,5) - This objects aren't perfect stacked with 00:56:684 (3) -
9. 01:00:809 (4,5) - Maybe better like this
10. 01:40:934 (1,2) - IMO much better like this
11. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (?

1. 00:51:809 (2) - I preffer a straight line
2. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (?

1. 00:39:434 (1) - It's my opinion here, but I think you can try to make a blanket with this note 00:39:059 (4) - I think it can be cool!
2. 00:39:059 (4) - Then if you do this on the previous slider, don't forget to do it here :3

1. 00:40:184 (3,4,5) - You can try to do some stairs with the beat, it can be better to play in my opinion, don't pay attention to le last slider >w< http://puu.sh/qlM0H/aca881e7d1.jpg
2. 00:45:059 (7) - I think on this slider, you can try to put the end of this one, more in this middle of the next.
3. 00:59:684 (2,3) - In my opinion, this pattern is quite strange, I don't know if you have to change this, because since it's your mapping style, I don't have anything to say, but I just give my opinion haha :p
4. 01:19:184 (3) - Tbh, I would have more abilities to do a straight slider here, instead of making it falling to the right, I mean, like this: http://puu.sh/qlMeT/2fd7a9af53.jpg

1. 00:03:809 (2) - In my opinion, it would be better if this slider guide the player to the triplets after this :c
2. 00:52:746 (4,1) - This overleaping can be avoided in my opinion :c
3. 01:55:184 (3) - I think that this slider could be extended
4. 02:09:434 (1) - Here too, you can also avoid the overleap, I think it could be better, since it's less visible than the last :p

1. 00:05:309 (2) - I think you can put this note straight after the slider, it can be better to play in my opinion
2. 01:41:684 (3) - On this slider, I think you can move the slider end a little bit to the bottom of the grid, because it's not straight with the move of the player, I mean like this >w< http://puu.sh/qlMLE/730e2b5ce3.jpg (ITZ VERY A LITTLE)

DaxMasterix

Holito

No era 198 el limite permitido? Lo es, pero como esto es un contest esta permitido romper esa regla.

Easy:

1. 00:09:434 (1,2) - Maybe This would be better IMO, Flow maybe (? Dunno really Me gusta como se ve el mio.
2. 00:18:809 (2) - Maybe a little curved (? No, casi no me gustan ese tipo de sliders.
3. 00:21:434 (1) - If you did the last one, you know what to do here then Lo mismo.
4. 00:36:434 (1) - Ctrl+G for a better flow with (2) and (3), Straight instead of zig-zag movemment En realidad el zig-zang me gusta y fue intencional realmente.
5. 00:39:434 (1) - This is better like This IMO En realidad si hago eso, se arruina el patrón que intento crear, el flujo esta perfecto de todos modos.
6. 00:40:934 (3) - This too if you make the change (VERY IMO, Better flow for newbies) ^
7. 00:54:434 (1) - Maybe This better IMO No me gusta.
8. 00:55:934 (3) - The same about the last one (Just if you did the change) ^
9. 00:58:184 (2) - Like this fits better IMO Queria romper el flujo, es por eso que se ve de esta forma.
10. 01:02:121 (2,1) - IMO I preffer the NC on the (2) Instead of the last object since it's in a red tick, what is usually more hard to read to new players, with the NC this can help a little but, just my opinion
11. En realidad es perfectamente predecible, es por eso que el espaciado es el correcto para evitar confusiones.
12. 01:27:434 (5) - Maybe better like this ^
13. 02:02:121 (2) - Yeah NC here too if you agree with what I say before ^
14. 02:03:434 (1) - This avoid the overlap.. Nah forget it looks ugly Es intencional.
15. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (? Prefiero evitarlo.

Normal:

1. 00:02:684 (3,4) - Why not this, it makes more sence with 00:01:184 (2,3) - figure Listo.
2. 00:04:184 (3,4) - Same, Sorry if I'm a little bit nazi Listo.
3. 00:58:934 (1,2,3) - Dunno real why buy this overlap looks not so good IMO Por qué no?
4. 01:18:434 (1,2) - You know what I'm about to say, no you don't. because I don't want this to change, I just want you to waste your time, making you read this large comment about nothing. Listo.
5. 02:02:121 (1) - You really want to have a stack in a normal with the next object placed in a red stick(? Señor Gero usted es diabolico ¿Que tiene de malo?
6. 02:21:434 (1) - Maybe this for avoid overlap No lo creo.
7. 02:22:934 (3) - Mirror if you did my last suggestion Listo.
8. 02:26:684 (5,1) - Maybe this would be better like this or this, Fits better with the music IMO Listo.
9. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (? Lo que he dicho acerca de esto en la Easy.

Hard:

1. 00:00:434 (1) - Ctrl+G Lo que he dicho anteriormente sobre el zig-zag.
2. 00:25:184 (3) - Ctrl+G ^
3. 00:29:496 (3,4,5) - Maybe this would be better Arreglado.
4. 00:35:309 (1,2) - IMO This is unnecessary, you can delete it Por?
5. 00:38:309 (2) - For consistency, this would be better with Ctyl+G, but with the Distance not, if you want to keep consistency here You can do this or ignore me El salto seria muy rato, prefiero algo tipo kick-sliders.
6. 00:38:684 (3) - If you did my last change and say, BUT (3) LOOKS HORRIBLE, then Ctrl+g this too and Ctrl+H eveything next to this object, if you ignore me, the ignore this too, lol ^
7. 00:52:934 (1) - Maybe like this would be better ^
8. 00:57:152 (4,5) - This objects aren't perfect stacked with 00:56:684 (3) - Arreglado.
9. 01:00:809 (4,5) - Maybe better like this Lo que he dicho ya.[/color]
10. 01:40:934 (1,2) - IMO much better like this ^
11. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (? ^

Insane:

1. 00:51:809 (2) - I preffer a straight line Se ve mejor así a mi parecer.
2. 02:27:246 (1) - Maybe better start in the previos blue tick (? Lo mismo.

Okay that's all! Mucha suerte con el mapa Nada que decir de la última dificultad

sahuang

quick mod :w:

[General]

1. audio is not 128/192kbps so maybe you need to change. and i feel that slider tick rate=1 is better? In this kind of contests this rule is not applied for it, that's why we use sample .osz when you start to map it, about the slider tick rate, I really prefer to use 2 in all difficulties.

[Easy]

1. 00:39:059 (4,1) - looks a bit awkward,how about make a blanket by rotating (1) 180 degrees? But it looks perfect for me, no changes.
2. 00:40:934 (3,4) - same here ^
3. 00:52:184 (2,3) - i think this overlap is quite confusing to play in Easy... Moved a bit.
4. 01:20:684 (3,4) - 01:48:434 (1,2) - same here, not unrankable but imo hard to play for newbie I always use this kind of overlaps in my difficulties, so it's okay to keep them as is.
5. 02:25:934 (1,2,3,1) - i dont think using 4 1/1 circles here in a row makes sense compared to previous patterns. It's fine for me.
   id rather change 2 of them into a slider.

[Normal]

1. 00:24:434 (1,2) - ds It's not a big deal.
2. 00:40:184 (3,4,5) - shape here looks really messy// Why?
3. 01:01:559 (4,1) - even tho they are stacked,3/2 gap surely feels weird and hard to catch. maybe change (4) to 1/1 slider? I don't think so.
4. 01:02:309 - 01:02:684 - heavy beats are here instead of slider head. ^
5. 02:18:059 (3,4,1) - hmm,why triple here?i think 3,4 should be a slider ^

[Hard]

• 
  testplayed and i think overall very nice,just some nazi stuff

1. 00:00:434 (1,2,3) - 01:34:184 (3,1) - maybe blanket here It looks good enough for me.
2. 01:21:434 (1) - imo circle 01:22:559 - and reverse slider ends 01:22:184 - I wanted to do something like that, because that's how I felt the music at this part.

[Insane]

1. 00:43:559 (6,7,1) - angle too blunt Moved a bit.
2. 01:14:121 (1,2,3) - ds quite strange to me,maybe put 2 and 3 further Fixed.
3. 01:19:746 (1,2) - 01:57:809 (2,1) - nazi bl Fixed.
4. considering ds better stack 02:26:121 (2,1) - Changed a little bit.

not much to say,symmetric style
gl

Spotty

Boop o3o

[Easy]

1. 00:39:434 (1) - It's my opinion here, but I think you can try to make a blanket with this note 00:39:059 (4) - I think it can be cool!
2. 00:39:059 (4) - Then if you do this on the previous slider, don't forget to do it here :3 I honestly like how it looks now.

To be honest, I have nothing much to say here, since there is nothing wrong here. I just don't think that overleaping too much is okay for beginner, maybe they will have some difficulties to read, but nevermind. I love that diff o3o

[Normal]

1. 00:40:184 (3,4,5) - You can try to do some stairs with the beat, it can be better to play in my opinion, don't pay attention to le last slider >w< http://puu.sh/qlM0H/aca881e7d1.jpg Actually looks good, fixed.
2. 00:45:059 (7) - I think on this slider, you can try to put the end of this one, more in this middle of the next. Fixed.
3. 00:59:684 (2,3) - In my opinion, this pattern is quite strange, I don't know if you have to change this, because since it's your mapping style, I don't have anything to say, but I just give my opinion haha :p I really like it, no changes.
4. 01:19:184 (3) - Tbh, I would have more abilities to do a straight slider here, instead of making it falling to the right, I mean, like this: http://puu.sh/qlMeT/2fd7a9af53.jpg Looks good, but I wanted to keep a simple style at some parts.

[Hard]

1. 00:03:809 (2) - In my opinion, it would be better if this slider guide the player to the triplets after this :c I tested it several times and it works well.
2. 00:52:746 (4,1) - This overleaping can be avoided in my opinion :c It's intentional.
3. 01:55:184 (3) - I think that this slider could be extended 1/1 works better in this section, that's why I used it.
4. 02:09:434 (1) - Here too, you can also avoid the overleap, I think it could be better, since it's less visible than the last :p ^

[Insane]

1. 00:05:309 (2) - I think you can put this note straight after the slider, it can be better to play in my opinion Okay.
2. 01:41:684 (3) - On this slider, I think you can move the slider end a little bit to the bottom of the grid, because it's not straight with the move of the player, I mean like this >w< http://puu.sh/qlMLE/730e2b5ce3.jpg (ITZ VERY A LITTLE) Fixed both things.

That's all I noticed on this mapset, it's pure masterpiece ! And the song reminds me some Mario's boss theme haha
Hope it will help you !

Cosmolade wrote:

(┛◉Д◉)┛彡
perdona por no poder modear, esque esta perfecto tal cual como le veo <3
/me runs*

Lily Bread wrote:

i will shoot 2 stars first. i don't know when i can get out of hospital, so i will try to ask someone to take my laptop to me.
anyway, i will mod it as soon as possiable.