forum

The Derailment Thread

posted
Total Posts
27
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
Derail yourselves and this thread so much that you and I crash into the mountain.

You may begin.

THIS IS NOT REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY.
Card N'FoRcE
You want me to abuse the [flash] tag, i guess.
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
Imagine posting that seven hundred times.

It would hurt. More than knives.


OR WOULD IT?

SEE THE PROBLEM HERE?
Lybydose
How can I derail something that never had a topic to begin with?
Sleep Powder

Lybydose wrote:

How can I derail something that never had a topic to begin with?
The answer is...giving it a topic.
Mismagius
I Am So Awesome!!!!!!!!

Let's ATalk About The Best Thing Ever!!!!
Cuddlebun
do you mean talk about or talk like
Kitsunemimi

Blue Dragon wrote:

I Am So Awesome!!!!!!!!

Let's ATalk About The Best Thing Ever!!!!
orz

do not want
Glass
incoming tbte
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock

Glass wrote:

incoming tbte
THAT'S A LIE
Powerdrone
Fabi
Just say tbte and a wild annoying boy will appear. GO!
Shellghost

Lybydose wrote:

How can I derail something that never had a topic to begin with?
Well you're doing it wrong. The topic is derailing this thread, in order to derail the topic we must talk about stuff which isn't talking about derailing the thread.

Like dogs, they're far more superior to cats.
Kitsunemimi

Shellghost wrote:

in order to derail the topic we must talk about stuff which isn't talking about derailing the thread.
The topic is to specifically derail the thread, not to actually talk about derailing the thread. However, since the topic is to derail the thread (not simply to stop talking about derailing it), it creates a paradox because our "topic" is to derail the thread in the first place. You cannot derail the thread from derailing, therefore your point is invalid. Also, it doesn't qualify for the anti-derailment challenge because if the topic never gets derailed, it's actually getting derailed from being derailed.
Shellghost

Kitsunemimi wrote:

The topic is to specifically derail the thread, not to actually talk about derailing the thread. However, since the topic is to derail the thread (not simply to stop talking about derailing it), it creates a paradox because our "topic" is to derail the thread in the first place. You cannot derail the thread from derailing, therefore your point is invalid. Also, it doesn't qualify for the anti-derailment challenge because if the topic never gets derailed, it's actually getting derailed from being derailed.
That's quite a bit of typing there.
Unfortunately it was all useless since "Topic" by definition is used in a manner of speech or thought, not action.
Krisom
Paradox here.

Well, good luck trying to dreail the topic, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail...

Cyclohexane
Thread/0

(Overused meme? What is that)
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock

Krisom wrote:

Paradox here.

Well, good luck trying to dreail the topic, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail, wich would make it not derail, wich would make it derail...

>wich
Krisom
You see what I did there? I derailed the thread into you noticing my typo~
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
It'd be right if you're saying 'sandwich'. Otherwise no.
Soaprman
posting in this thread without even reading any of the other posts, holy shitttt
Arusha Shuna
oh hey look, a flying turtle
Sander-Don
Kitsunemimi
Mismagius
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock
TBTE
WHOLELY SHIT ON A SANDWICH YOU GUYS ARE COOL FOR MAKING THIS THREAD
Please sign in to reply.

New reply