• [Elysium]

1. 00:06:885 (1,4) - dont stack these for consistent, since you didnt do at 00:01:399 (1,4) - 00:04:142 (1,4) - 00:09:628 (1,4) -
2. 00:22:999 - well i dont recommend to use sliderend to express the strong sound here, this strong sound deserved more emphasized and clickable, [url=osu.ppy.sh/ss/5562412]you can do sth like this[/url]
3. 00:56:942 (1,2) - why dont make the same shape for a nicer structure XD?
4. 00:58:656 (1,2) - i suggest use slider at 2 either cuz they got the same synth sound, and you can used different firrection to express the higher pitch on 2, sth like this
5. 00:59:685 (1,1) - stack? or not lol?
6. 01:02:085 (1) - unnecessary NC imo, dont need to emphasized and no sv change either
7. 01:17:856 - NC for consistent with 01:16:142 -
8. 02:31:485 (3,4,5,6) - imo the spacing here should be a little bigger then 02:29:170 - cuz here is more intense then 02:29:170 -
9. 02:54:885 (1,2,1,2) - why decreased the spacing here, imo the spacing should be equal or even larger for emphasized the intense drum sound and finisher
10. 02:56:599 (2,3) - imo you should change this into stream either for consistent with 02:56:085 (1,2,3,4) -
11. 03:10:313 (1) - unnecessary NC imo, nothing to emphasized here
12. 03:29:513 (1,2,3,4,1) - spacing should be lower then 03:29:170 (1,2,3,4) - cuz the pitch actually got lower here, imo slowly decreased the spacing would be a good way to express the sound here
13. 03:43:999 (3,4) - 04:00:285 (2,3) - not stacking here seems inconsistent with your structure at this part, cuz most of the similar part was stack
14. 04:08:085 (6,1) - could increased the spacing here, since there was still got a strong sound at 04:08:256 - although there was no more synth to support
15. 04:13:399 (1,2,3,4,1) - same as 03:29:513 (1,2,3,4,1) -
16. 04:19:228 - well just a suggestion here, you could NC on every red tick for emphasized, wont cause NC spam cuz you are doing some copy paste stuff here
17. 2nd kiai is awesome XD

xlni wrote:

im gya

Xilver wrote:

xlni wrote:

im gya

Riven wrote:

hi m4m


[General]
The mp3 is 128kbps but it actually sounds good lol. The only place I found it was on soundcloud, I suppose that's where you got it from as well, so quality can't get better than that? Yeah I got this from the soundcloud and even though it's 128kbs it still sounds fine so I don't see a reason to change it unless of course someone can magically find a 192kbs mp3
05:03:119 - There is an unsnapped inherited point here, not sure if this is intentional, I tried snapping it and it made the SV slower, so check it out. Fixed


[Elysium]
00:10:999 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The way I personally perceive this part of the song is with inward up and down sliders. To me, it feels more natural to play and definitely fits the SV and spacing increase you have added. Changed
00:17:342 (3,4) - Not stacked xd xd
00:36:370 (2,3) - The spacing here gets a little too much if it wasn't for the next sliders 00:36:713 (3,1,2) - being so close to each other. The volume of the song gets louder but the sliders there don't. Altered a bit
00:38:085 (2,3) - I can't hear anything here that justifies those kicksliders, so I suggest to just keep with the slider spam. I really like the short sliders, I might consider changing them if majority wants me to do something about them
00:39:028 - You can definitely get creative and map to this beat, however! Hmm I couldn't come up with anything that'd fit well
00:43:485 (4,1) - The spacing between those two is a little too large, don't you think? Also, the spacing of 00:43:399 (3,4) - in this stream is not on par with 00:43:228 (1,2,3) - . Fixed
00:43:913 - Maybe I'm nit-picking here, but since there is no real beat there, how about making 00:43:828 (4) - a 1/4th slider? Nah the current way is better
00:46:570 (5) - Same applies to this beat, but to make 00:46:485 (4) - a 1/4th slider now is too late and would only cause inconvenience by messing up with the pattern. The ''feel'' I get from it is that it sounds like a slider, if that makes sense xd This plays fine and is accurate to the music so no need to change
00:53:513 (1,1) - The first time I played it I thought 00:54:199 (1) - was on the blue tick 00:54:113 - . If you try to do what you did here 01:02:085 (1,1) - the hitcircles goes a little too far up, but I think you can make it work. Added some spacing!
01:20:085 (2) - Ctrl + G? Sure
01:23:228 (2,3) - Spacing is a little bit too high here in my opinion. Nerfed
03:19:399 (1,2) - Because of how the flow goes from the previous slider, I think doing Ctrl + G on 03:19:570 (2) - and placing 03:19:399 (1) - on the new sliderend works. Nice I like that one
03:29:170 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - I don't think this is correctly emphasized. By taking a closer look you will see that the main emphasized beats supported by a synth are 03:29:342 (3,4,1,2,3) - . And the upcoming note is almost completely unsupported 03:29:771 (4) - basically the after sound that (3) leaves. Same for 04:13:056 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - This is the best way to do this because now the stream jump comes at the highest pitch sound which makes the most sense
03:35:685 - You are missing out on a great opportunity for a great jump pattern by ignoring that white tick and placing a slider there. It seems like you are following the synths, but in this case the beats are so overwhelming that they are basically screaming for you to map to them. Or at least that is how I feel. I want to get the melody with that long slider before I transfer into jumping
03:43:999 (3) - How about placing this around x:84 y:252? Looks better in my opinion. I like the current way more
04:20:256 (7,8,9,1,2) - There is something about the flow on this part that doesn't do it for me. Actually, from 04:20:256 (7) - to the triple 04:20:428 (8,9,1) - is nice, but the follow up on 04:20:770 (2) - and linear movement that the cursor makes is what causes the fault to me. I don't see any issues here, it plays well for me
04:34:999 (3) - This slider could use some higher spacing, very loud and intense chord. Same goes for 04:56:942 (3) - . Sure

Atamare wrote:

like ur idea in the beginning bout those thiggies 00:03:628 (3) - 00:06:370 (3) - but u r skipping pretty strong beats after the sliders 00:03:799 - 00:06:542 - that may break the rhytm o9r be a bit confusing. also mostly all stacks in such moment are imperfect, like this one 00:17:342 (3,4) - for exapmle Not touching the intro, and couldn't find any messed up stacks

00:43:485 (4) - the flow after thi note sucks, so this spaced stream plays badly. id suggest u to do smth like that https://pp.vk.me/c636118/v636118809/18a ... j51jSw.jpg (to make 00:43:228 (1,2,3,4) - this a bit mor curved and move 00:43:570 (1,2,3,4,1) - this a bit to the right) Altered a bit

00:49:228 (2) - nc this one due to sv changes No need

00:52:399 - without a note here the sound that starts here sounds a bit overmapped I don't see a problem?

01:15:456 (1) - didnt want to be nazi but this wave can be improved Done

01:19:742 (2) - 01:20:085 (2) - not sure, but those sliders should have nc cuz sv changes are really huge and noticeable No need :p

01:23:599 (4) - again nc is needed cuz sv changes Not every sv change needs a NC if they are really minor like this

01:32:942 (7) - move to 369-243 for a better blanket Done

01:34:656 (1,2) - actually this is the first time when u used such stack. it may be not a good idea to introduce new patterns after one and a half mins It's easily readable and I have more of it later so I'm keeping it

01:54:970 (2,1,3) - ya, sorry for being that nazi, but this blanket can be improved (if it was supposed to be a blanket lol) uhh I think you highlighted wrong stuff here

02:12:713 (1,2,3,4) - isnt this spacing 2 big lol? like there are litterally no changes in the music and the beat here 02:12:713 (1) - isnt that strong Changed

03:07:399 (1,1,1) - really no need in those ncs, ye, spacing is changing but the gaps are still 1/2 and no huge changes in the rhytm I think these NCs work really well

03:39:456 (1) - increase spacing a bit to make it consistent? But it is consistent atm

03:51:284 (1,1,1) - as i said before They work man

04:13:742 (1) - increase the spacing a bit to make it consistent to another spaced streams It's already consistent xd

TheLeviathan wrote:

01:28:828 (1) - to be honest, i think this should be just a single note instead of kick slider Slider is better
01:28:999 (2) - also mind NC here, it's kinda different stuff your mapping after that Beep note No need
01:52:142 (1,2,1,2) - this is angled so it's just a bit uncomfortable to play. That can be just me, but i suggest to move 01:52:313 (1,2) - a bit to the right Altered this
02:54:199 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - so here you are decreasing distance in between pairs, but i recommend to do the opposite, increase DS with each pair, as the drums go more intense with each pair of jumps Doing this would break the idea that I have here
04:08:256 (1) - I really don't like position of this note, a would rather put it here X:435 Y:126 I don't see a flaw in the current way
04:56:599 (2) - consider adding whistle on the head of this too That would be inconsistent

SnowNiNo_ wrote:

[Elysium]
00:06:885 (1,4) - dont stack these for consistent, since you didnt do at 00:01:399 (1,4) - 00:04:142 (1,4) - 00:09:628 (1,4) - It looks better stacked though
00:22:999 - well i dont recommend to use sliderend to express the strong sound here, this strong sound deserved more emphasized and clickable, [url=osu.ppy.sh/ss/5562412]you can do sth like this[/url] I'm following the vocal melody to be consistent here
00:56:942 (1,2) - why dont make the same shape for a nicer structure XD? It would hurt the playability a lot
00:58:656 (1,2) - i suggest use slider at 2 either cuz they got the same synth sound, and you can used different firrection to express the higher pitch on 2, sth like this I don't want to spam too many sliders, needs some variety and the circles work as well as sliders imo
00:59:685 (1,1) - stack? or not lol? Definetly stack LOL
01:02:085 (1) - unnecessary NC imo, dont need to emphasized and no sv change either It's there for visuals xd
01:17:856 - NC for consistent with 01:16:142 - Not having a NC helps reading here so I don't want to add one
02:31:485 (3,4,5,6) - imo the spacing here should be a little bigger then 02:29:170 - cuz here is more intense then 02:29:170 - Making it bigger would be a bit too much for this part imo
02:54:885 (1,2,1,2) - why decreased the spacing here, imo the spacing should be equal or even larger for emphasized the intense drum sound and finisher This movement would flow bad with bigger spacing, and the spacing gets bigger with the back and forth movement that follows!
02:56:599 (2,3) - imo you should change this into stream either for consistent with 02:56:085 (1,2,3,4) - Kicksliders play better here
03:10:313 (1) - unnecessary NC imo, nothing to emphasized here Not having the followpoint here plays better from 03:10:142 (5) -
04:08:085 (6,1) - could increased the spacing here, since there was still got a strong sound at 04:08:256 - although there was no more synth to support I personally don't feel the need to increase spacing here
04:19:228 - well just a suggestion here, you could NC on every red tick for emphasized, wont cause NC spam cuz you are doing some copy paste stuff here Tried it but didn't like it that much to be honest so I'll keep the current way
2nd kiai is awesome XD Thanks

1. I think combo 2 color can slightly darker, I can't really tell the diffrent with 0% bg dim especially when it comes into a pattern with diffrent sv like this 00:10:999 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) -
2. Metadata?

1. 00:02:256 (1,2) - and 00:04:999 (1,2) - I'm not sure why those two have larger spacing compared to 00:07:742 (1,2) - 00:10:485 (1,2) - 00:13:228 (1,2) - 00:15:970 (1,2) - and etc which have similiar music only have 1.4 spacing, I think more consistency would be good
2. 00:38:085 (2,3) - and 00:39:713 (5) - Imo those two a bit overmapped, literally there's nothing to emphsized on the blue tick. Why not use 1/2 slider there to match the rest of your rhythm choice on this part 00:34:313 - until 00:39:799 - ?
3. 01:03:628 (1) - I think the end supposed be snapped on blue tick instead here 01:04:056 - instead on 1/6. Also add green line with 20% volume on that blue tick and add another green line with 70% here 01:04:142 (1) - so the transition between blue and white tick more natural
4. 01:57:970 (1,2) - Move downward a bit to avoid a complete stacked between 01:57:285 (1,2) - somewhat same as you did on 01:21:628 (1,2,3,1) -
5. 02:08:770 - and 02:09:113 - Use N:C1 there? S:C1 make the hitsound too quite
6. 02:49:228 (3) - I don't think you need an extended slider there, by skipping the drum here 02:49:399 - makes the rhythm weird, unless your extended like this one 02:48:199 (2,3) -
7. 02:56:599 (2) - Try to move a bit right to prevent complete stacked with this slider 02:55:913 (1) -
8. 03:35:513 (1) - The extended not good on that one, try to use 1/2 slider instead to cover a drum here 03:35:685 - to match your next hitsound transition
9. 03:39:970 - Why not add a circle there? I think there is a bass sound on that red tick
10. 03:45:285 (4) - Ctrl+g that for more natural flow on (3,4,1)

Mako Sakata wrote:

9ya I almost forget the request :D
Sugestion,

General
I think combo 2 color can slightly darker, I can't really tell the diffrent with 0% bg dim especially when it comes into a pattern with diffrent sv like this 00:10:999 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I added a tiny bit more color in it
Metadata? https://soundcloud.com/kamomesano/gya9- ... sano-remix This is the only place where this exists that I know of

9ya
00:02:256 (1,2) - and 00:04:999 (1,2) - I'm not sure why those two have larger spacing compared to 00:07:742 (1,2) - 00:10:485 (1,2) - 00:13:228 (1,2) - Fixed!00:15:970 (1,2) - and etc which have similiar music only have 1.4 spacing, I think more consistency would be good
00:38:085 (2,3) - and 00:39:713 (5) - Imo those two a bit overmapped, literally there's nothing to emphsized on the blue tick. Why not use 1/2 slider there to match the rest of your rhythm choice on this part 00:34:313 - until 00:39:799 - ? I feel like these prepare the players for what's to come and making these a 1/2 slider now would break this pattern and all of the ones after it. I really like these and don't want to change them even though I acknowledge their nature.
01:03:628 (1) - I think the end supposed be snapped on blue tick instead here 01:04:056 - instead on 1/6. Also add green line with 20% volume on that blue tick and add another green line with 70% here 01:04:142 (1) - so the transition between blue and white tick more natural Fixed!
01:57:970 (1,2) - Move downward a bit to avoid a complete stacked between 01:57:285 (1,2) - somewhat same as you did on 01:21:628 (1,2,3,1) -
02:08:770 - and 02:09:113 - Use N:C1 there? S:C1 make the hitsound too quite I'm being consistent with the hitsounding here and I have used normal samplesets for the wubs and soft samplesets for the synth heavy parts so I don't want to make this be unconsistent.
02:49:228 (3) - I don't think you need an extended slider there, by skipping the drum here 02:49:399 - makes the rhythm weird, unless your extended like this one 02:48:199 (2,3) - I'm following the voice cuts very closely on this whole part, so that's why the extended slider is a must here
02:56:599 (2) - Try to move a bit right to prevent complete stacked with this slider 02:55:913 (1) - This is intentionally stacked like this for better aesthetics and it doesn't hurt the playability
03:35:513 (1) - The extended not good on that one, try to use 1/2 slider instead to cover a drum here 03:35:685 - to match your next hitsound transition I know that I'm skipping the drum hitsound here but I'm willing to do that to follow the synth lead the best as possible like I did with this whole jump pattern afterwards! Also making this 1/2 would make this rhythm 03:36:370 (5,6,1) - Feel out of place.
03:39:970 - Why not add a circle there? I think there is a bass sound on that red tick I want to emphasize the fact that I'm following the voices with those 1/8 repeat sliders right after these, it would be anticlimatic to map that drum sound before the repeat sliders
03:45:285 (4) - Ctrl+g that for more natural flow on (3,4,1) In my opinion this makes the movement feel more weird, it should play really well as it is?
Do you mind to get one or two more mods before we push this forward? take it easy I'll get 2 more mods

VINXIS wrote:

general


ctrl shift a
get betr bg res plz It's the best possible for this picture man
add 2 tags: "edm, dance, music" : / anime. lol
hel ywea modding assistant seems 2 be ok wit the other sht
quality diff spikez with ur streamzbtw why does this program even exist, so pointless and serves no purpose.

lolzes


00:00:028 (1) - buffer these are fine
00:43:142 (4,1) - y is this jump a sharp turn but the other 2 steamrea jumpz rnt,, its weir Adjusted and should be better now
02:28:142 (5) - wher is the nc proboxe.. y is it on th slider. , , ,., Fixed xd
03:07:056 (5,1,1,1,1) - making the spacing decreas even mor drastically can make the meme mor obviouz cuz its not vERY/really apparent at first Fixed!
03:18:885 - 03:21:628 - vry consistent ncing Xd It is
03:26:770 - wher is my stream,, It's right there
03:32:256 (1,2,3,4,1) - y is the spacing of this 1 so lo comapred 2 the res,t Because you didn't see the stream that is there
03:35:513 (1) - if ur mappgin to the snare for the rest of this time frame then y r u using an extended slidor here , This works the best here imo
03:51:113 (1,1,1,1) - this 1 is mor noticabl at first but id still mak it mor apparent Xd Adjusted a bit too
04:10:656 - helo i wud lik 2 order a stream 1 stream with curves and good spacing coming right up
04:20:256 (7,8,9,1,2) - this flow,, : / I tried
05:08:428 (3,4,1) - for som reason i feel lik a slider witha repeat or a slider to circl works better than jsut 3 circles but idk y Xd current way is better :p

Mako Sakata wrote:

01:36:713 (1) - and 01:37:170 (3) - not snapped Fixed!
I don't remember if the laniency was 2 lol, any particular reason by doing that? imo I think it should be 3 or 5 at least Stack leniency of 2 is used in order to allow many of the current stacks in the "wub" part of the map to be as visually aesthetic as they can be. It's rankable with 2 and it's ultimately my decision so I really want to keep it as that :p
And metadata source? https://soundcloud.com/kamomesano/gya9- ... sano-remix

Underforest wrote:

good night probox