Lilyanna wrote:

from modreqs
General
nice flow but u need to work more on spacing


00:02:583 (6,1) - stack
00:08:240 (4,1) - stack maybe
00:08:240 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - this look little bit messy and overlaped
00:22:297 (2) - stack it with the slider or put it more closer to the end of the slider like here 00:32:583 (9,1) -
01:08:926 (1,5) - stack 1 well with 5 its not staked well
01:36:012 (3,1) - dont overlap here with the slider
02:25:212 (4,1) - stack
02:44:497 (5) - stack well
04:05:155 (10) - nc
04:25:383 (6) - if u want u can remap this slider imo
04:28:126 (2) - nc here
04:28:812 (5) - stack with the end of 04:29:326 (2) -
05:07:212 (6,2) - same stack maybe
05:40:469 (3) - nc


Im new on modding so i hope its helpful so gl

Rondo

1. 00:15:440 (1,2,3) - Using the same DS would look a lot neater
2. 00:16:812 (3) - Splitting this up into 2 sliders would play better and be less bland http://puu.sh/pxsh3/285732e966.jpg
3. 00:22:297 (2) - NC
4. 00:23:669 (1) - A lower SV would be better for these sliders as the song is less intense here
5. 00:40:126 (2,3) - The spacing is a bit big in relation to the earlier parts
6. 01:04:812 (3,4) - NC both of these sliders as the SV change is huge
7. 01:30:012 (4,5) - jump is huge. I recommend decreasing. Tbh I would decrease some of the other jumps too, it's still only the build up
8. 02:50:069 (3) - Suggestion - It would look nicely and flow better to place this under the slider http://puu.sh/pxsRm/023df7f3e3.jpg .
9. 03:13:383 - The pause here really breaks flow
10. 03:54:869 (6) - NC. Also How about a lower SV?
11. 04:31:897 (5,6) - This DS spacing feels unnatural

Kisses wrote:

Reminder for me to mod (will mod within 24 hrs)

Rondo

1. 00:15:440 (1,2,3) - Using the same DS would look a lot neater Fixed
2. 00:16:812 (3) - Splitting this up into 2 sliders would play better and be less bland http://puu.sh/pxsh3/285732e966.jpg Fixed
3. 00:22:297 (2) - NC Fixed
4. 00:23:669 (1) - A lower SV would be better for these sliders as the song is less intense here Fixed
5. 00:40:126 (2,3) - The spacing is a bit big in relation to the earlier parts Fixed
6. 01:04:812 (3,4) - NC both of these sliders as the SV change is huge Fixed
7. 01:30:012 (4,5) - jump is huge. I recommend decreasing. Tbh I would decrease some of the other jumps too, it's still only the build up Fixed
8. 02:50:069 (3) - Suggestion - It would look nicely and flow better to place this under the slider http://puu.sh/pxsRm/023df7f3e3.jpg . Fixed
9. 03:13:383 - The pause here really breaks flow Fixed
10. 03:54:869 (6) - NC. Also How about a lower SV? Fixed, I left the SV the same because I feel it matches how stretched out the lyrics are
11. 04:31:897 (5,6) - This DS spacing feels unnatural Fixed

Well that's all from me. I hope this mod was useful. GL!

Yahuri wrote:

From queue~

General
mapping style doesnt look defined, objects appear to be placed all over the place, especially for the more jumpy parts. look at some recently ranked maps with similar musical patterns to help you design the map Yeah, I sort of noticed that when playtesting as well. Probably going to end up remapping a lot of it.

Rondo
note: most suggestions here can be applied to most of the map, so look over the whole map with these in mind
00:02:412 (5,7) - this DS doesnt appear to be consistent with 00:02:069 (3,5), so move it out a little more It seems fine to me but I adjusted it a bit to be sure
00:06:526 (3,1) - get rid of overlap Fixed
00:08:240 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - huge cluster of stuff on this area of the map, spread it out more for better readability remapped that part
00:20:497 (7,8,9,10,11,1) - overlap not look good Fixed
00:23:669 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - overlap too heavy and sliders look messy, clean up by adding more symmetry/blankets/geometric patterns Remapped this section
00:34:640 (2) - might not be rankable, too scrunched up and path not clear I think it should be fine but I made it a bit clearer
00:52:297 (6,2) - overlap not look good Remapped this part
00:53:926 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - make stream curves cleaner and more open instead of scrunched up Remapped
00:58:640 (1,2,3,4) - why is this suddenly 1 beat rhythm when the before section was 1/2 beat rhythm? Remapped and Fixed
01:05:497 (1,2) - not good for readability, slider 2 extends under 1 and it is hard for the player to know if it ends at the tail of 1 or further than that Remapped
01:32:240 (8) - not rankable maybe I think this should be fine.
03:29:325 (2,3,4,5,6) - could make smoother angle Tried my best to fix it
04:14:412 (9) - probably not rankable Going to Remap
04:15:783 (3) - ^ ^
04:17:155 (3) - ^ ^
04:21:612 (4,5) - is there a reason for these sliders to be so close Fixed
04:51:612 (4,5) - jump section and then DS so small here? Going to Remap
05:38:069 (6,7,8) - make spacing consistent Fixed

Good luck!

Naxess wrote:

NM From Queue

Rondo

SPOILER

00:14:755 - Move clap to 00:14:926 - to match the song.

00:16:812 (3) - NC, following new instrument. Plus new measure.
^ 00:22:297 (2) -

00:19:555 (7) - NC, both a new measure and also has a distinct sound on it, like 00:20:926 - has.
00:19:983 (1) - Move NC to 00:20:412 (6) -, matches NC at 00:19:040 (1) -

00:36:012 (3) - Move red control point to closest slidertick, covers vocal better.

00:49:812 (2,4) - Can't hear these, am I missing something? Seems like overmapping. I put a quintuplet there to represent the vocals since I didn't want to put another slider. I'm keeping it for now but I'll consider removing it

01:07:212 (6,1) - Swap on timeline to cover vocals better.
^ 01:09:955 (6,1) -
From what you did at 01:10:297 (1,2,3,4) - , I can see that you're definitely following vocals, which is why I made this suggestion.

01:17:840 (1) - Why is this mapped when 01:17:669 - and 01:18:355 - are left blank? There's no distinct sound in comparison, so imo this makes no sense.
I think some pattern like 01:18:526 (1,2,3,4) - will work better, because clickable objects can be heard clearly.
Changed it, but differently from what you suggested. I still like having the pause there.

01:26:755 - Move spinner forwards to blue tick and place a circle here with a new combo, then remove the new combo from the spinner.
This way the beat will be clickable and the spinner will give resolution to that beat. I changed it but I wasn't sure what exactly you meant so I might've done it wrong

01:31:640 (1) - Move NC to 01:31:555 (9) - , it's stronger.

01:32:240 (8) - NC this, it's a transition from vers to chorus. Plus it's an SV change.

01:40:983 (3,4) - These sounds are not 1/4. I believe they are 1/6.


01:42:355 - Not going to map this sound? I don't hear a sound there? Unless you mean the wub sound at 01:42:183 (2)
Just a suggestion, but both this and 01:42:869 - could be mapped as stacks on the following object, giving a brief pause and emphasizing the sound more.

01:51:097 - This is a pretty strong beat. Not having it clickable seems strange imo.

01:51:269 - Again, I think these are 1/6.

01:53:497 (9,1) - Swap NC, stronger beat should have the new combo. Having them on blue ticks makes little sense in this case.
^ 01:54:869 (9,1) -
^ 02:34:640 (9,1) -
^ 02:36:012 (9,1) -
^ 02:37:383 (9,1) -

02:00:355 (5) - Might work better as slightly straighter or even completely straight, since it seems incremental because of 01:59:326 (1,3) - being different.

02:06:355 (5,1) - Swap NC, it is known as syncopation when a note is emphasized out of it's regular pattern.
As you may have noticed, 02:06:355 - is a red tick, but it's still stronger than the downbeat at 02:06:526 - , and usually downbeats are NCed because they lead into a new measure.
^ 02:40:469 (1,2) -
^ 02:43:212 (1,2) -
^ 02:45:955 (1,2) -

02:07:726 - Consider making this clickable, lifting your finger on stronger vocals is a bit odd imo.
It's also using syncopation, meaning that you could NC the object that you place here instead of the whole slider you had at 02:07:555 (1) - .

02:18:697 (3) - Why this but not 02:18:183 - and 02:18:012 - ? I'd suggest removing it. That way you're also emphasizing 02:18:526 - more by using a brief pause after it, acting as an anti-jump.

02:18:869 -
The normal-clap pattern around here is also a bit strange. Usually claps and snares would be placed on offbeats, because they're heard better.
For the pattern you're using I'd recommend some kind of drum-kick hitsound instead. Preferably a custom one, since default is quite limited.

02:42:012 (1,2) - Swap NC, downbeat is stronger. Will also
^ 02:47:497 (1,2) -

02:51:783 - Seems like you're using the same hitsound for the claps in the song and the drum-kick... Yeah, um, something went wrong there. The normal claps are supposed to be kicks but the audio file was wrong.

02:51:783 - Strong instrumental and vocal impact, should be clickable imo.
Look out for downbeats (large white ticks on the timeline) when it comes to this, as they're often emphasized the most of a measure.
^ 02:54:526 -
^ 02:57:269 -

02:57:783 - Also as strong as 02:57:269 - , which is why I'd suggest making it clickable.

03:01:383 - Like I mentioned earlier about NCing blue ticks, might want to swap some in this stream.

03:06:183 (9) - Could NC this as well.

03:43:726 (1) - begins at 03:43:897 - ends at 03:44:326 - You are correct about the ending but I want it to begin at the "n" and not the "ai"
^ 03:46:469 (1) -

I'll stop here. For small details like the last one and the 1/6 sections I'd recommend checking with 25% or 50% speed.

Btw, consider placing a preview point.

osu!wiki, Ranking Criteria - Audio wrote:

1. Each difficulty of the mapset must have a preview point set (and be consistent in every difficulty). This is used for both the song selection menu and the online thumbnail preview.

I happened to catch some blankets near the end as well:
05:25:897 (2,3) - Blanket looks off, would also straighten out the curve slightly; doubt it'd blanket well by being so curved.
Try something like: (control points in order, head to tail) (400; 200) (356; 207) (319; 188)
^ There's other blankets from here that are a bit off, if you want to correct them.

General

SPOILER

Consider adding some tags so people can find your map easier.

Your background is 1151x767 instead of the recommended 1366x768.
I would suggest scaling it up to this resolution so it matches the aspect ratio.
Right now it'll likely be slightly zoomed in. If I scale it up it'll be really stretched though

There are two instances of the song's audio in your folder, consider removing the unused file, World's End, Girl's Rondo (Asterisk DnB Remix) - Asterisk.mp3, because right now the folder is over 10 MB, which is unrankable unless you have a video or storyboard.

drum-hitnormal2.wav and soft-hitfinish.wav are unused, consider removing them if you're not planning to use them.

Of the used files, soft-hitclap.wav has a possible 5 ms delay.

osu!wiki, Ranking Criteria - Audio wrote:

Hitsounds must have an acceptable range of delay under 5ms, unless there's a special purpose. Every hitsound file should start in time, preferrably at 0ms. This is to ensure that every map doesn't sound mistimed, and therefore could provide acceptably synchronized rhythm feedback to players.

Like I mentioned earlier, try getting some custom hitsound for a drum-kick or similar for the onbeats, instead of using claps.

Rest looks fine.

Good luck!

jiaxunjason wrote:

Naxess wrote:

01:26:755 - Move spinner forwards to blue tick and place a circle here with a new combo, then remove the new combo from the spinner.
This way the beat will be clickable and the spinner will give resolution to that beat. I changed it but I wasn't sure what exactly you meant so I might've done it wrong

jiaxunjason wrote:

Naxess wrote:

Your background is 1151x767 instead of the recommended 1366x768.
I would suggest scaling it up to this resolution so it matches the aspect ratio.
Right now it'll likely be slightly zoomed in. If I scale it up it'll be really stretched though

SherryCherry wrote:

yo from my qe

00:01:726 (1,3,5,7) - The slight overlap looks a bit meh. Increase distance There isn't any overlap? I made sure that they were touching but not overlapping. It looks fine as it is I think
00:03:955 (2,3,3) - same, shitty overlap Honestly the AR is high enough that this is unnoticable, but sure why not. Fixed
00:08:583 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - ^ Again I don't think it is noticable and I don't want to have to redo the jumps that come after so I'm leacing it.
00:12:697 (1,2) - can you blanket better? https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/File:Blanketcombo1.png Fixed
00:16:126 (2) - change please Fixed
00:57:955 (1,2,3,4) - I don't see a need for such a large spacing here, especially compared to the distance you use on other I think the (shaking? not sure what to call it) of the voice is enough to warrant this spacing, plus it's only 4 notes so I don't think the difficulty is a concern. As the for the "other" I'm not sure what you are referring to. If you mean the one at 00:55:212, there is a a lack of shaking in that one hence no stream.
01:55:726 (2,7) - stack, like this 01:55:897 (3,8) - Fixed
01:55:555 (1,6) - ^ Fixed
02:00:355 (5) - make like this 01:59:840 (3) - So originally I did have it like that, but I changed it at the suggestion of another modder. I think the way right now makes more sense since the sliders are supposed get progressively straighter. I made the second slider straighter to reflect this better.
03:56:240 (1,2,3) - centr I don't think it's a big deal but sure I guess.

gl~

356,320,40126,2,0,B|236:308|176:240|204:184|264:132|336:176|360:268|272:304|168:324,1,450.000018842518,2|0,0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:

156,44,229212,2,2,B|200:104|268:100|268:100|288:20|396:48|412:80|420:144|384:224|264:184|264:184|304:220|296:276|259:306|208:304,1,660.000027635693,2|0,0:2|0:2,0:2:0:0:

SPOILER

SPOILER

[Toy] wrote:

[General]

1. You seem to have a lot of patterns overlap on each other and it's making the map feel really cluttered and dense. Sections like 00:55:555 (2,3,1,2,3,1) - feel really packed in a small area. Not every pattern needs to be stacked on itself.
   There's a lot of space in the editor. Use it. Yeah I noticed that after mapping everything and I didn't want to remap it so I left it. As I make modifications to the map I'll keep this in mind.
2. http://puu.sh/pVz1R/e3d8420af4.jpg Notice how dense your map is, don't be afraid to map to the corners.
3. It looks like you freehanded most of your sliders. It could be nice to copy and paste similar sliders for a single section 01:12:355 (3,2) - like these. Helps make the map more consistent Alright, I'll look through the map and fix that.

[Rondo]

1. 00:03:783 (1) - remove the NC for consistency with the other measures Fixed
2. 00:09:955 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Spacing for these jumps seem erratic, could try having the jumps get increasingly larger instead of what seems like random placement. I've tried a lot of different patterns for this section and they all ended up looking pretty bad. I'll try your suggestion.
3. 00:13:555 (5) - avoid ugly "half" overlaps like this. Looks nicer if it curves up away from the 3 and the tail end meets with the tail end of the slider from the previous pattern http://puu.sh/pVxod/090a5e5975.jpg Good catch. Fixed
4. 00:15:440 (1,2) - These seem out of place, I'm not sure what you're mapping them to and it creates an unnecessary slowdown during what's supposedly a build-up. Could try making a small jump section. I'm mapping it to the melody here. I realized that I've been mapping to the drums the whole time before, but I feel like the melody is a lot more noticable here than earlier. Plus the 4 kicksliders should be enough build up for the stream.
5. 00:16:812 (1,2,3,4) - Direction these sliders face seems random. Could try making them parallel to each other to give it somewhat more structure http://puu.sh/pVxK4/b5aa9cf0ff.jpg Fixed
6. 00:18:697 (7,8) - So direction changes in streams should be used to emphasize, for example each new combo is emphasizing the melody. Make direction changes follow the music and it'll make it more intuitive to play. Changed it so the direction changes line up with the NC
   01:30:869 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - you did it well here
7. 00:20:926 (1) - This slider just looks funky, should redo it especially since there's a red tick in between two white ticks that seems to be doing nothing to shape the slider. Eh, I think it looks fine. At least I think it looks better than just a normal curved slider. As for the red tick, I don't think it really matters how I made the slider as long as the end result looks ok
8. 00:23:669 (2) - why not stack this with the previous note or at least have it move in the same direction as the slider was pointing with equal distance http://puu.sh/pVxOr/ee23cecca7.jpg After changing the stream this should be fine now
9. 00:32:583 (5) - this is like halfassed in the center of the previous slider and the next 1 could go in the center of this 5 I didn't intend for it to be in the middle, but that looks much better. Fixed
10. 00:36:012 (3) - this could be more interesting I not feeling very creative right now so I just shortened it and added a note. At least it's better it being awkwardly long I guess
11. 00:37:383 (4) - could blanket with the slider too Blanketed it with the note I added
12. 00:40:126 (2,3) - why didn't you extend this slider to cover the full sound like the previous ones? If you mean 00:41:497 (3) I tried a few different slider designs but all of them looked really awkward. Plus I also didn't put a slider for the sound at 00:38:755 (1) so I think it's fine not to have a slider here
13. 00:48:869 (4,6) - more unneccesary overlaps Fixed
14. 00:49:726 (1,2,3,4) - what is this even mapped to? So that is supposed to be mapped to the melody as there was a long hold and I didn't want to put a 3 beat long slider. Considering you are the second person to bring this up, I guess I'll just change it to a longer slider
15. 00:53:840 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - there seems to be a more complex rhythm in the song. either way the stream jumps here are pretty unnecceesary You're right that there's a more complex rhythm, but it's really hard to figure out what it is. I tried to make it a bit more like the rhythm in the song though.
16. 01:02:755 (1,2,1) - i get your idea for this jump pattern but this angle is nearly nonexistant which breaks the flow of the snappy jumps. you could make them all face the same way by CTRL+Ging the 2nd and 4th jumps or make the first two face one direction and the second two facing the other direction by CTL+Ging the middle two patterns individually. Alright, went with your second suggestion
17. 01:06:183 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - these overlaps ju st seem excessive and make it feel really cramped It used to play better but then I changed the rhythm of that part and the pattern got messed up. Fixed
18. 01:13:897 (2,3) - why not cut and paste the same slider and just rotate it with CTRL+R Fixed
19. 01:15:612 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is a cool idea Is it? This was actually one of the parts I considered changing tbh
20. 01:24:012 (1,2,3,4) - if youre mapping this to the vocals it doesnt really fit Fixed
21. 01:28:126 (1,2,3,4) - would be nice if you made this a shape like a rhombus, keep the sides parallel http://puu.sh/pVyQ6/0dc2e1608d.jpg Sure
22. 01:29:669 (2,3) - distance between these two is really small compared to everything else Fixed
23. 01:32:240 (1) - shorten this slider to end on the red tick to match the vocals and have a smoother transition in general Fixed
24. 01:36:783 (3) - the strong beat is mapped to this slider end, not sure if it shifted on the timeline but it should start on the red tick like the next three sliders Fixed
25. 01:39:440 (2) - the sound this is mapped to ends on the white tick. it'll also allow the player to move to the next note without slider breaking Fixed
26. 02:06:355 (1) - could blanket this around the 3 Sure
27. 02:17:497 (1) - kiai should probably end here Ok
28. 02:17:840 (2,1,2,1) - why so much emptiness? I want there to be a small rest after the difficult section. Considering your previous point that is the end of the Kiai so even more reason to have a pause
29. 02:37:383 (1,2) - again with the odd direction changes Changed it to match the NC
30. 03:29:840 (1,2) - having this stacked really breaks the flow Fixed

I modded up to the break. It's a good start, there's just some large flaws with jump flow and excessive stacking that you should probably double check.

You can PM me if you have questions about anything I've said.

Good luck o/

Flower wrote:

From G.T.A. is not Great Thing Aqua

00:02:755 (7,8) - keep distance consistent with previous pattern? Fixed
00:10:983 (7) - use this sound effect? http://puu.sh/pVxP1/a07fc2ca1a.wav Sure
00:11:326 - use this sound effect? http://puu.sh/pVxqt/08904cb83d.wav Sure
00:40:126 (2) - use more nodes for better shape (I suck at sliders, you could adjust on your own criteria) Fixed

356,320,40126,2,0,B|236:308|176:240|204:184|264:132|336:176|360:268|272:304|168:324,1,450.000018842518,2|0,0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:

01:33:269 - and 04:35:669 - in these two dub part you can use normal whistle for better hit feedback. for example:
01:33:612 (2) - body and head add whistle
01:34:469 (2,4) - add whistle
01:34:983 (1) - body and head add whistle
01:35:840 (2,4) - add whistle
etc. Fixed
01:37:897 (2) - add whistle? Yea
03:49:212 (4) - the shape can be improved Fixed

156,44,229212,2,2,B|200:104|268:100|268:100|288:20|396:48|412:80|420:144|384:224|264:184|264:184|304:220|296:276|259:306|208:304,1,660.000027635693,2|0,0:2|0:2,0:2:0:0:

04:50:069 (2,3,4) - player can't really recognise this distance. consider deleting 3? Ok
04:26:412 (3) - the flow can be improved, for example: Fixed

SPOILER

05:03:612 (6) - change to note and add 1/2-beat slider at 05:03:783 - . this will emphasize the white line drum. I can't put a 1/2 slider there, it'll interfere with the repeat slider at 05:03:955 (7), and I want to keep that slider since I'm following the vocals
05:19:041 (2,3,4,5,6) - use "compose" - "convert slider to stream" for better shape: Fixed

SPOILER

That's what I could help. Good luck!

_MiaoFUuU_ wrote:

Hi NM(Forum req)

Rondo

1. 00:04:812 (3,5,7) - same of spacing then redo 00:05:669 (8) - Fixed
2. 00:12:012 (4,5) - ctrl+g use this rhythm like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5593108 Why? I don't think there's anything wrong with the pattern I have right now
3. 00:13:383 (4,5) - ↑
4. 00:16:126 (5) - stack at 00:15:440 (4) - then 00:16:812 (1) - stack ? I'm not sure what you're asking here. They're already stacked?
5. 00:26:412 (1) - add whistle at slider middle and the end Fixed
6. 00:36:012 (3,4) - del whistle and increase its vloume Why? I use the whistle for to emphasize vocals many times in the map
7. 00:37:212 (5,6) - remap 00:37:383 - 00:38:069 - I'm following the vocals there, no reason to remap I think
8. 00:56:412 (3,1) - blanket https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5593166 It is already blanketed, but I fixed it up a bit
9. 00:59:326 (5) - NC Why? It's part of the same jump pattern, and it's not as if I don't already have lots of other 8-combo jumps
10. 01:12:697 (1,2) - stack It is already stacked. It's just the stack leniency that puts it a little off
11. 01:17:155 - don't pass here Idk what you mean by pass? If you want me to put a not there, I won't because 1. I'm following vocals still and 2. I already have a bend in the slider to emphasize that beat and I don't think it's strong enough to need it's own click
12. 01:17:669 (1,2) - ctrl+g(use this rhythm) I don't think such a large jump is necessary considering there isn't even a notable beat there. The notes are only for flow so I think it's fine to have a small jump
13. 01:25:040 (3) - stack Fixed
14. 01:37:212 (2,3,4) - redo (don't stack if you want rank) Is this not rankable? I think it is readable and none of the other modders brought it up
15. 01:45:440 (2,3,4) - ↑
16. 01:47:840 (3,4,5,6,7) - 01:50:412 (2,3,4,5) - ↑
17. 02:08:069 (2) - stack Fixed
18. 02:44:497 (4,5) - stack It is stacked
19. 02:55:897 - don't pass here too I'm following the vocals
20. 02:58:640 - ↑
21. 03:29:326 (2,3,4,5,6) - stack at 03:28:982 (2) - Not what you suggested but I changed that part
22. 04:02:926 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - don't stack you can try like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5593292 Ok
23. 04:27:783 (9) - NC 04:28:126 (1) - del NC No because that 9 is part of the previous jump pattern. Also I think it's awkward to have a pause between the 1 and 2 of a combo
24. 04:39:612 (5,6,7) - do not stack (redo)
25. 04:44:926 (4,5,6,7) - ↑
26. 04:45:612 (8) - NC Fixed
27. 04:50:240 (3,4,5,6,7) - ↑↑
28. 04:53:669 (1) - del NC 04:53:840 (2) - NC The sound at 04:53:669 (1) is more similar to 04:53:840 (2) than 04:53:326 (5) hence the NC
29. 04:57:955 (9) - NC Fixed
30. 04:58:812 (1) - NC 04:58:983 (4) - NC Fixed
31. 05:03:269 (5) - NC Fixed
32. 05:06:697 (6,7) - blanket Fixed
33. 05:19:897 - put the spinner to 05:19:983 - here and short the end,then add a circle at 05:19:897 - Fixed
34. 05:21:269 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - do not stack Fixed

good luck！

1. 00:13:555 (5,1) - this is kinda too close for a 1/1 gap
2. 00:20:926 (1) - 00:37:212 (3,4) - etc. using that 44byte file to silence sliderend is unrankable afaik, u can consult other ppl for this as well
3. 01:10:469 (1) - curve less to blanket better
4. 01:34:126 (5,1,2) - straight flow plays a bit weird here, move 01:34:469 (2,4) - to somewhere around 440,170 is nice imo
5. 01:51:269 (1,2,3,4) - the 1/6 sounds already start at 01:51:269 - so try another rhythm pattern here
6. 02:24:012 (5,6) - ctrl-g cuz it makes no sense that u suddenly smallen the distance here 02:24:183 (6,1) -
7. 03:11:497 - 03:15:783 - 03:22:640 - adding sth here would play more fluently imo, if that's not ur taste, try increasing spacing at 03:11:326 (8,1) - 03:15:440 (3,1) - to make them look different from those 1/2 gaps
8. 03:21:955 - the strong beat should not be ignored..
9. 03:25:726 (5,1) - rearrange patterns here a bit to have these two notes stacked maybe, that made the 1/1 gap more intuitive to read.. well if 03:25:555 (4,5,1) - is just made to be a reading trap plz just ignore me
10. 04:34:640 (9) - nc specifically like 01:32:240 (1) -
11. 04:53:326 (5) - hmm the reversed arrow is not perfectly readable with that stack..
12. 05:12:012 (1,2) - this jump feels much forced to play, cuz flow suddenly stopped at 05:11:669 (6,1) - but u have to make a cross screen jump immediately after that

Garden wrote:

[Rondo]

1. 00:13:555 (5,1) - this is kinda too close for a 1/1 gap Flipped the pattern to increase the distance
2. 00:20:926 (1) - 00:37:212 (3,4) - etc. using that 44byte file to silence sliderend is unrankable afaik, u can consult other ppl for this as well Oh ok. Changed
3. 01:10:469 (1) - curve less to blanket better Fixed
4. 01:34:126 (5,1,2) - straight flow plays a bit weird here, move 01:34:469 (2,4) - to somewhere around 440,170 is nice imo Ok
5. 01:51:269 (1,2,3,4) - the 1/6 sounds already start at 01:51:269 - so try another rhythm pattern here Changed to 1/6 kickslider
6. 02:24:012 (5,6) - ctrl-g cuz it makes no sense that u suddenly smallen the distance here 02:24:183 (6,1) - Fixed
7. 03:11:497 - 03:15:783 - 03:22:640 - adding sth here would play more fluently imo, if that's not ur taste, try increasing spacing at 03:11:326 (8,1) - 03:15:440 (3,1) - to make them look different from those 1/2 gaps The first two I feel it's better without a note but I added notes for the last one
8. 03:21:955 - the strong beat should not be ignored.. But it feels weird to me to follow the vocals the whole time and suddenly throw in a note which doesn't. Plus while there seems to be a sound there, it doesn't really stand out to me so I think there is no need
9. 03:25:726 (5,1) - rearrange patterns here a bit to have these two notes stacked maybe, that made the 1/1 gap more intuitive to read.. well if 03:25:555 (4,5,1) - is just made to be a reading trap plz just ignore me I thought the AR was high enough that it wouldn't be a reading problem, but I'm a noob player so idk. I think I will leave it since I can't think of an elegant way to rearrange the pattern
10. 04:34:640 (9) - nc specifically like 01:32:240 (1) - Fixed
11. 04:53:326 (5) - hmm the reversed arrow is not perfectly readable with that stack.. Fixed
12. 05:12:012 (1,2) - this jump feels much forced to play, cuz flow suddenly stopped at 05:11:669 (6,1) - but u have to make a cross screen jump immediately after that Yeah most of these last jumps have been largely untouched since the first version of the map. Probably gonna remap the whole part later.

1. AIMod currently finds two sliders whose ends are not snapped - please check that.
2. 00:20:926 (1) - Either truncate the end 1/4 beat, or extend 1/4 beat + remove 00:22:297 (1). Otherwise there's a weird sound 1/4 beat before the next measure and it doesn't fit the music. We want something more like 04:34:640 (1,1) - which fits better.
3. 00:31:897 (4,5) - ^same idea
4. 00:40:126 (2,3) - ^same idea (remove 00:41:497 (3) - preferably)
5. 02:49:040 (1,2) - ^same idea (and any similar sliders in the map unless justified by the song's instrumentals)
6. 00:36:869 (2,3,4) - You seemed to be following the piano in this section except for these notes. Probably intentional, but I wanted to point it out. Otherwise, no harm in simply moving 00:37:384 (3,4) - 1/2 beat forward and deleting 00:36:869 (2) - to stay consistent.
7. 01:33:269 (1) - remove NC, 01:33:612 (2) - add NC
8. 02:17:155 (1) - remove NC
9. 02:51:783 (5) - add NC, 02:52:126 (1) - remove NC, 02:52:983 (5) - add NC
10. 02:54:355 (1) - remove NC, 02:54:526 (2) - add NC
11. 02:55:555 (6) - Move slider's points to (x:396 y:108), (x:408 y:148) - slightly better circular flow from 02:55:212 (4,5).
12. 02:57:097 (1,2) - Another NC swap (almost all these NC changes are to fit the start of each measure better)
13. 03:22:812 (1) - Ctrl+G it and adjust its position a bit to improve flow/make it end on the head of 03:23:155 (2) - (also since this is a short straight slider you can remove some of the unnecessary tracking points on it)
14. 03:49:212 (4) - Slider's okay for now, but I wondered if the points can be shifted so that there's a sharp angle change every time we hear a piano note in the background.
15. 04:07:383 (2,4) - Position these a bit lower in such a way that the distance spacing of 04:07:040 (1,2,3,4) - is consistent. I put start of 04:07:383 (2) - at x:364 y:80 and 04:08:069 (4) - at x:364 y:188
16. 04:52:468 (1) - Ctrl+G and extend by 1/8 of a beat
17. 04:54:869 (4) - Ctrl+G (nitpick)
18. 05:01:040 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe it's just me, but every time I play this part I'm tempted to continue the clockwise motion and move downwards, when instead 05:01:726 (1) - comes up on the left instead. Ctrl+G on 05:01:212 (2,3) - feels better to me.

Narwhal Prime wrote:

Hi jiaxunjason, here's a mod from my GIVE ME ANYTHING queue!

[Rondo]

1. AIMod currently finds two sliders whose ends are not snapped - please check that. Fixed
2. 00:20:926 (1) - Either truncate the end 1/4 beat, or extend 1/4 beat + remove 00:22:297 (1). Otherwise there's a weird sound 1/4 beat before the next measure and it doesn't fit the music. We want something more like 04:34:640 (1,1) - which fits better. Originally I had these sliderends to be silent, but another modder told me they were unrankable. After looking at the ranking criteria it does say that sliderends can be silent, so I'll add it back in.
3. 00:31:897 (4,5) - ^same idea
4. 00:40:126 (2,3) - ^same idea (remove 00:41:497 (3) - preferably)
5. 02:49:040 (1,2) - ^same idea (and any similar sliders in the map unless justified by the song's instrumentals)
6. 00:36:869 (2,3,4) - You seemed to be following the piano in this section except for these notes. Probably intentional, but I wanted to point it out. Otherwise, no harm in simply moving 00:37:384 (3,4) - 1/2 beat forward and deleting 00:36:869 (2) - to stay consistent. It does kind some of weird to have the piano in the middle of a slider. I moved it up and added some notes to make it flow better
7. 01:33:269 (1) - remove NC, 01:33:612 (2) - add NC Fixed
8. 02:17:155 (1) - remove NC Fixed
9. 02:51:783 (5) - add NC, 02:52:126 (1) - remove NC, 02:52:983 (5) - add NC Fixed first two but I don't think NC at 02:52:983 (5) is necessary
10. 02:54:355 (1) - remove NC, 02:54:526 (2) - add NC The NC is supposed to follow the the line of the vocals, and since I didn't add the NC at 02:52:983 (5) there'll be a 10 note combo which I don't want
11. 02:55:555 (6) - Move slider's points to (x:396 y:108), (x:408 y:148) - slightly better circular flow from 02:55:212 (4,5). Fixed
12. 02:57:097 (1,2) - Another NC swap (almost all these NC changes are to fit the start of each measure better) I get the thing about starting the NC at a new measure but I prefer the way I have it right now of following the vocals. Also I based my jumps around the vocals so the flow might be weird if I change the NC
13. 03:22:812 (1) - Ctrl+G it and adjust its position a bit to improve flow/make it end on the head of 03:23:155 (2) - (also since this is a short straight slider you can remove some of the unnecessary tracking points on it) Fixed
14. 03:49:212 (4) - Slider's okay for now, but I wondered if the points can be shifted so that there's a sharp angle change every time we hear a piano note in the background. Well if you gave me the code for such a slider I'd implement it but as it stands I don't have the skill to make a slider like that and still have it look good
15. 04:07:383 (2,4) - Position these a bit lower in such a way that the distance spacing of 04:07:040 (1,2,3,4) - is consistent. I put start of 04:07:383 (2) - at x:364 y:80 and 04:08:069 (4) - at x:364 y:188 Fixed
16. 04:52:468 (1) - Ctrl+G and extend by 1/8 of a beat Extended, but don't see why a Ctrl+G is needed tbh
17. 04:54:869 (4) - Ctrl+G (nitpick) I kind of like having 04:54:526 (3) and 04:54:869 (4) be opposite each other and I don't think there is any particular need for Ctrl+G
18. 05:01:040 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe it's just me, but every time I play this part I'm tempted to continue the clockwise motion and move downwards, when instead 05:01:726 (1) - comes up on the left instead. Ctrl+G on 05:01:212 (2,3) - feels better to me. Good point, Fixed

Overall this map has some pretty cool patterns. I was going to bring up more flow issues but you've improved those while I was modding so yay. Keep it up, and let me know if you have any questions!

Regards,
NP

yaleufeu wrote:

ayy, from my Modding queue !

Rondo

00:15:440 (4,5) - Completely breaks the flow, you should really change it You're the second person to bring it up, but I honestly think it plays fine. Plus to me the sound it's mapped to is very distinct and noticable and it would be weird to map to something else
00:20:926 (1,1) - Sounds weird I'm gonna need you to give me more than that. How does it sound weird? I think it sounds fine.
00:36:869 (2,3) - You always did pauses before and after, why are you mapping there ? Delete them 00:36:012 (1,2,3) is supposed to be mapped to the vocals, while 00:37:383 (4,5) is mapped to the piano. This part is really awkward to map for me because I don't want to have a super long slider there nor do I want a pause there since the piano is persistent through the whole section so I just followed the vocals there. If you have a better suggestion feel free to tell me
00:40:126 (2,3) - Sounds weird Again, you need to explain more.
00:48:697 (3,4,5) - Distance problem What distance problem? These are all 1.5x snap
00:49:040 (5,6) - Make a symmetry Fixed
01:07:726 (1,2) - Way too close Even though it's structually unsound, I liked how it flowed before. I'll still change it though
01:09:612 (5) - Make it horizontal
01:10:126 (7) - If you applied the last mod, make it horizontal too Both changed
01:11:326 - Map it I'm mapping to the vocals here. There is a clear pause in the vocals and I want to reflect that, there isn't even any drums or anything there so it makes no sense to put a note there. Plus it's a slow buildup section so I think it's fine to have a few pauses
01:15:440 - Same Same reason
01:16:983 (5) - You should map the 3 1/2 ticks instead of this slider, since there's a highlight there 01:17:155 Changed
01:18:355 - Map it
01:19:726 - Same No to these two because there's no sound there, and I think the pause complements the long slider before it. As for why I didn't have a pause later it's because I want there to be a bit of a "build up", and also at that point having so many pauses would be excessive. As it stands I think it's ok though
01:37:726 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Very ugly jump in my opinion, try to do something more beautiful ? xd I tried
01:50:755 (4,5) - Distance is too high, reduce it Fixed
01:55:726 (2,4,6) - The distance is not the same between the 4 and 2, and the 4 and 6, making the star jump not symmetrical It's barely noticable but fixed
02:00:355 (5) - Remove the midtick of the slider There is supposed to be a slight curve

Interesting mapping, I like it !

SPOILER

336,192,20926,6,0,B|320:144|276:124|230:136|230:136|224:212|160:248|88:244|56:196,1,359.999990354776,6|0,0:2|0:0,0:0:0:0: